Stack Exchange
log in
users (56)
rooms (40)
faq
Yosef Gunsburg
general
recent
conversations
Discussion between Yosef Gunsburg and
…
Imported from a comment discussion on
networkengineering.stack...
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 10:03
you'd think I'd get the hang eventually ;)
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 10:03
Mb MB Kb KB seconds, msec
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 10:02
yea, the conversion throws me off every time
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 10:02
whoa
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:59
Long fats
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:59
High speed satellite link, high latency
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:59
Drove me in circles
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:58
I remember trying to figure out BDP and RTT and window scaling TCP extensions...
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:57
(Math escapes me :))
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:57
Thanks!
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:56
yea
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:55
~ 50Mbps
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:55
= 51.2
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:55
?
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:55
/1000
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:55
/.01
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:55
64KBps
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:53
right
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:52
yup. so Win7 for example will set that up
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:52
from the start?
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:51
So that sets the window to a large value?
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:50
g
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:50
they set the multiplier
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:50
I know a university that does it
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:50
They start with a scaled window
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:49
Many implementations throw the window through the roof anyways
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:49
Ah, I see
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:48
lol
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:48
Optimizing TCP is fun...
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:47
That always makes me craaazy.
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:47
Oh... Up there you were referring to the BDP?
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:43
yea. every user download will congest
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:42
:)
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:42
I wouldn't suggest going lower than 10M
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:42
good point
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:41
hmm
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:41
for a file trans?
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:41
etc
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:41
vs. sql transactions
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:41
if you see file transfers (user based) taking up the link for a couple seconds here and there
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:40
and it really depends on the type of traffic
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:40
absolutely
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:38
how'd you get 51.2?
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:37
64KB/10ms
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:37
What I'm getting at is that if you have a 100Mbps link, and someone decides to download 600MB, the link will be saturated for the file transfer, but that doesn't mean you need a 100M connection
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:36
ah
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:36
Wait, that's the default?
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:35
And it will quickly scale back
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:35
Right
Yosef Gunsburg
Jun 9, 2013 09:34
It will never scale up in the first place :)