Zoredache

@ArcanisGK507 generally you should ask a question on the main side. This chat isn't very active, and is is likely the expert you would need wouldn't be hanging out here.

@Hennes there will be better options

@J.Todd take a snapshot with VSSadmin, and then use robocopy against the snapshot?

@Davidw AFAIK WoL wouldn't work on Hyper-V Server.

I am totally not saying something random so this channel doesn't get archived.

@deostroll One would assume that restarting the application forces the application to try to restart the connections.

@DarkCygnus Glad you got something figured out.

@DarkCygnus Don't know what the question is, but these days I like using Traefik or caddy as my proxy. I tend to like those a lot better. Nginx is also a good option as proxy.

@RogUE hard do know without more detail. You could try asking a question on the main site but it would need more details. What output do you get from lsblock, df? What do you see from mount? Any nfs/cifs/smb mounts?

You can click back through the transcript chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/177647#177647

Not that much older. First message was on 2010-09-10

Oh, and wow, this room is 10 years old.

Maybe it freezes because it was created by me instead of a mod?

Ah nice, someone un froze this

In some cases I suspect taking the derivative of some kind of bandwidth plots might be useful in showing you evidence of unusual transfer rates that simply wouldn't be easy to see looking at a simple bandwidth plot.

@ROODAY Not sure of the context, but generally derivatives are used to figure out the rate of change of something. So if you had a bunch of data points of a speed someone is traveling, then the derivatives would give you the +/- acceleration

Not as clean as Hennes's though. I kinda want to get larger displays at some point.

imgur.com/a/eDFv4BK

By reading this message you have been infected with COVID19 hysteria. You must now pass this on to all the contacts in your address book, including customers, clients and so on. /s

but I probably wouldn't VTC if it was on serverfault

@Mr.Mindor kinda depends on how that installer runs the child processes. You could probably debug what was going on with sysmon/process explorer. You might get answers on serverfault, or superuser. From one perspective it is more of a general windows thing so I would lean towards superuser if I asked it.

I mean, I can see it being useful, having a out of band communication for your management would be great, just seems like it could be pretty dangerous, if not properly secured.

Hope there is an easy way to disable. just imagine all the servers hosted in colocation facilities. With all that nice wifi, you can attack your neighbors servers.

is that a good thing?

ah, for the inline

why remove it?

Though there may be some hidden/deleted questions that are older.

The oldest open question I can see seems to be from August 2008.

The site ages are listed here. stackexchange.com/sites#oldest

@intika We had a 10 year anniversary about 9 months ago. meta.serverfault.com/questions/9507/…

hrm, how old is my account, I think I logged in the second day it was up

serverfault was the second site after stackoverflow

I wonder if in 10 years if the kids will even know that cats could sit on monitors and they got warm

My 'protection' services are 0.02 bitcoin per year, which I am sure you can easily afford.

ah, that is just the crypto malware I installed. Please keep ignoring that for a few more days. I need to 'protect' your system for you.

they go to \\domain.tld

If you deploy DFS on all your domain controllers, the only thing people have to remember is the domain

You could then even make a group policy that adds that as a 'network location' though that part is a bit tricky

Make a namespace \\domain\shares then build all the targets under that

@Shaamaan DFS-N

shrugs

I guess. When you do a clone you can always pass the -b option to set the branch you want as your default. git clone remoteurl localpath -b foo

Or put it in terms of the original git repo (Linux). Someone is working on a branch for a webcam driver, Someone could have a branch working on the on a security update, someone could be working on a new filesystem feature. There are hundreds of kernel developers and the branches and branch configs are often local and different between all of them

IE if someone in the front end side is working on some branch for a new feature, someone in the QA dept is fixing bugs, an someone is working on a different branch for the backend side

But when you are working ina large team you really wouldn't want your branches configruation sync'd

No git not syncing configs is something that is really annoying IMO

As you can see, the [branch ...] section doesn't match. cloning a repo doesn't copy the configuration. Configuration is mostly local to the computer, user, or directory.

BTW, you may need to be more specific on what you mean by the cloned repo's .git contents don't match the original repo. What exactly is different? Is it a completely different repo with no similar commits, or what? I am not a git daemon expert, but I am not sure you have given enough information yet, that I could attempt to replicate or even recognize the problem you are trying to get help with.

I think git-daemon usage is pretty uncommon, and most people just use SSH for read-write, and just the http backend for read-only.