@Zanna According to a comment by the OP he decided to abandon the question and go with the default Python version instead, so I VTCd it as off topic, no-repro.
@Kulfy If their question was spam, I would think it was just directly spam -- an effort to promote that script -- rather than a spam seed for something else.
Yeah. Under the circumstances, I think that's reasonable.
I believe their posts were not all deleted as spam, but that most (or all?) were deleted manually by a moderator. If they choose to post again, they may be able to do so, depending on how many posts there were (I might not have seen all of them) and where the threshold for automatic answer banning is set in the SE system.
This edit replaces the code the OP said they actually used with other code. It should be rejected. I used a custom reason:
> The question shows the code the OP actually used. This edit would make it falsely claim to have used other code. (https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/17649)
(That's worded pretty poorly and I'm not advising copying it, but the link may be useful. Though multiple canned reasons would also be okay here.)
