Ashish Ahuja

:O

@ArtOfCode he's not pingable in the room (meaning that the message won't land in his inbox AFAIK)

afk food

@Glorfindel ah.. so it will show an icon right?

IMO it is abusive: unregistered user, member since today, not related to the q at all, weird username

@SmokeDetector @trip isn't that abusive?

looks like the pending command would be extremely useful in this case

@tripleee flagged

@SmokeDetector k

sd remove

!!/test eremaxadvice.com

!!/blacklist-website eremaxadvice\.com

!!/test eremaxadvice.com

@SmokeDetector k

@SmokeDetector why

@SmokeDetector k

sd remove

!!/test user.com.sg

!!/blacklist-website user\.com\.sg

!!/test user.com.sg

if the user doesn't stop, mod flag

so that means its just vandalism

if it was not an edit, instead a new post with that content, flag as abusive. But in this case it was edited

just rollback

none

^

@SmokeDetector v

@Glorfindel didn't know that. I did the why to see which exact bad keyword it was catching

@SmokeDetector why

@Jamal ehh.. it is 10AM here

must have suspended someone

a mod on that site

@JanDvorak I guess he is talking about the chat about me

agree, it's easier for them to understand from that page instead of the repo

I guess we should first remove the static repo link first, if it is still not under, the website thing and then what @Jan told above^

maybe we should change the site.stackexchange.com at the end of messages to site.SE in case it goes over the char limit

@JanDvorak agree

@angussidney can't we put the message in two parts instead then?

@SmokeDetector heh, why no link to MS in that post?

even this: android.stackexchange.com/questions/91541/…

this also needs more flags: android.stackexchange.com/questions/167979/…

@SmokeDetector why

this needs more flags: graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/84176/…

afk for some time

heh :D

@art is there any update of doing 2 or 3 autoflags per post? IIRC, you guys were talking about this some time earlier

NSFW image ^

if you ever see live spam which has not been reported, you can use the !!/report <link> command next time in here @JourneymanGeek