Imagine that you bought a few strings of incandescent Xmas lights. They are rated for indoor use only. The tag says not to use them outdoors.
You want to use them outdoors for about one every per year (in the fall). They'll be used in a backyard hut. They'll be attached to the roof of the hu...
The close reason says that the question is "primarily opinion-based".
It elaborates: "Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise."
But I would argue that perhaps my question is 50% fact ("What are the risks?") and 50% opinion ("Personally, would you risk it just to save money?") instead of "primarily opinion-based".
@unforgettableid: Suggestion: at a minimum, delete "would you risk it?". Preferably replace "what are the risks?" with a single factual question whose answer you would find helpful ("is it legal in California?" or "How can I test my GFCI is working?")
In my opinion (:-)) - yes. But you don't have to convince me, I'm just some random guy in the intertubes, you only need a few other folk to vote for it to be reopened. If you edit is you may stand a much better chance of persuading other people.
Since nobody else is really speaking here right now, I have nothing to go on except for what you think. If others arrive, I can consider their opinions too; but, for now, we can't know their opinions.
But I'm aware that you can't reopen the question by yourself, and that others would have to vote too.