Qmechanic

general recent conversations

The h Bar

General chat for Physics SE (physics.stackexchange.com). For M...

Qmechanic

Jul 20 15:27

@peterh arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0406028

Qmechanic

Jun 21 17:55

@User198 : See this Phys.SE post.

Qmechanic

Jun 21 17:50

@User198 : See this Phys.SE post.

Qmechanic

Apr 12 18:27

@TobiasFünke : When SuperCiocia stepped down as a mod a year ago, the 5 remaining mods pondered for a while whether we needed a new mod, but decided that we could carry the workload with 5 for now. Are you (or somebody else) interested in becoming a mod?

Qmechanic

Apr 12 18:07

@naturallyInconsistent Hi.

Qmechanic

Apr 10 08:48

@GroveRover : Noted. Please be aware that there are also other priorities, such as, e.g. keeping the comment section tidy.

Qmechanic

Feb 7 15:01

@PM2Ring : One can spot the mandolinist Chris Thile from a mile away :)

Qmechanic

Dec 30, 2024 12:27

@Relativisticcucumber : Evil tag editor ponders tagging a person.

Qmechanic

Nov 10, 2024 11:19

@TobiasFünke : Ha-ha. For completeness, you should link to the IMDB page for actor David Cross on your profile page :)

Qmechanic

Oct 28, 2024 08:09

@Slereah Hey.

Qmechanic

Oct 28, 2024 07:45

@RyderRude : Hi, not so much.

Qmechanic

Oct 28, 2024 07:01

@Mr.Feynman Good, thank you. What's up?

Qmechanic

Sep 10, 2024 17:31

@Claudio : In eq. (7) it is the Laplacian. Now int. by parts.

Qmechanic

Sep 3, 2024 18:24

@Davyz2 Hi. I won't unilaterally reopen your post since it was closed as unclear by 2 more users, but if you edit it, it will automatically enter the reopen queue for 2nd opinions.

Qmechanic

Jun 15, 2024 08:02

@PM2Ring : That graph is a masterclass in data visualization.

Qmechanic

May 8, 2024 10:08

@JohnRennie and naturallyInconsistent: It should probably be stressed that OP did not explicitly assume spherical symmetry, so Newton's shell theorem and Birkhoff's theorem do not apply.

Qmechanic

May 1, 2024 06:54

@JohnRennie : Thanks for the clean up.

Qmechanic

Apr 27, 2024 11:39

@SillyGoose I guess this png is related to your Phys.SE question. Out of curiosity, which ref. is the png from?

Qmechanic

Mar 15, 2024 11:22

@SirCrackpot : Not at all.

Qmechanic

Mar 15, 2024 10:20

@SirCrackpot : Sorry, I'm reading the references that you added, and I'm just taking some notes for myself concerning a possible update.

Qmechanic

Feb 21, 2024 07:16

@SirCrackpot : I also got it from Goldstein.

Qmechanic

Feb 16, 2024 07:19

@ACuriousMind Not to forget JB gravity and BBZ black holes :)

Qmechanic

Jan 7, 2024 15:55

@naturallyInconsistent : I would not like to single-handedly reopen a question closed by the community.

Qmechanic

Jan 6, 2024 19:08

One may argue that it is a bit heavy-handed to close this post as homework. Cutkosky cutting rules are an interesting topic that deserves more exposure on Phys.SE. Consider to vote to reopen it.

Qmechanic

Dec 17, 2023 09:02

@Mr.Feynman : Unfortunately, no.

Qmechanic

Dec 14, 2023 07:33

@LalitTolani : Done.

Qmechanic

Oct 27, 2023 06:27

@SillyGoose : From a broader perspective, yes, but I'm not studying mirror symmetry per se.

Qmechanic

Oct 27, 2023 06:06

@ClaudioMenchinelli : Not rude at all. You should be able to edit your own post by clicking an edit button below it.

Qmechanic

Oct 12, 2023 17:33

@Mr.Feynman : No, it is just a matter of prioritizing my time.

Qmechanic

Oct 12, 2023 17:08

@ACuriousMind and @naturallyInconsistent : Thanks for comments on the post.

Qmechanic

Oct 12, 2023 12:13

I would appreciate it if someone could explain-to-OP/mediate/step-in/vote-to-reopen/vote-to-close here.

Qmechanic

Oct 12, 2023 06:20

@Relativisticcucumber : Ha-ha.

Qmechanic

Oct 5, 2023 17:31

@Mr.Feynman : Ha-ha.

Qmechanic

Sep 12, 2023 06:14

Hi @Relativisticcucumber

Qmechanic

Aug 30, 2023 09:35

@naturallyInconsistent : Get well soon.

Discussion on question by AngBar: Is …

Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...

Qmechanic

Jun 28 13:57

Related post by OP: physics.stackexchange.com/q/853968/2451

Discussion on question by Flamethrowe…

Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...

Qmechanic

Mar 19 11:29

Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/541228/2451 and links therein.

Discussion on question by Aswan Korul…

Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...

Qmechanic

Mar 10 17:35

Possible duplicate by OP: physics.stackexchange.com/q/844899/2451

Discussion on question by Rutajit45ad…

Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...

Qmechanic

Feb 26 16:41

Obligatory Feynman video.

Discussion on question by Ryder Rude:…

Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...

Qmechanic

Oct 17, 2024 21:30

Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/70836/2451 and links therein.

Discussion on question by Spinor: Is …

Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...

Qmechanic

May 9, 2024 21:59

Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/3014/2451 and links therein.

♦ Physics.

General physics problem.,

Qmechanic

Apr 26, 2024 06:01

@JohnRennie I guess "Problem Solving Strategies" room 54160 now fills that role.

Qmechanic

Apr 26, 2024 00:04

Brr. It's cold in here.

Discussion on question by ingotangjin…

Imported from a comment discussion on physics.stackexchange.co...

Qmechanic

Apr 7, 2024 10:25

Hi ingotangjingle. Welcome to Phys.SE. To reopen this post (v4) consider to specify whether you are talking about number of spacetime dimensions or number of dimensions of physical quantities. The post seems to talk about both. Consider to remove one of them to focus the question.