@North It seems to be a reasonable question that could be answered by some analysis of the play. Perhaps not wholly objective, true, but many questions about literature are partly subjective - the key is to be good subjective, so that answers can be given based on facts and evidence rather than pure speculation.
@North Being a homework question is not a reason to close. Such questions may still be interesting and thought-provoking.
I guess one answer to "what makes a good question" is one that inspires good answers and teaches us something / adds to a useful repository of knowledge. If we required every question to include quotes/research, we'd be missing out on an awful lot of good answers and information that could be (and are) posted to brief minimalist questions.
I agree with Gallifreyan and Rand -- question quality needs to be treated differently on literature.se than on some of the other Stack Exchange sites. This is often a surprise for people who arrive at literature from the other sites, who bring some of the question-closing culture with them, and it takes a while to get people attuned to the different situation at literature.se
I used to spend time at Code Review, at there we used to close a huge proportion of questions -- I think around 40% were closed more or less immediately. But that was because they didn't include any code to be reviewed and so they were of no value to the site.
Even poorly expressed questions are of value to literature.se because they provides a hook on which to hang a good answer. In the case of the Hamlet question, it could have been better phrased, it could have been more specific, it could have quoted relevant passages, etc. But that wouldn't make much difference to people writing answers -- the essence of the question is quite clear as it stands
3
Anyone who is familiar with Hamlet will have wondered, "why is the prince being such a dick to Gertrude and Ophelia?" -- you can phrase it in a more sophisticated way, but that's the essence
Also there are practical considerations -- in my experience, trying to persuade people to improve their questions is largely ineffective. There are lots of reasons why this might be the case -- language difficulties, the complexity of the Stack Exchange interface, or natural reaction to being badgered or criticised. From a practical point of view, it seems more effective for experienced literature.se users to improve the questions, and hope that new users will learn by imitation
That would be worth gathering data about: whether persuading (new) users to improve their questions is effective. At least for questions that aren't blatantly off topic.
Agatha Christie uses the character of Ariadne Oliver to gently satirize her own career as a writer of detective stories. A few of Christie’s personal characteristics also show up in Mrs Oliver, but Christie’s war work, marriages, travel, and daughter, have no counterparts—these show up elsewhere ...
@GarethRees ^ Nice answer. But your quote from Death in the Clouds doesn't say anything about how long the blowpipe is, so I don't understand what mistake Christie made about that.
The potions used in Asterix comic books resemble the methamphetamine usage of World War II. Has the drug culture within the comics ever been discussed?
When I suggested the currently running topic challenge on R. K. Narayan, I wrote that the author
was shortlisted for the Nobel Prize in Literature (possibly several times) but never won it.
This was based on the following statement in the Wikipedia article about the author:
He was nomi...
@b_jonas Christie didn't like the metric system as a consequence of her time as a dispensing chemist -- "The great danger of the metric system is that if you go wrong you go ten times wrong."
Follow, follow me into the South,
And if you are brave and wise
I'll buy you laughter for your mouth,
Sorrow for your eyes.
I'll buy you laughter, wild and sweet,
And sorrow, grey and still,
But you must follow with willing feet
Over the farthest hill.
Follow, follow me into the ...
I am an adult who struggles with reading. I can fully understand books up to about an eighth grade or high school level (books like Harry Potter, The Great Gatsby, writing of Hemingway, etc...) but I struggle with more complex works. I've recently tried reading Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Bertrand...
@Bookworm I hadn't even noticed we had a reading tag. But close-reading doesn't seem very relevant to that question; the issue described there is more basic.
I don't know whether problem resides in dealing with a certain level of linguistic complexity generally (vocabulary, syntax, sentence length), with texts that represent an older state of English, with a certain level of complexity of concept and thought (possibly not; see the math degree) or more something like dyslexia.
It's possible to offer advice on how to learn to read older varieties of a language. It is also feasible to suggest a path from relatively simple to more complex literature (but recommendation questions are off topic here).
I'm trying to find some lost poems that were favorites of mine in high school. This one, I only have one line that I remember clearly. Not much to go on, I know, but if anyone recognizes it, I would be grateful. Thanks! The line I remember is as follows, and I believe it is the starting line:
To...
Huh, when I use this link, I get a page saying that all IP addresses from Germany are being blocked. But I can access the home page just fine. Gutenberg will be turning in his grave.
@GarethRees Hm, I guess that makes sense. Coming from PSE, there's a heavier emphasis on question quality over there (since half the fun in PSE is actually making puzzles) and anything that could be found online is pretty much considered a duplicate
@Tsundoku Is it just in Germany? Because I use Project Gutenberg a lot for much older literature
Huh, works fine in the U.S.
Are copyright laws different in Germany/EU? I thought all materials in Project Gutenberg were long in Public Domain
@North The error message says, "A Court in Germany ordered that access to certain items in the Project Gutenberg collection are blocked from Germany. Project Gutenberg believes the Court has no jurisdiction over the matter, but until the issue is resolved, it will comply.".
So now I have Tor but the connection to Gutenberg.org times out.
Installing software is so comfortable on Linux when you use a distro with big repos :-)
Here are the details: "The plaintiff, S. Fischer Verlag, GMBH, demanded that the project block access to 18 ebooks by the three German authors Heinrich Mann, Thomas Mann, and Alfred Döblin or remove the books entirely from the catalog."
Heinrich Mann died in 1950, Thomas Mann in 1955 and Alfred Döblin in 1957. So they died less than 75 years ago, which I think is the period after which their works would become part of the public domain.
Copyright was introduced so authors can live from publishing their work. If you extend copyright until 25 years after their death, their children also benefit from that protection. At 50 years, the grandchildren may even still benefit from it. At 75 years, it should be obvious that this is just for the sake of the publishers, not the authors or their children.
I mean isn't 80 years reasonable. I highly doubt that a book of literature that significant is written by like a 5 year old
Gross
"The 1998 Act extended these terms to life of the author plus 70 years and for works of corporate authorship to 120 years after creation or 95 years after publication, whichever end is earlier."
You also can't publish images of the Hollywood sign. But as far as I know, the trick to prohibit that is even more ridiculous than copyright: they trademarked it.