Charlie Joey Hadley

@MichaelHale that would be lovely. Thanks for indulging me in flogging my DOI dead horse, look forward to playing with the video games (data).

@MichaelHale I understand the fear in breaking computation, but a working versioning DOI makes this less of an issue. The canonical doi(.org)/10.xxx/wolfram.xx.data is the most up to date version, and may have breaking changes but doi(.org)/10.xxx/wolfram.xx.data.vX continues to exist and computations/API queries can be made against that version of the data. Knowing what I know about where some of the WC lives, they may need to keep the overall size of WDR small before they're confident in it

@MichaelHale Bah. I can't trust myself, or the people I tell to do "Open Access and reproducible research", to put up the correct or full dataset first time. I'll stick with figshare until this is more clear. Zenodo will have versioning one day github.com/zenodo/zenodo/issues/34

@MichaelHale @MichaelHale could you answer me a riddle about the Wolfram Data Repository? I currently use Figshare as it's the only repository I know of that provides versioning DOI (a la doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3761562.v319). Does the WDR provide such a feature?

@J.M. That's great! Thank you.

I wish it was, no I was challenged to visualise that implicit function and have impressively failed with two kernel panics

@Szabolcs ah no not upgraded - I will look a download from the site admin. Cheers!

This causes a guaranteed kernel panic and reboot on my Macbook (10.12) with Mathematica V11. Anybody else willing to replicate? Plot3D[x^y == y^x, {x, 0, 5}, {y, 0, 5}]

@blochwave the site wasn't hacked, it's just that the company is headquartered in the 5th dimension youtube.com/watch?v=18FsulhRb8Q

@MichaelHale amazing. Without the word cloud I couldn't have understood this information +1

@MichaelHale it did look like Dataset internals were showing through, but I didn't put it past you having them deliberately used for some nefarious reason. Wordclouds are definitely a must, please do ensure that the wordcloud is shaped to the most popular function name in your directory. Cheers and have a good day :)

@MichaelHale do you not feel a self-answered question on listing frequent functions across many notebooks would be useful? I certainly do.

@ManuelOdendahl the wolfram cloud does away with the CDFPlayer as the browsers have killed it anyway (PCWorld come up surprisingly high in my google searches, pcworld.com/article/2990991/browsers/…). The support for 3D graphics in the cloud is fairly good. You're US based so I can't help, I'm a Europhile and European - until Article 50 is invoked, anyhow. Technical sales should help you :)

That's just personal opinion really. Depending on which country you're in, I might know where to point you to for evaluation/questions.

However, the computational side of things in the cloud is quite impressive, particularly if you would benefit from the curated knowledge (Wolfram Knowledgebase (TM)) or semantic interpreters.

Tooltips and a number of control types are poorly supported and there is next to no client-side interactivity available (i.e. panning, filtering) - everything must talk to the server and there's a lag as a result of that.

@ManuelOdendahl your use case would be possible with the cloud. As I'm no longer an employee I can offer the opinion that the cloud interface is not yet robust enough to provide a dashboard experience with CloudCDF that would be that impressive and user friendly.

@JimBaldwin well I didn't know about RStudio's manipulate until just now.. but it does seem to have died a death and have been replaced with [the thing I use everyday] shiny.rstudio.com. Anyhow, thanks for surfacing manipulate for me.

@Szabolcs thanks I thought it was new, if it's easier to talk to the cloud with wolframscript I might have a look into it. I don't have it yet, are there still the issues with multigraph? You added a bug tag for me on here mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/92014/… that I was going to update when I get my hands on m11

There's a lot of stuff there that isn't new but I fell off this horse a little after 10.1, is wolframscript actually new?

For the experienced user... wolfram.com/language/new-in-11/for-existing-users

Unusual request: I'm co-organising a workshop on Mathematica for the Digital Humanities at DHoxSS 2016 but a speakers pulled out. Would anyone in the chat rooms know a digital humanities Mathematica user who'd be interested in getting involved?

@halirutan

The RandomFunction sensitivity was/is really annoying, spoiled quite a few toys I was building. I'll report this variant now.

@LeonidShifrin that's wonderful, thanks! I didn't ask you out of embarrassment in having never learned R when I promised you that I would :D ... finally getting round to it now.

@Szabolcs no worries, thanks for reply :) I asked 'cus I've been using some of your nice stuff here szhorvat.net/pelican/pages/mathematica.html after you answered one of my questions on multi graph

Of course, I'd be ecstatic for a reply from anyone :)

@OleksandrR. I managed to get my Windows machine to 10.1.0 but still have my Mac on 10.0.2 and will be helping support (who replied very quickly) diagnose the issue.

@ilian I've discovered I do HAVE a license for 10.1.0 but contending with user.wolfram.com download speeds now. I didn't see anybody else ask on MMA.SE hence the sky is falling resort to chat, thanks for replying

@Nasser @Nasser there's more voodoo here than your previous question - I'd post a question or/and contact support