Sinh

It's not my intention at all, and I not say your answer is wrong, just wanted to let you know there's another way. I mean your current answer is very complex & cumbersome. And I also hope to see a answer better than mine

@Deusovi I can see you're fixed on this logic of thinking, while I not say my intended is the best but it's definitely not that complex. Here is a little hint to start rot13(Jul gurer ner 3 xrlf?)

If I understand it right rot13(Lbh ner gelvat gb znxr qbhoyr artngvir dhrfgvba gb znxr gur yvne fnl gur gehgu. V qba'g guvax lbhe dhrfgvba znxr gung pyrne.)

I don't see your logic. Rot13(Jul jbhyq gur yvne unir gb cbvag gb gur qvssrerapr xrl?)

@Loduwijk btw Michael still not edit his answer do you want to guess my intended answer? here is a clue: Why there are 3 keys?. If you guess before him I will gladly accept it.

@Loduwijk can you delete your comments first? I only need to delete what i responsed to you deletes

seriously I do glad you & I having this conversation

And no it is inappropriate, just trying to add some humor to this mess

thank you, seriously while I glad you interested in improving my question there are things call rule lawyering so no matter how or what you write someone will find a way

then please for a love of god just make a edit suggestion that make it clear to anyone else

yes

so do we on the same page on everthing?

which key go to which lock, and there are 2 locks

it required you to know which key go to which lock

it don't require you to unlock anything

so do we clear?

yes

so do we clear about what i meant?

yes/no?

2 guards answer that question at the same time

& 2 guards answer that question at the same time?

good

yes/no?

ok do you know what I meant about my condition?

ok in your answer by pointing to 2 different keys it make the content of the question change

but by all means reworded my condition

I think it's not worth it, you can point to a chicken and say it is a chicken and somehow someone will say it's a duck

I did ask you to make a edit suggestion

the not equivalent part is "simultaneously" and "then", for example your answer is you point to something and ask THEN you point to something else then ask, that mean your 2 questions is not the same BECAUSE the content has changed

@Loduwijk I think you missing the detail about my conversation with JMP, he asked that can a guard point to multi keys as a answer to my question. I said No, they can only point to 1.

On your question, there's a possibility for you but definitely on them

@hdsdv well, you can make the question so the guard a possiblity can't answer but not definitely can't. So you forced them to go with other possibility

@hdsdv now that is a good question, you make the guard can't answer you so your question is not valid.

@SayedMohdAli Yes I know the answer

@JMP I did say they will point to 1.

@JMP they will point to one of the other 2 keys, of course.

@Oray Nope, it's not given

@SayedMohdAli multiple condition is allowed that's why there are many valid question use form If something, is something? Here's a example puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/2188/…

This is a interesting ideal to have because my answer is based on it

*they acknowledge

@hdsdv but for you there is a difference between your possiblity and their. If you acknowledge there's a possibility they can't answer then it's not valid, but if acknowledge there's possibility they can't answer then they have to go with other

Now this is funny yes, but it is not valid as in you can not ask the question can make them not answer

On your question, there's a possibility for you but definitely on them

@hdsdv now that is a good question, you make the guard can't answer you so your question is not valid.

@hdsdv well, you can make the question so the guard a possiblity can't answer but not definitely can't. So you forced them to go with other possibility

@JMP I did say they will point to 1.

@SayedMohdAli Yes I know the answer

@Oray Nope, it's not given

@JMP they will point to one of the other 2 keys, of course.