« first day (1522 days earlier)      last day (3319 days later) » 

10:00 PM
@Runer112 Sometimes it adds more then one field
 
Let it go into warning.
That was our awesome strat last time.
 
Wait yallls doing the raiding thing....
 
no
 
10:01 PM
no
 
no
 
We were this morning, but they changed the rules to disallow it.
 
whew!
 
10:01 PM
Not only did they change the rules, they suspended everyone who broke the rules before the rules existed.
 
@Calvin'sHobbies Fixed that for you. :P
 
I was worried for a second since there are between 0 and 3 users guarding ours
and they could be easliy overpowered
 
He's tempting us. Ignore the giant cow.
 
are we going to use the same strat we used for grad in public beta
 
Restart votes 7 days in?
 
10:02 PM
alternate QA up to max, never voting for the same thing twice?
and then.. I don't know
 
Yeah.
 
@Rainbolt No
 
I'm not even sure if that's what we did for grad, I wasn't here
 
Let users and quality go into double-warning.
 
.... I'd hate for that to happen, there are more pitchforks & tar then users in our chat
 
10:03 PM
makes sense
 
...and I'd be blamed
 
Hey guys
Wanna see if we can let it triple warning?
And beat our previous score?
 
that sounds a bit too risky
 
oh dear
 
When a warning shows, ignore it once, ignore it twice, ignore it a third time, then ack.
 
10:04 PM
sure, go for it!
 
I think we can only reasonably ignore it at most twice
 
I mean, we'll only get the same score if we don't risk anything.
I'd much rather break the system
 
this round was supposed to be answer, but okay
 
I think it would be a three strikes = you're out type thing.
 
I think so too
 
10:05 PM
I will test this on a beta site
 
we don't know without trying
 
Too late
 
try it somewhere else :p
what the hell
thank you 50/50
here we go, riskmode
 
Upvote!!!!!
 
We're not ignoring the warnings?
 
10:07 PM
don't ask, that just dropped
answer
 
Guys, I'm on ignore number four on Sharepoint SE
five...
 
riskmode part 2
 
what do we do when Q&A are maxed
 
Ignoring five times restarts you.
Confirmed on Sharepoint SE
 
Five times, okay.
 
10:08 PM
Arquade just restarted
 
We can do way better next go round.
 
We got dis
 
Under no circumstances can restarting cause you to finish earlier.
It can bring your average time down, though.
But the scoreboard is ordered by number of victories.
I say we let users and quality go into warning again.
 
we won't have a choice
we'll have to upvote one this day
 
Ordered next by: averageTime - 10 * flags
 
10:10 PM
so now do we extend Q&A into Q&A&U?
guess not
#1 rule: don't upvote something that just dropped
waste, you'll never save a decay that way
 
Q&A&D
 
#2 rule: Never vote same way twice
 
that too
 
I'm telling you that U is for Useless, just leave 'em to last
 
quality just dropped, though
I think that might take precent over U is for useless :p
 
10:12 PM
@Runer112 ...take a percent ... ?
 
precedent, whoops
answer?
why are we upvoting
 
exactly
 
stop upvoting ffs
hmm
I'm not really sure which rule to break first
don't vote something twice in a row, or don't upvote :p
 
Vote for ask :D
 
hold the line
 
10:15 PM
Answer!
 
we can let it stay red for 2 turns
 
#1 rule needs amending. Don't upvote something that just dropped unless it's the only thing that isn't maxed.
 
next is answer, then upvote
 
Next UV
:D
this is quite fun
 
playing with fire and not getting burned
I like it
 
10:16 PM
Gotta ask
 
that's a tricky call, both answers and quality just dropped
 
The way I see it, there are three stages.
We know how to improve stage 1 (the Beginning) with the new knowledge that we can ignore warnings for four turns. Otherwise we are perfect.
We are pretty clueless in stage 2 (the Transition).
We are perfect at stage 3 (the End), except that sometimes we break 3 heart ties the wrong way.
 
@Runer112 Answer > Quality
 
what
when did we learn we can ignore for 4 turns
 
Ask???
not upvote?
 
10:18 PM
@Runer112 I tested it on Sharepoint SE
So that buys us a whole two extra turns that we weren't abusing before
 
maybe we should onlt try that in the next public beta
 
It also requires that all 10 of us keep a correct count.
 
because if we try it when graduated and lose, that's 100 days lost
 
Which will be difficult
Yes, I'm game for that
 
whatever just happened was definitely wrong
 
10:20 PM
You kept upvoting
 
I said ask
 
no Dvs are Asks
 
downvote
 
@Runer112 me too
 
users just dropped, downvote!
 
10:21 PM
Downvote!
Ask...!
 
ask just dropped
 
question just dropped, upvote I think
now we ask
 
You guys are one move behind
Answer!
 
answer just dropped, upvote..?
 
You shouldn't vote on something that just dropped
 
10:22 PM
Down vote!
 
downvote
 
look, now we lost users
answers had no chance of dropping that day
 
Doesn't matter
 
it definitely does matter
 
I disagree, we got through beta in 102 days withouth touching users until the end
 
10:23 PM
we're basically at the end now
we should pick whatever keeps the sum highest
which means trying to intercept decays
 
Preciesly
 
answer
 
userdecays the slowest
 
answer
 
actually, this might be different
 
10:23 PM
In beta, I feel like everything decays exactly the same
 
okay
 
And we honestly have no idea what caused users and then questions to get stuck after grad
But we do know they got stuck, and in that order
Perhaps high traffic makes users stick
 
it does
 
And perhaps high users makes questions stick
 
traffic automatically replenishes users somewhat, I think
anyways, is the new meta to answer when all maxed?
 
10:24 PM
The reason traffic makes users stick is that when you have high traffic, asking will give you a free users every so often
Downvote!
 
I think we should've downvoted here, but we'll see
 
don't know that it matters.
 
got lucky
I always break ties in favor of quality, it seems to decay more than others
 
you guys are still on this minigame?
 
@Runer112 Do you know how it breaks the tie, I think it is on a first come first serve basis
 
10:26 PM
no idea which wins in a vote tie
let's see if we can stun-lock the game again :p
aww nope
I guess we need the high traffic
which would've prevented users from dropping there too
 
You can't just quit when you're winning.
 
You build up questions and answer and Quality quickly
Questions are needed to prevent hyper answer decay
 
perhaps we should try voting users when all maxed?
since that happens
 
Thats what I did
 
10:27 PM
alright, I'll try users next time we're maxed
 
and I got the whole thing done in 252 days
 
When all is maxed, vote for the thing that we haven't voted for the longest IMO
Rather than trying to stick to a specific one
 
no, that isn't right
I think voting for quality when all maxed almost guarantees user drop
 
Ah, I see.
 
let's see what upvote does
 
10:29 PM
Then out of the other three, take the oldest.
 
I do ask when max is reached
 
that was a pretty good result
 
although users somtime if its been a long time
 
I think we're behind schedule compared to last time..
 
that may be, our private beta had a slightly slow start
 
10:30 PM
A couple hiccups here and there...
 
some of us couldn't do what had to be done and abandon our users :p
we seem to be stuck in a loop of always one off max, but I'm pretty okay with that
nevermind :p
hmm
that was no good
 
In order to get a head start in graduation, we have to be willing to let our users go deep into the red.
 
I think we should only test 4 ignores at the next private beta, though
I don't want to lose 100 days of progress
 
Do double-ignores at least, and do it multiple time.
 
yeah, I'm definitely fine with double-ignores
 
10:33 PM
I wonder If Users would go back up if we ignore it.
 
seems unlikely lol
 
I'm leaving now.
B back in an hour and 1/2.
 
so, for graduation: alternate Q&A up to max, double-ignoring reds?
 
Yup
 
works for me
then Q&A&U?
 
10:35 PM
Next public beta, we quadruple ignore reds.
 
nooo
why did we downvote
never downvote when full quality
 
Unless it's grad. Then downvote on max is a pretty decent choice.
Cuz users get stuck, and quality drops like a rock.
 
I don't think users are stuck if you downvote on max
bleh, 10 days late
err
that was unfortunate
maybe we should've tried quality instead
ask
users and quality can rot in hell atm
answer, upvote, downvote?
noo
 
NOOO
 
bleh answers got ruined
downvote this time, though
then back to Q&A I think
 
10:39 PM
@Runer112 I'm talking about in grad end game. Users get stuck and downvoting appears to have no effect on users.
 
what are we doing
we're screwed
griefed so hard there
if you're in this chat and you closed, please don't do that again
what the hell is going on, nobody's following the strat
we're basically exclusively breaking the optimal rules
 
Where on earth is @MartinBüttner in all this?
 
He's the guy that's been raiding us all day long, for 8 hours straight.
 
help help help
we're definitely getting raided or something
 
he's probably smart enough to have realized things might get ugly, and did some work unlike the rest of us
 
10:42 PM
users can burn in hell
 
Next round we hit mid game where we flop around for a while
 
downvote
I think we've lost our touch
 
i love this community and can't believe it that it took this easter game for me to find it
 
I tried
Ohhhh, easter egg.
 
This is probably really good publicity for PPCG
 
10:45 PM
And here I was thinking it was some silly April fool's thing :P
 
lol
 
you must be forgetting about the whole raid thing @BrainSteel
 
Ah, that selective memory...
 
Nah, they say no publicity is bad publicity, right?
 
why are we upvoting, gaaah
 
10:47 PM
Yeah, can't we put the past behind us?
 
I mean, I joined at the height of code trolling, and while that ultimately ended up bad, it was arguably good for the site as a whole by bringing in new blood.
 
answer
then downvote, I think
 
is answer going to decay?
 
they all decay
 
I mean on the next round
Too late anyway
 
10:48 PM
probably not
inby quality decay
well that was lucky
 
No, it was math =D
 
I completely missed code-trolling.
 
everyone try and follow these directions and let me know if it works --

http://codepen.io/run-time/full/WbWrMw/

-- I only tested in google chrome but it seems to get the job done
 
I don't miss code trolling one bit.
 
Now lets get these users up so we can ignore em
 
10:50 PM
Should I flag that link from DaveAlger?
Or is it legit?
 
I mean I wasn't around while it was still around, not that I mourn its death :P
 
Ok, I'm flagging it.
 
Oh my
 
it's legit
 
I take it that everyone who clicked on that link is now unable to use their machine?
 
10:51 PM
I'm not really sure what it does, but I think automating votes is probably against the rules
the code isn't malicious
 
you can still manually vote
 
Link itself is fine, I don't know what the code does...
 
it just looks at the thing with the lowest hearts and clicks the corresponding button if you don't click one yourself
 
"The code is fine. I don't know what it does, but it's fine."
 
10:52 PM
called it
 
" if you don't click one yourself" that part is extraneous
 
No, haha, that's not what I meant :P I mean, the page he linked to itself isn't virus-laden. The steps on it may or may not be awful.
 
You can't double vote, so there's no point in having that extra conditional.
 
That bot's not even optimal and would hurt us if it tied a better strategy.
 
oh right
we're in graduation phase
 
10:53 PM
i had to add a thing that looks for continue button and clicks that first no matter what because someone was trying to restart it
 
Can't ignore quality at this stage :/
 
we have to actually select quality if it dropped last turn
it'll guaranteed drop next if it just dropped from 4
 
We don't get restarted here, so that is also extraneous
 
and if all stats are maxed, we'll try voting answer again, since that worked so well last time
downvote
yup, should've downvoted
 
It happens every time
 
10:56 PM
yes, it does seem to be universal; if quality just dropped from 4 to 3, it will drop from 3 to 2 next
so we should intercept those
 
Given traffic is already at 4 yes
 
whoops, misclick
ha free users
 
Whoah
 
max traffix ftw
answer
 
Has that ever happened?
 
10:58 PM
yep
 
Do we seriously have to do this for another 20 minutes
 
We should be downvoting...
 
ugh
there's definitely some lag time here
I said answer for last round, so now people said it this round
 
then the fail votes go in
 
and we got both rounds wrong
 
10:58 PM
DV when answers and quality are tied at 3 hearts
 
just DV whenever DV just dropped from 4 to 3
 
Otherwise we get launched into quality recovery mode
Man that sucked
Three heart loss?
 
yeah I dunno, that was odd
 

« first day (1522 days earlier)      last day (3319 days later) »