« first day (12 days earlier)      last day (109 days later) » 

12:02 AM
useful for testing headphones
ultimately, unsuccessful.
I'm not completely sure religion is the result of idle hands, so I'm not sure it fits well in the list.
 
Ami
what do you mean?
 
Of things to do when bored. Religion seems ill fitting.
 
Ami
When people struggle with boredom, they don't only look for things to do...they also look for things to think
 
I would also put it at the end of the list in usefulness.
 
Ami
What makes something useful?
Is reading a book useful? If so why?
Are some books more useful than others?
What does it mean for something to be useful?
 
12:17 AM
You ask a lot of questions.
What makes something useful depends on how you mean.
Objectively, well, I'm not sure that would even matter. Subjectively, I would base it on people's desires.
That is, having utility.
 
Ami
What kind of utility?
Utility is just a synonym for useful
 
I know, but it seems more clear to say it that way.
It would be subjective, dependent on the person.
Reading a book can be useful, and worthless. Edge cases can be tough, but I've read both sorts.
Some books certainly are more useful if you have some sort of goal.
 
Ami
like what?
 
I'm not sure which you're replying to.
 
Ami
what sort of goal could make a book useful?
 
12:22 AM
If a goal is solving a difficult equation, math books would be useful. If you're building something, materials references or engineering texts.
 
Ami
How about Shakespeare? Does great literature have value?
Here's why I'm asking these questions...if we can figure out why an act like reading is enjoyable we should be able to figure out why the act of reading is a solution to the problem of boredom...
 
Possibly, I would have no clue.
I hate classic literature.
hate
I'm hardly the person to find a sane solution to that problem. I read because I don't want to be here.
 
Ami
So for you, reading is an escape...
 
Everything I do is.
almost every aspect of my daily life is a ritual to escape it.
 
Ami
Take your classic religious Christian...
He's in Church eating some sacrament or confessing or something like that
He's engaged in a ritual
Could that be a form of escapism as well?
 
12:28 AM
If it's done for avoidance, it could. Almost anything could.
Do I think it's a useful insight, that people might use religion for escape?
Only insomuch as masturbation is a useful means of escape.
 
Ami
Saying that religion can be used as an escape isn't a useful insight
A useful insight would be to understand how religion serves as escape and how it differs from various other types of escapes we could imagine
 
There are many reasons to read. Escapism is just one. Enlightenment, connecting with someone, vicarious thrill, assistance, etc.
 
Ami
@Ustice awesome....now you need to define enlightenment
 
Religion is much the same.
 
Ami
for sure
 
12:30 AM
To some, it may be escape, an to others an anchor.
 
Ami
but what is it?
 
Enlightenment meaning gaining knowledge that you didn't previously possess.
 
That's a pretty strict definition.
 
Religion? Ultimately, it is a world-view.
 
World view enabler, amirite?
Racism? We have quotes for you!
Sexism? Just pick one of many...
 
12:33 AM
@Josiah that was just for my example.
 
Like killin' people? We have untold numbers of reasons.
@Ustice, I'm becoming more friendly.
It took me time to get used to being on the lower end of the IQ spectrum here.
 
Ami
@Ustice so you see religion as people trying to gain some kind of knowledge?
Can you elaborate please?
 
No. I see religion as their base understanding of the world around them.
All of their experience is defined by that religion/world-view.
No, I was talking about reading. I don't see any knowledge in religion.
 
Ami
Sorry
 
Np. People can seek enlightenment that way, but it seems futile to me.
They more often seek emotional comfort.
 
Ami
12:38 AM
please explain
 
It's generally a hope for a just world.
See wikipedia on the just world fallacy.
 
ooo
reminded me radiohead owns
karma police ftw
 
It makes people feel protected
 
Ami
Okay...I agree
but I think religion does something else as well...
The problem of boredom is the problem of not having any meaning in one's life
The problem or boredom arises when everything I do feels useless and futile.
I think religion is attractive because it promises to solve this problem as well
Religion is able to take the mundane activities of life and elevate them as ritual
It solves the problem of a finite exist by promising an afterlife
Does that make sense?
@Josiah radiohead is the best.
 
It refused to fucking play.
woot, fixed
 
12:43 AM
Boredom is from being idle or doing rote action.
I don't think ritual will fix that.
But yes, many people cling to it to fill a void in their life.
 
Ami
Why do people get bored when they do rote action?
 
To push back fear.
They are mentally idle.
 
I enjoy rote action sometimes. Mostly manual labor.
Preferably hard physical labor.
 
Ami
@Josiah exactly.
 
Moving boxes, for example.
 
Ami
12:45 AM
why do people like sports?
 
Acting without thinking. Though meditation can be relaxing.
 
Because they're stupid.
Sorry. I hate sports a lot.
 
Ami
how about archery?
do you hate archery?
 
It's exciting. It engages the fight or flight response. Lots of good hormones there.
 
Ami
Not all sports...not golf
 
12:47 AM
Golf is more of a game than a sport.
 
Ami
Take two people
 
If golf is a sport then so are the booths at the fair. It's a game of skill.
 
Would I enjoy shooting things with a bow and arrow? Fuck yes. Would I go so far as to call that sport? nah.
Lies! You can win at golf.
 
Ami
both of them are forced to shoot arrows at a target
 
Again. Game of skill
 
Ami
12:48 AM
no problem...we're not talking about sports anymore
we're talking about a game of skill - archery
 
yay
I wouldn't really enjoy it competitively either.
 
Ami
They're forced to shoot arrows at a target for 18 hrs straight
no breaks
 
That's a death march, not a sport.
 
Ami
They both enjoy it for the first 1hr or so
after the first hr, the first guy starts getting extremely bored and sick of the game
but the second guy doesn't get bored...he's really really into it
after 4 hrs the first guy feels like he's in hell...its worse than doing mindless rote tasks...its worse than sisyphus, but the second guy is thoroughly enjoying himself ... for all 18 hrs
what is the difference, psychologically speaking between the first and second guy?
Now...if you don't believe that a person can do archery for 18 hrs straight, read the book "zen in the art of archery"
wikipedia page posted above
 
Insanity is the psychological difference.
 
Ami
12:53 AM
How about basketball players that shoot free-throws all day long?
 
Insanity.
 
Ami
lol
Possibly
Apparently the same task can be perceived as enjoyable to one person and boring to another
So "rote task" doesn't really explain what causes boredom
"The archer ceases to be conscious of himself as the one who is engaged in hitting the bull's-eye which confronts him. This state of unconscious is realized only when, completely empty and rid of the self, he becomes one with the perfecting of his technical skill, though there is in it something of a quite different order which cannot be attained by any progressive study of the art"
 
Well, let's be honest here. It's not a rote task unless you're a noob.
To the zen archer or the basketball player, each arrow is data.
Minor adjustments.
We're just not into it enough to understand the finer points of foot placement and minute adjustments of bow and hand.
So calling it a rote task is, I think, ignoring the fact that they have a deeper understanding of what they're doing.
 
Ami
@Josiah that's a good point
Can the archer metaphor be applied to life in general?
Two people...both are forced to live about 80 years before old age will kill them
The first guy gets really really bored after about 30 years...he's actually sitting on the roof of a building contemplating suicide as we speak. The second guy, he's not bored of life...he's really into it.
Whats the difference between the two of them?
 
If the one on the roof is me, general anxiety disorder.
Otherwise, probably some tramp broke his heart.
 
Ami
1:02 AM
Fine...I take it back. He's not on a roof.
He's just bored
No more no less
 
damn
I can't fit anything firm into the metaphor.
 
Ami
Why damn? Its a good thing he's not on the roof anymore.
 
I don't know how to explain it, but nothing sensible flows.
You don't even know the guy, maybe he had good reasons, Jeez.
 
Ami
of course I know him....I invented him
 
In that case, why is he so bored Ami?
 
Ami
1:06 AM
If I knew the answer to that question I would have told you already and we wouldn't have had to deal with this insanely wandering conversation
We got into this conversation when we decided to make a list of things that could help solve the problem of boredom
Then we got side tracked by the question of religion...does religion solve the problem of boredom?
Our results are so far inconclusive
I tend to think it does.
I think rituals and religious doctrine have the power to give a sense of purpose to one's actions
This doesn't mean that the religions of the wold are true, it just means that they could be useful to some people.
@Josiah what do you think?
 
But you invented him, and you said you know him.
 
Ami
I only know him as well as I know myself.
 
I would gather, from all the rabbit trails, that the problem of boredom isn't boredom. More that boredom is a symptom.
 
Ami
I agree with that 100 percent
That is a deep and subtle point
 
What is it a symptom of? Lots and lots of broken people..
 
Ami
1:13 AM
Remember a few days ago we spoke about the absurdity of life? Camus philosophy.
 
It's a familiar feeling.
At least, I associate with it when I'm not completely deranged with anxiety.
Then again, that just might have been dissociation.
 
Ami
Anyway, I mentioned a piece in G. K. Chesterton where he talks about a paranoid schizophrenic who thinks that either everyone is out to get him or that he is the king of england...
Chesterton's point is that the world is different sizes for different people
Someone who thinks everyone is out to get him, imagines a world that is pretty pathetic
 
Maybe even an odd expression of narcissism.
 
Ami
In the world of the schizophrenic there is no room for love, art, great music...
narcissism - excactly
 
I guess I know mildly sane schizos
 
Ami
1:18 AM
Chesterton asks the question: "how does what I believe alter the nature of the world I live in?"
What set of beliefs will give me a world that is absurd and cramped and meaningless?
And what set of beliefs will give me a world that is beautiful mysterious etc.
Skip to 3:25
I think its a really important piece of poetry
again...skip ahead to 3 minutes and 25 seconds to get to the important part
 
That's a lot of fucking holes.
 
Ami
Allen Ginsberg is giving you an insight into the world he lives in...its a world where everything is holy
 
The cocks of the grandfathers of Kansas.
Being a Kansan is really gay right now...
I have to apologize, I'm not very civilized and certainly uncultured. It sounds like he put the word holy in a blender.
 
Ami
He did
 
The number of words to express something so simple (and the number of times he says cock(s)) is just too much effort.
At least, I would like to punch that man.
 
Ami
1:23 AM
Well, Ginsberg was a homosexual
Why would you like to punch him?
 
I find it annoying and pretentious. I did say I'm uncultured.
 
Ami
Look...the cultured people hated Ginsberg
they thought he was uncultured.
 
I mean, yeah, he gets bonus points for putting dongs in a poem so many times and me having heard of it.
 
Ami
I love that poem
 
They did, but when was it?
 
Ami
1:25 AM
recent
From wikipedia:
"In 1957, "Howl" attracted widespread publicity when it became the subject of an obscenity trial in which a San Francisco prosecutor argued it contained "filthy, vulgar, obscene, and disgusting language."
 
right
 
Ami
Howl is Ginsberg's masterpiece
 
It's no longer considered uncultured.
So maybe in a racist, fiercely conservative America I am cultured.
 
Ami
Who cares about cultured people...they come and go with the fad
 
That was my point about you saying they thought he was uncultured.
I actually have a preference to, what's the word, austerity?
I liked the stranger a lot because it was direct and to the point.
Have you ever read a book by Dean Koontz?
 
Ami
1:28 AM
no
 
Don't
He has a thesaurus and just adds adjectives willy nilly.
But that's no longer a useful example.
Atlas Shrugged, maybe?
 
Ami
some of it
 
Same.
 
Ami
lol
 
Too much unimportant shit.
I really don't care to have every excruciating detail of what's in your character's head in their bloody conversations.
Nor do I generally want to hear a lot of descriptions. You may have a beautiful vocabulary, and some expressive words in your tool belt, but I have an above average vocabulary and if I'm going for a dictionary it's a bit annoying.
 
Ami
1:30 AM
forget about his style for a second...just think about the world that Ginsberg is describing
Its the exact opposite of the world that Camus describes in "The Stranger"
Do you see what I mean?
In "The Stranger" nothing at all mattered. For Ginsberg every little thing, even the vulgar things...they all matter
 
I'm not sure that I do.
I think that makes them somewhat similar in some regards.
 
Ami
"The Stranger" didn't see beauty anywhere, nothing is worth his time, even life is unimportant...for Ginsberg everything he sees has beauty!
Allen Ginsberg doesn't necessarily believe in God, but for him every aspect of his existence is imbued with numinous
Numinous (, from the Classical Latin numen) is an English adjective describing the power or presence of a divinity. The word was popularised in the early twentieth century by the German theologian Rudolf Otto in his influential book Das Heilige (1917; translated into English as The Idea of the Holy, 1923). According to Otto the numinous experience has two aspects: mysterium tremendum, which is the tendency to invoke fear and trembling; and mysterium fascinans, the tendency to attract, fascinate and compel. The numinous experience also has a personal quality to it, in that the person feels ...
My experience of life isn't like "The Stranger" and it isn't like Ginsberg's either...mine is somewhere in the middle
 
The Stranger didn't seem that bleak to me.
 
Ami
It doesn't seem bleak to me either...its just different
Chesterton wants to tell the paranoid schizophrenic: "if you just stop worrying your life will be so much more meaningful"
In his own way, thats what Ginsberg is saying to people who don't see any beauty and meaning in life
does any of this make any sense?
and I'm sorry for ranting...I'm finally done now, I promise
 
It does, to some extent.
The random jokes and quietness are part thoughtfulness and part anxiety.
 
Ami
1:41 AM
anxiety it terrible...I'm really sorry you have to go through that
 
It can be.
It's part of why I'm defensive about some ideas. Seeing beauty and meaning in life can be hindered pretty severely.
The idea that a schizophrenic can stop worrying and have a more meaningful life is condescending, at best.
 
Ami
You're absolutely correct
 
But the Stranger reminds me of dissociative personality disorder.
But admitting the absurd and being okay with it probably can't be described better than dissociation.
I sort of walked myself into a contradiction.
 
Ami
how?
 
The dissociation is one of accepting and embracing. Which sounds not at all like dissociation.
 
Ami
1:50 AM
I see
 
Do you think accepting absurdity brings levity to life that might not exist beforehand?
 
Ami
no
 
Why not?
 
Ami
I think accepting absurdity is about being courageous
 
I mean that, well, if I accept the absurdity of my life it becomes a joke to an extent.
When I see severely absurd things, and it doesn't have a negative impact, how else could I see it than mildly humorous?
 
Ami
1:52 AM
Imagine a cancer patient who's going to die in two weeks
will accepting their own death bring them levity?
I don't think so.
But accepting one's own death and being able to enjoy a drink with friends or give a lecture...that takes real courage
 
I don't think that's quite embracing the absurdity of it.
Maybe I am confusing it completely with dissociation.
 
Ami
Coming back to Ginsberg for a moment...we don't have to agree with that poem I showed you to appreciate or see value in it. I don't think the point of the poem is to make us something we're not, but rather to give insight into people who see the world differently than us.
Have you seen the "double rainbow" youtube video by any chance?
 
I do agree with it. I just don't like him.
Another person I would punch, for entirely different reasons.
 
Ami
The double rainbow video is a perfect example of the type of consciousness that Ginsberg is describing.
 
What? No.
What does it all mean.
What does it meaaaaan
fucking nothing asshole, but it's pretty
stfu and enjoy it
 
Ami
2:00 AM
lol
 
Don't get me wrong, I can watch symphony of science videos and have them bring me to tears at times.
 
Ami
The guy in the video may have been on drugs but thats irrelevant, what matters is that he sees the world through the lens that Ginsberg is describing
 
he was on Tosh.0
The drugs are pretty much guaranteed.
 
Ami
Understanding that lens...the Ginsberg lens, the double rainbow lens is fundamental in understanding the difference between atheists and theists
 
How so?
 
Ami
2:02 AM
You may hate theists and think they're stupid, but they see in the world in a fundamentally different way
 
We just point it at different things.
 
Ami
To be a theist is to experience a God in the world
Its to see meaning in everything...even a rainbow
The experience of the theist embraces holiness and numinous
 
Well, especially a rainbow, because it's a promise.
 
Ami
Yes
 
now you're one of those authors I dislike.
making me look things up
 
Ami
2:05 AM
its an important word
few things are more frustrating for a atheist than debating with a theist
everyone atheist who's been on this site knows that already
and the reason its so frustrating is that the two camps are coming from fundamentally different experiences of the world...they're not even speaking the same language!
There is nothing you can tell Ginsberg that will change his perception of holiness
There is no argument that will make the double rainbow guy stop asking "what does it mean?"
 
I wouldn't bother, personally.
Him sobering up, I guess, was probably the best argument.
Have you seen what he looks like?
 
Ami
no
 
google that shit.
 
Ami
Do you remember when I mentioned Jorge Luis Borges to you the other day?
Borges has line: "every cultivated man is a theologian, and faith is not a requisite."
 
I have the wikipedia article for Jorge open still.
 
Ami
2:11 AM
That line by Borges is probably the most profound and useful philosophical line I know
 
You can, to some extent, remove cultivated.
 
Ami
For sure
Borges is saying that every man should be, needs to be a theologian. If he's not, there is something missing in his life.
 
Ah, yes. I'm so unaccustomed to reading philosophical things.
Should have gone to college instead of wasting my life.
 
Ami
wikipedia and youtube can teach you much more than college can
and its less than half the price
 
So can the expensive books I buy.
But it would have forced me to do things I won't do on my own.
 
Ami
2:14 AM
What do you think of this one:
 
I might not know any of the name drops.
Which makes the entire thing weird and meaningless.
I don't get it at all.
 
Ami
Walt Whitman was an American poet who sang about beauty in nature.
Allen Ginsberg is describing his thoughts as he's walking in a supermarket with a book of Whitman poems in his pocket.
Its all just crazy
Ginsberg is crazy, his thoughts are bizzare
I happen to think its wonderful...but there are plenty of people who can't stand it
@Josiah as always its been a pleasure chatting with you
I must be going
have a great night
 
ah
@Ami, sorry, was letting puppies out. I agree, he is a bit crazy. Also a pleasure, and I hope you had a good night.
 
Ami
@Josiah I'm back
I had a thought
Earlier I said "its frustrating for an atheist when he's trying to convince a theist because the two of them are talking a different language"
I want to make a slight adjustment
When debating with a theist, if you're aware of that difference in perspective...
most theists and probably all of the theists who engage in theist-atheist debates are completely unaware of that difference in perspective we were talking about
 
2:34 AM
lmao
 
Ami
which is very very useful for an atheist
 
It's hard to consider the difference in perspective.
I am good at empathy, but i've been an apostate for around ten years and I've already forgotten the feeling.
Mostly.
 
Ami
I've heard all the famous atheist debaters: C. Hitchens Dennett, Harris...
They're all smart guys, but they have no clue about how to properly debate with a theist
Thats all...
If you're interested I'll share some more of my thoughts another time...I really need to be going now
 
Have a good night.
 
Ami
you too
 
3:07 AM
The site already needs a cleaning...
 
3:39 AM
haha
@borror0, we'll let @Vitaly start the pogrom.
 
3:55 AM
@Yasir is also allowed to start the pogrom.
 
sup chaps
 
Subjectivity pogroms.
 
As a French Canadian, all I can give you guys is a Quiet Revolution. Sorry.
 
This is due to militant atheism ? :]
 

« first day (12 days earlier)      last day (109 days later) »