So you see they can easily reason, and have, that the ends, saving a soul, is eternally important, therefore any means to save it are justified except the forfeiture of another soul. And when the ends justify the means, "brainwashing" and "trickery" are perfectly acceptable to make converts.
@fredsbend Whatever "the end" is, it can't be fake conversions. Of course lots of people believe dumb things. I'm just speaking as an idealist. Few Christians would agree with me.
@Malachi One question by you was in the close review queue, but I don't know if that's the one you meant
Sometimes, even when a question is not an exact duplicate of another, it gets closed and the header says, "This question already has an answer at [link]."
Is this proper? It seems that sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't; so what are those times?
@fredsbend I'm saying that even if they thought the ends justified the means, coercion will never achieve the ends that a good evangelist should want. Of course the goals of some evangelists are money or fame etc...
@curiousdannii Never mind that meta post. I just realized that what I thought was special wording in the duplicate header text was actually the standard wording, so my question was predicated on a false premise. @anyone else who sees this message: move along, nothing to see
@El'endiaStarman I've always been good a memorizing numbers. (well anything really, but numbers especially). I was about 9 and they were testing me at the bunker (jk), and they would say a series of numbers and I'd repeat it. I was able to to eight digits with about 80% accuracy and 9 at like 65%.
They said most adults can't do better than 50% (which is when they stop the test).
@fredsbend Wow. Oh, how times have changed! Back in Martin Luther's day, as written in the Small Catechism, children and other members of the household are encouraged to make the sign of the cross and say a prayer in the morning and evening before bedtime, and at every meal. On the other hand, you are not Lutheran. You have no obligation to know the Small Catechism.
@DoubleU I attended a Lutheran church for a number of years. I have a small catechism booklet. I also attended catholic services before that. My father had us do that when we were growing up.
@DoubleU Had a catholic friend who'd do that. We'd sit down to eat and pretty much in mid sentence, he'd bow is head, make the sign, say about twenty words, make the sign again, and be right back in the conversation.
@DoubleU And liberal. I was a funeral recently at a ELCA and the pastor read from Wisdom. I spoke to him about it later and he mentioned that he also reads from some of the gnostics occasionally. I was like "What!?"
@El'endiaStarman We had a problem with god having priorities in another room. Let me find it.
@El'endiaStarman Saying grace is how some people choose to express reverence and thanks to God for providing the delicious food on their plates and the ability to digest them!
Put one more way: when I said God has priorities, I meant that he has desires that cannot all be met to the same extent. He wants a family with the humans he has created. He wants humans to exercise real wills. He wants a good earth. He wants to be known. He wants to be known as a merciful, loving God. He wants to be known as a god who gives himself for others.
@El'endiaStarman An attitude like that may explain why none of my classmates to date says grace at the table, Christian-style. It seems to me that American Christians have a lax attitude toward religion in general.
@curiousdannii Oh, I'm with you. I just loved the description.
And beyond what you said, I'd say He has priorities for me insofar as there are actions that He would rather have me do instead of others, which may even be beneficial, but not as much. To me and/or to others.
The more I'm on Quora, the more I see how Stack Exchange is simply a better system. For example, on of the questions that people want answers on is "What are the "personalities" of all the major math departments in the U.S.?". What a terrible question. There's no way any one person could hope to answer this, and no way even a group of people could answer it fully.
Another example is of a person asking for a proof that "mathematics existed before humans found it" and one of the top answers is a disproof. Somewhat maddening, honestly...
> No, O people, the Lord has told you what is good, and this is what he requires of you: to do what is right, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God. - Micah 6:8
A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question that is asked in order to make a point, rather than to elicit an answer. Though classically stated as a proper question, such a rhetorical device may be posed declaratively by implying a question, and therefore may not always require a question mark when written. Though a rhetorical question does not require a direct answer, in many cases it may be intended to start a discussion or at least draw an acknowledgement that the listener understands the intended message.
A common example is the question "Can't you do anything right...
Then for all, here are signs of the death. When a person is "Upset" or "Pissed off". A house that is "Upset" was not build on the foundation. So has fallen and will be thrown into the fire. To the bag that is "Pissed off" a patch can tear, so one needs a new bag to store the waters of life.
To the one who is irritated, know that the Thornbush King rules over you. Sayings that come from the Thornbush King do not have much righteousness.
The Thornbush King is cut down and thrown into the fire. For he had little forgiveness.
For forgiveness comes to us when we forgive others. But to those that do not forgive. They are not forgiven. This is the opposite and equal reaction.
The garden of the mind becomes the good ground when the thorns are cleared out. So it is good to sell the thoughts and to give them to the beggar. Then your emotions become stable.
One is not obliged to obey the Thornbush King. Meaning the person who is annoyed. Sometimes disobeying the Thornbush King is the best idea.
"You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?" (Matthew 7:16 NKJV)
@Onlyheisgood. law of breadth is this: All you breadth is controlled by Allah alone and each breadth should witness him and his final messenger
@Onlyheisgood. Not always but for prophets like Jesus pbuh he rescues them even from impeding death and thus ALLAH saves him from crucifiction.
So that when he comes back he gives the good news of kingdom of heaven on earth , proves to the people that he never died \crucified in the first place and how the church all along hijacked his name all along.
This would unite the Christians and Muslims into Islam.
But that will do good only to people who would witness his second coming , those died under the false propoganda of church would not be saved and thus it is fair seeming to embrace the truth ASAP ,who knows about tomorrow?
@fredsbend Finding one word to sum up your beliefs is tricky, perhaps impossible. But I don't see any real difference between "labels" and "words". Words are tricky; language is tricky, and sometimes quite slippery. Sometimes, we don't quite fit into the categories our culture recognises, and that makes it tricky to communicate, as there is no widely-understood term for what we want to say so we must start at first principles. But words are merely abstractions of reality anyway.
@Islam The good news about the Kingdom of the Universe is this. Do to another as if it was actually yourself. For this is the Law of Motion that every action has an opposite and equal reaction. Know this. The Law is perfect. He who kills a man's son, will have his own son destroyed. The law is not limited to man. The law was given to man to accomplish to understand the Law.
He who lies will receive a lie. He who blows up a family with a bomb will have there own family blown up with a bomb. The Law of Motion is perfect. So only those that forgive will be forgiven.
Allah is merciful yes. What he does is in plain sight for all to see. Know that the flesh stands against the will of Allah. Allah is not afraid to kill you. Woe to those that do not think Allah is capable of punishing by his own hand! Your prayers will do you no good, what so ever. If you do not believe.
Be free from the Law or die by it. You have been warned. Woe to those that Allah sends his Iron Rod and Sword of Truth.
Woe to those that think themselves greater the Allah.
I am wondering if hints in the questions are allowed here.
Example: Do Protestants have a liturgical language?
Hint: Amish.
Then, the answer will have to discuss whether or not Standard German is a liturgical language, distinctive from the vernacular language.
I am still working on that Lutheran Eucharist blog post.
I start with the reading of Communion in The A to Z of Lutheranism.
And the section provides a lot of bold key words, which suggests that the key words are written down somewhere in the book, and I need to find and read every single concept to understand the overarching Communion concept.
Fortunately, I am taking detailed notes to get organized.
After that, I may need a second and third source - and more sources - to make sure that the information is comprehensive.
Most of the previous blog posts have a personal flavor to them, so I am just going to insert my one-day experience at a Lutheran church service.
Then, I'll have to get the blog post Caleb-approved somehow.
Or moderator-approved.
But it's going to be toooooootally worth it! The blog seriously needs a Lutheran perspective!!!
If nobody is doing this project or contributing anything on Lutheranism on the Blog, then woohoo! I'll have a monopoly over this territory!