The DMZ

A serious place where infosec is discussed PS we don't do hard...
Mar 31, 2016 15:23
please
Mar 31, 2016 15:23
and you're attracted to it?
Mar 31, 2016 15:22
why are you here if I'm talking BS?
Mar 31, 2016 15:22
please @Shog9
Mar 31, 2016 15:22
dishonest?
Mar 31, 2016 15:22
whenever I wanted to point any of these problems out the response I got was basically "we don't care" wrapped in a "we don't give a toss" wrapper
Mar 31, 2016 15:21
about what @Shog9?
Mar 31, 2016 15:21
dishonest?
Mar 31, 2016 15:21
Oh look
Mar 31, 2016 15:20
and their cocky stance about it
Mar 31, 2016 15:20
I mean, yes, sure, it is impressive what a massive cock-up it is
Mar 31, 2016 15:20
@RoryAlsop like what? that there's no session invalidation after years of being pointed out as a big effin problem? that SSL/TLS works so great across the site? that each time they change sing-on process they introduce more problems than they solved? that they test new features on production servers? what exactly is impressive?
Mar 31, 2016 15:18
I bet they're good at ping pong tho
Mar 31, 2016 15:16
I wouldn't hire not one of them
Mar 31, 2016 15:16
I don't care that they can recite fucking Microsoft manuals ... as developers they're as crap as they come
Mar 31, 2016 15:15
at least that's the attitude
Mar 31, 2016 15:15
SE as a platform is a mess, and whose fault is it? let me guess ... it's us isn't it?
Mar 31, 2016 15:14
I DON'T BELIEVE IT... THEY CAN PROVE IT WITH COMPETENCE
Mar 31, 2016 15:13
it's pretty much when I realized it's a joke, and I don't believe they have a single half-decent programmer among the lot of them
Mar 31, 2016 15:12
@RoryAlsop I meant that if your session is stolen (and SE makes it extremely easy), and account abused ... as per Shog9 ... tough luck
Mar 31, 2016 15:10
it only got worse, erm, packed with more features
Mar 31, 2016 15:10
@kalina guess what, that process is still just as epic as it ever was
Mar 31, 2016 14:53
@DavidFreitag that just removes all the charm from it, the whole point was that they were wired... if you wanted "mobile" you just added longer cord to it
Mar 31, 2016 14:46
this is also just a phone :P
Mar 31, 2016 14:46
Mar 31, 2016 04:43
I should start looking into solar tho
Mar 31, 2016 04:42
yeah you live alone in an apartment ... plus I opted for all renewable sources so that adds up to the cost a bit
Mar 31, 2016 04:39
I'd say a bit more but OK thereabout
Mar 31, 2016 04:38
sounds about right
Mar 31, 2016 04:37
I recon it costs me about 10 € of electricity per month, it certainly doesn't show up as strikingly apparent on the bills
Mar 31, 2016 04:34
@DavidFreitag it consumes about 40 W when monitors are off
Mar 31, 2016 04:33
sure, but not much
Mar 31, 2016 04:32
I build for silence so good power management is part of the trick
Mar 31, 2016 04:32
not at all
Mar 31, 2016 04:30
oh definitely
Mar 31, 2016 04:30
at least I don't remember it
Mar 31, 2016 04:30
or last year for the matter LOL
Mar 31, 2016 04:30
@DavidFreitag I don't think I restarted it this year
Mar 31, 2016 04:29
@Xander no, firefox :P
Mar 31, 2016 04:29
5
Mar 31, 2016 04:28
I think the problem might have been that I haven't closed my browser for weeks and it updated a couple of times in between
Mar 31, 2016 04:27
OK Ghostery just completely lost it, it's fine now after a bit of fiddling with it
Mar 31, 2016 04:25
bah it was Ghostery but it's still odd
Mar 31, 2016 04:23
wait I'll go into it
Mar 31, 2016 04:23
ReferenceError: spf is not defined
TypeError: yt.setConfig is not a function
TypeError: yt.setConfig is not a function
Mar 31, 2016 04:21
yes errors but not the ones I'd expect
Mar 31, 2016 04:21
not according to the console
Mar 31, 2016 04:21
@DavidFreitag ^ this is what I got after clicking your link
Mar 31, 2016 04:21
Mar 31, 2016 04:20
what the heck is going on with youtube?