David Freitag

Jun 8, 2017 17:04
This answer is flat out wrong. Using an individual DDR4 chip (not a DIMM) as an example, the addressing scheme is composed of 18 row bits, 10 column bits, and 4 bank bits yielding a maximum address space of 2^32, or 4,294,967,296 bytes, or 4GiB per chip. Previous versions of DDR had fewer row bits and fewer banks, but DDR has always been designed so that the maximum size is a power of 2.
 

 The DMZ

A serious place where infosec is discussed PS we don't do hard...
Oct 16, 2016 17:25
woopsies
Apr 27, 2016 21:05
@RоryMcCune Or the other roro can vacation at NY and get his own bottle :P
Apr 14, 2016 21:10
In fact generally speaking usually the most fun things are also the most dangerous
Apr 14, 2016 21:09
What just because it's easy to blow your arm off doesn't mean grenades aren't fun
Apr 14, 2016 21:07
@CodesInChaos What's your beef with C?
Apr 13, 2016 19:51
@Gilles Direct Message.
Apr 13, 2016 19:50
@schroeder DM incoming
Apr 13, 2016 19:25
You know what I mean.
Apr 13, 2016 19:25
conscience? or something.
Apr 13, 2016 19:24
Nah, my conscious wouldn't let me
Apr 13, 2016 19:24
@Gilles Because reasons.
Apr 13, 2016 19:14
@Gilles o
Apr 13, 2016 19:00
@CodesInChaos You just got a (probably) strange email invite. Accept it.
Apr 13, 2016 18:56
Yup, followed
Apr 13, 2016 18:54
@SEJPM def wanna dm your email
Apr 13, 2016 18:50
@SEJPM #WorksForMe
Apr 13, 2016 18:48
@SEJPM AFAIK yes
Apr 13, 2016 18:48
Yes it should!
Apr 13, 2016 18:47
@ThomasPornin delete! :)
Apr 13, 2016 18:47
@ThomasPornin shhhhhhhh
Apr 13, 2016 18:46
Trust.
Apr 13, 2016 18:46
@SEJPM It's for a good reason
Apr 12, 2016 21:50
@RoryAlsop AFAIK
Apr 12, 2016 21:50
With the way they were hyping it, you'd think there'd be at least one RCE
Apr 12, 2016 21:49
@RoryAlsop It's a DoS + MiTM vuln
Apr 12, 2016 21:49
So no, not serious
 

 The Pitstop

For the motormouth in you! (mechanics.stackexchange.com)
Apr 13, 2016 22:39
The issue is that the relays will have small, low power coils in them that might be easy for a sufficiently large EMP to short out indefinitely. To top it off, most of those relays are completely sealed, so fixing them might be quite a pain
Apr 13, 2016 22:38
Yeah everything that relays would control in an older model vehicle like that
Apr 13, 2016 22:38
As for the relays (which also have small coils), there might be something there.
Apr 13, 2016 22:37
@DucatiKiller Yup, but like I said, those coils are meant to handle gobs of power to start the engine, so should be no worries.
Apr 13, 2016 22:37
In which case you could disassemble the alternator and repair the coil with rubber cement or something like that.
Apr 13, 2016 22:36
i.e. if it caused an arc between two windings in a coil it wouldn't put it out of service completely
Apr 13, 2016 22:36
Also, even if an EMP was able to pierce the coating on the wires in an alternator, the alternator would still work it would probably just spark like crazy
Apr 13, 2016 22:35
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Yeah, or stop indefinitely
3
Apr 13, 2016 22:34
@DucatiKiller Semiconductors
Apr 13, 2016 22:34
@DucatiKiller If there is an EMP large enough to kill a coil that's designed to withstand 100s of Amps of inrush current, you've got bigger issues
Apr 13, 2016 22:33
The reason why an EMP is dangerous to discrete electronics is because the electromagnetic field will cause shorts and sparks insige the chips
Apr 13, 2016 22:33
Anything designed for an automotive environment is going to be extremely rugged
Apr 13, 2016 22:32
I would have to say yes
Apr 13, 2016 22:32
Basically all controls are done with automotive relays and switches?
Apr 13, 2016 22:31
i.e. ECU, sensors, etc
Apr 13, 2016 22:31
Your first concern in the car isn't going to be any coils, it will be the discrete electronics
Apr 13, 2016 22:30
@DucatiKiller What sort of coil?
Apr 13, 2016 22:29
Apr 13, 2016 22:28
ohai
 

 The Pod Bay

General discussion for space.stackexchange.com. Check our sche...
Apr 13, 2016 21:52
@called2voyage Things are far from "settled", however there isn't any open hostility (Not that S ever was, really).
Apr 13, 2016 21:51
@Hohmannfan Yup, he's back to normal (well, normal for T anyway :P)
Apr 13, 2016 21:48
FYI I got in contact with T and everything is resolved. AFACT he's still not coming back, though.