Nemanja Vuksanovic

Would anyone sufficient in the use of the CAS program "Maple" be able to tell me how to write a "binomial coefficients" in the form it is written in most textbooks?

So if I choose, let's say, to calculate the difference between 500 and 100 which is 400, what would the difference in t then be?

And remember, I am supposed to find the differentiated to N(10), so N'(10)

Anyhow you can link me to further reading perhaps? :)

@robjohn Can I ask where you knew this was the way to go?

Ahhh, it worked!

I did bookmark it, but nothing happens?

It all looks so cryptic

@robjohn No, I have not, pardon me. Could you perhaps point me where to do that?

weird*

@robjohn Sorry, your text is kinda wierd looking, I can't really read it sorry ://

@robjohn I would love if it rained in my country!

How would one go about and solve this? This is an old exercise from 2011

imgur.com/Y7o4hon

@TedShifrin As a representative of the Human Race and Mathematics, we hereby task you with your first mission for humankind, which is to find a word for it. Good luck sir!

@leslietownes And on it it says "I <3 CPH".

@TedShifrin I petition you to be the forefront of inventing international phrasing for every mathematical subjects, so no one ever gets confused. We start with cross vector (or what you guys name it in England/ America)!

Yea, Mathematicians like to put "hats" on symbols, they might freeze in the cold you know

@TedShifrin Could be angry haha

I find that mildly funny

The text is in Danish, however, translating it to English gives us "cross vector"

I finally made an imgur link as someone of you suggested. Here you can see the "cross vector". (imgur.com/a/Byi0gNt)

@Wolgwang I think some might call it transverse vectors. I simply just translated the name from my origin language to English, so cross vector is what I got. Sorry for confusion :-)

@TedShifrin Thank you so much for clarifying. May you have a great night/ day forward :)

@TedShifrin Ohhh, I beg your pardon. I got confused for a minute. You also said something about "the vector can't be 90 degrees to itself.". Our textbook says "The cross vector has the same length as the original vector, but is rotated 90 ° counterclockwise itself". How/ what would be a definitive way of explaining what a cross vector is, so people don't get confused? :)

@TedShifrin You wrote "there's a typo or a mistake somewhere" do you mean my actual calculations or the way I phrased my question/ example?

@TedShifrin Oh, so my mistake was the wording I used, I guess I learned something new, thx!

@TedShifrin I was just curious to the specific level, since images helps explaining stuff :))

Imagine you have a point on a coordinate system, let's just say you start from origo. If you have a point, let's say (3, 0), if you draw a vector, it will be (3, 0). The cross vector will be a new point which I learned is (original coordinatesystem (0,3) switched upside down and include a minus sign on the x-value. So 0,3 becomes -3,0 which, if we draw a new vector, will be 90 degree (against the clock) to our original vector).

@TedShifrin It's alright, I will try and use my imagination when explaining this

@Wolgwang Yes!

@TedShifrin Do you need to be a specific level to post images?

@TedShifrin The vector that is 90 degree (against the clock) of your original vector.

@LeakyNun Vacation.

I got it as a fail on my homework.

Can someone tell me, why the cross vector to (-2, -2) is (-2, -2) AND NOT (2, -2)?

@Koro Sorry, I meant @S.M.T. I mixed you two up, pardon me.

@Semiclassical What? Why did you tag me, I don't understand what you are saying "no, it's not" to?

@S.M.T One of the 4 answers is correct. I can help you a little. Remember the rule for exponential functions what happens when you derrive them ;))

ibb.co/QPXXDm8

Hey guys! I am kinda curious in somethin. When looking at a hexagon (6-sided entity) and wanting to calculate the area, could you in theory treat the hexagon as 4 triangles and one square in the middle like this?

@leslietownes Don't answer him, he will use the answer to destroy humanity

Well, a Laplace transform is TRANSFORMING a set of functions to another set of functions, so your prof did get the climbing right haha

@leslietownes Of course, I totally understand it. Just curious if anyone would choose a upper-limit

@user21820 Hey you! Are you referring to my calculations? If so, I posted it here, take a look (math.stackexchange.com/questions/4331100/…)

Anyone know how to find out, how many times a line touches a circle (0, 1 or 2 times) solely using a vector, "v", a point on the line, "P", and the equation for the circle, "C"?