SarcasticMathematician

Sandbox

Where you can play with chat features (except flagging) and ch...
Nov 9, 2022 00:52
The derivative of integral is a derivative.
Nov 8, 2022 16:29
I also am aiming to get fields medal for my works on k star gamble theory any way to sign up?
Nov 8, 2022 16:27
My mathematical frame work is based on binary independent advanced Bernoulli trials where everything has 0.5 percent probability of occurence.
Nov 8, 2022 16:25
I have been thinking to take PhD in algebraic gambling theory any advice?
 

 Cafe and Tavern on the math.se

A place to socialize, have fun, share humor and war stories, a...
 

 Mathematics

Associated with Math.SE; for both general discussion & math qu...
Nov 8, 2022 16:06
Surely most mathematician do drugs by looking at what they came up with.
Mar 6, 2022 10:35
@Koro Oh I see how it works. Thanks for saving my life again B-]
Mar 6, 2022 10:32
so it will eliminate the term $\frac{q_1q_1}{r_{11}}$ first time and then $\frac{q_2q_2}{r_{22}}$ at second time right?
Mar 6, 2022 10:31
Ok I will take time to digest it.
Mar 6, 2022 10:26
Sigma that inside is $\frac{q_iq_1}{r_{i1}}+\frac{q_iq_2}{r_{i2}}$
Mar 6, 2022 10:24
@Koro yeah I did that
Mar 6, 2022 10:18
Weird sum notation
Mar 6, 2022 10:14
everybody is offline ;_;
Mar 6, 2022 10:10
for i=/=j is making me even more confused
Mar 6, 2022 10:09
Quite confused
Mar 6, 2022 10:09
I don't know how to expand this if N=2
Mar 6, 2022 10:08
Mar 6, 2022 10:08
quite confusing
Mar 6, 2022 03:58
Thanks I was so confused.
Mar 6, 2022 03:57
Dot product also follows product rule.
Mar 6, 2022 03:57
@Koro no but now I see I proved it.
Mar 6, 2022 03:53
@Koro so they replaced dot product with product?
 

 Math Mods' Office

For informal chat with the site moderators about moderation, s...
Nov 8, 2022 16:01
I hope this rivalry doesn't end. After newton and Leibniz here I see Carlos and amwhy.
Nov 8, 2022 15:53
(No sarcasm)I really like your comments on old math post lol.
Nov 8, 2022 15:52
@amWhy :)
Nov 3, 2022 12:49
Real life game theory.
Nov 3, 2022 12:31
No wonder this community is called toxic lol.
 

 Martin Sleziak's room

Miscellaneous (not suitable elsewhere)
Nov 3, 2022 12:57
Dude respect him. You should pray to Martin R religiously everyday.
Nov 3, 2022 12:56
One is Martin R one is Martin Sleziak are you two brother.
 
Nov 3, 2022 12:53
@BAYMAX your profile is disturbing
 

 Chit-Chat with IB

For general discussions with IB or when comments aren't enough...
Nov 3, 2022 12:28
au au au
 

 The h Bar

General chat for Physics SE (physics.stackexchange.com). For M...
Apr 7, 2022 15:23
I am having doubt for the answer to that post.
Apr 7, 2022 15:23
Ohm's law holds for circuits containing only resistive elements (no capacitances or inductances) for all forms of driving voltage or current, regardless of whether the driving voltage or current is constant (DC) or time-varying such as AC. At any instant of time Ohm's law is valid for such circuits.
Apr 7, 2022 15:23
Ohm's law states that the current through a conductor between two points is directly proportional to the voltage across the two points. Introducing the constant of proportionality, the resistance, one arrives at the usual mathematical equation that describes this relationship: I = V R , {\displaystyle I={\frac {V}{R}},} where I is the current through the conductor in units of amperes, V is the voltage measured across the conductor in units of volts, and R is the resistance...
Apr 7, 2022 15:22
1
Q: Why is electric field zero in a wire with 0 resistance given nonzero voltage?

Curious MindWhy is electric field zero in a wire with 0 resistance given nonzero voltage and infinite charge inside a battery? It is true that for a wire with $0$ resistance there will uniform voltage across the wire. But comparing with an electron in an empty space it seems to be different. Imagine in a spa...

Mar 10, 2022 16:23
I think I understand it now a bit may be I need to contemplate it for a bit thanks for help I will try to reread it again and think more carefully
Mar 10, 2022 16:16
Yes makes little sense.
Mar 10, 2022 16:15
Potential is 0 on negative and N V on positive terminal. Potential difference is NV. "So the voltage rise from the battery must equal the voltage drops from the capacitors" is little bit confusing.
Mar 10, 2022 16:11
Yeah I was thinking this.
Mar 10, 2022 16:09
Is it because potential energy changes because the charges moves?
Mar 10, 2022 16:07
Why?
Mar 10, 2022 16:07
So moving from positive to negative terminal voltage drops.
Mar 10, 2022 16:05
So set negative terminal of battery as 0V and positive as NV where N is real number.
Mar 10, 2022 16:04
I will try to sketch and think about it.
Mar 10, 2022 15:49
The one thing I only know is charge quantity is same on all the capacitors in series.
Mar 10, 2022 15:48
Why is the sum of the voltages of the capacitors in series equal to the voltage of the battery?
My background knowledge is only up to electric potential and capacitors.
I know nothing about Kirchhoff or above.
 

 Problem Solving Strategies

General chat for high school physics. For MathJax see meta.sta...
Mar 12, 2022 01:31
I give up :(
Mar 10, 2022 15:48
I know nothing about Kirchhoff or above.
Mar 10, 2022 15:47
My background knowledge is only up to electric potential and capacitors.
Mar 10, 2022 15:46
Why is the sum of the voltages of the capacitors in series equal to the voltage of the battery?