CroCo

I used to use classic Gazebo, but I encountered some problems and switched to CoppeliaSim.

Unless you have a really powerful computer, there’s always going to be some limits, and you might need to approach the problem in a different way.

@Paolo, As far as I remember, Gazebo has an option to run the simulation without visualisation. Furthermore, you may consider CoppeliaSim, which is the most widely used 3D robotics simulator in the literature.

It seems a bit more complicated than I first thought. I believe I should stick with what my library offers and look for a workaround if needed rather than trying to go down a different path.

@PabloGonzálezL, what exactly is this overleaf.maxchernoff.ca? I'm using a professional version of Overleaf from my university and I don't see this option.

@PabloGonzálezL thanks

@DavidCarlisle That makes sense. Thank you for clarifying!

I'm not entirely sure how it operates behind the scenes, though.

@DavidCarlisle I find it quite frustrating that they receive such a substantial amount of money, yet it takes an entire year to resolve a single issue. What I still don't understand is why an update would require a full year—especially given that they're already using TeX, which, as far as I know, is freely available.

@DavidCarlisle I agree.

@UlrikeFischer This accurately reflects my issue, and my post is indeed a duplicate of this question. I am curious as to why this correction has not been implemented in Overleaf yet and the error is not helpful at all.

@DavidCarlisle I am utilising identical code across two distinct Overleaf documents. While one functions correctly, the other, which employs \RequirePackage[a-3u]{pdfx}, encountered a failure. So the compiler works fine, I guess.

@UlrikeFischer It is now accessible.

I attempted to reopen it because I believe it is not a complete duplicate but there is no response yet.

@DavidCarlisle I don't see it from my side

@DavidCarlisle I thought that you did, and I fully agree that it is not the exact question; however, the solution is effective.

I have restored the deleted question.

Hello Sir @DavidCarlisle, I appreciate your assistance in resolving the issue I am experiencing. I've deleted the question but I'm not sure if this is the right action. I have one question if you don't mind. Why \RequirePackage[a-3u]{pdfx} cause the issue? I don't see this info in the linked you've shared.

@cfr I've looked at their updated version, it seems I need to add \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} which solved the problem.

@cfr what do you mean by typewriter?

their 'Get Error Assist' is not helpful as it tells me to add 'amssymb' package but it is already there.

I get the above warning in Overleaf.

@JasperHabicht I agree and thank you for the tip.

@cfr sometimes I turn to the chat for quick solutions or suggestions. I engage in this practice not due to laziness but rather because I occasionally do not have sufficient time to conduct thorough research owing to time constraints. Inquiring without due diligence evidently violates the website's policies; however, this does not pertain to the chat functionality.

@JasperHabicht thanks. I did solve it, though.

@samcarter Yes, I do agree. However, I sometimes feel it isn’t worth posting a question about such minor details as this.

Never mind. I solve it with "extra y ticks"

I would like to demonstrate the threshold of a p-value (i.e., 0.05).

Hello everyone, I need to draw a horizontal line at a specific y value inside \begin{axis} \end{axis}. Something like this

Indeed, I have identified an error in their own review. They substituted a "D" with a "G" in one of the references I utilized.

Upon submitting my manuscript, the publisher contacted all authors to verify their work prior to conducting their own review process. They explicitly mentioned the bib files as they do have their own style. I don't know what the hell that is supposed to mean.

@JosephWright What is ACS?

@JosephWright Certainly, there exists substantial funding. This funding is derived from various sources, including journal and conference fees, as well as publication and other online access fees obtained from academic institutions.

Certain templates are considerably outdated. Given the substantial funding available, might it be possible for them to employ some Tex experts?

The problem I face with templates from IEEE and Springer is that they tend to be quite unreliable.

I believe the application of dual quaternion algebra is quite limited, whereas geometric algebra encompasses a much broader scope.

For dual quaternion algebra, I'm referring to $\underline{\boldsymbol{a}}=\boldsymbol{a} +\varepsilon \boldsymbol{a'}$ with $\varepsilon^2 = 0$ and $\varepsilon\neq 0$.

Good evening, everyone. I hope this comment finds you well. I'm seeking someone to help me understand the difference between dual quaternion algebra and geometric algebra. I know quaternion algebra, but I find it difficult to relate it to geometric algebra.

I see. Thanks a lot.

@XanderHenderson so it has nothing to do with measure theory? So basically this is subjective assessment used to measure the human operator workload in numerous fields like aviation, robotics teleoperation and of course psychology