@JourneymanGeek young pets especially (this one is young) have a VERY high chance of being claimed at shelters in a fairly short time in my community. there's a high demand for cats and dogs especially.
I'm not -terribly- worried about the prospect of him being put down.
almost no one goes to dog breeders and "buys" pets anymore, most people just go to a shelter looking to claim a healthy young pet that needs a home
@Bob it is not a good idea :-) unless you have a UPS, memory tests out 100% , and you have some crazy "unbuffered" stuff going on that the normal winders file cache doesn't handle
@Bob oh ssd cache. I no like, because to do them properly you have to still write to both, my ssd is only tiny bit faster than raid , and the total overall improvement as tested by intel even is ~25% or less based on standard HDs. But I was still interested in the testing of it.
figures, all these flushes here are taking BUKU time on shutdowns. Anyone who thought they would decrease that time after seeing how long it is, might apply fast shutdown methods (of course not saying you have them applied)
primo added lots of time, and today without primo on, I can feel the raid card delaying for a flush
Much of software will sometimes just have a "delay here for a while" before finish , you can see that on installs and other things. some detached to the action Wait time, that hopefully is long enough. We can find those people in the Bad Programming chat room :-)
with a really fast system, and monitoring what was going on, this type of program is still "waiting" for nothing :-)
and disable the service :-) , then have a switch to turn it all back on, when everything fails miserably to try and check it manually. Such is the horrors of actual control. and never having a life left after .
Microsoft 160 psycogeek 1 , team Microsoft wins :-)
but their mascot is a rhesus monkey , experimental lab animal
@Boris_yo so how did you manage to create this masterpiece? and did you show it to google?
hmmm , program works fine, I don't need any extra features, do I download the updated version, or stick with the one I have used faithfully for years ? youtube.com/watch?v=LOR5GA4gDfM
That is one reason why my "system" disk only holds the incorrigible system and programs, and games and other data are over there ----> 2 minute returns from backups.
well when you have to write non-destructive overlaying matte routines and memory management in HTML languages :-) it is bound to be a little bigger in size
when backing up with Ghost , I would sit there (waiting) watching the files being backed up and thinking , WTF is that. Go back in delete some stuff and try again minus the 1/2g of stuff. which sometimes proved to be a stupid thing to do BEFORE the backup.
back before the 2014 type version, the method it restored would do a full defrag (just because of piling in files) , but the 2014 aligns everything as it was :-(
Even when i specifically DEselect sector by sector backup,
yea, one wonders if using "file" method that the crazy junction and hard link stuff. That is why they only flat recover the whole thing now? Even when not selecting sector by sector in the backup..My Web Searches with posts from 2011 have different information , and are therefore are obsolete, making fact finding hard.
Now if i was going to Avoid windows mail, and windows live mail this time, and have successfully used thunderbird Mozilla e-mail before, is there a e-mail client program that would be small simple and still handle 6 e-mail accounts ?
> On July 6, 2012, Mozilla announced the company was dropping the priority of Thunderbird development because the continuous effort to extend Thunderbird's feature set was mostly fruitless. The new development model is based on Mozilla offering only "Extended Support Releases", which deliver security and maintenance updates, while allowing the community to take over the development of new features.
> We’re simply not going to pour resources into trying to “innovate” on Thunderbird. Users will still be getting an email client that answers to nobody but them. Users will still benefit from stability, performance and security updates from Mozilla. And their mail will continue to land in their inbox, just as it always has.
@Psycogeek Yea, I have a backup copy of the broken system, though. I'll try replacing the Acronis ProgramData directory if this set of Windows updates succeeds.
I still have the actual backup image files. Worst case, I can do a manual restore.
you went back 2 months and it still is doing File System errors? and have you since done the chkdsk /f thing on each partition?
I have a batch file that runs that check on every disk from A-Z :-) i use rarely , by being on one button it is easy to do the more thorough but still simple checks
oh service animal , just tell them Ash is a Cadaver dog, and then mention that he is getting the scent right now, and tell them they should go to the doctor Quick :-)
@Psycogeek I was aware of the dangers from power loss (that's what the UPS is for, and it actually survived a real power loss event without issues). I wasn't expecting a safe shutdown to cause this, though.
Probably one reason why the forum site is so bleak. it not working. add to that every expert in the world says the Ram cache stuff (not ssd) has zero value because MSes own file cache works.
I actually want to run across one of those so called experts and show them that there is ONE :-) application for it where MSes cache just fills and is not reused.
The unbuffered , intended to bypass the cache writes.
I had asked these experts before, WHY is it that the ms cache was not working. Of course it had to be that my system is screwed up because "it never happens in anything they have ever worked with" or that the programming was really bad.
So i asked again, like: isn't it true that there are some things that will fully bypass the MS cache. and of course the expert says, yes it Must be that way. Umm NO!!
Bad information, the fact that they Spammed (fancy cache and superspeed) means even if it has value in specific situations , the whole idea will be tossed. no users , no money, no testing by thousands.
But If the same thing was put Into the OS itself :-) and only had value in the tiniest of circumstances well then Apple and MS have done it exactally right, and THEN turning it off would be a terrible misteak.
Same thing happened when i had a discussion,( that was really kept civil) with experts about paging and virtual memory. they are 100% correct, undeniable facts , but refuse to see how the alternate universe could have implemented the same thing way better :-)
You cant tell a person who has kept 500 icons slopped all over their desktop , that windows 8 way of metro menu stuff is bad. it IS a lot better than what they did before :-)
@Boris_yo where do i start ? you have macro on, good for 3in-12in max . you turned off flash, when potentially you could block some of it or diffuse it . you have a 1/15the shutter , so any movement would blur. you have a 2.8 iris opening so your depth of field is low , you have auto white balance on, which could depending on the lighting mess up the color, and your histogram shows sort of ok.
and , you have anti shake on, which Depending on the camera can reduce the total amount of the sensor used . in digital stabilization. if it is real optical stabilization (where the lens moves) then it does not reduce the total sensor used.
@Boris_yo well then there is your problem, get a camera with an iris :-0
Easiest thing to fix most all of that, is Lock your ISO low, digital cameras don't really have film speed, but the "speed" setting for digital cameras effects the processing layer of the sencor, to "gain" the information the sencor receives
The higher the ISO is the more grainy the data will be as the cpu in the camera "boosts" the nasty light collection of the sensor
A low ISO will also mean you need Lots and Lots of light, so be it auto ISO reacting to the proper light, or manuel setting, and the user having to add light, the results is the same, getting more light to the sensor
A low F-stop iris setting thing means the iris is wide open. good for portraits, and blurring backgrounds, and taking pictures at night. a higher number showing for the iris say 16 , is the iris very small.
Always remember the "Brownie" or better the "pin hole" camera. tiny iris make everything stay in focus. Like the pinhole camera didn't even have a lens .
And again as you close up the iris reducing the total light hitting the sencor, you have to have lots of light again.
Shutter speeds , well there is no shutter, so again why the heck do they put all that film stuff into digital things, very few cameras will actually shutter the light.
in fact a large amount of your problem is the modern digital camera is all lies held over from film :-) if they had tossed out all the film jargon , people would know what is going on.
Its like DB in digital wave processing, there are no DBs in digital waves, what is wrong with these people :-) and they said i was stuck in the dark ages.
I would say "If a tag is only used three times, you can probably just remove it without raising any flags" But I'm afraid someone will rip my balls off if I do
@Boris_yo i must have OIS not DIS, in all my cameras, just because of terrible results with the way digital image stabilization was done, back when the sensors were barely enough resolution to begin with. it is possible that with a 12and14megapixel kind of camera and a fully properly done engine for it, it would be fine.
with the lens moving around itself , it can fix the jerky human movements changing the light on the sensor to begin with , before it light collects. because of that it might just be the only way to reduce smearing, improve on HDR (double pass) and low speed capture.
I want to test a desktop application and I need to test it on 1000 terminals, is there a way to use VMWare and make him use one operating system and simulate like it is many separates ones and running the same application?
@Psycogeek Shutter speed started measuring in hours, seconds and today in milliseconds. Back then photographers operated shutter counting seconds from opening it to close it after getting enough light.
@Boris_yo yea hold that camera still while you move a light blocking plate away that sits between the film and lens 1940's? ahh same thing holds true today, the more still you hold the camera, or use a tripod, the more pictures are going to turn out.
@Hennes or wants to say "my software works on thousands of computers" so it must be your fault. perfect test of software, to put it on 1000 clones :-) if only we were clones using it.
@Psycogeek I have dimmer to operate light level of lamp on ceiling. I think I had it on maximum when I felt it being warm. 4 hours with cuch level resulted in light out. Tried replacing lamp but still nothing but I also hear like there's spark inside the dimmer. Will have to dismanle it to see if anything melted?
@Boris_yo what style of dimmer? 1960's resistive? 1980s SCR 1990's triac , or 2012 mosfet ? Uhh yea check the wiring anyways maybe a screw is loose.
now you make me put in disclaimer, turn power off at main circuit breaker and test with voltmeter before touching. Or just man-up when you get zapped , instead of having a heart attack.
Electronic dimmer with circle... Bought it 3 years ago. I don't have voltmeter but this: http://www.dx.com/p/pen-style-non-contact-ac-voltage-detector-90v-1000v-2-aaa-23031#.VFDiW_mL-So
oh, from what little i know about it "online" means to an OS that is active, as opposed to a image that is being created on the side before deployment.
well if i could see :-) what your doing. did you do a quick check with the resource monitor? which sort of knows what everything in the puter is doing. except the NSA stuff :-)
They generally reserve it for super-critical vulnerabilities (i.e. remote exploit without user interaction), but yes. You have to set WU to "Don't Automatically Download Updates" to disable it.
I want to test a desktop application and I need to test it on 1000 terminals, is there a way to use VMWare and make him use one operating system and simulate like it is many separates ones and running the same application?
