« first day (981 days earlier)      last day (2528 days later) » 
01:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

1:26 AM
hey there @DonyorM
 
hey
 
how're things going?
 
prety good
how's it going for you?
 
alright here
 
Do you have any worlds your building now?
 
1:43 AM
trying to puzzle out a campaign world these days, but it's kind of on a slow burn -- got some nasty structure-of-laws issues to work out
 
fun :)
 
most history texts don't talk about that sort of thing except at a 50,000' level AFAIK
and most of what's written about the law deals with modern systems, and being an English speaker, the texts in English predominately deal with the law in English-speaking countries, which mostly inherit the British notion of common law
(I'm a USian -- but we are closer to the Brits and their spinoffs legally speaking than we are to say the French)
 
yeah I understand. American here too
I kinda glossed over it in my world, with a superficial level british-based style law. But in an RPG that would be harder
 
@DonyorM especially when you start having legal issues play into the plot
 
yeah, you kinda need more detail then
 
1:50 AM
lots more detail
 
 
3 hours later…
4:37 AM
Is there a bot framework or configurable app for such, for SE chats?
 
 
6 hours later…
10:31 AM
@Green n*e! yeah, I've read some articles on ocean currents and its some complicated stuff
 
11:26 AM
1
Q: Are answers posted in comments acceptable or not?

Michael KjörlingIt happens every now and then that someone posts what is actually an answer as a comment to the question. That is, something that actually addresses the question being asked, perhaps succintly, but in a way that would be an answer that could be voted up or down but not legitimately flagged as "no...

 
 
2 hours later…
1:42 PM
@PedroEtCetera My problem isn't so much the physics of the ocean currents, it's massaging the data before processing and visualizing the results afterwards.
The sim package I'm working with handles the physics just fine. Configuring it properly requires lots of reading.
 
2:16 PM
Morning wubbers.
 
wub wub wub wub hello
 
@DaaaahWhoosh That sounded like a helicopter in slow motion in my head.
 
you must have a large head
 
Not that I see how it is relevant to this conversation but as a matter of fact I do have a large head....finding fitted hats is a pain in the ass.
 
I can feel your pain. Though recently I ordered a hat at the largest available size, and it did actually turn out to be too big. That's the first time that's ever happened to me
 
2:21 PM
This is why I don't wear hats.
 
it annoys me because I want to make a tricorn, but the suggested way to do that is to use one of those women's sun hats.
 
@DaaaahWhoosh lol
All I can picture right now is a goose-pirate. A bird wandering around with a tricorn and an eye patch.
...he says Quaaaarrrrk alot.
2
 
you're welcome
 
Its sort of a fantastic image actually.
 
@James Morning.
 
2:46 PM
Morning all.
 
@Green Good afternoon.
 
@Bellerophon Good afternoon!
 
2:58 PM
whats shakin today?
 
atoms!
 
@James Fighting with security on a system I should have access to.
It's fixed now.
 
3:22 PM
Well that was efficient.
 
3:33 PM
Hum, @james, what is the best way to select an individual person, to have a short conversation with, that is off the mainstream channels. I am aware of how to start a private channel but the way I know does not get me the ability to invite a specific person.
 
@Green Just give in. Security is always right. And this is a 100% unbiased opinion.
 
@NexTerren only a Sith deals in absolutes
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Is a Sith like a Black Hat?
 
pretty much
on a related note, I'm the only person in this chatroom who has said 'only a Sith deals in absolutes'
which seems fitting
 
@NexTerren Not Security, the group of humans, but Security, the cached software credentials that were out of date and just needed to be updated.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
@DaaaahWhoosh, sorry. It was too easy to do.
 
3:40 PM
Only an absolute deals in Sith.
 
So I need to wait for the person to make a chat message before I can invite them to a private channel to clear the air?
 
@EnigmaMaitreya There's a timeout so people who don't visit the chat aren't spammed. Basically "opt in, timed automatic opt out."
@EnigmaMaitreya If it helps I can pretend to be mad at you so we can clear the artificial air!
 
@EnigmaMaitreya you can opt to open a room just between you and the aggrieved.
 
@Green Right, but there's no way to tag the user and bring them in, right?
If they don't use chat in the first place.
 
@NexTerren that I don't know about.
 
3:47 PM
You could get in a comments argument with them until someone migrates the comments to a chat room.
4
 
I recall us having to have mods ping users for us for podcast discussion when they hadn't been in chat for a while.
@Bellerophon Best. Plan. Ever.
 
could you vote to open the question https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/81819/robots-replacing-human-in-future
I stuck with long answer and was not smart enough to make place holder
just in case ping @Mormacil
ping @SZCZERZO KŁY
 
@NexTerren Huh? No lets try it this way on Meta there is a person that clearly I have never been able to make any post understandable to under any circumstance. With all due respect I just wanted to let that person know that for the betterment of the community I would start to just ignore them It has nothing to do with anyone here I don not think I have ever seen the post here
 
@MolbOrg It's a dupe. It should stay closed.
 
@EnigmaMaitreya No, no, no. Come on. I can pick a really interesting fight with you, I swear! Lemme see...
 
3:53 PM
@NexTerren Go ahead and try
 
@EnigmaMaitreya The initials of your username remind me of a certain candy which looks like skittles which is so deceptive. Man, you're just the worst. Skittle-mocker. :(
 
@NexTerren that may be true as I do not know what your saying about me
 
@EnigmaMaitreya It's just a joke. :P
 
@Bellerophon it is dupe of the question which is closed and in which the answer can't be added, so the dupe thing is pointless in the case, in therms of preventing multiple answers to the same question, because no answers can be addd at all.
 
And if the user doesn't visit the chatroom/hasn't for a week or so you won't be able to ping him.
 
3:54 PM
@NexTerren Oh well then Shrug my horizons have been expanded
@NexTerren The plain and simple is nothing personal,I do not know how to communicate with those that can not frame the conversation in any context but the one they want to talk about meaning they talk others just listen and nod.
 
@AndyD273 There the scoundrel is! Go get him, Enigma!
 
@NexTerren Wha'd I miss?
 
@MolbOrg But it has the same problems as the other question. If it were reopened it should be closed as too broad. It doesn't seem worth the effort.
 
It may be that person is here but of all the icons I donot recognize him
 
What's there name? There is a search function.
 
3:57 PM
I prefer a public argument. more entertaining
 
also the dupe asks about strong AI, which is pointless, but removing human from productions is another hings and valuable answer can be given
 
@AndyD273 I dunno. I'm trying to start a fight.
 
@curt1893 Public arguments are rubbish.
 
@EnigmaMaitreya Ah. I don't think he and I see eye-to-eye either, but I don't think he means ill.
@Bellerophon I disagree! And your mother is a toad!
 
3:58 PM
@NexTerren Ah, any topic in particular?
 
@NexTerren I do not think he means ill either but it is clear I can not communicate meaningfully with him and just want him to know it is not personal that I ignore him. But clearly I can not.
 
:'(
 
Oh, can someone look this answer over and see if I have any inconsistencies after a rule is discussed?
0
A: Would a civilization simplify their languages (eg:English) in order to let their citizens learn more easily?

AndyD273I don't know about removing words persay, but as someone who is trying to teach his kids to read, I'd start by simplifying the alphabet and spelling rules. For instance, get rid of the letter C, and just use the letter K or the letter S. I don't know how often I've had to klarify a word. "No, ce...

I'd hate to get called out on something simple that I missed... :)
 
@EnigmaMaitreya chat.stackexchange.com/users/77967/molot Click invite this user to a room.
 
@Bellerophon yes it is not a dupe - that Q asks about "How would the job market change, if strong AI were developed, and they could do ALL jobs currently available " - and that is supid question, it's sad people do not see the difference and voted that way
supid as I ,write long answer and not making a placeholder to the q which have 4 close votes, I should punish me for that )))
 
4:03 PM
@EnigmaMaitreya just go to the bottom of the page here: chat.stackexchange.com/… then create the room. There should be an invite button in the room, or you can post the link here and @ping the user you are wanting to talk to.
 
@Bellerophon I am there and can not see a way to start it, let me study it some more.
 
@AndyD273 You wrot 'consistent' not konsistent in the 4th paragraph.
 
Ok, not totaly intuitive but I figured it out. Thanks @Bellerophon and @James
 
@EnigmaMaitreya Chat can be a bit labyrinthine
 
Also, should 'foreign' be foriejn?
 
4:07 PM
@Bellerophon Ah, thanks. I found a couple more errant C's too...
konsistensy is hard when you're trying to break rules on purpose
 
@James etiquette wise, I am planning on expressing my thoughts and put a 24 Hour Timer on the Room. In your experience, can you suggest something better?
 
24 hour timer? You kan do that?
 
@Bellerophon I dont know I am just saying some long time
It gives tiomeout in seconds and I see nothing to indicate it can not be 24 hours worth of seconds
 
@EnigmaMaitreya I like that I knew how many seconds that is without having to calculate it...
 
4:24 PM
@AndyD273 :) isnt that true for both minutes and seconds? It is often time a standard value with computers :)
Hum, did the chat reboot or something?
 
@EnigmaMaitreya I don't think so? People are just quiet.
It may be lunch time. I am hungry.
 
@AndyD273 Nah I got 404's on all my chat tabs for about 2 minutes
Might have been a router failure from them to me
The Q/A's were active
 
Though I've been hungry a lot since I stopped eating sugar. I joked with my wife that maybe I should try something milder to help take the edge off. Like heroin...
Not heroine, as that would be harder to explain away to the wife than heroin...
probably
 
4:49 PM
@AndyD273 Normally I suggest doing science to find the answer. In this case I'm making an exception.
 
@sphennings "Listen honey, I understand you're upset, but I need you to answer this one question for the sake of science; Which was worse, me doing the heroin, or me doing the heroine?"
3
 
It's not what it looks like. We're doing science.
 
@sphennings the science of the case is simple observation and observing facts are too obvious. So never give up on science.
 
To quote Adam Savage: "Remember kids the only difference between screwing around and science is writing it down."
 
In some regards then Science is like Sculpture, Painting were the value is viewer specific.
 
5:08 PM
And I return.
 
5:43 PM
@NexTerren this always reminds me of 71-hour Achmed
I go! I return!
 
@AndyD273 Que?
 
@NexTerren He's a character in one of the Discworld books (Jingo).
An explanation of his name: in D'Reg culture, anyone you offer hospitality to is completely safe for three days i.e. 72 hours. Ahmed, a D'Reg, didn't want to wait the extra hour to dispense with a man he arrested for poisoning a well.
 
@EnigmaMaitreya Without knowing the topic, not really.
@NexTerren Related: I am eating chips and queso.
 
5:59 PM
@James Why so?
 
Because melty cheese is delicious and proof that god loves us.
2
 
@James shoot, that should have been what so, not why so... (que so)
There's a reason I only took one semester of Spanish...
 
my knowledge of spanish is basically limited to ordering food where the staff don't really speak english
Would it be inappropriate to copy the first paragraph of a Wikipedia article into a tag description?
 
6:14 PM
@James Probably not. Maybe just give attribution?
 
That's sort of what I was thinking...maybe this is a meta-worthy question...
 
I am not an authority on this. I just know that I copy text from wikipedia pretty often for answers, giving attribution, and no one has ever called me out on it.
in fact it's kinda SE policy: copy relevant data into the answer so that if the linked page is removed down the road the answer will still make sense.
 
Quite true.
I just posted a meta question to cover my bases.
 
@James As long as there is more in the tag description it should be okay. Just copying the first paragraph sounds very lazy otherwise...
 
@Secespitus Hey my left hand can only ctrl+c then ctrl+v so many times man.
 
6:30 PM
Tag wikis should include when to use the tag as far as I know. I think wikipedia doesn't include that information in the first paragraph
Help center on tag wiki excerpts: "Avoid generically defining the concept behind a tag" and "Concentrate on what a tag means to your community"
 
@James You're actually not wrong.
 
3
Q: Copying other sources in tag wiki's

JamesSo I was sifting through some tag descriptions and realized it would be far easier to fill in some that are blank just by copying a bit of the Wikipedia article on the topic into the tag. Is this fine or frowned upon? We could certainly attribute and link to the page from which the content was ...

 
@NexTerren I'm thinking about asking a follow-up question to your light armor question, this time about light weapons. Do you mind?
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Not in the least! I'd be interested in what people have to say.
I still need to accept an answer for that.
 
@DaaaahWhoosh light weapons? This is going to be an interesting one...
 
6:44 PM
Do you ever feel bad not accepting the highest voted answer? I feel guilty, like I'm being stubborn or something.
 
@NexTerren if, in that case, the answer I want to accept was written by DaaaahWhoosh, I would have no qualms about accepting it
to all the mods entering the room, I want to make it clear I was not trying to influence others to gain more rep
 
@DaaaahWhoosh :P It's yours or Myrdden Wyllt. I feel like both of you thought outside of the box--yet practical--which is something Aify didn't do, which makes your answers better.
Better = possibly more accurate as to how it'd play out if my question was actual history.
But that makes me feel like I'm being insulting to Aify or stubborn towards the community's views.
 
acceptance isn't about the community, it's about what answer helped you the most
it's your chance to be selfish
actually, I might be trying to influence others to gain more rep
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Well you got a star, at least.
 
You realize we all like chat because it functions like the reward system we all experienced in kindergarten right?
2
 
6:50 PM
@James go sit in the corner
2
whoa, I just got a weird sense of deja vu
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Only if I get a cool hat that makes me feel like a unicorn.
2
 
@AndyD273 Heh, klever. I kan't find a klear inkonsistency.
 
@James Scotch tape and a single ear of corn.
 
@NexTerren So many jokes...jokes that I would never put in writing on the internet.
 
@James There is no way a joke would that corny
 
7:05 PM
@AndyD273 Wow.
lol
 
@James Yeah, unfortunately I a few words there... I feel about that.
@HDE226868 inkonsistensy. Thanks :) I had to go back and fix it a few times...
 
Am I off the mark here? https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/81872/super-metal-and-the-construction-of-knight-weapons

If I'm leading down the path of bad advice I won't reply, as I don't want to add clutter.
 
@NexTerren ?
 
@NexTerren He's just advertising his lessons so that new users see from high-reps how to write questions.
 
@NexTerren You talking about your comment?
 
7:15 PM
Yeah, my comment. Was wondering if I was off the mark.
 
@NexTerren I think the question could be slightly edited for clarity. But in it's current form it's more than acceptably readable.
 
I can see it going either way. It's not a wall of text, so expecting someone to read the whole thing isn't asking that much. But the question could be asked in the title or worked into the first sentence and maybe be better because of it...
 
Hm. Okay then, I won't say anything else, then, since it seems I was somewhat off in my comment.
 
I don't actually think your comment is wrong. It's not an unclear question
 
@NexTerren Your question is valid, the real world version is "Damascus steel" - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damascus_steel vs All other contemporary steel.
 
7:23 PM
@EnigmaMaitreya It's actually DW's question, I just made a comment.
 
@EnigmaMaitreya That steel has roughly the same density of other steels.
 
@DaaaahWhoosh It wouldn't really be an effect on the battlefield (Probably?), but I'd imagine that it would push forward the invention of the rapier by a fair bit
 
@sphennings The belief is that weapons made of Damascus Steel was superior to all others and was reportedly able to cut through other weapons without damaging itself. I simply offered up a real world case that may provide guidance to an answer to the question.
 
@EnigmaMaitreya Even today there is no steel superior to all others. There are many use cases with vastly different needs and many specialized alloys that cater to them.
 
@Mithrandir24601 see, that's what I'm wondering though. Would it make rapiers, or would it make longswords that feel like rapiers?
 
7:28 PM
We are no longer able to exactly produce Damascus Steel. I accept that others may reword my statement to say yes they can but their version is always with exceptions. I have no vested interest in this question. I am making an objective observation.
@sphennings Damascus Steel can NOT be made the art was lost. Just like the Flexible Glass of Roman Times was lost.
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Right, because theoretically the strength of the material wouldn't change, just the same sword would be lighter in the hand.
 
@NexTerren so, one-handed zweihander fencing?
 
@EnigmaMaitreya I remember reading that it's accepted that the properties of Damascus steel were exaggerated?
 
DUEL WIELDING ZWEIHANDER FENCING?!
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Stop right there with those ideas, boy. You're going to summon the anime.
2
 
7:30 PM
@NexTerren As far as I am concerned Damascus Steel never even existed as in I have no clue what the reality is to Damascus Steel.
 
And I've never even heard of this flexible glass. Was that a real thing?! If so that's kind of cool.
 
isn't glass already some sort of fluid? Just a really slow one?
 
@NexTerren OBvzously they'd use Katanas which are the most superior weapon because their Japanese and can cut through anything evar!!!
 
Flexible Glass - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_glass and I have no more clue about this either there is just enough to suggest that maybe it was real
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Urban myth.
Not actually true.
False
Incorect
Wrong.
Unproven.
Inaccurate.
 
that's like, the stupidest myth then. How did it even get started?
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Old glass is thicker at the bottom than the top. People thought the glass had run down over time but it hadn't. It was just thicker at the bottom to support its own weight.
Also glass is blown when it is semi-liquid.
 
@Bellerophon that's, like, even stupider than I'd imagined
 
wait, so they are something other than solid
 
7:49 PM
@DaaaahWhoosh Yes
 
@Bellerophon You are a master synonymizer
2
 
DaaaahWhoosh is still beating James on the starboard, 4-3.
 
@James You are too kind.
Nice.
Generous.
 
@HDE226868 My alternative facts say otherwise. That on the right is an optical illusion.
 
quick, nobody star anything!
2
 
7:57 PM
@DaaaahWhoosh You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
4-2.
 
@James I'm in it to win it
 
@DaaaahWhoosh Is rubber solid?
 
@DaaaahWhoosh But by the end you will be morally bankrupt.
 
@James morals can't buy you happiness
2
 
7:58 PM
5-1.
 
@HDE226868 This is a conspiracy.
 
it really does seem that way. I wonder...
yep, there it is
 
To me it looks like DW is using an alt account to star everything he says.
 
Look at the way I have been treated lately, especially by the chat. No chat room owner in history, and I say this with great surety, has been treated worse or more unfairly. You can't let them get you down, you can't let the critics and the naysayers get in the way of your dreams.
 
@James You know you could solve this problem... Just star pin your own comments. You can't let @DaaaahWhoosh win. You know you want to.
 
8:04 PM
@AndyD273 That's so evil!
 
@AndyD273 Stop it devil half of my conscience.
 
And he's back
 
I'm pretty sure you can't star your own comments.
 
@sphennings Oh the young and naive are so adorable.
 
I think yet again I've been stood up in a meeting.
 
8:06 PM
@NexTerren You're too good for her man.
 
@James She's a senior... Geochemist. Didn't know geochemistry was a thing.
 
@James Why is he meeting some woman's man? I didn't even thing people had menservants anymore.
 
@NexTerren ...aaaaand its time to google.
 
@NexTerren Apparently she isn't making it up
 
Geochemistry is the science that uses the tools and principles of chemistry to explain the mechanisms behind major geological systems such as the Earth's crust and its oceans. The realm of geochemistry extends beyond the Earth, encompassing the entire Solar System and has made important contributions to the understanding of a number of processes including mantle convection, the formation of planets and the origins of granite and basalt. == History == The term geochemistry was first used by the Swiss-German chemist Christian Friedrich Schönbein in 1838. In his paper, Schönbein predicted the birth...
 
8:08 PM
@sphennings You see, you're missing something here: @James, Steward of WB, Crusher of Dreams, Lord of The Factory Floor, First of his name is, well, @James, Steward of WB, Crusher of Dreams, Lord of The Factory Floor and First of his name and has powers that even us stewards-in-training can only dream of
8
 
@AndyD273 ...unless she wrote the wiki page! CONSPIRACY!
 
@Mithrandir24601 So DW might have been winning the skirmishes, but I think Mith just won the war.
 
what @Mithrandir24601 is saying is that I can do this...
PIN
 
@James PIN WIN?
 
@NexTerren :D That was the fastest 5-starring that I've ever seen :D
 
8:10 PM
@Mithrandir24601 I'm surprised he lets you dream of his powers.
 
@sphennings Letting the people aspire to greatness makes them work harder.
 
@James Yes, give in to the dark side. Become one with the star board.
2
 
@AndyD273 "Star Board." "Who?" "You know, Star Board? Legendary circle jerk?"
 
hehe
 
@sphennings I am nearly a half-steward... I will become a steward at some point! :P
 
8:13 PM
I just noticed how many people are in this room...
 
@NexTerren That's what she said.
I'd be curious to know how our chat room ranks among all the others regarding activity.
 
@James I can tell you that we've currently got more (current) users than physics' hbar
 
@James Mos Eisley had ~26 people once.
 
@Bellerophon I did once see hbar go in to the third row as well
 
Several rooms have over 30 routinely, but not all are active simultaneously.
 
8:22 PM
We are sitting at 9th overall population wise... chat.stackexchange.com/rooms?tab=all&sort=people
 
What is happening here?
 
@dot_Sp0T The Star Wars.
 
@NexTerren no, just fought them
 
@NexTerren that just about made my day
 
@DaaaahWhoosh How close did he get?
 
8:26 PM
@AndyD273 let's just say he shot for the moon and missed
 
@DaaaahWhoosh My corpse is floating in space. Frozen.
 
@AndyD273 I'd rather see a version that goes: "Shoot For The Moon" - Because that's no moon.
 
8:44 PM
@PedroEtCetera, here's some of the math (which I thankfully don't have to worry about)
 
@dot_Sp0T There you go
 
@AndyD273 Technically it was aiming for the moon Luke was stationed on, not the planet.
And I feel like if they would have gone straight for the gas giant instead of sailing around they would have taken the moon with it.
 
@NexTerren I was thinking more Alderaan when I wrote it
 
@AndyD273 Well fair.
 
@NexTerren I've seen it fail to blow up several moons, but it doesn't seem to have any problem with planets
 
8:51 PM
@AndyD273 Huh. Maybe that's part of the design. Do you think they planet that way?
3
 
I hope the universe doesn't pull a Groundhog Day on me tonight, because I don't think I can survive another round of these puns.
2
 
@HDE226868 But puns are so fun, although I'm no good at them. But I can Haiku!
 
@HDE226868 yeah, I think I've had my Phil
 
I can't Haiku. I only Sonnet.
 
guet :)
 
8:56 PM
@HDE226868 Ah, see, you're not seeing the big picture. Next time around the loop you can be the one making all the puns.
 
@AndyD273 I think I'd do limericks, if I had the choice.
 
@HDE226868 You have the choice. What you lack is the skill.
I don't actually know if that's true :)
 
> I'm writing to you, UserY.
> Your voting fraud sure makes me cry.
> Your votes are not right,
> So your socks I shall smite.
> Our tools quickly saw through your lie.
5
That was in another room, in October.
 
A limerick is carefully versed
The second line rhymes with the first
The third is short
The fourth the same sort
And the last line is usually worst.
6
Meta limerick.
 
A well-written limerick's art.
You just need the right place to start.
Rhyming is stylish
Not just for the Irish
Though limericks set them apart.
2
 
9:15 PM
Limericks are much too distracting.
They make it so hard to keep acting
Like I'm getting things done
(and it's really no fun
when your boss finds your work to be lacking).
3
 
5 stars. New highest starred post. I knew it was worth learning how to write poems.
 
Roses are red,
So were you when you bled,
Got smacked on your nose,
Blood gushing like a hose,
All because making limericks you kept
 
Last line doesn't rhyme.
 
"You have fully used your vote allowance for today" Interesting. Never had that before.
 
9:20 PM
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Our love's in my head
And not felt by you.
 
Roses are red,
Violets are red,
Everything is red,
Red
 
@Bellerophon "I met my soulmate. She didn't."
 
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Boohoohoo
 
@NexTerren The guy who got me into poetry basically has that problem.
Plus the fact that he writes love poems which is definitely a problem.
 
Roses are red,
but violets aren't blue.
This isn't a poem
I'm just correcting you
@Bellerophon Well this is sad.
 
9:24 PM
I once met a man in a van,
He was small so we called him Stan,
Stan had a wife,
And children times twice,
'twas Stand the man with the minvan
 
He's a teenager, he'll get over it.
Nex Terran's an awkward name
It is hard to rhyme, what a shame
This limerick won't work
And I'll feel a berk
If my rhyme scheme ends up rather lame
There once was a guy named dot_spoT
Who hung around Worldbuilding a lot
Even if he got flack
His answers on Stack
Were by far the best in the pot.
 
Aww that is nice, thank you!
We should introduce a day every month where we only get to talk to each other in rimes
 
there was one day a while back where I only talked in blank verse
 
Back in the day,
I had money like hay,
This started as a poem but ended up in despair
 
9:39 PM
@dot_Sp0T And a High Rep person asked me why we would want to Role Play in the SFF Chat room .... as though I was breaking every rule in the SE book.
And there are times, situations that make me think I am in an Episode from Red vs Blue, speaking of which I probably need to see when the next episode comes out.
 
@EnigmaMaitreya I didn't understand, if you rewrote it as a rhyming quatrain I think it might help.
 
@dot_Sp0T I may have once spent, a day speaking in Haiku: that's a good idea
But I still can't rhyme. Maybe it improves with time? Better, is this line :)
 
9:55 PM
I say the day of the full moon in June.
 
10:14 PM
hey there @Bellerophon and @Mithrandir24601
 
@Shalvenay Rytsas this ev'ning. How are you doing today? My day's been quite good :)
 
@Mithrandir24601 a bit tired but otherwise OK -- got to do some dungeon playtesting last night. what's been up on your end?
 
@Shalvenay Nice! It's been a long time since I've done any D&D... Currently revising for my last ever exam next Wednesday(!), working on a project to do with generating randomness by things called t-designs, an essay on quantum communications between ground and satellites (yes, this is actually for Uni), started catching up on Scholagladiatoria's videos again and back to writing my thing on medieval warfare for the Universe Factory...
 
@Mithrandir24601 ah. speaking of bladed weapons: how small can you make a hidden knife or dagger before it's no longer usefully lethal? (I believe I've heard somewhere in the vicinity of a 3" blade is needed to be able to pierce far enough to reach most vital spots on the human torso, but I'm not sure if that's correct...)
 
@Shalvenay Usefully lethal? I don't know - in general though, I'd argue that's it's useful regardless of the size - even a pin could be useful at the right moment, although 'usefully lethal' is a bit different
 
10:30 PM
@Mithrandir24601 yeah -- something that's a) not going to break or bend if you hit the wrong thing by accident and b) can penetrate far enough into the torso to reach arteries, organs, ...
or is that not a useful definition of "usefully lethal"?
 
@Shalvenay Well, 'lethal' for stabbing is going to be different to 'lethal' for cutting - a cut could be lethal by blood loss if it's at the right place, in which case, the size of the blade probably isn't that important. Stabbing though... How lethal would it be if you were stabbed in, say, an eye?
by what you've said, you seem to be looking at 'lethal by stabbing'?
 
@Mithrandir24601 fairly nasty, but you may not have the target of your choice available, all the same...and yeah, I'm thinking stabbing over cutting here
 
@Shalvenay I can't give a definitive answer, but I can try and work through stuff and see what happens
So, first thing: if the opponent's fat, you've got to get further to reach some of the organs
 
yeah, that's definitely a variable
 
On a related note, blades can get caught on things like clothing (never mind armour) if it's layered enough
 
10:36 PM
@Mithrandir24601 yeah, having to get through potentially 3-4 layers of clothing is another factor
 
@Shalvenay So, assume a middle-aged average weight person, with about 3 layers of clothing?
 
@Mithrandir24601 yeah
 
@Shalvenay To my (extremely limited) knowledge, the rib-cage is just over the lungs
 
@Mithrandir24601 yeah, that's my knowledge as well -- besides, a chest wound is going to be seriously crippling even if it doesn't pierce all the way to the lungs (due to pressure issues in the chest cavity)
 
So, for that, maybe anything over 2 inches would be long enough to be fatal there? The only issue would be a short blade catching on the ribs
(and potentially damaging itself)
 
10:41 PM
@Mithrandir24601 yeah -- that'd be the issue -- you'd ahve to make it wide enough to not be too badly damaged if it does so, I take it?
 
@Shalvenay But then, if it's too wide, you're increasing your chances of it just catching on a rib...
 
@Mithrandir24601 that is a point as well
how wide are the gaps between the ribs in our test-victim?
 
If it was long, it would just need to be reasonably flexible and it wouldn't break
Mine are maybe an inch apart?
 
so yeah -- maybe half inch would be an upper limit on width to avoid too much risk of catching on ribs if such a strike is attempted?
 
@Shalvenay From Buffon's needle, 2l/(t*pi) is what you want
 
10:48 PM
@Mithrandir24601 good thinking
 
l is the width of knife, t is distance between ribs - this is just an approximation, but it seems pretty reasonable
 
yeah
what would be an acceptable risk of catching on a rib?
(and how would you deal with it if it did happen?)
 
So... plugs in numbers for a probability of 0.5 gives an answer of a width of just under 0.8 inches (say 2cm)
(I need to get drying sorted - will be AFK for a few minutes)
 
@Mithrandir24601 yeah -- P=0.5 seems somewhat high though.
P=0.1 seems fairly low, but requires a 0.15" wide blade, which seems...awfully needle-like
P=0.25 requires a blade just under 0.4" wide, which seems reasonable to me
 
(and I'm back)
Needle-like does offer the advantage that it would be a bit more flexible
 
10:58 PM
that is true, but AFAIK it also increases the breakage risk
 
True
Or wait...
Depends on how flexible
 
01:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

« first day (981 days earlier)      last day (2528 days later) »