some examples may help. some triplets: (a,b,c)=(1,1,2), (1,1,-2), (1,-1,0)
so the lines x+y=-2, x-y=0, and x+y=2
there's no points which are concurrent between all three of them, and there's no concurrences between the first and last
but the first two do concur at (x,y) = (1,1), and the last two concur at (1,-1)
i guess the point is that, if you pick two lines, then if they intersect then they must do so at either (1,1) or (-1,-1). but they may not intersect at all
except that's not true either
yeah, i dunno wtf this problem meant
i get the algebra they intended you to do, but the problem itself is nonsense
There are two collections of lines.One collection corresponds to $(a+1)x_0+(b+1)y_0=0$ and this is possible only if: a=-1 and b=-1 so we get the equation: $x+y+2=0$
which gives $x_0+y_0+2=0$, where (x_0,y_0) is the point at which lines in this collection meet. Like wise the other collection of lines (corresponding to $c=-a-b$) satisfies $x+y=2$ and you can that d) satisfies these conditions.
I've been getting some wild algebra that I don't think you intended on us doing for the solution Ted. I may be wrong, but it is getting wild in my notepad...
i'll clarify for the culturally ill informed. a company is demonstrating an automated robot cop. a lackey at the company who hopes to sell it is chosen to demonstrate it at a board meeting by pulling a gun on it. the robot demands that he drop the gun. he does. the robot still demands that he drop the gun, and when he can't comply with the machine's nonsensical instructions, it shoots him to death.
it's hard to describe the shining. a guy who is an alcoholic, or former alcoholic, agrees to be a caretaker for a snowbound hotel in the middle of winter and ends up trying to kill his family.
i liked the new david copperfield movie. it's not in my all-time top 10 but it is good, and funny. with dev patel.
there's a system of 3 equations in 3 unknowns on the blackboard in the background of the david copperfield movie. and yes, i solved it instead of paying attention to the scene.
@leslietownes. Cool. I got one item today. I saw a bunch of kids having many, then I said to myself you will get nothing from me :( I felt bad afterwards
a lot of people were doing socially distanced stuff in their driveways. i hadn't seen that before but appreciated it. although i don't see the difference with just answering the door. my daughter began yelling after someone had a dog in their lap. it was all over at that point.
😭😭😭.... I see what you mean I took that last term from rushing and looking at the $x$ partial instead of the $y$ one....
Now I get $-x^4 + 2x^2y-y^2 = 0$ that should factor nicely which i'm going to get once I type this
so doing the "sneaky" quadratic substitution I let $t = x^2$ then set up a quadratic to use the quadratic formula. after solving that I arrived at $t = y$ which translates to $y = x^2$. I suppose I could plug this into my $z$ derivative to find what will eventually be $z = x^3$...
I do actually...factoring out an $x^2$ from the first two terms and then $y^2$ from the second two terms
so here's a question then.....I probably know the answer...... but how do you know "when to stop" if you're solution is going in the wrong direction? and on the other side how do you know when you have a solution if it is something that has no prior solution available?
rough day in algebra for me to day though........damn meticulousness of it.....
how does one do a technical math presentation, in the spirit of 'good presentation practices', especially if one is constrained to say a one hour presentation. It seems to me like unless the audience is already familiar with so much jargon and subtle but important things that will be used in the presentation, this is pretty much impossible without grossly deviating from 'good presentation practices' (not too many words on a slide, 'big picture' rather than finnicky details)
i ask because i will be presenting something ive been immersed in for the last few months to my advisor who has likely been doing other unrelated things, and i dont want to end up doing a 'bad presentation'
and sure, maybe when i become an expert I can convey some subtle technical argument in a few words, but at this stage that doesn't seem possible for me
ive already tried to omit as much stuff that they probably know as possible but my presentation is still bloated
i also have this 'big picture' version which takes a lot of liberties omitting technicalities, but reading it through, i cannot imagine anyone would actually derive any meaning out of it, lol
better put when will I feel ready?....because every time i feel a step closer i discover more that is out there that is unknown to me and I have to learn...
Hey guys! I am kinda curious in somethin. When looking at a hexagon (6-sided entity) and wanting to calculate the area, could you in theory treat the hexagon as 4 triangles and one square in the middle like this?
@S.M.T Given any a and b in R, there are two such families: 1) ax+by+(a+b)=0 and 2) ax+by-(a+b)=0. All straight lines in the family 1 pass through (-1,-1) as a(-1)+b(-1)+(a+b)=0 and all straight lines in family 2) pass through (1,1).
@S.M.T That is not technically correct. What Koro said is correct. The entire family is not concurrent at any point, but there are two families; one concurrent at $(1,1)$ and the other concurrent at $(-1,-1)$.
@Koro i agree with this reading of it. It does lead to an interesting question: suppose you randomly pick one member of the first family and one member of the second. what's the distribution of intersections?
the sticking point here is what "random" means, mind
some of them give the right answer for specific values of x. it is always a waste of time to speculate but i wonder if a draft of the question involved "at x = k" and the draft answers did too and then someone decided to 'generalize' the answers without thinking about the product rule.
i did something like that writing a final exam once. it really frightened me because i only discovered it after i'd turned grades in, and it's a huge paper trail and hassle to change anything after that.
thankfully, 95% of the class 'read my mind' and knew what i was asking for and the 5% who didn't, it didn't make a difference in the ultimate grade.
also it wasn't multiple choice, so the grading process involved the input of a sane human and not just comparison of letters.