Quantum-meatball

Apr 17, 2020 08:53
Okay got it. Thanks again @YusufHasan
@AdvilSell Oh I don't mind people having conversations and discussions :) . To be honest, it prevents the room from becoming a bit monotonous.
Apr 16, 2020 19:18
Hello again everyone! I have another doubt that I would like to clear.
In free radical bromination of alkenes, we see that one of the products formed has it's allylic hydrogen replaced with bromine. In that product, the hydrogens attached to he carbons in the double bond are not affected.
Does this also happen in case of free radical chlorination of alkenes or do these hydrogens attached to the carbons constituting the double bond get replaced by chlorine?
Mar 22, 2020 17:10
@YusufHasan Thanks again!!
Mar 22, 2020 17:05
@YusufHasan Ok, thank you so much!! That's what I wanted to ask! Also when making iodobenzene, using Potassium Iodide with benzene diazonium chloride/bromide is ok right? Also, Hooya @AdvilSellis
Mar 22, 2020 17:01
@YusufHasan So just to be crystal clear, if I use benzene diazonium chloride with cuprous bromide it will give me bromobenzene and if I use benzene diazonium bromide with cuprous chloride it will give me chlorobenzene?
Mar 22, 2020 16:53
@YusufHasan Hello
Mar 22, 2020 16:00
What I intend to know is that, "What happens if we have different halides in the cuprous salt and the diazonium salt?"
Mar 22, 2020 15:52
Hello! everyone. I have some doubts related to Sandmeyer's reaction that I needed some help with.

Is it necessary that the diazonium salt of a specific halide, say benzene diazonium chloride, needs to be reacted with the Cuprous salt of only that specific halide, that is, Cuprous Chloride in order to form the required aryl halide i.e. chlorobenzene?
Can benzene diazonium chloride with Cuprous Bromide not give bromobenzene?
 

 The h Bar

General chat for Physics SE (physics.stackexchange.com). For M...
Jan 19, 2020 16:58
Thank you for the help! @ACuriousMind
Jan 19, 2020 16:42
I also think that the question was not really clear and some users also pointed out clarifications in the beginning. I assumed that the question that he really wanted to be answered was that 'how can a reaction force exist if the object on which the force is being applied on be so small?' and I tried to clarify that in the last paragraph of my answer.
Jan 19, 2020 16:34
Ohhh okay.. now I get it. But if I assumed that the hand and the object do not stay in contact after applying force, then?
Jan 19, 2020 16:28
Hello everyone! I recently answered a question relating to Newton's third law and a user suggested an edit in it through the comments. I could not fully understand what the user was trying to say and I wanted to clarify some things. I thought pinging the user again and again through the comments would take up time.
I was hoping that maybe you guys could help.
The link to the thread is given below:
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/525524/how-can-action-and-reaction-forces-be-equal/525535#525535