Aug 9, 2020 19:53
@ThePopMachine The difference between this answer and the others is that these are examples of the phrase "first contact" being used in a non-sci-fi sense; they mean first contact between two human cultures. I assumed, since this is SF&F, you meant first contact with aliens :)
 
Nov 27, 2018 19:12
Or more succinctly... is there a difference in the penetrating power between me stabbing you with a sword or me holding a sword stationary while you dive onto it?
Nov 27, 2018 19:12
Just rewrite this question to restate the premise without the fantasy elements. They're totally irrelevant to the question and answer: Switch "Shelob" with "guy wearing plate armor" and "magic sword" with "sword". Assuming a given person cannot pierce plate armor with their sword, could the armor bearer pierce their own armor with the same sword merely being held in place by the sword bearer?
 
Nov 15, 2018 15:24
@KyloRen well, you could interpret them properly, for example, you could read the tooltip on the downvote button.
 

 The Restaurant at the End of the Univ

General discussion for scifi.stackexchange.com, both on-topic ...
Jul 29, 2018 19:34
no, they're the same link, don't need both of them.
Jul 29, 2018 19:34
:thumbs_up:
Jul 29, 2018 19:31
feel free to rewrite and pin whatever you want :)
Jul 29, 2018 19:31
the first link is broken, don't pin it.
Jul 29, 2018 16:04
or, better yet, ignore that link and go here: gofundme.com/…
Jul 29, 2018 15:52
I hope this is not considered bad form here, if so I apologize, but please take a moment to consider: gofundme.com/help-me-get-new-lungs
10
 

 The Screening Room

“We are all the pieces of what we remember. We hold in ourselv...
Jul 29, 2018 16:09
if not I'm probably gonna die.
Jul 29, 2018 16:08
yeah, well, if I'm really super lucky and I can go back to my current job afterward I will be mostly OK.
Jul 29, 2018 16:08
thanks... i mean I'm not dead yet.
Jul 29, 2018 16:04
Take a moment to consider: Help Me Get New Lungs
5
Jul 29, 2018 15:53
I hope this is not considered bad form here, if so I apologize, but please take a moment to consider: gofundme.com/manage/help-me-get-new-lungs
May 12, 2017 05:50
do we have to rub it in?
May 12, 2017 04:15
but that's not even my point. what do I personally do to stop it?
May 12, 2017 04:15
this time they clearly stepped over the line. 9 times out of 10, though, that's not even what happens.
May 12, 2017 04:14
when no one can tell you where the line is ahead of time, and no one's willing to talk about where the line is after the fact, you're left guessing.
May 12, 2017 04:14
But I'm also a regular of several rooms, some of which frequently talk about exactly the same things that got Mos suspended.
May 12, 2017 04:12
other than "be terrified to talk about anything"
May 12, 2017 04:12
but no one's willing to explain how we're supposed to do that.
May 12, 2017 04:12
we keep being told to "do better".
 

 The Bridge

General Arqade Chat. We tried to leave once, but the door lock...
Jul 29, 2018 16:04
sorry :|
Jul 29, 2018 16:03
Jul 29, 2018 16:03
i always do that
Jul 29, 2018 16:03
ugh.
Jul 29, 2018 15:52
I hope this is not considered bad form here, if so I apologize, but please take a moment to consider: gofundme.com/manage/help-me-get-new-lungs
May 12, 2017 15:23
and join all of them at once.
May 12, 2017 15:23
you can set up favorites.
 
Jun 28, 2018 14:10
@TheLethalCarrot it's how some people insist on doing things no matter how many times the rest of the community tells them to stop, is a more accurate description.
 
Jun 21, 2018 14:57
@Catija I don't think anyone here is asking for an election. I feel like several of these meta questions have been marginally passive-agressive ways to express the exact idea you just did -- we have 5 moderators but not 5 active moderators, why not trim some of the excess? The response, of course, was "why? it's not hurting anyone." (which is not 100% strictly true, but close enough).
 
May 11, 2018 15:35
didn't we just have this post like 6 months ago?
 
May 1, 2018 03:52
but then we would have to elect new moderators, and historically speaking, that tends to end badly.
 
Oct 3, 2017 15:29
@MichaelKarnerfors it's well established SE policy that "the community finds it offensive" is plenty justification for removal of content, and in certain cases, suspension of the user who posted it. That's the entire point of community-moderated content. Why is this situation any different?
 
Sep 26, 2017 13:42
And yes, I'm openly, blatently, and explicitly voting the user, not the post. If anyone else posted this, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt that they were just unclear how this site works. SS knows better. He's doing this to make people angry and I'm absolutely going to downvote him for it.
Sep 26, 2017 13:42
@Randal'Thor you're ignoring the key part of my comment: if you take out the anti-British rant there is no NEW information in the answer. The Dark Lord posted a very thorough answer about the International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy nine months ago. SS's answer merely takes that exact information, presents it less clearly, and tacks on "plus Churchill was also evil" onto it.
3
Sep 26, 2017 13:42
@Randal'Thor and there's is a HUGE difference between disliking a user, and recognizing that a user has repeatedly taken actions to disrupt the site despite being routinely punished for it, and deciding that said user no longer qualifies for "assuming good faith" because they have proven decisively that they have none.
2
Sep 26, 2017 13:42
@Randal'Thor it's a rant because it has nothing at all to do with the question or the answer. Whether the British Empire was evil or not is completely irrelevant to why a character with Dumbledore's power didn't try to stop another evil person in history. You could ask why didn't he stop both of them, but the OP is fully away that answer was already given. They were just looking for an excuse to tell us that the British Empire f---'d over India in case we didn't already know.
2
Sep 26, 2017 13:42
the entire answer is a rather transparent way to trash-talk the British by reviving a question that was asked 9 months ago by providing an answer that included precisely 0% additional relevant information wrapped around a unnecessary political rant, posted by a user with a long and pathetic history of causing trouble just to be a jerk about it, so I feel no need to pretend not to be annoyed by it.
2
Sep 26, 2017 13:42
The second paragraph is a made up justification for why Dumbledore, in the OPs own imagination, might not have thought Hitler was evil. For which there is no evidence given other than "some other people thought Churchill was evil too", which is a logical fallacy on top of everything else. (They're both allowed to be evil.) It also goes against all common sense about how a character who spent their entire lives living in Britain would see Hitler in the middle of The Blitz.
2
Sep 26, 2017 13:42
answers shouldn't contain political views on this site. take that crap to politics.se. this site is for science fiction.take out the entire second paragraph and it's a decent answer.
3
 
Aug 10, 2017 22:08
Diana is not a god; she's a demi-god. The rules may be different for her than Ares.
 
Jul 29, 2017 21:09
@Aaron it was already in your best interests of your employer to screw you; the ACA only moved the goalposts on where and how.
 
Jul 14, 2017 21:21
its an open-ended list question, at least until JKR stops tweeting. we close these all the time.
 
Jul 10, 2017 13:52
@Typhon I'm pretty sure the first scene in movie is Toomb's crew cleaning up the Chitauri mess from The Battle of New York; there is then a title card explicitly stating "8 YEAR LATER"...
Jul 10, 2017 13:52
@FezWasTaken re: your deleted answer -- the second part of your answer was very good and makes perfect sense; I just think you're misinterpreting the first part. Please don't delete a good answer based on a bit of constructive criticism!
 
Jul 6, 2017 17:14
You can't make it interesting, and that's exactly how the SE moderation team wants it.
 
May 18, 2017 14:47
May 18, 2017 14:47
@Valorum 1) tags are not a substitute for asking good questions, and 2) if media tags are only meaningful when paired with story-id... then perhaps they shouldn't be separate tags.