blackgreen

general recent conversations

Charcoal HQ

Where smoke is detected, diamonds are made, and we break thing...

169

blackgreen

Mar 31, 2023 12:50

!!/watch dezyre\.com

blackgreen

Mar 31, 2023 12:06

^ ref: ChatGPT + spam link post: stackoverflow.com/questions/60403220/…

blackgreen

Mar 31, 2023 12:06

!!/watch resijnt\.id

blackgreen

Mar 30, 2023 10:12

!!/watch gsgglobalsolutions\.com

blackgreen

Mar 26, 2023 08:13

!!/watch nebulahoroscope\.com

blackgreen

Mar 26, 2023 08:13

ref: stackoverflow.com/questions/75846524/… there's a suspicious non-clickable link in there that might be worth watching

blackgreen

Mar 14, 2023 15:01

^ plagiarized with spam link

blackgreen

Feb 25, 2023 21:13

oh ok, yeah fine by me

blackgreen

Feb 25, 2023 21:12

appears in an apparently unreported ChatGPT+spam post

blackgreen

Feb 25, 2023 21:11

!!/watch hapivpn\.page\.link

blackgreen

Feb 20, 2023 12:30

@VLAZ ah yes, I just saw it was already reported by SD

blackgreen

Feb 20, 2023 12:28

^ please can someone look into that? The domain appears in a CGPT+spam post, not sure if it's worth watching it

blackgreen

Feb 20, 2023 12:27

!!/watch apkaone\.com

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 22:01

!!/addblu stackoverflow.com/users/21216100/onlinestarups

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:17

also, given the rather singular spam pattern it might be useful to keep the account around as a reference

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:15

for some reason the user has posted one single non-AI non-promo answer, so I didn't outright destroy

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:15

yeah, I also nuked one of those posts as spam

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:13

As you can see the blogspot link blurb is seemingly identical to the SO one. It could even be a bot

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:11

@cigien example stackoverflow.com/questions/75459287/…

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:08

@cigien yes just a sec

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:08

I just wiped away everything

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:08

I suspect the user is creating answers to SO questions with chatGPT on their blog, and then copy-pasting the blog with some words formatted as links

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:06

it's a user who is hiding links to their blog in chatGPT answers

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:02

!!/watch solveerrors\.blogspot

blackgreen

Feb 15, 2023 13:01

!!/watch solveerrors\.blogspot\.com

blackgreen

Feb 11, 2023 07:32

@CodyGray that sounds interesting; though I'm not too fond of chat-ops. I like advanced flagging's ability to report to smoke detector while viewing the post. Makyen's message hinted at SIM being able to do that but with chat commands. Disclaimer: I haven't looked into the documentation yet

blackgreen

Feb 10, 2023 22:35

ah I see. Advanced Flagging -> spam

blackgreen

Feb 10, 2023 22:32

reporting through the API, i.e. with the Advanced Flagging userscript?

blackgreen

Feb 10, 2023 22:31

@HenryEcker how did you report the other three posts?

blackgreen

Feb 10, 2023 22:29

@Spevacus thanks for the heads up, noted. What Henry said. What I wanted to do was to report the domain. watch seems to accomplish this just fine

blackgreen

Feb 10, 2023 21:53

!!/blacklist-website www\.booksyeah\.ml

blackgreen

Feb 2, 2023 20:14

!!/addblu stackoverflow.com/users/21125383/karthik

blackgreen

Feb 2, 2023 20:13

!!/report stackoverflow.com/users/21125383/karthik

blackgreen

Feb 2, 2023 12:22

!!/addblu stackoverflow.com/users/21132858/yiszza

Winter Bash 2021

discussion & hat hunting for winterbash2021.stackexchange.com

blackgreen

Dec 29, 2021 10:02

Spotting Scope: follow a question and visit it again after it has been edited?

Chinese Language

For students, teachers, and linguists wanting to discuss the f...

blackgreen

Sep 11, 2020 13:12

I've removed three low-traffic tags from the site. Due to scarce participation on meta, I just went ahead and did it. Feel free to open a thread on meta, if you disagree and/or with to restore them.

1. [family], 2 questions overall, it's already covered by [kinship]
2. [distribution], 2 questions overall, rather generic and unclear what it refers to
3. [interjections], 3 questions overall, extremely narrow syntactical topic, and anyway the existing questions were about [swearing].

blackgreen

Sep 3, 2020 18:35

Improving one's own English as side effect of helping others with Chinese...? Nice

blackgreen

Sep 3, 2020 18:34

while digging up old posts I came across several answers from Tang Ho, who has been consistently posting for quite some time now. I noticed that his English improved significantly over the years...!

blackgreen

Sep 1, 2020 19:44

thanks

blackgreen

Sep 1, 2020 19:44

Also, if you have ever posted a more extensive discussion in an answer or anywhere here on a stack exchange site, I would love to have those links as well

blackgreen

Sep 1, 2020 19:43

I can't find it anymore. Please can you repost it?

blackgreen

Sep 1, 2020 19:43

@dROOOze I remember a while ago you posted a link to some article, probably under one of my answers, debating the merits of using the term "component" instead of "radical".

blackgreen

Aug 20, 2020 07:58

nice, thanks

blackgreen

Aug 19, 2020 21:12

@dROOOze please can you teach me how to format the characters in the <kbd> tag as you often do, like here .https://chinese.stackexchange.com/questions/38698

Do you use some particular tool to remove the character background?

Discussion on answer by dan: Using 有 …

Imported from a comment discussion on chinese.stackexchange.co...

blackgreen

Aug 20, 2020 16:11

@user21820 thank you for your insight

blackgreen

Aug 20, 2020 11:16

in other words, it is possible to use these linguistics concepts in either EN and ZH, and they are not confined to one language or the other, regardless of how much widespread the literature making use of them may be.

blackgreen

Aug 20, 2020 11:14

My argument, which I admittedly didn't bring up in the other thread, is simply that verb valency exists in any language (or at least in English and Chinese), hence transitive and ditransitive verbs exist, hence the concepts of direct and indirect object exist

blackgreen

Aug 20, 2020 11:12

@user21820 interesting discussion, and great articles you linked along the way.

Since you seem to know what you're talking about, which is a rare quality, I would like your opinion on the following:

in another thread I was debating with others about whether certain linguistics concepts are general enough that it's possible to use them to analyze different languages, irrespective of whether said concepts are commonly used in such analyses. The keyword being "commonly used".

Specifically we were talking about whether the notions of "direct object" and "indirect object" make sense in Chines…

Discussion between blackgreen and Argyll

Imported from a comment discussion on chinese.stackexchange.co...

blackgreen

Aug 19, 2020 16:45

So feel free to contribute as you see fit

blackgreen

Aug 19, 2020 16:44

And English is not my native language either by the way