angussidney

@SmokeDetector job post

@SmokeDetector seems to be a website recommendation question, other answers are similar

What do we think about this answer? Simply NAA or abusive because it's somewhat threatening? skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/49843/36719

@gparyani github.com/Charcoal-SE/metasmoke/issues/824

@gparyani it can be filed under the metasmoke repository. Do you want to write up the issue or shall I?

(note that link is probably not visible to most of you)

Hmm, it looks like the webhook which tells metasmoke to tell Travis to trigger a build is getting a permission denied error: github.com/Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector/settings/hooks/12739390

I've just tried editing a page, hopefully that should trigger another build

Which page?

@DanielWiddis yeah. If there was no question at all, and it was purely jibberish/copypaste, we would consider it rude/abusive (abuse of the system), so k. But since there is a question, it's simply f (with downvotes warranted for lack of effort when asking :))

@DanielWiddis it looks like an attempt at asking a question, with the text of the post just being a copy/paste to fill in the character count. So I'd probably mark it as f

@SmokeDetector technically has disclosed affiliation. Makyen has edited to make it more clear.

@SmokeDetector I've removed that website from the watchlist (no tp in 2 years)

@SmokeDetector Someone has been a bit annoyed whilst debugging...

Cool :)

@Mast are you sure about the TP on that ^ one? It looks like a legitimate question, and feedback guidance states that we shouldn't mark foreign posts as TP just because they're in a different language

anyway, really sorry, gtg

I would expect so, usually git won't let you do a destructive action without warning you

Now git status?

what about after git checkout PRDuplicate?

I'm sorry, I'm confused what's going on, you might be using slightly different terminology than I'm used to

Even after git checkout master?

(or whatever branch you were previously working on)

If you run git checkout master it should reappear

The git checkout -b branchname command probably doesn't carry over local changes

Git doesn't lose information without warning you, it's probably just sitting on a different branch somewhere

git checkout master?

If you haven't gotten it fixed by tomorrow I might be able to help then

really sorry, I've got to go right now

Then try running the push upstream command again

(that will specify the username)

Okay, try running this command: git remote set-url origin Daniil-M-beep@https://github.com/Daniil-M-beep/SmokeDetector.git

No username?

Did it ask you to type in a username/password?

Have you got git set up correctly to use your github credentials?

403 means access denied

(I think I have a config option enabled that lets me skip that step)

Just run that command it suggested, I forgot about that step

Can you paste what it says?

Then, you need to head to the github page for your fork (github.com/Daniil-M-beep/SmokeDetector), and switch to the new branch that you just created

Cool, and then once you've created the new branch and are currently on it (use git status and git log to make sure that you're on the new branch and that your commits have been transferred over), you can run git push and it should push your changes to a new branch of your fork

That will update your origin remote (i.e. the place that the code will be pushed to) to your fork

So what you will want to run is the command git remote set-url origin https://github.com/Daniil-M-beep/SmokeDetector.git

Okay

@Daniil can you please show me the output of git remote -v

Instead, I would suggest making a new branch locally (git checkout -b "branch-name") and then pushing that to the branch-name branch on your fork. Then, you can perform a pull request from branch-name on your fork to master on Charcoal-SE/SmokeDetector

Oh, right

@Daniil Why do you need a new branch on the charcoal repo specifically? Is there something that you can't do with your fork?

@Daniil thanks!

I don't have enough rep to suggest a one-character edit to this answer, but is someone able to adjust --gapplicarion-service to --gapplication-service? (r -> t)