The h Bar

General chat for Physics SE (physics.stackexchange.com). For M...
02:07
Does anyone knows any mathematica package for calculating in-in formalism Feynman diagram ?
Thu 02:05
I think it is really hard to say if someone had learnt all of GR.
Thu 02:04
@DIRAC1930 how do you define "learn GR" ?
Thu 02:03
@controlgroup lol
Jul 14 08:44
wouldn't be surprised if it is written by Bilbo :P
Jul 14 08:43
@JohnRennie pretty J.R.R. Tolkien
Jul 14 06:15
hello
Jul 12 10:29
btw no need to be aggressive, i mean no harm
Jul 12 10:22
sorry
Jul 12 05:39
I think you are right about the part where every theory has its own merit
Jul 12 05:32
my bad
Jul 12 05:31
@JohnRennie i suppose you are right
Jul 12 05:30
@bolbteppa the problem is that too much people are on the direction of steering away from reality
Jul 12 03:38
@naturallyInconsistent what does the "mew" mean ?
Jul 12 03:17
@naturallyInconsistent anyway you are correct, just write out the nabla and there will be no confusion
Jul 12 01:06
btw I think Ads/CFT is not completely useless in real life, they might help us understand black holes in our universe better
Jul 12 01:04
people might start doing de-Sitter again
Jul 12 01:04
if someone find a new method towards de-Sitter space or find a new pragmatic aspect to do research on
Jul 12 01:02
so there is still hope
Jul 12 01:02
there are people doing physics on de-Sitter
Jul 12 00:52
but I still think string theory on de-Sitter space can be a very promising candidate for quantum gravity, it is just that not a lot of people are working on it.
Jul 12 00:50
okay i forgot who state this lol :P
Jul 12 00:46
so it is much harder to write an essay on de-Sitter space and a lot of them turn to anti-de-Sitter space
Jul 12 00:45
because de-Sitter space is much more harder than anti-de-Sitter space
Jul 12 00:44
@DIRAC1930 if seen someone in the chat stating that they don't dare to do research on making string theory more pragmatic for the fear of losing their job
Jul 11 10:32
@naturallyInconsistent so is this indeed taking covariant derivative twice ?
Jul 11 09:55
because they substitute something with the covariant derivative into a formula with a covariant derivative and arrive at the result
Jul 11 09:54
and from the content it looks like it have something to do with taking covariant derivative twice
Jul 11 09:53
@Slereah no it actually looks more like this: ${A^{\nu;\mu}}_{\mu}$
Jul 11 09:04
(in my book the lower index $\mu$ is behind the upper index $\mu$)
Jul 11 09:04
guys I come across a notation $A^{\nu;\mu}_\mu$, what does that mean ? taking covariant derivative twice ?
Jul 11 07:21
they thought:"wow ! terminator is comming true ! so it must be really smart ! "
Jul 11 07:20
@SirCumference they mistake ChatGPT for some super artificial intelligence in the sci-fi movie like skynet in the terminator i suppose.
Jul 11 07:06
yup, build from the prerequisite is the best choice
Jul 11 05:01
@Feynmate I wasn't reading carefully enough :P
Jul 11 04:55
in case you live in different time zone, good morning, good evening and good night :P
Jul 10 14:37
and I think if you don't know about the stuff, it is easy for you to be misguided by LLM @fqq
Jul 10 14:33
@qwerty it simply means attracting wealth
Jul 9 14:31
or certain part of the website
Jul 9 14:31
it has a function of making certain button vanish
Jul 9 14:30
@Slereah no i mean certain area of the website
Jul 9 14:20
now i am working to block AI button on all SE websites :P
Jul 9 14:19
@Slereah iron and sulfur ? i'm not sure what that means :)
Jul 9 14:19
so I could simply get rid of that button
Jul 9 14:18
luckily i get an ad blocker that can block elements on a website
Jul 9 12:46
and also other SE
Jul 9 12:46
and find PSE the better choice
Jul 9 12:45
I come to this site because every LLM I have tried failed me
Jul 9 12:44
I don't even want to play around it
Jul 9 12:44
if you want AI, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok or Deepseek is so obviously better choice