« first day (1274 days earlier)      last day (3715 days later) » 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

8:00 PM
@enderland n,tstllhsvwlsst'sdngbttrthnsmfthm.
 
maybe when I leave this position I'll write a code obfuscation program
and name everything random 20 character strings
 
@enderland classnamer.com
 
You have been prevented from viewing this site because this page ( classnamer.com ) is categorized as: "Placeholders"
 
...what?
> Classnamer

Can’t think of a good class name? Try this:

WritableListStream

source code
that's the entirety of the page
less CSS
 
user20683
WritableListStream seems like perfectly reasonable java to me
 
8:06 PM
> SmartRobotPermission
 
user20683
These are like Hipster Synthtron band names
 
They are perfectly reasonable class names... and then you put them on classes that have nothing to do with the title haha
 
user55340
8:30 PM
I'm trying to find that old "enterprise code means" site...
 
user55340
Enterprise code means catching and handling every exception. You have two choices:
 
user55340
try {
    ...
} catch (Exception e) { /* ignore this */ }
 
user55340
try {
    ...
} catch (NullPointerException e) { /* ignore this */ }
catch (OutOfMemoryException e) { /* ignore this too */ }
catch (InvalidArgumentException e) { /* oops, ignore this one too */ }
...
 
Woooo error handling is for scrubs.
and my prof said that I wouldn't be able to do that in the real world
 
0
Q: One-time use nonced login token on redirected URL - vulnerable to cross site attack?

Jimmy HoffaI'm not a security expert but whiteboarding with some colleagues on a design approach this one detail set off alarm bells in my gut. I'm not certain this is a risk so I was hoping to get some term for the type of attack this is vulnerable to - if any. The situation is we're talking about creatin...

Thoughts? Should I delete and repost on a different site? Is Sec.SE the wrong place for that?
It's got no upvotes and no comments or anything, I would think that's what those people are there for but now I'm wondering if the extent of their security is setting ACLs on a DC. Perhaps it's a better fit for SO or P.SE
 
user41796
8:36 PM
@JimmyHoffa You may just need to be patient
 
user41796
Security is smaller than us, and your question is detailed. Ergo patience is in order
 
@GlenH7 I presume they have at least as much traffic as us - if it's a fitting question it should have at least a +1 I would think
 
user41796
If nothing happens after a day or two, then you might want to migrate it
 
user20683
Yeah, give it time
 
user20683
also it's a Friday
 
8:37 PM
they're probably in some obscure chat room talking about beer and monads
 
user41796
@JimmyHoffa We have 57k visitors a day versus their 31k
 
user41796
And we have roughly 3x the number of users
 
user41796
@Ampt I would have pinned, but you said the m-word
2
 
user55340
On monday, make an edit to it to tweak the wording of the question.
 
@GlenH7 Interesting. I had assumed Sec.SE was one of the mega sites like SU
@MichaelT Good point, it's Friday...
 
user41796
8:39 PM
Nah, they're nuttin's, just like us. stackexchange.com/sites#technology-traffic
 
Ah, they've the same number of Qs as CR
 
user41796
We scrape in at #10 on that list. And it's a pretty steep drop in traffic from #10 to #11.
 
pretty big drop from #1 to #2 as well
 
user41796
@Ampt SO is definitely the 800 lbs gorilla for the SE sites.
 
@GlenH7 that would make us.... 6.9 pounds of something
 
8:46 PM
@GlenH7 800 lb Stuffed Unicorn
 
we have a higher answer % than anyone else in the top 10
or pretty much anyone, minus UX
they claim the throne there
 
yesterday, by Jimmy Hoffa
@RobertHarvey let's be honest here. P.SE has very high quality standards for our content; SO is just our toilet bowl.
 
@JimmyHoffa what, you want more stars?
I'm cuttin you off
 
@Ampt Workplace ftw. n00bs
now with 100% more pointless spam answers
 
Nov 26 '13 at 16:59, by Jimmy Hoffa
err, excuse me
 
user41796
8:51 PM
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
"43 questions/day" oh that's why I am typically outta close votes
 
@enderland funny... I don't see you guys on the list anywhere... odd
 
user41796
We drop to #14 for SE overall by traffic
 
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
@Ampt Nope, just pointing out that yes we do have a higher answer % than others.
 
user41796
8:53 PM
@Ampt TW shows up in the top half by traffic; that's pretty decent IMO
 
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
23 secs ago, by enderland
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
let's see how deep it may go...
 
25 secs ago, by gnat
23 secs ago, by enderland
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
53 secs ago, by Jimmy Hoffa
29 secs ago, by Jimmy Hoffa
24 secs ago, by Jimmy Hoffa
21 secs ago, by Jimmy Hoffa
10 secs ago, by Jimmy Hoffa
@gnat 43Q/day seems odd. I bet if you curtailed the sample and or went for median instead of average you'd find it's commonly more. I wager the current is an average over total live days when it would be better to do it over past 6 months
 
27 secs ago, by Ampt
25 secs ago, by gnat
23 secs ago, by enderland
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
user41796
8:57 PM
@JimmyHoffa I presume they're doing some sort of rolling average, but I don't know what the rolling period is.
 
1 min ago, by enderland
27 secs ago, by Ampt
25 secs ago, by gnat
23 secs ago, by enderland
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
@JimmyHoffa we want more!
 
26 secs ago, by Ampt
1 min ago, by enderland
27 secs ago, by Ampt
25 secs ago, by gnat
23 secs ago, by enderland
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
user41796
@gnat quality growth is good; and increased numbers provide a bit more oomph behind requests we might make on MSO
 
19 secs ago, by enderland
26 secs ago, by Ampt
1 min ago, by enderland
27 secs ago, by Ampt
25 secs ago, by gnat
23 secs ago, by enderland
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
8:58 PM
I hope this breaks and someone posts on meta as a bug. "if you embed 20 quotes in each other chat breaks!"
 
We need to go deeper
 
9 secs ago, by Ampt
19 secs ago, by enderland
26 secs ago, by Ampt
1 min ago, by enderland
27 secs ago, by Ampt
25 secs ago, by gnat
23 secs ago, by enderland
2 mins ago, by gnat
1 min ago, by GlenH7
@enderland I filtered the list to the SE technology stack
 
user41796
And please stop with the embedding thing; it's gotten old
 
Dude! That's NSFW! — Bart Sep 19 '13 at 14:14
 
@GlenH7 but mooooooooooom
2
 
8:59 PM
can't beat mobile
it's a future
 
ok now's a time I want to see what deleted messages were. haha
I mean, a message like
followed by two deleted messages?
damn missed that quote by a fraction of a second haha
 
(removed)
 
user55340
 
user41796
@JimmyHoffa - you can't add enderland. Otherwise he won't run for TW mod.
 
user41796
9:06 PM
@MichaelT and I just picked up another delete vote today.
 
@GlenH7 if he becomes a TW mod I think we're duty bound to remove him from the room
 
user41796
@JimmyHoffa Be careful. He'd have the ability to chat ban you.
 
30
Q: Is it okay to change the coding style of an open source project if it doesn't follow them?

Rafal ChmielI'm talking about Ruby specifically here. Recently, I came across a number of open source Ruby (or majority of it was Ruby) projects on GitHub that when checked with a code analysing tool like Rubocop, create a lot of offences. Now, most of these offences include using double quotation marks inst...

"SamTheBrand" == ArsTechnica? Edits --^
No I'm confusing things
Who's the editor we see before something hits Ars?
 
user41796
@JimmyHoffa yes
 
@JimmyHoffa Yes, per the edit message: A few small format, punctuation, and word choice edits. This question will be featured at Ars Technica this weekend.
 
user41796
9:09 PM
SamTheBrand
 
user41796
But we call him Sam for short.
 
@amon Sharp.
 
user41796
And the question has been proactively protected
 
user15026
It's nice you get warning
 
user41796
@AshleyNunn it's a bit indirect since we have to watch the edit queue on Fridays
 
user41796
9:14 PM
but we don't have any warning systems for reddit and the like
 
still bummed about that ars question where I didn't even get a mention
 
reddit just brings lots of high quality content not sure why you are worried!!1
2
 
user55340
I'm surprised he didn't go for a Workplace question again... especially since they graduated.
 
user41796
@AshleyNunn - would you mind giving @enderland a cooling off period from chat? Obviously his brain is a bit addled at the moment.
 
user55340
@GlenH7 You know we just need to reddit that crack question on workplace...
 
user41796
9:22 PM
That's .... cruel.
 
Could you write a (semi)formal description of the proposed protocol? — curiousguy 6 mins ago
I guess Sec.SE is more IT.SE than security experts..
Anybody here disagree that question is a fine fit for P.SE?
 
user41796
@JimmyHoffa Give it the weekend and see what comes back. I'm not sure we have enough web security experts rolling through to get you a solid answer. Requesting a migrate on Monday would give you better visibility when it's moved.
 
honestly it could just be the timing
friday afternoons aren't great for getting attention
 
user41796
@JimmyHoffa - patience. :-)
 
user41796
9:39 PM
Reading over your question, it seems secure enough. Potentially exposed to MiM issues, but I don't think you can really defend against that in this case anyway.
 
@GlenH7 The MitM issue should be mitigated by the one-time use nonce that halts replay attacks
it's just a question of if a MitM can pick up the URL and stop the request from going through.. I guess so..
 
what if the MitM hits it before you?
can you use another piece of information about the end user
 
@Ampt Which is basically my concern, or rather, my concern is that the MitM could just be like a hosting frame or something.
 
to limit it to that browser? IP address? cookies?
 
@Ampt Cookies was basically what we came up with in whiteboarding
But I raised a concern about the approach, mostly I want to get validation about whether my gut instinct was onto something or if I was just overreacting, which is why I asked.
 
9:43 PM
how likely are you to be targetted?
are you making financial transactions?
launching missiles?
ok.. so there is a real concern about being hijacked
does the user really need to be able to be redirected without logging on?
 
@Ampt Absolutely. I play in the big leagues ;P My code has bugs and there can be serious ramifications heh
@Ampt Yes. That's the whole point of a single sign-on site for us, think of it like you login to google and you are already logged in to youtube.com and gmail.com etc
 
@JimmyHoffa just make the user re-authenticate?
 
In fact I'll go look at how google does that now that I think about it...
 
pretty sure google does it through cookies, but then again I'm not a high value target
 
ooo I think I know. That actually gives me an answer.
@Ampt google.com puts a cookie on your browser, your browser won't hand it over to youtube.com
 
9:46 PM
@JimmyHoffa why not?
 
user41796
@Ampt - any project big enough to support SSO is at some degree of risk of attack.
 
@Ampt your browser has no reason to think that youtube should have access to cookies from google.com. Basic security of cookies man is that they are domain scoped
Imagine I put a website up that you go to and it just picks up all the cookies from all the websites on your computer, then I can use those to pretend to be you on all the sites that have given you "remember who I am" cookies - or at the least all sites you're actively logged into right now that haven't had your token expire yet
Cookies are scoped so they aren't handed out to just any site.
 
then how do third party cookies work?
 
@Ampt If you go to a website, and it has an <img src="someOtherSite.com/blank.png" /> when your browser requests that URL, the 3rd party site may send a cookie down to your browser as well, so now you went to someSite.com which is the first party, and someOtherSite.com which is a 3rd party has planted a cookie on you.
 
ok, so how does that cookie get back to them?
if I never go to someothersite.com
it just has to have content loaded from the page requested to get a cookie?
 
user55340
9:56 PM
@GlenH7 @gnat FWIW, I've just tossed a bunch of delete votes on some dups to deleted questions (that are low view/poor themselves).
 
@Ampt cookies are a part of the HTTP protocol - you make HTTP requests wherein you attach your cookies scoped to the site you're requesting from, and the responses may have add/update/delete cookies
the content type or body doesn't matter, cookies go in HTTP headers, headers are a part of all HTTP requests and responses.
 
so a MitM would already have a cookie...
 
user55340
@WorldEngineer go go flag janitor!
 
user55340
(@WorldEngineer for fun, the list I was working off of - data.stackexchange.com/programmers/query/169338/… )
 
user41796
@MichaelT - if you haven't already, would you look at: programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/57192/…. Looks like Community got a little out of hand and nuked off of the failed migration. Probably ought to be restored, IMO. If you agree, it would probably help to flag and indicate that.
 
user20683
10:05 PM
For fun, tonight will likely consist of Android development and time spent with my girlfriend
 
user55340
Don't dupe your girlfriend. Bad things happen.
 
user55340
@GlenH7 webmaster question with all questions migrated here, didnt get any new answers, when closed, since there were no P.SE answers the entire question was deleted.
 
user41796
@MichaelT oh. duh. That makes more sense.
 
user41796
It's been nuked from Webmasters though
 
user55340
Yep. Not on topic there at all either.
 
user55340
10:09 PM
That said, there are some ok answers here. Community shouldn't be vindictive about if it was undeleted (and the migration flag(?) cleared(?)). Though it should remain closed.
 
user41796
@MichaelT I see a mod campaign against Community regaining some steam...
 
user41796
10:19 PM
I need more close votes
 
@GlenH7 More close votes need you!
...Next xkcd will be 1337...
 
11:09 PM
@jozefg touched D much/any?
 
11:37 PM
 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (1274 days earlier)      last day (3715 days later) »