Jan 2, 2018 20:14
Ah, fascinating! I was never aware of the back-formation, just the word "akimbo" on its own. Embarrassingly, it appears that my source was Wiktionary (although it does in this case appear to correctly reference the "in kenebowe" derivation)
Jan 2, 2018 18:36
"Kimbo" was never in use as a word, so I'm not sure the second example fits. "Akimbo", last I checked, was a reduction of the Middle English equivalent to "in [a] keen bow".
 
Jan 2, 2018 18:36
Note that "high tone" and "low tone" are absolutely meaningless, almost to the point of nonsensicality, in the context of a non-tonal language like English. You can pronounce any part of any word with any tone you please, be it high or low or in the middle or too slow -- but that doesn't give us any information about the vowels' actual relevant qualities. Suitable rhymes rather than vague descriptions should be at least a bare minimum in the absence of proper IPA...
 

 The Nineteenth Byte

The Nineteenth Byte: General discussion for codegolf.stackexc...
Jul 18, 2015 23:13
gotta go for now, though.
Jul 18, 2015 23:12
Ah, not quite what I had in mind - I'll see about sandboxing it
Jul 18, 2015 23:11
I had a decent idea for a challenge, but iunno if it'd be too easy. It'll be in the sandbox when I get around to it
Jul 18, 2015 23:09
Figures
Jul 18, 2015 23:08
How hard/easy would scrambling a string according to a pattern be in golfing languages like CJam?
Jul 18, 2015 21:03
if I do find it by any chance, though, I'll be sure to use it for as many contests as I can
Jul 18, 2015 21:01
I think it worked by storing data on a 2D array or something? I don't have the code for the interpreter anymore... and judging by that snippet, I'd honestly rather not look for it
Jul 18, 2015 21:00
agreed
Jul 18, 2015 21:00
one of them was this Hello World program: 9.V1.2+1*14.2+1^!{VV}V3.3-2!VV4.^4+3!!{V}V{>}V3.^5+4!{>^^^}VV4.^4.5*6+5!^^^^>{V‌​}VV8.1+3!^!V3.2+3!V!V8.4-5!
Jul 18, 2015 20:59
I just found some remnants of an esoteric "language" that I wrote an interpreter for when I was learning Python
Jul 9, 2015 04:56
I haven't been seeing nearly enough flags lately
 
Jun 24, 2015 23:32
Yeah, they are. If you can't delete a letter individually, it's part of a token. (as in, you can't delete any of the individual characters of cumSum( because it's all one token)
Jun 24, 2015 23:31
Sorry, had to go away for a bit.
Jun 24, 2015 23:20
Not all of the keywords, no. Generally, the most common ones are one byte, although TI's definition of "common" is a bit weird sometimes
Jun 24, 2015 23:19
I think its monochrome equivalent also does the same, although I'm not sure since I don't have a monochrome calculator.
Jun 24, 2015 23:18
Oh, that'll make life easier! Doors CSE, a shell for the color calculators, can count bytes for you without including the VAT header/size info in the byte count
Jun 24, 2015 23:18
wait, actually, let me check something
Jun 24, 2015 23:17
No, unfortunately-- you'll have to count them manually.
Jun 24, 2015 23:16
What do you mean? Ans is a one-byte token, typed with 2nd (-). That'll end up saving one byte, since the | token is two bytes on the calculator.
Jun 24, 2015 23:16
"| \ Output(O,1,Ans \ Output(O,20,Ans should work.
Jun 24, 2015 23:16
(X=20)→S can be (X=20→S, and you can take advantage of Ans to save a few bytes in the final For( loop. I'm positive lines 8 and 9 can be golfed, but I'm not sure how at the moment.