Erik the Outgolfer

@HyperNeutrino I'm currently giving @Mr.Xcoder and you room ownership and GitHub collaborator access as the students of the highest level, because I'm likely to leave SE soon, and the other RO is inactive; you may make yourselves "teachers" if you think you deserve the title; please use the added powers wisely ;)

last Sunday...

...

ANTIFREEZER V4

in the meanwhile...

Law Stack Exchange is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for individualized advice from a qualified legal practitioner. Communications on Law Stack Exchange are not privileged communications and do not create an attorney-client relationship.

I'd say that, given the accepted answer, it's 100% a dupe

@Adam yeah lol 6 out of the 38 Ishihara plates aren't supposed to be readable

wait for it...

yeah I meant the general wage

@DJMcMayhem yeah, I would count 50k as way over

wait wth that's way over the average US wage

pretty sure that was made by hand with F12...

this... is 'nother hard one :P

and yeah, if I hadn't mistakenly put (), using : instead of s.t. would've been confusing like hell

that's why I avoided {x in S : x}

nope, it represents S with one of its elements removed, especially if bracketed correctly :P yeah, I'm using unusual notation there

yes, although - is often used, but the latter isn't really encouraged (cue how they use it in our high school system, yuck)

yeah that can be very confusing

also, that (...) should've been wrapped in {}

(well, it does, but it's not representable with pure ASCII :P)

yes, maths doesn't really have a better notation for that :(

alright, then we're definitely in CS territory and not maths territory :P

dangit markdown

and then the formula would be n (S) = {0: S = {}, n (S \ (x s.t. x in S)) + 1: S =/= {}}

(S is some superset, <= means subset)

tbf, I'm pretty sure we can define a function n : {x <= S : x} -> N

an unordered list of numbers at that :P

cardinality still sounds like a function to me

why not

you need to read the whole §4 to even have a chance to understand anything

there are two such tables

the 3rd, 4th and 5th CLAs are only accessible by ⁵, ⁶ and ⁷ respectively

it's just called as a dyad with the 1st CLA as its left argument and the 2nd CLA as its right argument

nope

oh no it doesn't

APL doesn't do it either

what would the syntax be though?

uh... Jelly doesn't have triads

gets 2 stars one second after being posted

@Adám maybe the internal processing?

@Adám then yours should generally be ~66.7% faster, but it looks like the percentage converges to something greater

and 87% faster for 1000, yeah looks like there's a whole different time complexity

@Adám lol yours is 73% faster for input 500

@cairdcoinheringaahing Dyalog APL, 13 bytes: '@',2↓'.'⍴⍨×⍨

although I'm not sure if the program will always end :P

brute force :D

also their certificate was updated just today... ;P

nah, too tired