Feb 14, 2022 16:27
@GuntramBlohm: see also workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/177120/… for his previous work history (seems like he has been sole responsible for a critical app)
 

 Ask a Super User Moderator

For moderation, spam, troublesome users and related issues you...
Oct 29, 2017 18:31
@DavidPostill: Thank you for both the info and for taking the time from your busy moderator job.
Oct 29, 2017 17:55
@DavidPostill: Thanks, Makes sense. Is it ok with the edit to superuser.com/questions/464232/…? Should my question be reopened (there is no real need for me ATM; maybe for later if some easier solution for Chrome comes along), or not?
Oct 29, 2017 16:36
Hi mods. superuser.com/questions/1263519/… was just closed as a duplicate of superuser.com/questions/464232/…. The latter to me seems to ask about bigger-than-physical viewports, while mine just asks about a specific size that should fit most screens. Should I migrate my answer that just works on physical to the other question, or how should it be handled?
 

 The 2nd Monitor

General discussion about codereview.stackexchange.com - Welcom...
Feb 10, 2016 15:40
well, yes, but still different sites are different, so your help was very appreciated.
Feb 10, 2016 15:38
You answered the main point, so the accept was justly earned.
Feb 10, 2016 15:36
exactly. thanks so much
Feb 10, 2016 15:36
That is very neat, as it avoids the code repetition yet still loops over integers.
Feb 10, 2016 15:33
Anyways, thank you very much for all the effort and the answer.
Feb 10, 2016 15:32
Tor traffic can be analysed using website fingerprinting. This is an attempt to mitigate.
Feb 10, 2016 15:31
... that was a question what it's for, right?
Feb 10, 2016 15:29
ok, explanation of randomUrl is there. As for the title, feel free.
Feb 10, 2016 15:24
let me try
Feb 10, 2016 15:21
please forgive the browser-crashing.
Feb 10, 2016 15:20
anyways, it is now toned down to just one class
Feb 10, 2016 15:20
in FF, it works...
Feb 10, 2016 15:11
that is a good idea
Feb 10, 2016 15:10
it was actually supposed to be about for loop with floats problem, but yes, that sounds good
Feb 10, 2016 15:10
well, this is from an addon, which listens to http requests, etc, so we could start from the trigger code maybe... and that could keep it down
Feb 10, 2016 15:09
give me some time
Feb 10, 2016 15:09
sure
Feb 10, 2016 15:07
would you like me to try that?
Feb 10, 2016 15:07
sure
Feb 10, 2016 15:07
Hi all
Feb 10, 2016 15:07
Hi @Pimgd
 
Sep 6, 2015 12:07
@MichaelT Yes, that sounds like a challenge which an RDBMS can take off you. My previous code was key/value (Android SharedPreferences). Worked when sorted by date, yet, as you pointed out, more complicated use cases get harder and harder. (Thanks a third time ;-) ) Yet, MongoDB can probably do that as well as a RDBMS while being less in the way.
Sep 5, 2015 17:16
yes, SQL is very strict in what you can insert into your table, where MongoDB gives you more freedom. That also means you can make more mistakes. Again, thank you for recommending the chat room. It really helped.
Sep 5, 2015 17:13
and if you sum all of these up, Mongo gets in your way much less than a SQL DB
Sep 5, 2015 17:12
yes
Sep 5, 2015 17:11
1. Schema design, where you can just insert stuff into Mongo. 2. connection to the database is just two lines in Mongo, 3. Database setup: install, run mongo, you're set, 4. having a driver (which admittedly fits better to python or JS vs formatting your (Java) data to fit into the text query. 5. Handling retrieved documents seemed easier, too, but I had given up on SQL before really getting the hang of it.
Sep 5, 2015 17:11
@Ixrec Concerning your query, you are right. (except that the 30 is a String in SQL (?) and an int in Mongo)
Sep 5, 2015 17:04
So the next step would be to either research document-based DBs or just to bite the bullet and use SQL. Thank you very much, again.
Sep 5, 2015 16:59
Compared to SQL, Mongo is just so much easier. But maybe you are right, there, too. (You already were, concerning Snappy)
Sep 5, 2015 16:58
Thank you. Seems like key/value storage is a poor fit. Concerning Mongo: you can define an index for date, for example. (which, admittedly, is a bit more work, but possible).
Sep 5, 2015 16:56
db.keys.find({key: {$gt: 30, $lt: 50}}); in Mongo
Sep 5, 2015 16:54
Yes, that would be possible with MongoDB (not on Android), but Snappy is a poor fit for that.
Sep 5, 2015 16:53
@MichaelT if you use the date as the key, you can use a snappyDB.findKeysBetween(
Sep 5, 2015 16:51
@MichaelT Thank you. While it would be a good fit, SQL seems such a kludge compared to key-value storage, though. It is just way harder to get working. Is that effort well-spent? (And Snappy can search for all keys with an item less than a fixed value, so the searching would be easy there, too)
Sep 5, 2015 16:32
@MichaelT Yes, that's what you said in the last message. I did not get the "new message" from the FAQ, where it says "on a line by itself …"
Sep 5, 2015 16:29
@MichaelT I tried "a line by itself" in the same message, but the "line by itself" did not work :-(. New message is a good fix.
Sep 5, 2015 16:28
@MichaelT Thank you.
Sep 5, 2015 16:27
Hi all, @Ixreq advised to ask here: meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/7584/… . Is there anything to be improved before migrating this question to Programmers, or not? : stackoverflow.com/questions/32246376/…