Chipster

!!/scan stackoverflow.com/a/65546240/10957435

@SmokeDetector tp

!!/scan stackoverflow.com/a/62668475/10957435

@Makyen Okay. Thanks.

@RobertLongson No, I'm thinking of a Report equivalent to the feedback guide. Like is there any specific things you want me to consider before reporting a post to SD? Any common pitfalls?

Is there any guidance for manually reporting an answer as spam?

And, it just got nuked. So I don't think Smokey can read it now...

Should I manually report stuff like this to Smokey, or do you not want to block that on a "system level," as I believe one the help pages worded it.

@Makyen Ah. That makes a lot of sense.

@Makyen We must be talking about 2 different questions, I think. I think the one I'm talking about only had 2 revisions, and it's not on askubuntu. I was talking about this report.

@Makyen Oh, I just realized the edit was older. That's interesting. Why did SD catch it now then, not before?

@Makyen Got you, so again, if we want to catch it, tp, otherwise fp. That's all that matters. Makes sense.

@Makyen It was asked 6 months ago, that's a long time to wait. I'm going to guess compromised is more likely. However, I think it's gone now, so not much I can do about it now, I think. But I will save that for the future. Thanks :D.

I guess vand is an alias for tp, so does it really matter?

What should I do with a question that seems okay, but vandalized by spam? I ask that as a) what to do with Smokey, since I found it in a SD report (Is spam or vandalism more appropriate?) and b) should I flag it as spam, roll it back, or mod flag (since it appears the OP has vandalized their own post with spam)?

@SmokeDetector why

@Makyen Also makes sense.

@Makyen That's kind of my thoughts. Technically, it falls into our definition of "spam," but it's not the worst type of spam. It's not like they are advertising airline tickets or something ;). Makes sense. Thanks for the answer.

While we're asking about spam, should this also be counted as spam?

@Makyen Oh, I'm sure other people have written good scripts. It's just you are particularly well-known for writing good ones ;)

@Makyen Noted. I should compile a list of userscripts to add if I decide to use them. Although, I could probably just add everything you've made and it'd be good :D

@tripleee Hmm. Weird.

@tripleee Could be. I ran into it in review and gave a [tag:spam] request in SOCVR, so it might have gotten taken care of too quickly for Smokey. I was still surprised it wasn't caught--to my knowledge anyway.

So, did you just copy and paste the text and ask Smokey to check and see what it would have done if it had seen it?

@tripleee Right. That makes sense.

@tripleee So I can't report things that are deleted? I guess that would make sense since it's not a 10k user.

Is this question worth reporting to Smokey, or a) has it already been caught and I didn't realize it, or b) should it normally catch stuff like this anyway since it is mostly non-Latin characters?

@Makyen Awesome. Thank you.

!!/amiprivileged

!!/amipriviledged

I think your edit is also still a little strongly worded, but it does improve your answer. It does, however, still see to avoid the literal question of the OP.

Presuming good faith/earnestness isn't a flaw in the question, it's a feature. That said, if you adding your comments here to your answer, particularly the first one, I think this answer would be salvaged.

This doesn't answer the question. The OP asks if Trump has explained why, not whether Trump would want to or not.

While not NAA, it doesn't directly address whether Trump has attempted to explain this. A quote, or an explanation that you searched for a quote and didn't find one, would improve this answer.

From my interactions with the mods here, History.SE has some good mods. You all seem to work very well together as a team.

@Semaphore Got you. Makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

Okay, that makes more sense. Thanks, @MartinSleziak.

I didn't realize History was in Beta before.

Oh. This is because the site is graduating?

So I'm a casual member of the History SE specifically (I'm more active on other sites). I'm a little confused. I thought current moderators didn't have to nominate themselves in an election on SE. Is there something I missed?

@gerrit I'd imagine it's because the accusation here doesn't just extend to Hunter. The accusation is that Joe is corrupt, not just his son. The claim is that Joe not only knew of his son's actions, but also partook in them.

I mean, the polls are good, but does anyone remember the 2016 polls? There were several of them in favor of Hillary Clinton. Just because there are polls saying Biden is leading doesn't necessarily mean that's how it will shake out.