@user I noticed you said that the pre commit stuff found an error with your formatting even though you formatted it with black.

I noticed that too last night

I autoformat whenever I save and I use the same settings as the script, but it still didn't like what I had

Is it using different configs?

@VyxalBot tmw you limit your code while debugging and forget to take it out of the PR but the tests still run

Lyxal approved on PR #739 (Vyxal/Vyxal): "lgtm"

pog

→ 24 messages moved to ­Trash

Lyxal created branch Vyxal/fix-branch-parsing-issue

Lyxal opened PR #740 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:fix-branch-parsing-issue → Vyxal:main): Make `|` parse correctly when its in a structure

Lyxal closed issue #644 (Add a digraph for suffixes, Vyxal/Vyxal)

in regards to #573, @emanresuA given razetime's comment, do you still want it added?

Lyxal closed issue #543 (Rickrolling in local system, Vyxal/Vyxal)

Lyxal deleted branch Vyxal/join-inf

also @AaroneousMiller what's happening with the modified-full-stack branch? I don't recall what it was for

I'm just doing some repo housekeeping, that's all

cgccuser approved on PR #740 (Vyxal/Vyxal): "Lgtm but could you add a parser test too?"

SE-Nitro approved on PR #740 (Vyxal/Vyxal): "lgtm too"

Lyxal closed issue #738 (`|` not working in loops, Vyxal/Vyxal)

Lyxal merged PR #740 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:fix-branch-parsing-issue → Vyxal:main): Make `|` parse correctly when its in a structure

Lyxal deleted branch Vyxal/fix-branch-parsing-issue

@lyxal IIRC, that was going to be where I made full-stack elements have an arity or -1, as well as implement the various modifiers for full-stack elements, such as ~W or ƒ^. I had started implementing that, but then I accidentally found that sympy ACE and got a little bit distracted

I should probably finish that

if im right

!!/make me a cookie

What's the shortest way in Vyxal to create an empty list?

Without any context, I'd say ⟨⟩, but depending on the situation, you can do it in 1 byte

Would everyone be okay with it if I deleted the entire repo?

but what about the memes?

Mmm ok

Why is it private again?

→ 2 messages moved to ­Trash

because lyxal

because vyxal

because vyxalS

touche

@user what about local vars then?

github.com/Vyxal/Vyxal/blob/… o stole ideas from Jelly?

Also, I have a feeling we should use more traditional [] syntax for lists

@Seggan Local vars inside constructors, you mean? Hmm, I guess there's no way to do that with my proposed syntax. Perhaps local variables can stay as →asdf and fields would be assigned like →.prop

@Seggan +1

And " or ' for strings

+1 ^^

Im fine with [1|2|3], I like the BF-like function of the comma

Though if we used , instead of | as the separator, we'd have to do that for other structures too

But if | is kept then we still need to have separate stuff to print Vyxal and Python lists

is there a difference?

we could always just print it using the []

Well we'd need one thing to read/print as Vyxal, with [a|b], and another thing to read/print as Python, with [a,b]. It'd be nicer if we just used one syntax for everything

hmm

IMO, thats how I think it should be

CMP: How would you like { cond , body } for while loops, ( var , body ) for for loops, and ⟨ then , else ⟩ for if statements?

its so hard constantly copy-pasting list delimiters

^

And Markdown doesn't play well with `

@user that actually doesnt look so bad

imma hyperping cause it's fun

!!/hyperping

@AaronMiller @AaroneousMiller @Allxy @Ausername @Milk @PyGamer0 @Seggan @Wansen @astonearachnid @emanresuA @grandBagel @hyper-neutrino @lyxal @mathcat @pxeger @rues ^

!!/ping me

@user I have put you on the ping list.

@user (and [a, b, c, d] for lists and "foo" for strings)

FR: Diagraph to check if a list/string is sorted

also a diagraph to check if a list/string is reverse sorted

+1, you should make an issue

AMiller42 opened issue #741 in Vyxal/Vyxal: Diagraphs for checking sortedness

cgccuser created branch Vyxal/inf-cart-prod

cgccuser opened PR #742 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:inf-cart-prod → Vyxal:main): Implement cartesian power for infinite lists

@user hmm

I'd ⟨ cond , body ⟩ for while loops more

and {} for if-else

Is that a "Hmm, good idea" or "Hmm, I don't like this"?

@mathcat That could work too

because I've a feeling if-else would be used more than while loops

Ye. {} for if else reminds me of Java

but I think [] for lists would e good

We could use <> for for loops actually, since those ar eprobably rare

People will probably mainly use map lambdas

Or maybe not, I should consult the corpus

@mathcat what about using commas?

Yup, ƛ is used 132 times while ( is used 94 times

remind me where the corpus is?

nvm

github.com/Vyxal/Vyxal/issues/14 (emanresu got new results here) (thanks emanresu btw)

hmm for seems to be used more than if

We should promote øm, ÞT, and ka to single byte elements and demote some elements to digraphs

Interesting, I guess if doesn't come up too often in golfing?

like gcd

If is 69 and Loop is 94

Nice

but while loop is 28

So my evaluation: ⟨ cond, body ⟩ for while, (var, body) for for, {if, else} for if, "string" for strings, and [list, item] for lists

+1

+1

I wonder what the pipe will be used for if we adopt this...

Btiwse or, perhaps?

+1

Think I should put up a discussion on GH?

👍

cgccuser opened PR #743 (Vyxal/Vyxal) (Vyxal:cgccuser-patch-1 → Vyxal:main): Create dependabot.yml

Seggan created a discussion in Vyxal/Vyxal: Refactoring structures

→ 5 messages moved to ­Trash

@user you are cgccuser, right?

Face reveal

is user really cgccuser?

Place your bets

lol

just making sure I wasn't mentioning the wrong person

@Seggan Yup

Don't tell anyone, but I'm actually a koala

Could someone please review this?

Also, is it just me or is the Discord dead? :(

Lyxal approved on PR #743 (Vyxal/Vyxal): "Sure. "

If a lambda is λarity|code;, how would you get the 2nd argument passed to it in the code if it is a arity 2 lambda?

nt

it is passed as a list?

It's not exactly documented, but if you have a lambda with arity more than 1, n refers to all arguments

@Seggan correct

The stack starts with all the arguments individually

mhm

But n contains a list

just another implementation detail for Jyxal lol

@user no.

Those are needed for comparison

Also, I don't know if I made this clear, ; closes all structures in v3

@lyxal lol I meant the fancy vector angle brackets, I just didn't want to copy them

@lyxal Lists too?!