« first day (1637 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) » 

12:21 AM
I've been kind of looking for something to help me organise/build my new campaign world. One of the possible tools was a desktop wiki - zim-wiki.org
(RealmWorks looks really nice, but not sure I can justify the $50)
For now I'm using Evernote to jot down my ideas
 
I use a combination of Evernote, Drive, the Spoil-Lair, and my bullet journal.
 
onenote
its free and available on almost anything you can compute on
 
I have very bad experiences with stuff that hooks into Microsoft accounts.
An “Actually” of pedants.
Wait, Magician already posted that. You saw nothing.
 
@Tritium21 It didn't used to be free. I already had Evernote on my phone, and can access it on the web too
 
Onenote is free on the web.
and application...
 
1:02 AM
This querent may need more guidance than I can give today.
 
@BESW He could be a hell of a lot worse.
 
That guy's got the help he needs, in the form of @SevenSidedDie's comment.
 
@BESW If I had an optimistic side, it might agree with you, but based on that particular user's previous interactions with the site I forsee nothing but pain.
 
@Miniman Oh, there's nothing saying they'll act on it, but they have the guidance available.
 
I'm just hoping KRyan can get back to me re: The Way Words Work's version of the Truenamer
 
 
1 hour later…
2:27 AM
o/ @Pixie
 
3:01 AM
I keep reading this question as "How to replace the party( member)'s face?"
 
@Shalvenay won't necessarily be able to get back to you re: its tier though
 
3:18 AM
@Shalvenay Hey.
 
4:00 AM
@Adeptus I've poked at zim and found it really heavyweight and hard to set up, for what it does. At least, last I poked at it. For a desktop wiki I found the super-lightweight tiddlywiki to do the job well and have negligible set up time.
 
0
Q: Problem Players

xenoterracideIs this really a good line of questioning? it seems like every question is answered with some variant of talk to your players, be polite remove problem if that doesn't work and generally seems to be a "be my groups therapist" tag, and since we aren't professional therapists, maybe we s...

 
 
4 hours later…
8:23 AM
Morning all
 
Morning
 
it's always morning on the internet
XD
 
You mean everyone is grumpy, not really paying attention and tired?
 
Huzzah
Actually yeah
 
Or that people get on the internet in the morning and thus it is always morning to the newcomer. :-)
 
8:27 AM
Or are on the bus to work
 
Or at work :P
 
probably both
my intended meaning was mostly that it is morning somewhere, (not here) and I often read someone saying good morning when it isn't morning where I am
not that I mind that
 
The sun is always rising on the British empire?
 
not anymore, I would assume
 
8:33 AM
 
Actually, still true
:-)
Though the correct saying is the sun never set, since the sun is always somewhere. I think there is one tiny island somewhere that makes that work for several hours.
 
cute
 
Would a question about getting synergy out of a specific multiclass build be site-appropriate?
 
Provided you give specific enough goals, yes.
 
Talking of game, anyone interested in joining an ongoing game? Tends to run 1830 BST (or at least will after this week)
 
8:39 AM
@BESW so my goal isn't to maximise damage, per se, but to squeeze as much out of the synergy as I can. E.g. One class ability grants advantage, make sure I pick the class ability from the other side that makes most use of advantage
@Mourdos unfortunately I'm maxed out with games atm
 
Know of anyone looking for one? We use a mixture of forum and maptools. (Pathfinder E6 game)
 
Not that I can think of
 
Yay, some actual Savage Worlds questions
 
Hehe
 
might not seem much to you, but it validates my existance ;p
 
9:12 AM
Not a question for the site, but looking to write up a forum post and wondering how best to express my request...
 
9:26 AM
> DnD 3.0/3.5/d20: How do I star punch?
> I've taken a significant interest in Punch-Out lately, since recent events made me remember that the Wii game is so damn good. I'm currently curious if there are any d20 mechanics like the Star Punch, where a well-placed blow grants you a one-use super-move. I'm thinking that the closest match I know of is feats that require you to expend psionic focus, in combination with the Critical Refocus feat (*Ultimate Psionics*, Dreamscarred Press). Does anyone know of any features or feats that do similar?
 
10:09 AM
@IronHeart looks good
@BESW what do you think of my proto-question?
 
Hmm. What system?
 
D&D 5e
 
I don't know 5e, but in other D&D systems "all the ways to maximise synergy between two classes" is a bit too broad/long for SE's format.
 
I've picked classes with conflicting specialities (casting/control x tank )
Hmm, what if I asked, what sort of abilities to look out for, in an attempt to make it a good shopping question
 
It'd be best if you can avoid making it a shopping question at all.
But I'm really not the right guy to hold forth on this, since I don't know 5e.
 
10:15 AM
You showed an interest, plus good at questions type thing.
Thanks for the advice
I might try anyway as I don't think there's much synergy, so it might not be too broad
At least not with the play style I have in mind
 
If it were 4e, or Spycraft, or something, I'd be more useful.
 
 
2 hours later…
12:06 PM
@Pureferret good build questions tend to have these bits of information: where you currently are, what you want to do with your character, and the obstacles you face getting there.
e.g. "i want to play this caster and this tank, i picked them because i have these specific objectives {list} and those classes seemed like a good idea, but i'm having trouble working out how to make them work together powerfully to achieve those objectives"
 
good morning gentlemen
(and if there are ladies lurking)
 
12:23 PM
Good morning
 
@doppelgreener thanks, that's very helpful
 
16
Q: Keeping Mass Battles interesting for players

fgysinIt happens on rare occasion that the characters I GM for end up in some bigger battle. Often this follows lots of preparation and planning of strategies and tactics. Sometimes it just happens that the charaters are pulled in, but almost always this is quite a climactic and importent moment. Being...

 
On the ninth day of Stackmas, my wifi showed to me:
Nine ladies lurking
Eight mods a-smiting
Seven spams deleted
Six queues reviewed
Five tag edits!
Four comment flags
Three upvotes
Two VTCs
And meta in the chat feed.
3
 
dude
should be FIVE GOLDEN BADGES
 
Doesn't scan.
 
12:31 PM
hah
 
It could have been Five lame in-jokes! but that seemed unnecessary.
Every Whovian should check out this 1980s Walt Simonson illustration of the 4th Dr. Who and Romana: http://marvel1980s.tumblr.com/image/114530154626
 
12:46 PM
@Pureferret oh, also, the meta question:
11
A: Are character optimization questions on topic?

wax eagleA good charop question is either very specific or very general. If you fall in between you've entered the no mans land of gimmie the codez. There are 3 types of char-op questions that fall into the "good" category in my mind: I'm 90% complete and I need help making the final selection or two. ...

which elaborates on the good types of charops and etc
@BESW that is very good
 
user image
3
 
@BESW [uncontrolled sniggering]
 
In other news, I showed my poster draft to the client at a meeting with a dozen people, and nobody noticed the figure had two right hands.
 
1:06 PM
@besw sounds about right
 
[needs to photograph left-handed marionette puppeteers for reference]
(Also, line variation covers a multitude of sins.)
 
2:03 PM
what am I missing with this whole game survey/overview idea? To me it just sounds like another name for a list question, and I don't understand why people are trying to make out that it should be considered differently. Surely the same basic criteria of ensuring a question is narrow enough is all that is required?
 
@Phil i think the idea is that instead of having an exhaustive list, you're able to give someone a picture of their options with just mentioning a few.
it's the difference between "Please list to me every address I might visit as a tourist in Japan" and "what kinds of places are there to visit as a tourist exploring Japan?"
 
Hmmm, I'm so far from convinced it might be a good idea that I think I'm on a different planet
 
i am not sure if it's a good idea
i'm leaning toward the most recent edit being not a good idea
 
Same, but I'm not sure how to make it better O_o
 
@phil which wuestion?
 
2:40 PM
ello
 
@Phil personally i'm gonna treat it as an experiment and let it sit there at least a day to see what happens
 
sigh people downvoted sevensideddie's response
I think game survey questions are junk questisons
they are inherently list questions, primarily opinionbased or both
 
yay, some agreement :)
as far as I can see they are an attempt to get around our strict rules regarding list questions by people who don't like our strict rules regarding list questions
 
imgur.com/gallery/7kmNF
 
right, just because its a sys-rec question doesnt mean we through out the rulebook
 
@Aaron Darths and Droids is pretty great.
 
 
3 hours later…
6:22 PM
Chalk up another one for poor editing:
1
Q: How can one establish communication with intelligent creatures lacking language?

Hey I Can ChanThe ice toad (Frostburn 140-1) has an Intelligence score of 6 yet no language. Beyond being conceptually annoying and making me feel bad for the handful of aberrant genius ice toads that lack the capacity to express their brilliance outside their own heads, this utter lack of language makes the o...

 
6:44 PM
"I can't get something I want at my RPG table and instead of talking to the DM I'd like to form an angry mob on the internet that sees my presentation of the issue and sides with me."
 
Hmm?
 
Trend of several questions we get. Including that bastard sword question.
 
The funny thing about that bastard sword question is that the querent is the GM.
 
.... What
 
Right?
 
6:45 PM
Then he can just make it whatever
Rule 0
 
Exactly.
 
... I have to edit now
 
It's also a part of one of my favorite Rule 0 corollaries: If it's not visible to the players, you don't need to follow the rules.
He asked another question about getting extra starting cash by crafting before the game starts. Once he said he was the GM, I basically threw my hands up in the air.
 
Quantum rules. The act of direct observation changes them.
My group has quantum entangled rules. Usually a rule tangled with a player. If I consider a new change or reading of a given rule, the entangled player at any point in space/time will become enraged.
Most of the criteria given, except the light weight, IS a bastard sword. So I guess that might be the close-unclear votes.
 
The question was a lot less clear before.
It's better now that's he's given a list of requirements.
 
6:51 PM
And if they're the DM you wave your hand and do the 'elf metal', 'unobtanium', 'star metal' or any number of fluff-caveats to justify changes.
 
Yeah.
 
7:30 PM
Anyone read Ready Player One in here?
 
No, but I know the basic plot. They're making it into a movie as well.
 
7:49 PM
Avast!
 
@JohnP that's why I'm asking, just named Spielberg as director....
read it last week at my conference...good read
 
@DuckTapeAl I believe there's some GMPCing involved in this group. (That either makes these questions better or infinitely worse, I'm unsure which.)
 
GM PC, heresy! Burn the witch!
 
@MadMAxJr As I understand it, they just want a sword that is graceful like a katana but not a katana, and shaped like a western sword but not wielded like a meat clever. Which means the problem is that they have some terrible stereotypes that have nothing to do with mechanics or fluff that we can help with.
 
I want an axe that works like a hammer.
Also I've never seen anybody wield a western sword like a meat cleaver.
 
7:59 PM
As we all know, horses are titanic meat-eating horrors that are on fire and will steal your soul when you look at them. I want to make a character who is a master horseman, but is graceful like a dragonrider, so I need a description for a horse but non-Satanic.
Speaking of being mislead by stereotypes about katanas:
 
Yeah people seem to think katanas are some sort of mythical weapon that will slice through diamonds because it has been folded sixty-six times by a blind gnome.
 
@Theik Yeah. Ironically, the legendary smithing techniques used for katanas was due to having terrible iron to work with, requiring amazing skill to make into a decent sword.
 
Yup. If their iron wasn't downright atrocious they would never have had to do the whole folding thing in the first place.
 
Aha, here's a video specifically about "using a western sword like a meat clever is STUPID"
 
Ah yes, Lindybeige.
Yeah people watch too much television and think what people do in movies is how things work. And considering most tv knights swing like idiots and most tv samurai cut arrows in two like they're some sort of jedi savant, clearly the katana is superior. ;)
 
8:28 PM
@SevenSidedDie In the end it's all just that this guy is clearly an inexperienced GM, and feels weird about doing anything outside the rules.
 
@DuckTapeAl I dunno. They've been really insistent about running a GMPC, despite the rules not giving any guidance for that and people saying they really shouldn't. I think what we're seeing instead is "I want to twink out my GMPC, but I need rules backup or my players will murder me."
 
The thing is, the stuff he's doing isn't even that great.
 
The "graceful like a katana" bastard sword request has the smell of Mary Sue about it; I sense a GMPC that is going horribly wrong.
 
It's like, getting extra gold pre-game from a craft skill is never going to matter once you hit level 4 or so.
MAybe.
 
@DuckTapeAl If you're inexperienced, it would seem like it though. What's awesome in 3.PF to an expert is really non-intuitive to a beginner.
 
8:36 PM
I keep forgetting that, while I'm super bad at optimization and munchkinry compared to my group and the people I talk to online, I'm still way more knowledgeable about that kind of stuff than most newbies.
 
@DuckTapeAl Yes. "Woah, Toughness is broken!"
 
Toughness is super broken man.
 
I actually asked a question today that came out of a discussion from the 'toughness is op' question.
 
3 hp will totally double your level 1 hp if you're a wizard with CON4.
 
If you're a wizard with 4 con, Toughness will quadruple your HP, if my numbers are right.
At level 1, that is.
 
8:42 PM
@Theik As I recall, the intent was for Toughness to be extremely situational, like a 1st-level wizard who you don't expect to get very far. Monte Cook wrote a blog post about it way back when.
 
I didn't do the math, I was just joking.
But yeah, toughness is really a feat that is only useful if you don't intend to play past like level 4 and you really need that extra HP for the first few levels.
 
My current Psion build uses Psionic Body, which is like a slightly better Toughness, because I legitimately can't find anything that's worth more than the HP it gives me.
Is this the blog post you're talking about?
 
@DuckTapeAl That's the one, yeah. I'd just dug it up too.
So to be fair, yeah, when you're new and your focus is on the early game, Toughness looks awesome because right now it is.
 
That's the thing though with DnD, a newbie is going to see something and go "woah, that is awesome", when in fact there are other things that don't look nearly as awesome but are way better in theory.
 
But in any case: slow-motion GMPC trainwreck. It makes me sad, and cringe.
 
8:48 PM
I don't think I've ever heard a new player say "Woah grease looks like an awesome spell!"
 
@Theik Same with web, or glitterdust. They don't sound like they're that great up front, when they're actually amazing.
 
I just left a comment on their gear-crafting question, trying to get the idea through that a GMPC is sucking away valuable campaign prep time. There is never enough time as a GM, and spending it on asking about tweaking your GMPC is such a waste.
@DuckTapeAl Dunno, I thought everyone has always known that web is amazing.
 
@SevenSidedDie For a newer GM, yeah, definitely.
The people that I first played with, before I was exposed to the idea of charop, no one thought web was that great.
It would have been considered a sub-par control spell, if we would have used that kind of language.
 
I've actually been told in a game that my wizard wasn't optimized properly, cause I had taken grease instead of summon monster 1. xD
 
@DuckTapeAl Maybe it's just that I've been playing since AD&D 1e, and web has always been a killer spell. That and sleep, though that depends on edition I think.
 
8:52 PM
When is the last time you ever thought "man this fight would go a lot better if I had an owl to fight with me"?
 
@Theik 24/7
 
I started playing with 3rd, around 2001. :)
 
Then we encountered a whole buttload of zombies. Suddenly grease didn't look so bad. ;D
 
A greased buttload of zombies?
2
 
The DM threw an arbitrarily large number of zombies at us (I think it was like 30 or something) to make us run away, but he didn't really consider the fact that grease was going to tie them up forever.
 
8:56 PM
@SevenSidedDie Based on input from @DuckTapeAl, the questions being asked are just farming for fluff answers, which there is no definitive right response.
Which is really odd, seeing as how it was pointed out the asker is the DM
 
@MadMAxJr The bastard sword one, yeah. Which is why my Mary Sue alarm is being triggered, because there are few reasons to want Internet Mob Support for "my character is graceful and swordsy" than trying to optimise for GMPC Mary Sueishness.
 
The 'bonus skills' one sounds like there's a bit of Mary Sue to it, too.
"I want my character to be extra special, but I don't want to put my skill points into those skills"
 
Especially since they keep ignoring every advice to stay far, far away from the idea of a GMPC. They just really want to have their awesome special snowflake graceful swordsmaster weaponsmith supercrafter magical unicorn of a character. They don't want to GM, they want an audience for their Mary Sue.
 
@DuckTapeAl I just realized one of my CharOp questions is quoted in that answer
 
Which answer?
 
8:59 PM
Some people don't respond well to advice. :P
 
Well they aren't wanting any extra rules out of it. So that makes me wonder why there's even a question. "It's a bastard sword." "It's a light double bladed bastard sword that is wielded unusually gracefully." I mean that's as far as he has to go.
 
New GMS don't understand that you can do that.
 
Unless he was expecting a paragraph written response/short story of Bastardius: The awesome double bladed, lightweight bastard sword
 
@DuckTapeAl Warlock with background in theivery
 
Double-bladed?
 
9:00 PM
He made a comment somewhere that implied that that was what he wanted.
 
@MadMAxJr Because securing Official Rules Permission to wave your Mary Sue in your players' face means you can rules-lawyer your friends into being a captive audience for it.
 
Er, double-edged.
 
Is he making darth maul?
 
@SevenSidedDie And that's the part I didn't quite put together until the downvote brigade made a pass.
 
@waxeagle Yeah, I saw that. Hopefully there are no jar jars.
 
9:03 PM
@Theik I suspect something more like
 
No no no no no NO CAPES.
 
Jar jars are awesome. Where else would you store your jars than in another jar?
 
No LOOSE, TORN capes especially.
 
That's not a cape.
 
@MadMAxJr But this cape has extra holes! (What's the crafting DC for extra holes?)
 
9:03 PM
That's more like a kite.
 
Oof, just found another point in the MAry Sue column.
11
Q: What are the ramifications of waiving the Evil requirement for the assassin class?

Cataru MooreWould being able to be a Good assassin mess up the game or something? Have the designers ever explicitly stated why they added that requirement to the class? Secondly, is there an alternative?

 
Given the twist flow of the cloth there arcs a quarter way around the body, this means in a neutral state it is dragging on the ground. this guy is going to trip and cut himself up on his shoulder spikes.
 
Ah yes, assassins.
 
Thankfully d20-based games don't penalize you for absurd anime looks.
 
@MadMAxJr "No capes, dahlingk"
November 15th of '58! All was well, another day saved, when... his cape snagged on a missile fin!
 
9:04 PM
@MadMAxJr NO, BECAUES GRACEFULL
 
Wasn't the original idea with assassins being evil because they used poisons? And then at some point they came up with the weird idea of good-aligned poisons called...was it ravages or something?
 
Don't get me wrong, it's okay to look cool, but I will call my players out on impractical design.
 
Stratogale! April 23rd, '57! Cape caught in a jet turbine!
 
Neat sigil thingy on the cloth though.
 
@Theik Yup. There was even a good-aligned poison class in the BoED.
 
9:06 PM
The logic is lost on me, to be fair. I mean... using a poison to incapacitate somebody is evil, but sticking a blade in them is fine?
 
"straight, as in not curved". Glad he cleared that up.
 
The imagery is cool, yeah. Nothing wrong with that style either, no. But I'm picturing a "GM" book full of "aweshum GMPC" details with like, only a half-page of actual campaign notes.
 
Of course, the reason why poison is evil, according to the BoVD, is because it causes a bunch of suffering while it kills, which is exactly what Ravages do.
 
@Theik That comes from the bushido code, where not facing your enemy was dishonorable. Poison fell into that category.
 
@JohnP Perhaps he's worried people thought he meant he wants a heterosexual sword?
 
9:07 PM
@DuckTapeAl In fact I have the badge for optimization....
 
I'm pretty sure it's not just Bushido that has rules like that, @JohnP.
 
There is also some debate whether the Bible passage about "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" was mistranslated and actually should have been poisoner instead of witch.
 
@Pureferret Oh, cool!
 
In my group, I encourage players to not get overkill on describing gear/loot/appearances until an action or event occurs that justifies describing it in detail... Because doing it that way, other players actually /remember/ it.
 
Burn the poisoner!
 
9:08 PM
@DuckTapeAl I should know how to write a good question
Should
 
How would you recognize a poisoner though? Unlike witches and ducks, they don't float.
 
@MadMAxJr That's a nice way to motivate players to narrate in 'scene' details. Nice.
 
@DuckTapeAl Not just bushido, but assassins there (Japan) were really (as far as I'm aware of) the first to be really considered evil.
Other places/times assassins weren't considered as evil, but just not encouraged.
 
@JohnP I suspect a lot of the western connection between assassins and evil was the Crusades against the "infidels", and the Assassins came from there.
 
By that logic though, using a bow would also be an evil act. More reasons why the DnD alignment system makes relatively little sense.
 
9:12 PM
@Theik Ironically, as I understand it the samurai were originally bowmasters. Those who drew their swords were considered unskilled, since they hadn't already killed with their bow skills. The swords came to prominence only as a symbol in a later age, when politics made co-opting samurai gear a successful strategy. And it's hard to carry a greatbow around court.
 
@SevenSidedDie Yeah, a lot came from that. The Genpei War tale (even though it's fiction) was about the same time frame, 12th century.
@SevenSidedDie And you are correct, they smoked hashish before missions hence the name "hashishans" = assassins.
 
Looking at the light bastard sword guy's history of questions, it's a whole array of questions leading up to some really sad players in his campaign when they realize that 99% of his time went into his bastard-sword wielding good aligned assassin, instead of an actual campaign.
 
@JohnP I thought even the hashish had been discovered to be just western rumour/libel in recent years though, hasn't it?
@Theik This is my sad-face about these questions, yes. And that they're cluttering up the site, but mostly "oh no, oh dear lord no, turn aside while you have time..."
 
"Although it is commonly believed that Assassins were under the influence of hashish during their killings or during their indoctrination, there is debate as to whether these claims have merit, with many Eastern writers and an increasing number of Western academics coming to believe that drug-taking was not the key feature behind the name."
-Wikipedia, which is never wrong.
 
I don't really get why people insist on DMPCs in the first place. As if you didn't have enough things to worry about as a DM.
 
9:16 PM
DMPCs can be useful, depending on the group.
The one or two times that I've used a DMPC since I stopped being an idiot DM were to shore up combat weaknesses in the party, and the characters were more like hirelings than full characters.
 
99% of the time you're most likely better off simply giving your players a mercenary they can tug around
 
Like, they wouldn't talk unless they had to.
Sure, but someone's got to play them.
 
Nuh-uh. Mercenaries are robots.
if(enemy.inRange()) { hitIt(); }
 
That's assuming that you just need someone to swing a sword.
My DMPCs are basically always healers.
 
Simply having your players share the merc will most likely do the trick.
 
9:18 PM
One of them was a rogue, I think.
Yeah, I'd prefer to just run it myself.
That way, if I want to have something interesting happen, I can do it without the players having seen the sheet.
 
@DuckTapeAl Yes. GMPCs are one of those things where, once you understand how GMing works, breaking the "no GMPC" rule judiciously has value.
 
"Oh, you didn't know that he was a secret half-orc? You probably should have asked."
 
Haha
 
I have a few DMPCs provided to me by the module. Sometimes they help a party with an area they haven't been to before if the party stalls a on the plot.
 
9 hours in the players suddenly realize that their cleric was a 30 feet tall frost giant all along, but nobody bothered to ask him.
7
 
9:21 PM
Lost in the woods. But they recruited a local ranger back in town. They get back onto the path. Ranger tags along, is a second rate combatant compared to the party, but has good intel.
Doing a DMPC wrong is the guy who does everything the party can do better.
And that is when your party goes, "If we kill him, do we get XP?"
 
And then they kill him and a rock falls on them and they die?
 
@SevenSidedDie I had not seen that, but a quick "to the googles!" appears to confirm that: alamut.com/subj/ideologies/alamut/etymolAss.html
 
That's if your a DM who is there to tell YOUR story and you get upset that they dared to interfere.
 
Doing a DMPC wrong is when your DMPC is doing anything that your players care about better than your players.
 
My long hours of running the local shop game desk let me observe generations of terrible DMs for seven years.
 
9:25 PM
You get to watch campaigns trainwreck as a job? Awesome.
 
@MadMAxJr At that point I rarely use GMPCs though. Unless "they tag along with the party for an amount of time" automatically makes someone a GMPC, but as far as I'm concerned they're just NPCs doin' stuff.
 
Yeah that's my idea too.
GMPC sounds like you intend to play the entire game along with that PC.
Hence my earlier comment on "just throw in a mercenary".
 
Yes, my definition of GMPC is that it's the GM's PC, who is a peer to the other PCs.
 
Ah, okay. I was just taking in context of 'something with player class levels that you're controlling as DM'
You're talking about playing a full player role while being DM.
Yeah that's.. A conflict of interest in my opinion.
 
@MadMAxJr I would agree
 
9:28 PM
Exception: You can play a cool character as DM, provided he DIES for the plot after earning their respect.
 
There's a kind of game that I've heard of where it might not be as much of a problem, where everyone is the DM for a couple sessions, and you switch off.
That way, everyone has a 'GMPC', but it's just a regular PC most of the time.
 
Round-house DMs.
 
@DuckTapeAl Right! Yeah, that would be one of the exceptions that work-when-you-know-what-you're-doing.
 
How does anyone consider Haile Selassie I as an evil ruler?
 
I once took one of my own PCs from another game, who the players all liked, and made him a kind of mentor NPC for them in a new game. Then had the villain kill him.
 
9:30 PM
I'm trying something a bit new with my current group this year. They paid for a base of operations in a town. I'm letting them hire story NPCs to join them and stay there. Characters are also welcome to roll up new characters and park their existing ones at the keep between story arcs.
 
@JohnP The second paragraph of his Wikipedia article has the word "suppression" in it. My guess is, he's considered evil by whoever it was he was suppressing.
 
@JohnP That list is full of explosives and I won't touch it. Stalin and Lenin aren't considered evil by many people in the world, either. There are few rulers who all but the tiniest fraction of people would agree are unambiguously evil.
 
Robot Stalin however, totally evil.
 
Did you know that Robot Stalin killed more people that Mecha Hitler?
 
Make that two questions in the CharOp meta answer...
 
9:33 PM
And this reminds me of a card game SuperFight we played recently....
 
@DuckTapeAl But Mecha Hitler annexed the Moon, and that's a special kind of evil.
 
You get white cards that are people. Black cards are powers. Play one of each. Then you argue with the table whose fighter would win.
 
@MadMAxJr Sounds potentially awesome. What prevents deadlocks?
 
We had a round with [Hitler] [Piloting a Giant Robot ____] [He-Man] [With Yo-yos for hands]
Deadlocks are solved by everyone agreeing this battle isn't likely to be solved. Then the combatants flip over new white card, with NO powers.
So we got Mr.Rogers vs. Iron Man
 
Mr. Rogers has beaten Mr. T, so I'm pretty sure he could take iron man.
 
9:35 PM
We agreed Mr.Rogers could talk down Tony Stark kindly.
Then the player added the context "This is Ultimate Showdown Mr.Rogers" And then it was hands down, Mr.Rogers for the bloody kill.
 
Wasn't that basically the plot of The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny?
Lol.
 
It's not fairly expensive, but the game is 80% how well you can argue.
Just beware the red deck... it is R rated cards. Awesome and horrible.
 
Speaking of Mr Rogers vs Iron Man, if I link to Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny, will I be linking to something obvious, or something so old that it is new and awesome again?
 
Green deck is kid-friendly cards. Simple childlike things can be super powerful.
 
What is this? It sounds like CaH
 
9:37 PM
SuperFight
The cards /look/ a bit CaHlike.
 
@MadMAxJr Never mind, should read faster. :)
 
There's a similar game I've played called Ex Machina where one player is a client with a problem, and everyone else is trying to build and sell a machine that will solve that problem, all based on cards.
 
@DuckTapeAl That sounds pretty cool too.
 
It's CaH-like in that the client picks who wins, and the winner overall is the person who won the most rounds.
 
The orange deck is geek cards. It has 'Predator'. So we let the player define the context. Naturally being from the geek deck, we agreed it's the sci-fi predator. It was facing off against a class of kindergardners.
 
9:38 PM
Coolest RPG idea I've seen lately is better angels. Which is not new at all, but sounds cool with a 'good' group.
 
Superfight has three play modes. Standard mode is you fight your opponent to the left, winnner stays, next player to the left is the next contender.
SuperVillian mode, one player crafts a big bad from some cards, everyone else makes a hero, then plays a power card /anywhere they want/ cause half the power cards are BAD.
Then the villian determines who would win.
Battle Royale, everyone makes a hero, plays a random power anywhere they want, table has to argue last-standing.
 
Ooh, also, Channel A.
 
Some of our good ones included [The Mario Brothers] [Piloting a predator drone] [Can only see via heatvision]
They held up well until [Zombies] [100 of them] was drawn.
Zombies are dead. Don't give off heat.
 
One person is a board member at Channel A, an anime channel. Everyone else uses cards in their hand to make a premise of an anime show to pitch to the board member, and explain it in a minute or less.
 
But zombies can't reach the predator drone!
 
9:41 PM
No, but the zombies can reach the drone control station.
 
Not if it's up some ladders!
 
And this is the key gameplay mechanic. Arguements. But most of the time they're fun.
 
@DuckTapeAl My group would love that.
 
Heaven help you if both players draw [Name a Comicbook Character] or [Name a Movie Character]
 
@Theik Unless they're Minecraft zombies.
 
9:43 PM
True, but if they were minecraft zombies you'd just walk around a table and they'd be stuck.
 
@Theik But with 100 of them and only heat vision, they'd sneak up on you.
 
Dig a moat!
 
Also their pathfinding was fixed a few versions back to make them much nastier.
 
I felt bad near the end of the game because my kill pile was a Hipster, Mr. Rogers, and an entire retirement home.
 
Ah, really? haven't played minecraft in ages
 
9:44 PM
@MadMAxJr Ah, yet another card game that makes you feel like a horrible person for winning.
 
To be fair, that retirement home had the power to [Drain the life of anything it touches]
So it was a serious threat.
 
Most retirement homes have that power.
 
So, it was like a normal retirement home.
 
@Theik Also while they're burning from sunlight, they will set you on fire if they can reach you. Plus the child zombies are horrifying.
 
I only got one picture of the most awful matchup ever and I'm not sure I can type it in the channel.
 
9:45 PM
@MadMAxJr Probably not, then!
 
The not so direct version: [A Doomsday Cult] vs [A tentacle monster] [Doing something I'd rather not describe] [While nursing ___] [A little pony]
The red deck is awful. And awesome.
We pretty much said, at that point the Doomsday Cult drinks the Kool-Aid.
The next in line? [Master Chief] [Wearing Clown Shoes]
Master Chief butchered the Flood. We decided he was qualified to end that.
It's a great game that can be easily tailored to appropriateness of audience with the bonus decks.
... My CaH deck is not suitable for anyone.
Don't let people at cons fill in blank cards for you.
 
lol
 
10:29 PM
Yet another question where the tag would be appropriate.
@Theik #JustLokiProblems?
 
@BESW In theory the tag is for that, but for understandable reasons it never caught on.
 
@doppelgreener nevermind, that character dumped mine. She's not awesome anymore.
I bumped hard into Stormwind Fallacy
 
@SevenSidedDie Yeeeah.
And 3.XPF is more like a sunscreen.
 
10:45 PM
@Zachiel I'd like to be a blaster/debuffer wizard, but I'd also like to max charisma for roleplaying purposes. I don't like the "you only know these spells" limit on charisma-based classes
So if I want to be charismatic, I need to get a worse build...
[is still on a crusade to find the character he wants to settle on, but now it's late, goodnight]
 
11:44 PM
@Zachiel i don't know how helpful we'll be to your pseudo-D&D game, but you could ask main site what powerful CHA-based casters exist that aren't very limited in their spells
 

« first day (1637 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) »