@CareyGregory If this question is suitable for Medical Sciences depends on the answer. For example if it turns out that Aspartame is worse than sugar for 30% of the population and for 70% of the population Sugar is better, then it makes sense to continue selling both.
@Fizz The people on the economics forum say that the question is not about economics. Can you please move my question to the appropriate forum? economics.stackexchange.com/questions/41715/…
So for secure multiparty computation, when only computing addition we can tolerate 𝑡 < 𝑛−1 corrupted parties. Why then can we only tolerate t < n/2 corrupted parties for multiplication?
the problem Im having with my books recently is that a lot of the popular science books explain some concepts again and again with tedious analogies, however textbooks are usually far to dry for me to enjoy reading. There should be more middleground.
@0celóñe7 thanks. It doesn't have to be physics related. Just looking to extend my booklist. For example I have read "three stones make a wall" (Archeology), QED feynmann, The planet remade (Geoengineering), I contain multitudes (microbiology), life on the edge (quantum biology) recently and enjoyed them.
I like both popular and books that are a bit more involved. I read for example recently the books branches, flow and shapes by Philipp Ball and rocket propulsion elements by george sutton. I really enjoy understanding everyday phenomena too, like for example why glass cracks in the patterns it does etc...
I like both popular and books that are a bit more involved. I read for example recently the books branches, flow and shapes by Philipp Ball and rocket propulsion elements by george sutton.
Light travels at speed x through a vacuum, and then it encounters a physical medium and slows down, only to leave the physical medium and re-enter vacuum. The speed of light immediately re-accelerates to speed x, the speed before going through the physical medium. How does this happen, what is th...
Hej, does anyone have a good way of refining this answer or explaining why the "emitted" photons will be in the same "state" (to explain why they are emitted in the same direction) without getting into superposition and stuff?
Yes, but you calculate the amount of refracted (i.e. Transmitted) light with Fresnel, and from that amount you should be able to subtract the amount of light that is absorbed and get the diffuse reflection?
But if I have the index of refraction of a medium (light enters it from air), I can then calculate the amount of specular reflection using Fresnel and the amount of diffuse reflection would be the refracted part minus the absorption?
With the Fresnel equations I can calculate the amount of light that is reflected and the amount of light that is refracted. But is the reflected light part always specular reflection?