« first day (276 days earlier)      last day (2974 days later) » 

5:00 PM
Lemme try...
 
Even more kilometers. (0:
 
Haaahhh!
TIL: Vladivostok is very close to Japan!
 
He was a midshipman with the Far Eastern Fleet during WWII, and she was a nurse with the First Ukrainian Front.
 
Ahh -- that was how they met during the war.
 
@DamkerngT. Yes, quite close even to Thailand!
 
5:01 PM
LOL
 
@DamkerngT. Yes, the war in Europe ended, and the First Ukrainian Front was partly relocated to fight with Japan.
But the US dropped the bomb, so there was almost no fight.
@DamkerngT. Japan even occupied it for a while.
 
It was a sad way to end a war, but it was good that the war finally ended.
 
nods
 
@CowperKettle Oh, I don't know much about what happened up there during the war.
 
They should've dropped the bomb to some unpopulated area.
 
5:03 PM
nods
 
@DamkerngT. The occupation happened after WWI, in 1919
The Japanese Siberian Intervention (シベリア出兵, Shiberia Shuppei) of 1918–1922 was the dispatch of Japanese military forces to the Russian Maritime Provinces as part of a larger effort by western powers and Japan to support White Russian forces against the Bolshevik Red Army during the Russian Civil War. == Background == On August 23, 1914, the Empire of Japan declared war on Germany, in part due to the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, and Japan became a member of the Entente powers. The Imperial Japanese Navy made a considerable contribution to the Allied war effort; however, the Imperial Japanese Army was...
 
@Araucaria Not much. I just thought you picked that name because of being a plant lover, and thus you'd have a diverse, populated garden.
 
@Kurzd Araucaria is also a name of a famous crossword puzzle maker.
(Maybe the name is better, but I'm not sure how many pen names he has (or had?))
 
@snailboat *waves back*
@IͶΔ Meeting you here reminds me of SAO. Perhaps there's a quest you have to offer.
@DamkerngT. Had no idea o_o
Carry on with the radioactive Eurasia chat?
 
Let's see...
The Reverend John Galbraith Graham MBE (16 February 1921 – 26 November 2013) was a British crossword compiler, best known as Araucaria of The Guardian. He was also, like his father, a Church of England priest. == Career == Graham was born in Oxford, where his father, Eric Graham, held the post of dean of Oriel College. The family moved to a country rectory in Wiltshire. After attending St Edward's School, Oxford, he obtained a place to read classics at King's College, Cambridge, leaving to join the RAF when the Second World War began. After the war he returned to King's to read theology. In 1949...
 
5:12 PM
Can't be comfortable to have his screen so far away from him at that age ._.
 
@Kurzd Yes, in the meantime
Bye guys, I'm going to celebrate Nowruz for now
Be back in a certain amount of minutes.
 
Have a good time!
 
@IͶΔ Happy Nowruz!
 
\o/
 
Word of the Day: philistine
 
5:13 PM
Have a good time!
 
(the word came up in the above Wikipedia page)
Huh? GitHub keeps returning the Unicorn to me!
Is there any earthquake somewhere right now?
 
GitHub took like 5 s to load, but threw no unicorn.
 
nods -- It looks okay now.
 
I finally got to reading your answer, @V.V., and it looks nice
2
A: The order of words in a clause: "tell me who is the real man" vs. "tell me who the real man is"

V.V.The word order in the reported question or a clause with who is usually Subject + Verb. When who in the clause is followed by the verb to be and it is the subject of the sentence, the sentence looks like the following : Who is happy?- I don't know who (subject ) is happy. Compare: I don'...

I digressed a bit on my radioactive Eurasia talk.
 
My guts say Tell me who (between you and me) is the real man sounds better than Tell me who the real man is.
E.g., "Who's the man?" "You're the man!"
"The man is you!" would sound a little strange.
 
5:29 PM
(0:
 
Hmm... what I meant was that I was thinking that the formal alternative may not work well in this case.
But it was just my gut feeling.
Then again, there is this:
Yes, you do often hear things like "Let's see who's coming" (as in, to a party), or, take some google results: "Let's see who's behind the mask," "let's see who's dumb," etc. I still maintain you would never hear the sentence Let's see who is the real man uttered by a native speaker except in jest. I think it's the combination of the predicate nominative and full form (who is) that makes it sound so awkward. — Jonah 11 hours ago
Maybe the real makes the difference.
This is probably a fair test: "see who the better man is" (in Google Books)
(vs. "see who is the better man")
About the same number of results!
 
nods
 
What works better here : I didn't have money. or I failed to have money.
 
The former.
I probably will insert any before money.
 
@Marek "I didn't" is better, although my translation teacher insists we should use "I failed to" in formal business letters. (0:
Which is just laughable.
She says "didn't" is too informal, so probably she would have made me use "I had no money"
 
5:49 PM
I found a small typo in a LaTeX package manual. I looked everywhere in TeX.SE for his email, found his website, the author's fb was there, so I sent a message.
He answered, and suggested me to send an email, as his is displayed in the first page of the manual
<-<
 
@Kurzd Nice! You're contributing to the project!
 
@CowperKettle, thanks.
 
but what about that one : I didn't buy a new car for failing to have any money. or I didn't buy a new car to have no money.
 
Both sound strange.
 
@DamkerngT. In the most awkward way possible, yes.
 
6:00 PM
@Marek I didn't buy a new car because I had no money
"I didn't buy a new car to have no money" would imply that you did not buy it because you wanted to have no money.
 
Thanks
 
You're welcome!
 
I didn't buy a new car for money.
 
> I didn't marry you for your beautiful eyes.
See, in this sentence "for" works as "because of"
The meaning: "I married you. But that was not because of your beautiful eyes"
 
With the car It's different.
 
6:13 PM
How? (0:
Yes, "money" is not an attribute inherent in a car, like beautiful eyes are in a girl.
But still it's "because of". (0:
 
He didn't pay money, it was something else.
 
But for is flexible, e.g., We can't afford to have it for its price. If only we could buy it for half price...
 
nods
@V.V. I see. "A business reputation is no small matter; you can't buy it for money."
 
vs. I stopped for pedestrians.
 
Yes, it can be understood any way.
 
 
1 hour later…
7:27 PM
@CowperKettle What did she tell you after this?
 
7:53 PM
Which is sharper? Occam's razor, or Hanlon's?
 
You can't really compare apples and oranges.
 
Anonymous
8:46 PM
@CowperKettle Eep, only two days left on that bounty!
 
Which sentence is correct? I have done it for your happiness. I have done it for your being happy.
 
@snailboat Time flies!
@Marek I think both are passable. The former sounds better. I'd personally use I did it to make you happy, informally.
I'd personally use choose (e.g., We choose a certain value of x to satisfy a certain condition; We choose x to be 2 so/such that y = 5 (because y = x+3). I refrain from posting an answer because I'm not sure about your Lorentz frame example. — Damkerng T. 2 mins ago
I think choose fits the bill, but I choose the gauge condition to be the Lorentz gauge (a gauge choice in electromagnetics) and I choose the coordinate system to be the Lorentz frame (a reference frame in relativity)?
Personally, I don't want to write I choose something to be some thing.
I think it's better to write We choose some thing as something.
 
Anonymous
9:30 PM
@Marek Damkerng's suggestion, I did it to make you happy, is the same thing I wanted to suggest when I saw your sentences.
 
@snailboat Yes, but a trainload of answers already. (0:
@IͶΔ I haven't the chance to say that, so nothing. (0:
Yeats is considered a great poet, but I prefer Keats to Yeats for now..
 
Anonymous
Neat!
 
(0:
But this one is nice:
> Had I the heavens' embroidered cloths,
Enwrought with golden and silver light,
The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
Of night and light and the half-light,
I would spread the cloths under your feet:
But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
But still poets of the olden days seem better.
Some breakdown happened to English poetry in the 20 century.
 
Anonymous
9:48 PM
Poetry today seems very different.
 

« first day (276 days earlier)      last day (2974 days later) »