Say someone post an answer that has nothing do to with the question asked. Then, you comment "This has nothing with the question asked." If I upvote your comment, does it substitute for saying the exact same thing as you?
@Josiah I have hacked into StackExchange and can now downvote comments. Fear me. Rawr.
@YasirArsanukaev I agree. For as long as the reason is explained once in a comment, others don't need to re-explain it. I'm just making sure Josiah agrees.
Haggard is a German symphonic metal musical group founded in 1991. The group combines classical music and early music with doom metal.
Background
Haggard was founded in 1991 and originally played death metal. They changed their musical style after their first demo tape, Introduction in 1992, becoming a band with symphonic melodies and classical instruments but folk themes. The album And Thou Shalt Trust... the Seer marked their breakthrough in 1997. After their second album Awaking the Centuries (the life of the prophet Nostradamus), they toured through Mexico twice. In 2004, they r...
I will never forget my first time in supermarket, and I saw this box. It said "New Freedom" and I said to myself I said, "What a country! Freedom in a box!"
@Vitaly Vitaly, seriously? Back in Lithuania where I was born, I remember that in the end of 80s we surely did have the "Christmas balls", as "New Year's Decorations".
I just remember always having the fragile glass balls, lights, and all kind of shiny stuff. Don't think we used any sweet, but on the other hand, we were never really traditional in any aspects (both cultural or religious).
And I remember it well because I always used to break them ;)
Perhaps. Our family emigrated when I was 8, so I wasn't even old enough to know about what's going on around me, not to mention other parts of the USSR
Here, we present the first evidence of sex differences in use of play objects in a wild primate, in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). We find that juveniles tend to carry sticks in a manner suggestive of rudimentary doll play and, as in children and captive monkeys, this behavior is more common in females than in males.
It's okay, chimps refuse to be his relatives, too. Having a relative with no fur, unable to nurse a baby chimp, and with those ugly flat superciliary arches? No way.
Yes. It is possible. Many Buddhists are atheists who believe in karma but not in any god. While Buddhism is a religion, it has no god. Therefore, all Buddhists are atheists that believe in karma.
Believing in karma is believing in the supernatural, but not all supernatural beliefs are of gods.
What do you guys think of Konrad's position (in the comments)?
Oops. Irreligious is so often interchangeable with atheist that I missed that.
Deleted, fixed and reposted.
You could argue that impious fits to make a third term though
@Vitaly Buddhists probably don't self-identify as atheists for the same reason that Christians rarely call themselves theists: they got a better, easily recognizable label.
Think about it, how often do you hear a Christian say "I'm a theist"?
A deva (देव Sanskrit and Pāli) in Buddhism is one of many different types of non-human beings who share the characteristics of being more powerful, longer-lived, and, in general, living more contentedly than the average human being.
Synonyms in other languages include Khmer tep (ទេព), or preah (ព្រះ), Myanmar language nat, Tibetan lha, Mongolian tenger (тэнгэр), Chinese tiān (天), Korean cheon, Japanese ten, Vietnamese thiên. The concept of devas was adopted in Japan partly because of the similarity to the Shinto's concept of kami.
Other words used in Buddhist texts to refer to simil...
Atheists have better labels too but few would actually get it if you say you were, say, a metaphysical naturalist or an empiricism or an objectivist or an logical positivist or...
@Vitaly For one, Buddhism says that questions on the origin of the world are worthless.
And since the term “atheist” originated in the Western tradition where supernatural would invariably be linked to deities, why cannot we, in the global world, extend the term to anything supernatural?
We don't worship Perun, Heracles or Thor either
And the Kwaio people have a concept of a supernatural creator (and therefore, a god), but don't worship him anyway; they instead worship their ancestors' spirits, because those spirits possess strategic social knowledge and are interested in the peoples' lives
I do have to agree with you that the definition of a god is hard, if not impossible, to achieve. That's why ignosticism believe that "every other theological position (including agnosticism) assumes too much about the concept of God." Honestly, they kind of have a point.
@Vitaly With that said, you can't "extend the term to anything supernatural" because it would include magic and gods have to be supernatural beings. That much is consistent. Gods are supernatural and sentient.
How about his? Gods are: 1. Supernatural beings 2. Sentient 3. The embodiment or source of an (or multiple) aspect(s) of the universe (a force, a thing, an emotion, etc.), or is the creator of existence
Interesting interpretation, but it's from the point of someone who doesn't believe in Santa Claus. A kid who believes in Santa Claus does not believe that.
Someone who believes in Mars does think he's the embodiment of war
@Vitaly You've misunderstood what I mean. If a culture has no creator, or if the creator was a spirit, then if a new religion comes by where there is an all-powerful god ABOVE those spirits that religion could claim cosmical superiority.
NO, really.... because of the definition itself!
"Is there an all-encompassing philosophy that could unify all religions/non-religions?"
definition
Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. ...
via Wikipedia: The results have suggested that people who are high in the need for cognition score slightly higher in verbal intelligence tests but no higher in abstract reasoning tests. Huh?
The results have suggested that people who are high in the need for cognition score slightly higher in verbal intelligence tests but no higher in abstract reasoning tests. Huh?
Now it reads, "The results have suggested that people who are high in the need for cognition scale score slightly higher in verbal intelligence tests but no higher in abstract reasoning tests. There have not been any found gender differences in the need for cognition."
I wish it would just allow real html in here. (the simple stuff like em, a, etc)
I just got the Good Answer badge (25 rep) on a five line answer about Christmas but my several paragraph long refutation of the Theological Argument for the existence of God has only +2 rep...
@Nomæd I get that. It doesn't make the situation any less frustrating (or worrying, what's the incentive to write thorough answers when shorter, flawed answers are the ones at the top of the page and yours is at the bottom).