JAL

Looks like two duplicate answers

Also, this needs some mod attention please: retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/a/8224/621

@wizzwizz4 hi! o/ Thoughts on this? retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/a/8225/621. Seems to be more of a comment than an answer to my question.

Thanks, looks great!

:)

we haven't established them yet here, so we can always disallow it

I guess it's not necessarily "protocol" but more of an acceptable use of CW in the communities

Yeah, did not mean to call you out, I've just always done that on other networks as sort of a way to work around questions that have been answered by other people elsewhere, just to make sure they're "answered"

@wizzwizz4 I'd love your input here: retrocomputing.meta.stackexchange.com/q/543/621

\o/

of course, nothing wrong with that

looks like most of the traffic comes from Stack Overflow and Software Engineering, especially with regard to hot network posts

That post sounds cool! Maybe look at where traffic comes from/in links?

Great, thanks!

Flagged as abusive in accordance with this meta post: meta.stackexchange.com/a/58035/242209

cc @wizzwizz4 @Chenmunka

Any mods around? This needs a mod nuke: retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/a/2690/621

woot just hit 5k! Site analytics here I come!

Nice, I'll have to check it out

@Mick I'm not sure you can ping users based on the posts from Annoying Robot. Maybe add a comment on their question?

@wizzwizz4 do you think this answer should be deleted? retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/a/2516/621

Any mods around? This answer should probably be a comment. cc @wizzwizz4, @Chenmunka

@wizzwizz4 I hope you laughed while deleting this retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/a/2392/621

@wizzwizz4 Both are excellent answers, thank you!

I didn't realize you were posting two separate meta answers

@wizzwizz4 Oh I see what you're doing, nice!

afk for a bit for a meeting

hmm, I want community input. I wonder if we want to keep the tags separate

more meta votes for me!

ha, alright

@wizzwizz4 @Chenmunka is it possible to add a synonym that doesn't exist for a tag that does exist? I'm thinking famicom and nes should be synonyms, but it doesn't look like anyone has used famicom yet.

Thanks, appreciate the feedback

That's what I was trying to do, but I agree it's still a little general.

totally

ah yes of course

If you have any suggestions on how I could improve the question feel free to share (or just go in and edit it)

@wizzwizz4 It's meant to be a general canonical-style self Q&A pair. Generally in those the question is open-ended

Let me know if anyone has any comments on my self answer Q&A (the Famicom question above)

I need to head out for the day, have a good one @wizzwizz4. Great chatting with you

haha

I should go for 1% :)

damn

:)

I got close to hitting the rep cap a few weeks ago, but sadly missed out. Hope to get that badge someday!

ha! It happens, hopefully it gets some more traffic

nice find

huh

For something like protocol data or uuid/serial number reverse engineering

Hey @IgorSkochinsky do you have a recommendation for a program, package, or library that can do pattern discovery on a set of strings? For example: given a set of strings, find runs of similar characters, strings of the same length, strings with numerals/similar types of characters in the same index, etc.