most history texts don't talk about that sort of thing except at a 50,000' level AFAIK
and most of what's written about the law deals with modern systems, and being an English speaker, the texts in English predominately deal with the law in English-speaking countries, which mostly inherit the British notion of common law
(I'm a USian -- but we are closer to the Brits and their spinoffs legally speaking than we are to say the French)
It happens every now and then that someone posts what is actually an answer as a comment to the question. That is, something that actually addresses the question being asked, perhaps succintly, but in a way that would be an answer that could be voted up or down but not legitimately flagged as "no...
@PedroEtCetera My problem isn't so much the physics of the ocean currents, it's massaging the data before processing and visualizing the results afterwards.
The sim package I'm working with handles the physics just fine. Configuring it properly requires lots of reading.
I can feel your pain. Though recently I ordered a hat at the largest available size, and it did actually turn out to be too big. That's the first time that's ever happened to me
Hum, @james, what is the best way to select an individual person, to have a short conversation with, that is off the mainstream channels. I am aware of how to start a private channel but the way I know does not get me the ability to invite a specific person.
could you vote to open the question https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/81819/robots-replacing-human-in-future I stuck with long answer and was not smart enough to make place holder
@NexTerren Huh? No lets try it this way on Meta there is a person that clearly I have never been able to make any post understandable to under any circumstance. With all due respect I just wanted to let that person know that for the betterment of the community I would start to just ignore them It has nothing to do with anyone here I don not think I have ever seen the post here
@EnigmaMaitreya The initials of your username remind me of a certain candy which looks like skittles which is so deceptive. Man, you're just the worst. Skittle-mocker. :(
@Bellerophon it is dupe of the question which is closed and in which the answer can't be added, so the dupe thing is pointless in the case, in therms of preventing multiple answers to the same question, because no answers can be addd at all.
@NexTerren Oh well then Shrug my horizons have been expanded
@NexTerren The plain and simple is nothing personal,I do not know how to communicate with those that can not frame the conversation in any context but the one they want to talk about meaning they talk others just listen and nod.
@NexTerren I do not think he means ill either but it is clear I can not communicate meaningfully with him and just want him to know it is not personal that I ignore him. But clearly I can not.
I don't know about removing words persay, but as someone who is trying to teach his kids to read, I'd start by simplifying the alphabet and spelling rules.
For instance, get rid of the letter C, and just use the letter K or the letter S.
I don't know how often I've had to klarify a word. "No, ce...
I'd hate to get called out on something simple that I missed... :)
@Bellerophon yes it is not a dupe - that Q asks about "How would the job market change, if strong AI were developed, and they could do ALL jobs currently available " - and that is supid question, it's sad people do not see the difference and voted that way
supid as I ,write long answer and not making a placeholder to the q which have 4 close votes, I should punish me for that )))
@EnigmaMaitreya just go to the bottom of the page here: chat.stackexchange.com/… then create the room. There should be an invite button in the room, or you can post the link here and @ping the user you are wanting to talk to.
@James etiquette wise, I am planning on expressing my thoughts and put a 24 Hour Timer on the Room. In your experience, can you suggest something better?
Though I've been hungry a lot since I stopped eating sugar. I joked with my wife that maybe I should try something milder to help take the edge off. Like heroin...
Not heroine, as that would be harder to explain away to the wife than heroin...
@sphennings "Listen honey, I understand you're upset, but I need you to answer this one question for the sake of science; Which was worse, me doing the heroin, or me doing the heroine?"
@NexTerren He's a character in one of the Discworld books (Jingo).
An explanation of his name: in D'Reg culture, anyone you offer hospitality to is completely safe for three days i.e. 72 hours. Ahmed, a D'Reg, didn't want to wait the extra hour to dispense with a man he arrested for poisoning a well.
I am not an authority on this. I just know that I copy text from wikipedia pretty often for answers, giving attribution, and no one has ever called me out on it.
in fact it's kinda SE policy: copy relevant data into the answer so that if the linked page is removed down the road the answer will still make sense.
So I was sifting through some tag descriptions and realized it would be far easier to fill in some that are blank just by copying a bit of the Wikipedia article on the topic into the tag.
Is this fine or frowned upon? We could certainly attribute and link to the page from which the content was ...
@DaaaahWhoosh :P It's yours or Myrdden Wyllt. I feel like both of you thought outside of the box--yet practical--which is something Aify didn't do, which makes your answers better.
Better = possibly more accurate as to how it'd play out if my question was actual history.
But that makes me feel like I'm being insulting to Aify or stubborn towards the community's views.
I can see it going either way. It's not a wall of text, so expecting someone to read the whole thing isn't asking that much. But the question could be asked in the title or worked into the first sentence and maybe be better because of it...
@DaaaahWhoosh It wouldn't really be an effect on the battlefield (Probably?), but I'd imagine that it would push forward the invention of the rapier by a fair bit
@sphennings The belief is that weapons made of Damascus Steel was superior to all others and was reportedly able to cut through other weapons without damaging itself. I simply offered up a real world case that may provide guidance to an answer to the question.
@EnigmaMaitreya Even today there is no steel superior to all others. There are many use cases with vastly different needs and many specialized alloys that cater to them.
We are no longer able to exactly produce Damascus Steel. I accept that others may reword my statement to say yes they can but their version is always with exceptions. I have no vested interest in this question. I am making an objective observation.
@sphennings Damascus Steel can NOT be made the art was lost. Just like the Flexible Glass of Roman Times was lost.
@DaaaahWhoosh Old glass is thicker at the bottom than the top. People thought the glass had run down over time but it hadn't. It was just thicker at the bottom to support its own weight.
Look at the way I have been treated lately, especially by the chat. No chat room owner in history, and I say this with great surety, has been treated worse or more unfairly. You can't let them get you down, you can't let the critics and the naysayers get in the way of your dreams.
Geochemistry is the science that uses the tools and principles of chemistry to explain the mechanisms behind major geological systems such as the Earth's crust and its oceans. The realm of geochemistry extends beyond the Earth, encompassing the entire Solar System and has made important contributions to the understanding of a number of processes including mantle convection, the formation of planets and the origins of granite and basalt.
== History ==
The term geochemistry was first used by the Swiss-German chemist Christian Friedrich Schönbein in 1838. In his paper, Schönbein predicted the birth...
@sphennings You see, you're missing something here: @James, Steward of WB, Crusher of Dreams, Lord of The Factory Floor, First of his name is, well, @James, Steward of WB, Crusher of Dreams, Lord of The Factory Floor and First of his name and has powers that even us stewards-in-training can only dream of
> I'm writing to you, UserY. > Your voting fraud sure makes me cry. > Your votes are not right, > So your socks I shall smite. > Our tools quickly saw through your lie.
Limericks are much too distracting. They make it so hard to keep acting Like I'm getting things done (and it's really no fun when your boss finds your work to be lacking).
@dot_Sp0T And a High Rep person asked me why we would want to Role Play in the SFF Chat room .... as though I was breaking every rule in the SE book.
And there are times, situations that make me think I am in an Episode from Red vs Blue, speaking of which I probably need to see when the next episode comes out.
@Shalvenay Nice! It's been a long time since I've done any D&D... Currently revising for my last ever exam next Wednesday(!), working on a project to do with generating randomness by things called t-designs, an essay on quantum communications between ground and satellites (yes, this is actually for Uni), started catching up on Scholagladiatoria's videos again and back to writing my thing on medieval warfare for the Universe Factory...
@Mithrandir24601 ah. speaking of bladed weapons: how small can you make a hidden knife or dagger before it's no longer usefully lethal? (I believe I've heard somewhere in the vicinity of a 3" blade is needed to be able to pierce far enough to reach most vital spots on the human torso, but I'm not sure if that's correct...)
@Shalvenay Usefully lethal? I don't know - in general though, I'd argue that's it's useful regardless of the size - even a pin could be useful at the right moment, although 'usefully lethal' is a bit different
@Mithrandir24601 yeah -- something that's a) not going to break or bend if you hit the wrong thing by accident and b) can penetrate far enough into the torso to reach arteries, organs, ...
or is that not a useful definition of "usefully lethal"?
@Shalvenay Well, 'lethal' for stabbing is going to be different to 'lethal' for cutting - a cut could be lethal by blood loss if it's at the right place, in which case, the size of the blade probably isn't that important. Stabbing though... How lethal would it be if you were stabbed in, say, an eye?
by what you've said, you seem to be looking at 'lethal by stabbing'?
@Mithrandir24601 fairly nasty, but you may not have the target of your choice available, all the same...and yeah, I'm thinking stabbing over cutting here
@Mithrandir24601 yeah, that's my knowledge as well -- besides, a chest wound is going to be seriously crippling even if it doesn't pierce all the way to the lungs (due to pressure issues in the chest cavity)