« first day (2366 days earlier)      last day (2595 days later) » 

8:00 PM
@NautArch no, spellcasters, people that can't math, and players that don't know what they're doing slow down the game
 
@ACuriousMind I've only ever played the video games. It was OK.
But I did run a Dominant Ideal Ardent once
That was a lot of dice
 
@SPavel Ah, I meant because in the non-video game rolling 15 d6 at once is not rare
 
I did a oneshot with a lvl 14 warlock with hex
 
15 is not much for a 3.5e blaster mage
 
The deafness condition doesn't impair verbal spellcasting. #DnD https://twitter.com/Jarun2972/status/843856984260665344
 
8:01 PM
3d20 + 3d10 + 3d6 (for hex I think?) for each eldrict blast
 
That is a change from prior editions.
 
You can rock 30d6 just off an empowered delayed blast fireball
 
@Adam i play this partly to roll dice. rolling more dice doesn't slow it down for me, it makes it more fun.
 
Honestly though, d6 isn't that fun to roll
d20 is the most fun die
 
@NautArch I more mean that there is a limit. I agree with you for the most part. And rolling a lot of dice sparingly is super cool. But, for example, the paladin in my group rolls 2d6 + all of his extra smite damage, and the DM let's him reroll 1's and 2's on every die because of his feats
 
8:04 PM
@SPavel not gonna argue that :) also why my 5 year gravitated to the d20 for chutes and ladders
@adam mine does as well (for my paladin) and you know how much longer it takes me to pick up and reroll all the dice vs the d20? about 1 second.
 
I was mathing out a skill check variant where you could roll extra d20s but it didn't math well
 
and it makes my paladin smites feel gooooooood. which is kinda what they should.
 
I mean, different people feel good about different things. Some people just like high numbers, in which case the one roll might be better because you have a better chance of hitting max damage.
 
They feel good for you. And even I agree they are fun to watch for the first couple of times. But when 4 other people at the table are just sitting there while you roll 20 dice, then reroll 10 dice, then add all of it together 3 or 4 times a game, it gets really annoying
 
And some people, like you, prefer rolling lots of dice.
 
8:07 PM
@Adam good point. although as I said the amount of time it takes me to identify the 1s and 2s and reroll them for just my 2d6 vs my d8s is very very small.
 
I like rolling tons of dice too, but I'd rather free up as much time as possible to have more rolls in the game, rather than fewer rolls of larger instances
 
@Adam Yeah, I remember playing with this one guy who rolled a homebrew Wild Mage in 3.5e. He'd Wild Surge on Disintegrates and roll like 20d6 with rerolls and all sorts of things. Luckily for us, he was a bit of a math whiz so it progressed quicker than average, but I could definitely see that getting real old real quick.
 
Especially If I can roll, at most, 4 die at once and only one or two other people can enjoy rolling fistfulls of dice
 
and as @DForck42 said, the time difference between rerolling those dice and waiting for casters to decide what to do or others to decide what to do is minimal.
my paladin mostly attacks. I spend nearly no time figuring out what i'm going to do.
 
I'm not saying your way is wrong! I'm just saying that if I myself were at your table, I might not like that as much. It's whatever. We're not trying to convince each other
 
8:09 PM
@adam hehe. fair enough :) I'm just saying your emphasis that it slows the game down is pretty minimal. And I'm pretty sure that unless you're the DM, watching your smitin' paladin take more HP off his target is a good thing.
 
Yeah, not everyone can throw fat stacks
 
@Adam There is one true way to play!!1!!one!
 
It helps that I'm pretty handy with mental math
 
ONE!!!1111!!!!
 
UND EXACTLY ONE
 
8:10 PM
@NautArch Not when he's done it for the 6th time, it gets lame
At least I think so
 
Funny thing I've noticed (which i'll guess I'll learn in a few more years) is that I do mental math as New Math.
which i basically taught myself
 
Yeah, full attack until meat points reach 0 is not super fun
But if you want to play a spellcaster, plan ahead
 
@NautArch as a DM watching players killing your monsters is a good thing too. Monsters exist to be killed by PCs.
 
@adam i hear you and hadn't really thought about the rest of the table getting frustrated. We generally do like it when each of us do well. And if it took me forever to reroll and add, it'd piss me off.
 
@NautArch "new" math is the same as old math. It just teaches math theory a little bit better. The old way of "carrying" or "borrowing" doesn't teach you why you do it, just that you should do it.
 
8:14 PM
@eimyr true, although as a DM it's always kind of sad to see your big bad guy go down in one hit because your paladin critted and dropped 110 damage.
 
Never make the challenge "lower the guy's HP"
I always assume that if the party melee performs a full attack upon a guy, the guy is dead
And plan out encounters with that in mind
 
@NautArch goblin dice
 
@LegendaryDude from what i've read, new math is less about 'carrying and borrowing' and more about moving things to 5s and 10s and calculating the difference. If it's not that, then i'm not doing new math and i'm doingNautarch math
 
@NautArch Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying.
 
@SPavel definitely not how my DM runs things
 
8:15 PM
@NautArch The old way of "carrying" or "borrowing" doesn't teach you why you carry and borrow. That is, it doesn't teach you the underlying mechanics of numbers and their relations.
 
Difficult terrain that prevents charging, illusions, favourable terrain...
 
players that don't math well tend to frustrate me more than anything
 
@SPavel Wait, difficult terrain prevents illusions?
 
I'm just like "why can't you add two numbers together"
 
@DForck42 Not everyone is as able as you
 
8:17 PM
This is why I love Knockback and Knockdown - give it to a big guy with reach, and he can not only interrupt a charge on an AoO, but also toss the sucker back where he came from and trip him on top of that.
@Karelzarath No, those are separate strategies. Use difficult terrain to prevent charging, or illusions to conceal the real target.
My best illusion was to make a 20ft pit appear one square in front of the real 20ft pit
 
@LegendaryDude but it's simple addition... you literally learned how to do that 20 years ago...
 
It wasn't combat or anything, but it really caught the PCs by surprise
 
@DForck42 It's really not that simple for some people.
 
"Oh, a trap, let me jump over it"
donk
 
@DForck42 To some people, numbers don't make sense. They just jumble up on the page and they can't make anything out of them.
 
8:19 PM
@LegendaryDude After several years of tutoring my sister on math, yes. Some people just don't have a head for numbers. Alternately, I suck as a tutor. Probably both.
 
Abstract concepts are difficult.
 
@LegendaryDude that, I understand. and would probably not recommend them playing dnd.
 
@LegendaryDude Yeah, she's pretty much described it to me like this. She sees numbers on a page and they just start to blur together.
 
@DForck42 One of my best friends is like this and plays D&D and we have a ton of fun almost every Saturday.
 
There are classes that don't need numbers
 
8:21 PM
@LegendaryDude how do they do it then? (not being snarky, genuinely curious)
 
I once built a guy to roll dice as infrequently as possible - he could take 10 on almost everything
 
@DForck42 Slowly and with a lot of re-rolls.
"Oh wait, I forgot what my first die roll was."
 
@SPavel Like bards. They give numbers to everyone else.
 
Bards are good, most casters just point to a person and say "you there, give me an arbitrary amount of dice rolls"
 
Yep, our bard mostly just rolls a d4 every now and then.
 
8:23 PM
@LegendaryDude for that reason is why I like to roll all of the dice at once. so I need 6d6 I just roll 6d6
i COULD remember, but it's easier and faster to see them and add them together
at least for me
 
@DForck42 Yes, but... well, he ... is a little odd. So he'll roll 6d6, then move the dice he's counted, add them all up to the wrong number, then we have to kind of decipher where he went wrong, and then he looks back and he doesn't know where he moved the dice to.
So we don't know which ones he's counted and... we just ask him to re-roll.
It's not always like that, just sometimes.
 
ahh
does he have memory issues at all, or is it JUST with numbers?
 
He is dyslexic (so he has a hard time with the rules) and more than likely dyscalculic. And yes, he has severe anterograde amnesia from a brain injury.
 
That explains it.
 
@LegendaryDude ahh, that's unfortunate
 
8:27 PM
His ability for recall in the very short term is non-existent.
But he'll remember 20 minutes later.
 
ok
 
Having a conversation with him is fun though because he will suddenly change the subject to something else, having forgot about the current subject, then 15 minutes later he will switch back to the original subject as if he never missed a beat.
 
that would still frustrate me (cause I'm me) but I'd be way more understanding and patient
 
And I'm probably making it sound way worse than it is. You'd never know something was wrong if you met him.
 
"So, about those Russian knife jugglers..."
 
8:29 PM
@LegendaryDude ok
 
@DForck42 Oh, don't get me wrong. It can be incredibly frustrating. It's just that we love him anyway. :)
 
i once tried to explain that there are orders of magnitude of infinity to my fiancée, and it broke her brain
@LegendaryDude :-D
 
And with a little bit of help, someone to sit next to him and watch his dice rolls, and someone to help him understand the rules a bit, a lot of the frustration can be mitigated
 
Orders of magnitude of infinity isn't even hard to imagine though
 
@SPavel well, she's not a math person
 
8:34 PM
so I'll text him at random times, "Hey, did you know your character can do X? You should read it on pg N."
 
i think her lawyer schooling ate that part of her brain
 
Imagine that you said every number. One, two, three, etc. It would take infinity time. Not imagine you said every number twice. One one, two two, three three, etc. It would take twice as long.
 
"hey check out this spell, it's really cool. not sure if you've seen it"
 
yeah, we've got a player at our 3.5 game that doesn't really know how to play the game, so we just kinda tell him what to do
at least in combat
in social situations he's perfectly fine and a joy to play with
 
Maybe he should play a warlock
"Here is a d20 and 10d6. Roll them all every round, then pick an enemy."
 
8:38 PM
@SPavel heh
@LegendaryDude Priming the pump on his memory, so to speak?
 
@SPavel he's playing a rogue
 
Full attacks are scary
Flanking, stealth...rogues might be the hardest mundane character to play
 
@Karelzarath Yeah, once it's in there he's got it, it's just very short-term stuff is easily forgotten.
@SPavel If it's 5e this isn't a problem, no iterative attacks so-to-speak
 
Aren't there bonus attacks?
Also I believe he said 3.5
 
@SPavel i did say 3.5
 
8:44 PM
he walked into the bar carrying a sawed off shotgun and sits at the bar and orders a whisky hey ya' hillbillies
wrong type of rpg
abort
 
@DForck42 oh, missed that
@SPavel There are... attacks, extra attacks (only the fighter gets more than 1) and possibly bonus action attacks.
 
what are you kids playing
 
@Anheuser Yeah. Especially since "hillbillies" would spell it "whiskey".
 
moonshine*
 
@Anheuser A bazooka is also the wrong type of RPG
 
8:47 PM
@yuuki en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisky when you drink this stuff enough you can call ti whatever you like.
 
@Anheuser "Whisky" is typically used for non-American varietals while "whiskey" is for American-made.
Per the NY Times:'
> Up until quite recently, The New York Times tackled the problem by spelling everything the American way (with an E), regardless of the spirit's country of origin. From Kentucky bourbon to Islay malts, everything was "whiskey" to The NYTimes. But then, last February, the venerable newspaper made a decisive change.

After receiving a raft of complaints from some serious Scotch whisky drinkers, the paper re-tooled its approach to follow that of many specialized spirits publications, spelling each type of spirit according to the way favored by its country of origin. So, while American-produce
 
I prefer the term uisce
 
Why do you assume that I am american?
 
@Yuuki The Irish also tend to spell it whiskey
 
He didn't, but your hillbilly would be American
 
8:49 PM
Did you just assume my nationality?
 
oh shit you're right
 
"Hillbillies", as far as I know it, is an American colloquialism for rural Americans.
 
well, I don't pretend to know about hillbillies.
 
No, it's much more specific
 
@Yuuki It's pretty specific to the Appalachians.
 
8:50 PM
@Yuuki A specific sort of rural American, though.
 
My cousin gotten eaten by one in the movie deliverance.
 
"Redneck" covers a wider range of rural people, but even that's far from all-encompassing
 
@Karelzarath I might include those from the Ozarks as well.
 
Bumpkin or country bumpkin is more general.
 
Bumpkin is more pejorative
 
8:51 PM
@LegendaryDude Good point.
 
It's also not American-specific, IIRC.
 
My grandma called me a country bumpkin once...
 
Hillbilly is pretty damn pejorative. :D
 
It's not
People self-identify as hillbillies
 
I didn't mean to start a debate lads and lasses.
 
8:52 PM
@Karelzarath The most famous hillbillies were from the Ozarks, after all.
 
Rednecks, too
But not bumpkins
 
People also self identify as other pejorative things
 
I met a rapist once who self identified as a rapist.
 
That's not really a perjorative...
 
8:52 PM
^
 
[redacted political commentary]
 
okay...
 
there's also hick, but that one feels more insulting than the others
 
"Rape" is a crime. "Bumpkin" is an insult.
 
I met someone who lose a million bucks who self identified as a gambler.
 
8:53 PM
"Gambler" is a hobby.
 
But...
 
gets out the popcorn
 
I would use it as an insult.
 
If I called you a gambler, that's not an insult.
 
I'd be insulted!
I calculated the odds good sir!
that is not gambling!
 
8:54 PM
@Anheuser Then you clearly don't know when to hold them or when to fold them.
 
As long as the odds aren't 100% you're still a gambler
 
I know to fold my arms in when I dive out of a fast moving vehicle.
 
@SPavel Calculating the odds doesn't... yeah, that.
 
What about counting cards.
 
Still not guaranteed
 
8:55 PM
Does anyone know how to do that by the way?
 
@SPavel So what if they're 0%?
 
Basically you just need a really good memory
 
I'm sure someone does, yes.
 
@Anheuser there are several different systems, but it's usually a point system
 
@Yuuki Then you're a fool, not a gambler.
 
8:55 PM
I mean specifically here you....
A point system.
 
@SPavel Was I a gambler when I looked for a job?
 
@Anheuser with math.
 
ie, you keep a running total in your head, when you see certain cards you add to the total, when you see others you subtract
 
if a card is worth 10 then you count it as minus one?
 
@GreySage If you payed money for an uncertain outcome, then yes.
 
8:56 PM
when the number is at a certain threshold you general know that the coming cards are going to be high
 
Gambling requires two things: risk and uncertainty
 
@NautArch ...
 
Counting cards is easy. 1, 2, 3, 4... all the way until 52.
 
multiple deck shoes makes these systems more difficult
 
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 ..... = infinity.
 
8:57 PM
@DForck42 Pretty much, the idea is that when the point total is at a certain point, you are more likely to get 2 10s, leading to a usual win
@Karelzarath I used my time, and time is money, so...
 
@Anheuser sorry, it's been a long day. launched our new website...still waiting on the DNS to propagate.
 
@GreySage Not if you're unemployed it's not. ;)
 
@Karelzarath haha, fair enough
 
are questions about miniatures on topic?
 
@Anheuser I thought it was -1/12 or something like that
 
8:57 PM
@DForck42 @GreySage so then would you still be a gambler if you're using mathematics to know that your chances of winning are much higher.
@Adam noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
;)
 
@LegendaryDude Not wagering? I suppose that could qualify as risk.
 
@Karelzarath Your wager is your risk
You are risking a certain amount of value on an uncertain outcome
 
...
 
Please keep it clean.
 
8:59 PM
Sorry.
But seriously.
 
@Anheuser It sounds like more of a kink
 
:36243795 Dude, you're at, like, an 11 and I need to more at a 5.
;)
 

« first day (2366 days earlier)      last day (2595 days later) »