Nov 7, 2017 18:23
Anyhow, I got to go for now, good luck!
Nov 7, 2017 18:23
Or the class current-menu-item added.
Nov 7, 2017 18:21
I have the feeling you be doing it wrong. I would probably do it like this

-taxonomy
---parent1
------childA
------childX
---parent2
------childB
------childX
---parent3
------childC
------childX

You see, different parents can have the same child term name, here childX, without it being the same term, they have different ids, so they wouldn't get all highlighted.
Nov 7, 2017 18:16
So you're using the same term of the same taxonomy on multiple instances?
Nov 7, 2017 18:14
Because I think having the same term name in different taxonomies shouldn't add the class.
Nov 7, 2017 18:13
So you're mixing the taxonomies in your menu?
Nov 7, 2017 18:00
Are those hierarchical taxonomies?
Nov 7, 2017 18:00
You're just getting the first id, because the code in your other question is breaking after the first occurrence.
Nov 7, 2017 18:00
Are you working with taxonomies, pages? Or what are you referring to, when your speaking about terms?
Nov 7, 2017 18:00
I'm over simplifying a little bit, but WordPress is applying current-menu-item to all menu items with identical objects that are connected to the page you are viewing. Which definitely makes sense in a way, because generally you want to identify the element you are viewing, not the menu item you clicked. So I hate to break it to you, but I'm pretty sure it is indeed working properly and as intended. Otherwise I would advice you to add detailed information.
 

 The Loop

Where humor doesn’t work.
Mar 30, 2016 17:52
IIRC implementing it was pretty easy and I did it for a client, so I thought there is no security risk, but don't ask me for specifics, it was a while ago
Mar 30, 2016 17:45
unless it has changed lately it isn't default
Mar 18, 2016 14:18
@MarkKaplun haha forgot about the effort needed...craziness I have a lot too :)
Mar 18, 2016 14:15
the real question is, who is crazy enough to actually do a fork of WP
Mar 18, 2016 13:55
Actually the future is now isn't a logically true statement. So I kind of regret saying it, just because it was fitting. I don't want to perpetuate something wrong. Should be something like, now was the future.
Mar 18, 2016 13:50
because the future is now
Mar 18, 2016 13:36
@MarkKaplun the shell of the bubble is blocking your view :)
Mar 18, 2016 13:33
@toscho Of course :D Or maybe they escaped and do not longer need to discuss about it..
Mar 18, 2016 13:32
Just their line »Love beautiful code? We do too. The PHP Framework For Web Artisans.« makes Lavarel actually sound like the natural adversary.
Mar 18, 2016 12:24
So WP might be on top, not because it is the worst, but because it is used a lot.
Mar 18, 2016 12:23
Unfortunately so true...I don't like it though
Mar 18, 2016 12:19
One a side note, am I the only one thinking, Helen is looking very good, I have never actually seen her just read things by her or her name.
Mar 18, 2016 12:17
On the other hand, people like to complain about things and WordPress is good for that. Strangely it gets often chosen for the projects anyways. Personally I'm not getting that contradiction...
Mar 18, 2016 12:17
What??? People don't like working with WordPress...I'm absolutely shocked.
Mar 17, 2016 12:08
Maybe something like this answer? Regarding the hash I mean.
Feb 11, 2016 17:42
Maybe there isn't a technical problem, so no error is thrown, maybe you are targeting the wrong element, or whatever. and thus it isn't working, but not wrongfully coded.
Feb 7, 2016 14:11
@toscho hail to the king! until he gets beheaded of course...
Jan 6, 2016 14:46
@MarkKaplun you are probably right, although it isn't that hard
Jan 6, 2016 13:20
I don't know why, but I kind of was surprised, but in the end, what do I know :D
Jan 6, 2016 13:19
@MarkKaplun no contradiction on my part, in terms of all the details that are brought up, but on the other hand, it actually isn't a complicated problem to solve
Jan 6, 2016 12:56
I mean could the card have been clearer, sure - can it be done right with the card as it is, definitely - end of story :D
Jan 6, 2016 12:55
@Sisir what? that is a thing people discuss...
Jan 5, 2016 14:42
otherwise I would have asked for names :)
Jan 5, 2016 14:42
@toscho too bad we are not a blaming and shaming community
Dec 27, 2015 23:54
Oh my goodness, the comment is golden :)
Dec 5, 2015 10:16
@kaiser your money says you are the best
Nov 24, 2015 15:36
@Howdy_McGee The only thing you need is an account. There are no restrictions, so you could create one and do it yourself.
Nov 24, 2015 14:16
you meant that, I suppose :)
Nov 24, 2015 14:15
awesome ninja
Nov 24, 2015 13:56
but don't forget to give it a catchword like, lets say, awesome...
Nov 24, 2015 13:55
really...how to produce over-simplistic, common-sense content
Nov 15, 2015 18:21
@toscho That might be a hasty and unjustified assumption...but believing is truth I guess :) But joking aside, looks like you two had a good time.
Nov 14, 2015 11:23
@Sisir ok, I'm wrong than :)
Nov 13, 2015 22:20
@Sisir You probably should ask her at the question, because she won't get it automatically, only the next time she is in the chat.
Nov 10, 2015 21:20
@TomJNowell next time maybe, I just presumed a (different) joke, so my expectations weren't met
Nov 10, 2015 09:43
@TomJNowell I don't know why, but I kind of expected you to link a picture of yourself... :)
2
Nov 9, 2015 10:14
@Sisir you've predicted it ;)
Nov 6, 2015 20:02
@Rarst I guess I've earned your disapproval :)
Nov 6, 2015 17:39
@Rarst do something more substantial....I guess
Nov 6, 2015 16:01
my guess is, they had the blue one done and no time and/or interest to redo it