I am going to read to Dragon for a while now, probably for 30 minutes or so. This time from 3001: The Final Odyssey (which I have never read). So, I'll be back soon.
now, before you (or Faheem) launch into an anti-Apple tirade, hear me out. 1. I am a computational polymath. I have 2 windows PCs, my MBP, and I run Ubuntu VMs on all of them
3. for the level of spec I was looking, an MBP was only slightly more expensive than Windows alternatives, and along with much better reviews and the aforementioned reliability, it was a no-brainer
I've had 5 Macs and have never had a minute of trouble. Yet I have used Windows computers for the last ~18 years for work and it seemed that there was always something to deal with.
LOL. So true. But I can say that I haven't seen the longevity out of others that I've had from Macs. E.g., I have an original Bondi blue iMac running OS 8.6 on my desk that is up and running right this minute. I also had another just like it that got fried in a low power situation. That was a sad day. :(
At this point, I don't know that I am really doing any real good for the accuracy of the speech recognition by continuing to read to Dragon (it has maybe 10 different choices of text)...
...but I was way out of practice reading out loud. If I had read that excerpt first (instead of the Kennedy speech) I think I would have tripped over my tongue trying to do it too fast.
The excerpt I just read was 10 pages or so of Poole waking up and learning where (when) he is.
It reminds me of the TNG episode, The Neutral Zone.
The premise is cool. Waking up 1000 years after you lived. Yes, they even say as much.
If you enjoyed this excerpt....
Which of course makes the whole exercise more enjoyable.
I don't think I could read the phone book out loud for 20 minutes.
I suspect that Dragon will continue to improve its accuracy even in the face of me not always keeping a steady tone, if I continue to read these excerpts.
As a vet tech, I always enjoyed pharmacy work. You could probably find online training that would give you a leg up in getting a job as a pharmacy tech.
I worked very closely with the vet I used to take my dogs to. He was a very good friend and taught me quite a bit over the years. And I think I would do well in the pharmacy arena. I know the pay probably won't be much starting out, but I need $$ to pay bills, so any pay is better than none.
Another good thing is that I would think your, ahem, slightly increased age would be an advantage. You don't want some ditsy girl running around weighing your meds, you want some wisdom there
@Jolenealaska Yes, but there is a lot to learn and I researched it yesterday. The certification exam is $129. I don't know about the state licensing. I haven't had time to dig into that yet.
@Jolenealaska I dont really agree. I feel like without peer pressure, a 20 yo is old enough to decide whether or not they want to do drugs or not. Maybe I just have a skewed perspective since I never had the urge to do any drugs
@ElendilTheTall Nicely put. And finally something positive about being my age and trying to find a job! Not that I feel old or anything, but for the first time in my life I have felt that it is a factor in not getting responses.
My guess (and it's only a guess) is that the pharmacy tech exam is a lot like the veterinary tech exam. Piece of cake if you're reasonably book smart and just plain good at taking tests. $129 and perhaps 100 hours of studying would probably be enough.
If I'm fortunate enough to land something I will pursue it vigorously. But right now, with no income, $129 is out of my range. I mean, I'm not sure all of the bills can be paid this month. That's how tight it is.
@Cindy I took a closer look at that website. Everything looks just like taking the vet tech exam 20 years ago. It's the same test no matter where in the country you take it, states will vary as to whether or not you need formal school or OJT to sit for the exam.
The US was sucker-punched by 9/11. By then, NSA already had far more data than it could possibly analyze. I can't even imagine how much more data there is today than there was then. To try to comprehend what it would take to effectively monitor communications in order to prevent the next one makes my head spin.
I'm fairly sure the Scrabble app on your Kindle is about as far away from the bleeding edge of cryptography as it's possible to get and still be using an electronic device...
Just another pepper substituted for green bell pepper, a mix of red bell pepper and a hot pepper of some kind, perhaps.
Dragon just pooped out on me
it just stopped
Ah, now it tells me that it has more data in my profile than it has room for the data. Well shit, I have some 500+ GB of hard drive space. You have my permission to take up more space!
That was a lot faster than it has ever loaded before.
It's more like a chocolate bar. It doesn't have the creamy texture of candy, but the flavor is great just out of the package. It has cinnamon, sugar and other "stuff".
it is a true AI (in the sense that it uses the theory which computer scientists have developed for AIs, not in the sense that it can think like a human)
which means that it will offer you what you are statistically likely to buy, no matter the possible logical inferences made of the "meaning" of your previous buys
Humans are absolutely terrible at that type of reasoning, actually
there are the good old classic Tversky studies on that
You know, where they describe a young woman who votes Democrat, is health conscious, is a feminist, has a good job
then they ask you, "What is more likely: that Linda has a college degree, or that Linda has a college degree and goes jogging regularly?"
That just came up in conversation. The AI that Kindle uses for its Scrabble opponent knows every single allowed word, yet I consistently win against it because it plays stupidly. My ability to think ahead trumps the AI's complete memorization of the Scrabble Dictionary.
The way that question is worded, there is only one answer.
As far as I can tell, lowering the difficulty level just decreases the absolute vocabulary of the opponent. The "strategy" seems to remain exactly the same.