HERO

thank you mister

i think i get it now

OH

oh

do i take it that x and y arent independent now, then? but look at the wording it says "chain rule for functions of two independent variables"

i was studying multivar calc where x and y were denoted as independent variables of f(x, y) but now they go on to define the chain rule for situations where x and y are differentiable functions of t... at this point how can i think of them as independent variables though? there functions of t!

express them as functions of another independent variable t

if two variables x and y are independent then should you be able to parametrize them at all?

if

yeah im familiar with epsilon delta!

i see...

but say difficulty-wise? or um, prerequisite-wise? you see, like freshman calculus is prerequisite to analysis...

i'm just getting into things...

i see... deep stuff

oh, no :|

oh... um what's the difference

@LucasHenrique say what?! but my textbook clearly said...!

is the Archimedian property not deducible from the field axioms?

Thank you :)

Yes that makes sense

Ohh yes

So there's no proof, and this is like a principle or something?

@soupless this one

Prove that the above statement is true when g is continuous at L

How would you prove it in full generality though?

Oh...

Yeah haha I can see that much... (^^")

Okay, question no. 2, would proving this statement require concepts like uniform continuity?

Hehe :3 to err is human... keep at it!

Relatable ^^" specially the part about making mistakes :')

Never mind, this room looks pretty dead :| I'll make a post instead

I'm studying acids and bases according to the Bronsted-Lowry definition, and I was trying to find the acids and bases on every reactions provided in the study material I was using. Then I came across this: $\ce{SO2(g) + H2O(l) \rightarrow H2SO3(aq)}$. I can't identify the proton transfer in this reaction at all. Then is it not a neutralization reaction at all?

little by little...

that makes sense

thank you

ah!

bit... "pulled low?"

characters like ^@ and ^H and <80>

err yes, but i see more than just 0's and 1's

how exactly is the binary displayed

what is the gibberish that i see

when i open a binary file with less

hey um

okay, that clears up a lot of confusion! thanks!