Little Alien

+1

I want one with touchpad but simple usb cable, not wireless. All shit I see on the Amazon is wireless.

Where can I ask about keyboards on the market?

Are there spreadsheets that allow me to add constraints like "those series must add up to 100 and if they do not, fix the latest unmodified cell value"

@MatthewGunn That what makes me puzzling: you visit A first (in 2/3 of cases). This must make it less likely to be the last visited. BUT IT IS NOT!

@MatthewGunn I do not analyze "getting next to". I am comparing the probabilities of getting into: getting into A vs. getting into B. As you say, if we run into A sooner then we reduce its chances to be the last visited. Yet, we see that the chances are not reduced. That puzzles me. But, I think that it is less paradoxical after your explanation. You basically say that it is irrelevant if we visit A first or after B in average.

You say that my situation was discussed earlier here. But, that analysis does shifts focus away from the paradox I address. Thanks for pointing out that I have no code bugs. Now, it is time to realize that I do not have any false assumptions either. My code confirms all the assumptions and theoretical results and confirms the intuitive paradox I had. Just think about it: you hit A, the the left and right elements of the table sooner than reach B, the center of the table. However, getting later to A is as likely as later B. How is it possible? Why do not you see neither my question nor paradox?

@ssdecontrol Why don't you ask the same question to the "falling into confidence interval probability is 1 or 0" in the first place? My logic is copy-pasted from theirs. Why do you ask me when I challenge it? Ok, you perished my defense, I give up. My logic worth nothing. Does it mean that you defended the remark about confidence intervals succesfully? Is it right that it is wrong to say that mean falls into the interval with probability?

I will then probably add an answer to my question. Yes, I already have a question about it.

There is a million answers on that subject and they all refuse to address what I complain about here. So, it is just polemic. I am not going to ask one more question to be redirect to one of the available answers that just re-iterate the "truth" about the coin flipping that I complain about here instead of explaining it. So explain just here.

So, the same is with the coin. It is antiscientific to say that fair coin has outcomes 50/50. Probabilities are either 1 or 0. Speaking in probabilisic terms you demonstrate your illiteracy.

Quote: The calculated interval has fixed endpoints, where μ might be in between (or not). Thus this event has probability either 0 or 1. One cannot say: "with probability (1 − α) the parameter μ lies in the confidence interval, therefore."

This sounds silly logic. But, how can you say the same about confidence intervals?

A fair coin flipped and, despite we do not know the outcome, we cannot say that it is 50/50 beacuse it is either heads or tails, for sure.

Do not pretend that people are better than Aliens.

Is there anything I need to understand to build such relationships myself?

How do you build mean relationships, like here? As I understand, the logic is "structure is distrubuted like X, we are looking for its mean. If experiment fails with P=q, the average size is incremented by 1. Alternatively, with P=p, (average) structure size is incremented by 1+E(X), so E(X) = q * 1+ p (1 + E(X)). It seems to give right answers but not quite intuitive to me.

I wonder how do they get .2/1.9 = .08? I am getting something closer to .105.

Did you hear about this Elvis problem: "Twins are estimated to be approximately 1.9% of the world population, with monozygotic twins making up 0.2% of the total---and 8% of all twins.''

How do you call a function that multiplies corresponding items of two vectors, (a,b)(x,y) -> (ax,by)?

Why do they say E_i_n instead of simply E_i, texpaste.com/n/jwslyo7

Not, it is ([],whatever[1]), ([],whatever[2]), ... = whatever[1], whatever[2], ...

But, anyway, cartesian([], whatever) = [].

Now, it is a matter of flattening it.

After first iteration, you get ((), a), ((), b) and ((), c). After second, (((), a), a), (((), a), b), (((), a), c), (((), b), a), and so on.

Wait, I feel I am getting it.

How do you program this theoretically?

Theoretically, I map every exsting strings of lenth-1 with abc, I am getting 3 more strings in response. The theoretical problem I see here is that when I try to map an empty, zero-dim strings, I get 0 in response because 0 multiplied by whatever is 0.

I wonder, how do you make a cartesian power of a list, e.g 'abc'? I tried to start from a dot, which is an empty list. I then should get one-dimensional strings a,b,c when multiply it with possible values. Then, taking second power, I should get strings of len 2: aa, ab, ac, ba, bb, bc, ca, cb, cc and so on.

How is it possible that it is Putin steals US elections but not US establishment?

How is it possible that Russians hijack the US election but not the Hillary administration?

BTW, do you know that US is in the state of the war with Russia already youtube.com/watch?v=wuRhALY8iZE?

How can we resist the russian propaganda. You see how dirty tricks they resort to display to their population that US leadership statements are not different from the worst dictators of XX century and this is done with the help of US (leftist) citizens!

This is also related to may alAssad question. Why should we listen US to remove alawites from power in Syria as US and salafite terrorists want that, disregarding elections?

I want to ask a question. If democracy is the best form then why should US rule the world? Who elected them?

Yes, the same class of capitalists organized Golodomor in the US. Here we have a number important conclusions: nowhere it is Stalin's responsiblity.2 It is capitalist class responsibility 3. The golodomor is a myth. Next, we can draw one more conclusion: you is a scum propagandist.

@DVK-in-exile The famine in Russia 1932 was caused by sabotage of the individualist class, who slaughered their animals and seeds not willing to convey them to the newly formed collective farms. The same famine has also happened in Romania and US. Is it guilt of the Stalin as well?

Even through vote count is a last resort of manipulations youtube.com/watch?v=P_Zqbg6QThg. If you are abroad, they US has more means to affect your elections, quora.com/…

In US, you must to sit down and shut up youtube.com/watch?v=6D00MmTuja8 No discussion is allowed in US.

@JeffLambert Which "no fly zone" and "boots on the ground" advisors of president candidates do the american piece activists talking about in the end?

In complete ignorance of facts youtube.com/watch?v=VwYVhqfmb4Y

@JeffLambert Have you seen how he pushes the generals, youtube.com/watch?v=oMIH-W3i7nI youtube.com/watch?v=MQwofJEQ6ng.

It is about Hillary warmonger is less dangerous than Trump, who proposes cooperation.

@JeffLambert youtube.com/watch?v=isH3ZOnAdZg

@JeffLambert But, on the Earth, you are right. Only american like you has a right to decide what is right, who is a "dictator", who must go and who must be a president in which country on the Earth.

You say that you are going to inflict ultimate harm without providing any evidence because you are a grown up. Our ethics says that Clinton supporters hold Satan morality.

Are discern and discrete are related as concern and concrete.

I felt that. I just do not understand why English grammar textbooks say that, grammatically, we must use the latter.

How do I ask more correctly: what drives the Empire or what does drive the Empire?