« first day (4672 days earlier)      last day (348 days later) » 
03:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

3:13 AM
Isom. thms for rings hold for nonunital rings right?
I looked up the proof but I think it doesn't matter if the ring is unital or not.
 
 
1 hour later…
4:34 AM
hard to say for sure without more specificity as to what you mean by "isomorphism theorems" and how you phrase them, but broadly speaking yes, it shouldn't make too big a difference, maybe no difference as long as you phrase the results the right way. "old enough" algebra books often include some results of this type.
 
i have never encountered a ring without unity in my 2 weeks of ring theory
christ this profile pic is terrible
why would they do this
what happened to the old profile pictures
 
did yours change? the automatically generated ones sometimes do. koro's changed recently.
 
yes it changed
it's no longer anthropomorphic and it's way greener
 
oh, you can switch back. you just need a copy of the image, or the hash that was used to generate it. gravatar.com/avatar/… in your case.
 
WOAH!!!
thanks leslie!
 
4:44 AM
i noticed koro's because it was accompanied by a change in color even more dramatic than your green-getting-greener.
 
yeah he went to like grey
how did you find the hash btw?
test123
 
the internet archive keeps occasional copies of old profiles. web.archive.org/web/20220816162640/https://…
 
ahh very cool
 
it might take a minute for the servers to catch up to your "new"/old image.
i used a gravatar for sufficiently long that i grew attached to it and kept a copy of it, but i like my current image.
 
there was not enough water in the pool
or the pool was not adequately sized
 
4:58 AM
WHat have they done to my avatar???
Reading up a few lines I see I'm not the only on eperturbed
 
find your profile page on internet archive
and save your pic
 
And we shall return to our "old" tempered green in a few
 
5:20 AM
1) Can a discontinuous function on a connected domain have connected graph?
2) Can a discontinuous function on a path connected domain have path connected graph?
I know 1) is true.
For an example, we can choose f:I\to\Bbb{R} such that f is discontinuous only at a single point which also an end point the interval and the corresponding point in the graph is a limit point of the rest of the graph.
f:[0, 1]\to\Bbb{R} defined by f(x) =\sin(\frac 1 x) ;x\in(0, 1] and 0 otherwise
 
@SouravGhosh what is a domain here?
 
if you look at a portion of a helix such as {(cos(t), sin(t), t): t in [0, 2pi)} as the graph of a real-valued function on the unit circle, you get a nice example for both (1) and (2)
and yes what is a "domain" here, is my example even an example
the things that are often taken as branches of the complex logarithm on C \ {0} would also work, they will have discontinuities on whatever path you cut along, but this won't disconnect or path-disconnect the graph
 
6:15 AM
@AlessandroCodenotti Any path connected space
 
7:13 AM
Then Leslie's examples work
 
you can change the answer to (2) if you impose more conditions on the domain. e.g. math.stackexchange.com/questions/2577156/… shows that if 'domain' means 'subset of R' the answer to (2) changes. it also links to examples like the one you gave for (1).
 
7:31 AM
it makes sense that R would be somewhat special here. it is pretty restrictive in terms of how you can "get to" one point from another. not a lot of ways of sneaking in a discontinuity in a way that doesn't also disconnect a graph.
 
7:50 AM
@leslietownes Thanks :)
 
Can anyone cite the source, page # for the scan in math.stackexchange.com/q/4003576? Thanks!
 
For people wondering why their gravatar changed recently:
4
62
Q: We're regenerating all identicons

Cesar MWe've recently discovered a vulnerability in our identicon generation process. To remedy it, we have changed how we approach generating them and regenerated all identicons. We do not have any indication that any personally identifiable information (PII) was leaked as part of this vulnerability. S...

^ @shintuku @D.C.theIII @Semiclassical
 
Thanks @PM2Ring 🙏
 
No worries.
 
8:06 AM
@user1176240 it appears to be from some edition of steven lay's "analysis with introduction to proof." maybe the fifth edition. page 280 in the version excerpted here: math.colorado.edu/~walter/Math3001/section7.1pp275to283.pdf
 
I made an animated interactive version of Prince Rupert's cube in Sage.
 
\o @copper.hat how's it going, pal?
Are you over the jet-lag yet.
 
I am going to show that every metric space is normal.
Let A, B be two non empty disjoint closed sets. f:X\to \Bbb{R} defined by f(x) =d(x, A) /{(d(x, A) +d(x, B) }
Continuous and well defined.
 
@shintuku you got it back :).
 
f(A) ={0}
f(B) =d(A, B) /d(A, B) +d(B, B)
A, B disjoint closed sets. Does this implies d(A, B) >0 ?
 
8:18 AM
yes
 
Gr(exp) and x-axis in R^2
 
@SouravGhosh no
 
ohh 😮😮
 
I guess so. One closed set must be compact.
 
8:35 AM
f(x) =0 implies d(x, A) =0 implies x\in A
f(x) =1 implies d(x, B) =0 implies x\in B
Ignore what I have done above 😪. f(A) ={d(x, A) /(d(x, A) +d(x, B) : x\in A}
d(x, A) +d(x, B) >0 for all x\in X
Done!
f^{-1}{0}=A and f^{-1}{1}=B
We can choose two disjoint open sets containing 0 and 1 respectively (thanks to Hausdorff :).
Their pre images separates A and B
 
 
2 hours later…
Hmm
10:50 AM
Hey guys, I'd love to chat with a transdisciplinary, meta / holistic mathematician about a problem I'm trying to solve.

It has to do with sweeping the entirety of an N dimensional state space with a single variable, or finding a mapping from an N dimensional space to an X dimensional space (without any data, not at all talking about dimensionality reduction techniques like PCA or t-SNE or UMAP that require data)

But I want to do this hierarchically (like an autoencoder, or how I imagine a renormalization group works even though I barely know anything about it), and (hopefully) in some loc
So imagine a second (44.1K samples / numbers) and we want to hear every possible second. This problem is a bit like using a hilbert space filling curve, but I've already tried implementing that and running into some problems programmatically. That solves my "many to one" dimension problem but not my "many to many"
or "many to fewer"
It's also a bit like a poincare disk, or any fractal
Any ideas, or concepts, or books you think I should look at would also be really helpful!
 
 
1 hour later…
12:12 PM
For UFD $R$, if $a = bq$ for some $a,b,q\in R\setminus\{0\}$ then $R/(b)\simeq (q)/(a)$ as an $R$-submodule of $M$. Does this imply there exists a unique maximal ideal $M$ of $R$ with $M\simeq R/M$ as an $R$-module?
writing $a$ as a product of irreducibles,,, but it's PID that irred element generates maximal ideal
 
Hamburger
 
Correction: there exists a unique maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of $R$ such that $M\simeq R/\mathfrak{m}$ as an $R$-module
Well actually, $(q)/(a) = \{r+(a)\in R/(a)\mid sr\in (a)\quad\forall s\in(b)\}$.
 
12:52 PM
what is the initial object of the full subcategory of unital rings with $1+\cdots+1$ invertible (in the ring)?
 
1:29 PM
how many additions is that supposed to be
 
Fixed $n$. Sorry
 
2:03 PM
$\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n}\right]$ then, no?
 
ah
thanks. it factor through fraction ring
 
2:26 PM
3
A: Existence of a set $A\subset\mathbb{R}$ such that $|G\setminus A|=\infty$ for every open set $G\supset A$

Austin ShinerYou are indeed right that your set $A$ need be non-measurable and uncountable (after all any countable set is measurable). Let $S \subseteq [0,1]$ be a non-measurable set. By the criteria that you stated there must exist $\epsilon_0 >0$ such that $|U \setminus S| > \epsilon_0$ for any open set $U...

why is $|U\setminus (S+n)|\ge \epsilon_0$?
 
3:21 PM
I understand this now.
But why is $|U \setminus (S \cup (S+3))| \ge |(U\cap(-1,2)) \setminus S|+|(U \cap (2,5)) \setminus (S+3)|$?
 
3:45 PM
"Möbius transformation is always a bijective holomorphic function from the Riemann sphere to the Riemann sphere"
Tz=(az+b) /(cz+d)
for c=0 , it's a polynomial. So infinity is a pole.
How we define holomorphicity at infinity?
 
4
Q: Holomorphic at infinity (definition)

Sha VukliaI struggle quite a bit with the usage of $\infty$ in complex analysis. In some cases, I can translate a definition involving infinity to equivalent statements using limits, or in the case of continuity I just make use of the topology defined on the Riemann sphere. However, what I don't understan...

 
I haven't understood the answer.
 
4:05 PM
Set $w=1/z$ and decide if $f(w)$ is holo at $0$.
 
4:21 PM
Can you explain with one example ?
f(z) =z has a pole at infinity
f(1/z) =1/z ohh
f(w) =w
f(1/z) =1/z ohh
Holomorphic at w=0
 
Well, if $\infty$ is mapping to $\infty$, then you look at $w$ mapping to $1/f(w)$.
Otherwise, you just look at $f(w)$.
 
0
Q: Understanding a proof for existence of set $A\subset R$ such that $|G- A|=\infty$ for ever open set $G\supset A$.

KoroI found an answer here https://math.stackexchange.com/a/4233925/266435. I'm pasting that here to avoid switching tabs and I'm highlighting the parts that I need clarification on: quote You are indeed right that your set $A$ need be non-measurable and uncountable (after all any countable set is me...

 
Are $8$ and $144$ the only Fibonacci-numbers that are perfect powers ? Upto $n=10^5$ , no other perfect power $F_n$ exists.
 
(removed)
 
Measure theory and Algebraic topology imho are the perfect examples of subjects which one should do outside college on their own and never in a semester at a college.
 
4:31 PM
The link didn't work. Test italics link.
Weird
 
@Koro I am going to revise measure theory from tomorrow.
 
because in these subjects, one doesn't get get help so easily espacially when teachers at my current college are useless.
and another problem is: there are not many people who do this.
There is a high chance that the questions on these will go unanswered on mse.
on discord too
 
what discord are you checking out Koro
 
@Koro Bad a.e
 
you shared the link once. The affinoid union.
 
4:34 PM
@Koro No. Ask good question to get an immediate answer.
 
oh cool yeah the people there are nice
 
@SouravGhosh you'll be surprised it is NOT true.
 
koro maybe if it is too niche try mathoverflow?
 
@Koro Take your time. Try to improve your post.
 
otoh, a question on real analysis, complex analysis will almost never go unanswered.
@SouravGhosh ?? what is wrong with the post?
it is self contained.
 
4:36 PM
also up to now each time i added a bounty i've gotten a reply
 
@Koro False.
 
koro you tried a bounty?
only issue is you gotta wait 3 days
 
@shintuku I tried it once at an answer few days ago. I was looking for an explanation for an answer, got none.
 
that sucks
 
the bounty didn't give me the answer. It was an AT answer.
@SouravGhosh you are evading the question. What is wrong in the post?
What makes you think that it is not 'good'? Be specific.
 
4:40 PM
Instead of complaining and whining incessantly, you should appreciate the help you do get. It's remarkable that there is a place like this where professionals provide their services literally for free and out of the goodness of their own hearts.
8
Seriously.
 
I do appreciate that, seriously.
 
You do nothing but complain when you don't receive instantaneous service that meets your (whatever) standards.
 
I'm just saying that there is 'shortage' in case of AT, measure theory etc.
 
Just stop.
Ten years ago there was no site like this and yet students managed to study and learn mathematics somehow ... for centuries.
 
but what if only the rich ones could
 
4:42 PM
What do you imagine that the rich ones did?
 
the bastards lived off the rents of their tenants
 
When I was a student, I worked with fellow students and we tried to answer one another's questions. If after a few days we still couldn't get anywhere, yes, we actually went and asked faculty at our universities.
 
that's nice but not applicable here at my college.
 
We actually read books and articles.
I do not accept that, Koro, and I'm sick and tired of your complaints.
 
no! not reading! my worst weakness
 
4:47 PM
5 hours ago, by one potato two potato
For UFD $R$, if $a = bq$ for some $a,b,q\in R\setminus\{0\}$ then $R/(b)\simeq (q)/(a)$ as an $R$-submodule of $M$. Does this imply there exists a unique maximal ideal $M$ of $R$ with $M\simeq R/M$ as an $R$-module?
Is this a true statement? I'm doubting.
I can't come up with a counterexample. For PID? maybe.
 
will get back to you about that on monday
 
Don't try to be a robot! Take your time to think about your doubts. It may take 1 day or 7 days; it doesn't matter.

If you think your question is too advanced for MathSE, then post it on MO.
But asking for clarification of another's answer in a different post is not a good practise and should be avoided. Who cares about others' answers? Ask the original answerer in the comment and wait for his or her reply.
 
Very rare that something that comes up in a class or textbook has any business being on MO.
@onepotatotwopotato Are you saying that the first sentence holds in every UFD? And what is $M$?
 
That's what my professor said. $M = R/(a)$. (Oh, I didn't write that).
wait I think I typed incorrectly
 
Then you use $M$ again in the second sentence. That isn't cool. Are those all the same $M$? ... I think I believe the statement for a PID, but I'm dubious in general.
 
4:59 PM
Let $R$ be a UFD, $a,b,q\in R\setminus\{0\}$ with $a = bq$. Let $M = R/(a)$ as an $R$-module. Then as an $R$-module, $R/(b)\simeq (q)/(a)$ by $1\mapsto\overline{q}$. Note that $(q)/(a) = \{r+(a)\in R/(a)\mid sr\in (a)\quad\forall s\in(b)\}$.
Now the claim is there exists a unique maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of $R$ such that $M\simeq R/\mathfrak{m}$ as an $R$-module.
The statement is believable if $R$ is PID as irred elements generate maximal ideal. buf for UFD...
So $(q)/(a)$ equals $\{m\in R/(a)\mid sm = 0\quad\forall s\in (b)\}$.
 
What if we take something like $R=\Bbb Z[x,y]$ or even $\Bbb Z[i]$. Those are examples you should play with.
 
@SouravGhosh ? Did you even see the tags there? Proof explanation is one of the tags there. Did you see the answerer has not been online in a while (it's viewable by going to their profiles.)? 'Asking for clarification ... avoided'- is that a site policy (if yes, can you please share the related policy?) or you are enforcing it?
 
@TedShifrin For counterexample or for intuition?
 
that was the whole point of me posting the question link here: just in case, anyone interested in that here could know about it.
I have shared that on discord as well so that the question gets more attention.
 
5:14 PM
1
Q: Question on analytic continuation of the principal branch of logarithms on $B(1, 1) $

Sourav Ghosh(Excercise $6$ ,Conway ,page $217$ ) Let $D_0=B(1, 1) $ and $f_0$ be the restriction to $D_0$ of the principal branch of logarithm. For $n\in \Bbb{Z}$ let $\gamma(t) =e^{2\pi i nt}$ for $0\le t\le 1$ . Find a continuation $\{(f_t,D_t):t\in[0,1]\}$ along $\gamma$ of $(f_0, D_0) $ and show that $[...

 
If I just take $R = \Bbb Z$ and $a = 4$. Then the statement is false?
 
Unanswered ,12 month. No comment, no upvote.
Hi @AlessandroCodenotti
 
@onepotatotwopotato I don't know, but they are concrete UFDs that are not PIDs :)
@onepotatotwopotato Which statement? Explain.
 
@Koro The above post is an example:)
 
To Ted Shifrin: I hope I did the [thing](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/63612014#63612014 "thing") how it was supposed to be done? I hope the link formatting works this time.
(You actually helped me to remember how the derivative is used to analyze functions. So thanks a lot.)
My reasoning was that since the partial derivative showed us for which values of $y$ the function stops changing, substitution of that value should yield us the values of the function where it peaks, and therefore taking $x \to 0$ shows us the behavior near $(0,0)$, from which we can analyze bounds
I don't know why the chat doesn't format links to messages... uh...
 
5:24 PM
You are referring to this?
Don't put anything else inside the parentheses other than the URL.
 
@SouravGhosh 'almost never'. Did I anywhere say 'never'? :)
 
Thanks. In the help there was "optional title", and it seems to be working when it's not a link to the chat.
 
At any rate, if you're actually getting into this question, you should try to solve my general question. What is the criterion in terms of $\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta$ for the function $$f(x,y) = \begin{cases} \frac{|x|^\alpha|y|^\beta}{|x|^\gamma + |y|^\delta}, & (x,y)\ne 0 \\ 0, & (x,y) = 0 \end{cases}$$ to be continuous?
 
anyways, I seem to have found one solution to my question. I'll post an answer to my question soon.
 
5:27 PM
The answer is quite nice.
 
I will screenshot your question and think about it somewhere in time. Thank you.
 
@AlessandroCodenotti Please help me to prove that topologist's sine curve is not locally connected at (0, 0)?
 
Where are you stuck, Sourav?
 
To prove it's not locally connected at (0, 0), we need to select an open ball in R^2
 
5:33 PM
sorry open set in \Bbb{R}^2
 
Containing the origin, I presume. A ball suffices.
 
Such that there doesn't exist any open disk containing (0, 0)
(0, 0) \in B(0,r) \cap T_s \subset U\cap T_s
 
Soon we'll need dollar signs so I can read it. What is $T_s$?
Before you get buried in symbols, explain in words why the result is true and how the proof should proceed.
 
I know topologist's sine curve isn't path connected.
 
Yes, but it is connected.
 
5:39 PM
There is no path connecting (0, 0) to any points in the graph of f(x) =\sin(\frac 1 x) ; x\in (0, 1]
 
So we do not want to be thinking about paths, do we? But what does the intersection of a (small) ball centered at $0$ with the TSC look like?
 
The curve has infinite oscillation near origin
 
Yes, so answer my question.
 
@PM2Ring sigh, i've decided to change back to the new gravatar in consideration of the potential security issues
thanks for the link
btw, gravatar isn't stack exchange's own terminology, but it seems to be some sort of company that makes avatars of something
are they related?
 
B(0, r) \cap T_s
 
What is $T_s$? Don't just create notation.
 
Good grief. Just call it $X$.
So describe $B(0,r)\cap X$ in words.
 
{(x, \sin (\frac 1 x)) : ||(x, \sin(1/x||)<r}
x^2+\sin^2(1/x) <r^2
 
I don't want algebra or equations. I specifically said in words.
Draw a picture for yourself.
Then describe it to me.
 
5:48 PM
Ok.
 
5:58 PM
@SouravGhosh Well?
This should have been one minute, not over ten.
 
The pictures looks like this waves hand up and down really quick
 
Yes. Any open ball around origin contains infinitely many segments of f(x) =\sin(1/x)
 
Roughly like little pieces of parallel line segments ... So ?
 
As f(x) =\sin(\frac{1}{x}) has infinite oscillation around origin.
@TedShifrin line segments are connected
As portion of continuous map on a connected domain.
 
But what about all those infinitely many line segments?
@AlessandroCodenotti Precisely~
 
6:03 PM
Those are maximal connected subsets contained in B(0, 1) and X
As Ball separates the graph with closed segments.
 
Don't do $B(0,1)$. Choose $r$ arbitrarily small — you have to make the general argument, anyhow.
So are we done?
 
Yes.
Each line segments are connected components.
 
Even if your definition requires that you choose an open set inside the given open set, the picture stays the same.
Yeah, so thinking about the origin as a special point is really misleading.
 
We can do same thing to any points on line segments joining (0, -1) and (0, 1).
Those are the limit points, so any open set must intersect the graph.
 
Yes. But what would happen if we picked a point not on the y-axis?
 
6:08 PM
Then the point will be on the graph.
 
Yes, and ... ?
What if I intersect the graph with a small ball?
What if I intersect the graph with a larger ball?
 
Two points can be separated by two disjoint balls
 
So what?
 
The portion of the graph inside the ball compact
 
We were discussing local connectedness. Yes or no?
 
6:12 PM
Must have positive distance
 
Ted. Using the three noncollinear points to show the equation of the parabola is $0$ by taking the determinant. Is there any particular way I should think about it? Or is simply a matter of doing things by brute force through doing determinants with their minor or reducing the $4 \times 4$ matrix by row operations?
 
I mean we can choose the ball small enough to contain one component.
 
Not brute force, no, @D.C.
@SouravGhosh Right. This is why the definition of local connectedness has to be phrased carefully.
 
good...I'm glad I asked because it doesn't look appealing in the least
 
What do you mean "to show the equation of the parabola is 0"???
 
6:17 PM
Conclusion: Any nbd of origin contains infinitely many connected components; hence, no nbd of (0, 0) can contain a connected nbd.
 
Correct.
 
So $T_s$ isn't locally connected at (0, 0)
Thanks 🙏
 
Stop using that horrid notation.
It looks like some basis element of a topology.
I know what the question is. But you're not showing an equation is 0 !!!!
 
@TedShifrin T stands for topology and s stands for sine curve.
:)
 
You have to show two things: Setting the determinant equal to 0 gives you such a quadratic equation. And the three points satisfy the equation.
 
6:20 PM
Oh......
for a determinant to equal $0$ means one row is equal to another
 
GRRR.
 
or at least a scalar multiple
 
GRRRR.
 
Lol...I noticed the 4th R this time
Oh....are you asking to literally set up the matrix that would come from the equation of the parabola by plugging in each of the individual points?
 
I don't follow you.
Why does that determinant give you the quadratic equation you're looking for? (No, do not explicitly write out a $4\times 4$ determinant. Yet you can tell.) Why does $(x_1,y_1)$ satisfy that equation, etc.?
 
6:28 PM
So to save typing it would be $y = ax^2 + bx + c$, but I would have $y_1 = ax_1^2 + bx_1 + c$, etc but it would be four rows, then I would express that correctly in the matrix form. .....I just wanted to express what I was thinking even though you have said different above
 
If X is locally connected then every connected component of X open in X.
The component {0}×[-1, 1] of Topologist's sine curve is not open.
So TSC isn't locally connected.
{0}×[-1, 1] is the disturbing component!
 
@D.C. I continue not to understand what you're saying.
@SouravGhosh Yes, but the reason comes from all the other stuff.
@D.C. So how do I look at that determinant and see instantaneously that it will give me an appropriate quadratic equation?
 
Give me a second I'm working through what you asked of me but on a simpler one in #19 to see if what I'm thinking is the right idea.
Seeing instantaneously that it gives a quadratic I don't see, but is the first column of the determinant considered "variables" even though the other three columns are realized values?
I ask becasue if we want to say the determinant is $0$ if we take wny of those three points given and put it into the first column, I will have two identical columns
 
Aha, so that answers the second question ... immediately.
 
So that is a valid observation?
 
6:42 PM
So how can I calculate the determinant and see the equation fall out?
Somewhere we need to use the fact that the three points are non-collinear.
 
Hmmm... pondering the noncollinear idea
 
Worry about that last.
 
As far as calculating the determinant you did say no brute force, so my idea of expanding along the first row is void for this question
 
Yup.
 
Dare I say Cramer?
 
6:52 PM
Initial topologies are easier than final topology :)
 
What could Cramer have to do with this?
 
STill need to calculate deteminants tho
I was tyring to "think out the box"
 
Subspace topology( generated by the inclusion map) ,product topology (generated by the family of projections)
Subspace topology( initial topology generated by the inclusion map) ,product topology (initial topology generated by the family of projections)
 
I think learning linear algebra out of FIS has made you row-obsessed.
 
Lol...Indeed...I essentially do give short thrift to columns and almost think of them not existing
 
6:55 PM
If you've read my book, it's all columns. So wake up and pay attention.
 
Yes. Columns are nice.
 
I haven't read your Lin-Alg book, but this is good to keep me sharp about the "column side" of life
 
Ax := linear combination of columns
 
I'm talking about this book, DC. All vectors are columns.
 
Quotient topology is a final topology.
 
6:59 PM
I mean, even this problem makes that obvious.
 
I didn't understand the quotient topology.
 
Do you want the determinant calculated through using column operations?
 
I'm saying no more, DC.
 
by getting it in an upper triangular form
fiiinnnnnnnneeee
 
rolls $8\pi^{\sqrt e}$ eyes
 
7:59 PM
Are steinmetz solids useful in research mathematics?
 
hmmmmmmmm.
 
8:18 PM
Oh.... If I were to go through with calculating the determinant down the first column, Each cofactor is going to be a "number", so that times the respective entry from the first column will give me my equation. So in the case of this determinant it would be $1 c_{1,1} - x c_{2,1} + x^2 c_{3,1} - y c_{4,1}$, where $c_{i,j}$ is just the respective cofactor.
 
love seeing 'number' in scare quotes, wanna see this more often
 
Then with some tidying up by isolating $y$ and dividing $y$ by $c_{4,1}$, I'll have the equation. Is this the reasoning you were looking for @TedShifrin
 
Yes. Just have to justify why that coeff is nonzero.
And to see parabola, why is the coeff of $x^2$ nonzero?
 
The coeff would be nonzero due to the noncollinearity
That was in response to the first question
 
Guess again.
 
8:41 PM
btphbpthbt
 
Hi to Munchkin.
 
I was looking at a triangle through $(0,0), (1,0), (0,1)$ to see the idea behind to justify the nonzero coefficient. I don't know how to phrase it properly, but if something such as the three noncollinear points I just stated were used, I wouldn't have a "proper" parabola
 
@user85795 thanks for asking! just getting over it now! 3 short europe trips in 6 mos is too much for me.
 
That is needed for the coeff of $x^2$. Figure out why. The coeff of $y$ should be something you did in both FIS and my exercises.
At least no covid, copper!
 
@TedShifrin i'm a bit astounded i never got covid. both of my kids were vaxed yet got coide.
 
8:56 PM
fuses to london, money to cork, transistors to belfast...
 
no longer needed it seems.
 
@copper.hat Living the life of an Instagram Influencer
 
in fact, when i was returning last week through dublin where they have us preimmigration, the tsa green lighted me and waived my security check!
i have entered the real of true uselessness
 
@copper.hat I finally got it two months ago.
 
@D.C.theIII my only real post on instagram (copper.hat surprisingly) is of a dung beetle
@TedShifrin sorry to hear it. i hope recovery was swift & complete
 
8:59 PM
Only A couple of slightly bad days, but more tired for quite a while,
 
i can imagine.
i do have a pic of broom bridge (quaternions) and an old one with my daughter on ig
 
TEd I would've only done it in your book. FIS deal with quadratics in a special section in the inner product spaces chapter. One of the "starred" sections that I intend to return to........eventually
 
No, the coeff of $y$ is a very famous determinant.
In every linear alg book.
 
hmmm.
Do you rememebr where in your exercises I would've done it?
Ohhhhh....... Vandermode?
 
Interesting, it appears several times in my plain lin alg book, but maybe not in this book.
Yes.
 
9:05 PM
Yes....I did the exercise looong ago.....clearly forgot it cause it fell under the "if I see this in the future I will have to refresh, until then I'll probably forget it"
 
Not in this book, other than in this problem. Just too much stuff to cover.
 
I don't thinki you would ask about Vandermode in this mbook. I may be wrong
 
Nice interpretation with linear maps, rather than just grunging determinants.
 
I do appreciate you placing this in here and unknowingly forcing me to recall old mateiral from previous subjects
 
I should have put the conceptual version as an exercise in this section. My error.
 
9:08 PM
You probably thought about it and just left that concept up to the student to eventually encounter when they do more advanced work. Since it isn't a mainstream thing.
 
Consider the linear map from the vector space of polys of degree $\le n$ to $\Bbb R^{n+1}$ given by evaluating at $n+1$ points. What is the matrix with respect to the obvious bases?
Now deduce the Vandermonde det is nonzero.
 
Yea. I'm looking at the exercise now from FIS and going back to my notes where I did it
 
The usual thing is inductive grunge with determinants and getting a formula. That too is useful, but all we need here is nonzero.
 
Oh I was sneaky in showing the Vandermode determinant was nonzero. I used the fact that the linear map I had defined was an isomorphism and as such had an inverse.
 
Read what I’ve been typing here.
 
9:25 PM
there's two Ns in vandermonde
that's probably not what ted meant by 'read what i've been typing here,' but as the licensing representative of the vandermonde estate, i have to say this
 
Dutch for worldly, I imagine.
 
9:39 PM
the vandermode determinant is a regular determinant with a scoop of ice cream on top
 
Does Li(x)-f(x)=O(log x) essentially mean that the error grows on the order of log x?
Yes
 
h(x) = O(log x) usually means that there is some number M for which |h(x)| <= M log(x) holds for all x sufficiently large
it means no more, and no less than that
 
It can be way less! 🤷‍♂️👹
 
for example, 0 = O(log x) but 0 does not "grow on the order of log(x)"
 
You need to write $\sim$ to get what you want.
 
9:48 PM
sometimes people talk about O( ) as though the thing inside is chosen 'best possible', but making useful sense of the thing i just wrote in quotes is not really meaningful, and that is not how the notation is defined
people on MSE/SE also ask stuff like "what is O( ) of [some function or algorithm]" which is not even a well-posed question, but could become one in a multiple choice environment
 
Unfortunately, leslie and Ted agree yet again.
 
correction Li(x)-f(x) \sim log x
 
so while it is sadly quite standard to speak about O( ) as if it is more than it is, i would caution you against doing so
 
$\mathrm{Li}(x)-f(x) \sim \log x$
 
even with \sim (however you define that), we had something a while ago where some confusion resulted from someone thinking f(x) ~ g(x) allowed them to replace f(x) with g(x) anywhere in any subexpression without changing the limiting behavior at infinity
 
9:50 PM
Huh?
 
so, just be careful, and resist the impulse to boil down asymptotic descriptions to "oh, all this means is X"
ted: if you weren't there for it, think something like: x^2 + x ~ x^2 as x goes to infinity, but sqrt(x^2 + x) - x and sqrt(x^2) - x have different limits as x goes to infinity
 
The linear map we are using is $T(f) = (f(c_0), f(c_1), \dots, f(c_n))$. So using the standard basis for polynomials of degree $\leq n$. I have as a matrix:

$$
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & c_1 & c_1^2 & \cdots & c_1^n \\
1 & c_2 & c_2^2 & \cdots & c_2^n \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
1 & c_n & c_n^2 \cdots & c_n^n
\end{pmatrix}
$$
Sorry I had to take a second to reacquaint myself with the Vandermonde ideas.
 
@leslietownes Oh, right. Well, a symbol other than $=$ won’t be perfect,
You still haven’t read what I wrote above. This is the proof I suggested.
And the mapping is an iso because?
 
$\mathrm{Li}(x) \sim \pi(x)$ meaning the differences tend to increase as $x \to \infty$ but of course due to Skewe's number there are infinitely many times where $\mathrm{Li}(x)-\pi(x)$ changes sign. How should I think about this? $\mathrm{Li}(x)$ is getting further away and then at skewe's number just randomly spikes downward toward $\pi(x)$?
 
03:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (4672 days earlier)      last day (348 days later) »