Heh.... End user was having issues with monitors so she called the service desk. They nuked her roaming profile and then escalated the job as they couldn't figure it out.
so, put aside money you'd spend on starbucks one time a week ;p. You'll get there!
(I've cut back on junk food until my fun money budget isn't in deficit. Granted being able to spend that ahead is a luxury but I've quite literally put aside a tenner a week in the past to afford something I wanted)
@ThatBrazilianGuy: he's doing that a s a student job tho. and heh. I know a guy with a doctorate and a job as a researcher who is thinking of quitting to do that.
Well, as my wife's still studying / starting, and she still doesn't have an impressive portfolio, she mostly picks small gigs for friends and acquaintances.
The "friends and acquaintances" part makes them often think they are entitled to paying next to nothing.
(funny thing tho, I tell people to pay what I think my work is worth. If they don't pay me, or pay me too little, I don't bother to do it next time. Works REALLY well)
I see no real benefit to getting an 802.11ac router at this point. It's just too expensive, and our slow Internet service does not justify a high-end router.
but yeah, with no LZ4 compression (I opted out of that!) and ZIL and L2ARC, this thing screams... RAID1 instead of RAIDZ, no LZ4, so low CPU overhead... just 2 mirrors
the only CPU overhead is figuring out if the requested blocks are in cache
and then transferring from ZIL to the primary storage in the background periodically
game servers, web servers, Cards Against Humanity, remote desktop to a general purpose Windows VM (KVM instance) hosted via Guacamole, file storage, Cavil...
My Linode server is primarily for my website (House of DragonLord and The Dragon's Journal). It also holds a couple of private Git repositories acting as a backup for my most critical documents (namely college files and a subset of game saves).
it is more expensive, but keep in mind that I was paying for a hardware RAID card, which carries like a $25/month bill just there, so, removing the card and adding some disks is only $3/month more
@DragonLord Using a dedi gives us more control and the ability to run VMs (or containers), at the cost of being far more expensive. And the more control means we need to spend more time fiddling with it.
also I might have linked this earlier today but while waiting for server to do stuff I've been completely entranced with watching her videos all day: youtube.com/user/bionerd23/videos
@Bob and having an IPv4 /27 with more than half of it unused, plus tons of free RAM and storage, means that I can often fire up a random box for whatever people need, as long as it's not CPU-intensive
with this new box, my limiting factor is really CPU... DDR4 kicks ass, ZIL and L2ARC kicks ass, so the only way this box is going to be bogged down is if someone pegs the CPU
@Bob not good for those use cases where something you purchase (or even FOSS stuff that's just really, really hard to compile) is like "here, download this binary :D"
in practice it's going to be way faster than a smartphone though -- it has a gigantic heatsink, it doesn't need to worry about battery, and there's an SSD attached instead of a simple flash chip
@allquixotic A smartphone with an identical SoC/CPU. But we don't know which one they're using, and the available ARMv7 cores go just about the whole range.
@Bob Looking at passmark CPU mark for Android devices, the Note5's Exynos 7420 is about 10x faster than the Note 3's Exynos 5420, in raw CPU performance (discounting memory and disk). Unfortunately, the Marvell Cortex-A9 they have at scaleway is closer to the Note 3's SoC.
again, the disk will be (much) faster, and the CPU might be better on certain workloads, and the RAM is probably DDR3 so that'll be faster than the Note3... but that still leaves a lot to be desired
it would be pretty awesome to see something like the Exynos 7420 run at full speed without the constraints of a battery, a GPU, pushing pixels to a screen, etc
@Bob which is not at all surprising, considering the TDP, and also considering that Intel has always been the king of single-threaded perf, as long as I can remember
even a piece of an Intel CPU is going to deliver amazing single-thread perf
I'd rather take the single-thread, myself. If you have a multithreaded workload, the CPU can do thread interleaving. Or the scheduler can optimize out the context switches so well that it runs almost as if they were lightweight fibers.
But if you have a single-threaded workload that demands high throughput, you're stuck if you have 4 weak cores.
Cortex-A53 is (slightly) faster, supports AArch64, and most importantly, consumes much less power.
Something along the lines of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 (Cortex-A53 4C@1.7GHz big + Cortex-A53 4C@1.0GHz LITTLE) would be ideal. If only there was a version for servers without the extraneous cellular functionality...
PrecisionCore is an advanced print head technology with extremely high native resolution (600 dpi, vs. typical 300 or 360 dpi) enabling high-speed, high-quality printing.
@JourneymanGeek If print permanence isn't a serious concern, have a look at the EcoTank printers. These have an integrated continuous ink system and come with two years' worth of ink.
I'm trying to set up a brand-new Epson WorkForce WF-3640 printer and it seems there are some weird mechanical issues. It would seem the carriage is not moving freely. This is before I get to install the ink cartridges.
The printer may make a odd grinding noise and return errors 0xF1, 0xEA, or 0x...
^ My E6420 Dell came without bluetooth so I purchased 1 cheap Chinese. I wonder if bluetooth headphones successfully pair with Chinese bluetooth device. Actually my device does not have all features available because it works on generic Windows bluetooth driver. Yet it is said to work with licensed driver that certain company sells. Actually it's BlueSoleil software that costs like $20: http://www.bluesoleil.com/bssoftware/BSoftware.aspx
So what seemed to cost cheap in the end costs like normal bluetooth device...
To increase available space on a HDD (Windows Server 2012 Standard x64), I tried to enable NTFS compression on that drive. While doing the compression, it ran out of available space (despite having like 200GB on that HDD available at the beginning of the process). Compression process was interrup...