Wolfram Mathematica

Welcome! This is the main Mathematica chat room for mathematic...
May 29, 2023 16:12
I received some guidance from user21 but now there is another issue. mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/285802/…
May 29, 2023 02:38
pars = <|
"MaterialModel" -> "LinearElasticAnisotropic",
"MassDensity" -> If[Abs[y] <= Abs[barY/2], 2700, 8908],
If[Abs[y] <= Abs[barY/2],
"ComplianceMatrix" -> matSB*1*^-12,
"ComplianceMatrix" -> matSA*1*^-12],
"AnalysisType" -> "Eigenmode"
|>;
May 29, 2023 02:36
Is anyone experienced with Solid Mechanics in Mathematica? I have a fairly basic question about material parameters. I need to specify two different compliance matrices. A hint would be great.
Dec 31, 2018 21:35
Happy New Years Everyone!
Sep 19, 2017 20:52
@user21 Do you have an example of using FEA to calculate the magnetic field (or potential field) of a solenoid?
Sep 19, 2017 01:37
Hi @Edmund: I did see that but it focuses on an analytic solution and I was looking for a numerical method to include non-linear ferromagnetic materials
Sep 19, 2017 01:35
Has anyone used NDSolve and FiniteElements to solve Magnetostatic problems with solenoid coils and ferromagnetic materials?
Sep 12, 2017 00:58
@halirutan Thanks ... I figured it out
Sep 12, 2017 00:43
I'm try to produce a streamplot of an electric field (the electric field potential is calculated using ndsolve then the grad of the interpolation function). A contourplot of the electric potential is correct and one of the electric field is plausible, but a vector or stream plot is returned empty. Any guesses what I'm doing wrong?
Jul 8, 2017 02:44
Using AccuracyGoal->[one order of magnitude smaller than MaxCellMeasure] and MeshQualityGoal -> 1 helps (both not required in V10.4) but it's still not great
Jul 8, 2017 02:40
I find when I perform a RegionDifference on two ImplicitRegions with small dimensions (0.01) then use ToElementMesh the resulting mesh is terrible in V11.1 but perfect in V10.4
Jul 8, 2017 02:17
@user21 what do I need to do in order to make V11.1 generate a mesh with the same quality as V10.4?
Aug 25, 2016 18:51
@JasonB Do you think Wolfram would provide a Raspberry Pi license unlocked for more than 16 kernels?
Aug 17, 2016 00:31
@Karsten7. "BenchmarkResult"->0.245, mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/124097/41016
Aug 16, 2016 23:37
@JasonB My daughter thinks the Pi is cool and she enjoyed setting it up with me ... I've done a couple of projects with her using the GPIO of the Pi ... I don't think it would outperform a carefully selected low end PC.
Aug 16, 2016 21:03
@JasonB @Karsten7.
Aug 16, 2016 21:03
I was planning on running a Parallelize[Benchmark[]] tonight
Aug 16, 2016 21:03
As far as speed it seems to be about 1/2 the speed as my Quad Core Laptop w/ 8GB RAM running my own notebooks
Aug 16, 2016 21:01
I spent $290 and can post a full BOM if you're interested (money could be saved if simple stand-offs were used to mount the boards) ... The only special code for Mathematica came from here: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/123442/…
Aug 16, 2016 20:13
16 Kernel Raspberry Pi 3 Cluster
Aug 16, 2016 20:12
user image
2
Aug 11, 2016 01:15
@bbgodfrey I'm interested in creating a 2D electromagnetic PIC simulation for a high temperature plasma (30keV) ... do you know of any open source Mathematica codes that would be a good starting point?
Aug 9, 2016 01:06
@MichaelE2 That doesn't seem to remove them from the Kernel Configuration Options window
Aug 8, 2016 23:53
Is there a command I can evaluate in the front end to remove a kernel ... when I try to do this through the Kernel Configuration Options window it freezes (Pi3 V10.3)
Aug 6, 2016 01:03
The entire notebook is only 18MB
Aug 6, 2016 00:59
I used DumpSave for a 2D Interpolation Function created by NDSolve and the file is 35MB ... Does that make sense?
Jul 22, 2016 03:14
@MichaelHale Cool!
 

 Electrical Engineering

A place to talk with friends from the EE community about vacuu...
Dec 31, 2018 22:45
Happy New Year
 
Jul 22, 2016 19:01
in my post
Jul 22, 2016 19:00
just like the image shows
Jul 22, 2016 19:00
My code would give you a curve for tau=0.5 and tau=1.5
 
Jul 21, 2016 13:44
The question has been deleted
Jul 21, 2016 13:43
You can use the previous version and just define the range of m and p as j ... then change j to 1, 2, etc
Jul 20, 2016 19:40
I'm not sure I completely follow, maybe it's best to write it out as a question for the forum
Jul 20, 2016 19:09
or on SE and I'll work on it
Jul 20, 2016 19:03
you can post your question here
Jul 20, 2016 19:02
sure
Jul 20, 2016 18:30
thanks for the link
Jul 20, 2016 17:15
bye
Jul 20, 2016 17:15
I need to go now
Jul 20, 2016 17:15
No problem
Jul 20, 2016 17:11
Plot[f[\[Tau]], {\[Tau], 0.01, 2.01}, PlotRange -> {0, 3},
PlotPoints -> 100, MaxRecursion -> 0]
Jul 20, 2016 17:11
\[Delta][\[Tau]_] :=
NIntegrate[integraldelta[\[Omega], \[Tau]], {\[Omega], 0, 70000},
Method -> "LocalAdaptive", MaxRecursion -> 15]
\[Gamma][\[Tau]_] :=
NIntegrate[integralgamma[\[Omega], \[Tau]], {\[Omega], 0, 70000},
Method -> "LocalAdaptive", MaxRecursion -> 15]
Jul 20, 2016 17:11
MaxRecursion is 15 for NIntegrate and 0 for the Plot
Jul 20, 2016 16:59
takes 43.8051 seconds on my machine
Jul 20, 2016 16:57
use PlotPoints -> 80, MaxRecursion -> 0 in Plot
Jul 20, 2016 16:56
oh and use Method -> "LocalAdaptive", MaxRecursion -> 15 in the NIntegrate
Jul 20, 2016 16:52
You could probably delete your comments on the answer ... just to clean things up ... it's up to you
Jul 20, 2016 16:44
no problem ... glad to help
Jul 20, 2016 16:42
gamma tau calls integraldelta instead of integralgamma