D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

It is truly unfortunate that we don't have the capability to downvote & delete comments that are greatly misleading.

I have linked a few of them here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3452819/…

However, might it be useful to have an ur-question to which all of these can be redirected?

I don't think that any of the one's I've found are good candidates, so (1) does a good, general, "why do my integrals differ?" question exist, and (2) if not, is there any point in writing one?

Very high rep user picking cherries outside his primary tags instead of helping to organize dupes of FAQs.

Proof positive that it is possible to gain over 150K rep without understanding how to write precise rigorous arguments (nor understand critiques thereof)

ARG!

Are you complaining about an offer of full massage?

Heh. Let's go with that.

@XanderHenderson Oh geez, we're never going to here the end of that SE congratulation letter, are we? I was hoping that the proud display in his user profile would be the end of it. He's killing the letter too!

Yup.

@Jack Are you talking about something like this: Coping with abstract duplicate questions. and List of Generalizations of Common Questions.

Some posts on the main site contain the link to that meta post. And the second link contains several links to the post on the main which might be in the spirit you mentioned.

@Jack Yes, I know that those posts are on meta. However, the latter contains quite a lot of links to questions on the main site.

There are also post on main linking to the other meta post.

For example: "This is being asked in an effort to cut down on duplicates, see here: Coping with abstract duplicate questions, and here: List of abstract duplicates." Quoted from: Limits: How to evaluate $\lim\limits_{x\rightarrow \infty}\sqrt[n]{x^{n}+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_{0}}-x$.

The search for "cut down on duplicates" is:q returns 11 questions.

Some duplicates:

1: math.stackexchange.com/q/551445/407165

2: math.stackexchange.com/q/1232463/407165

Yet another pile of duplicates:

3: math.stackexchange.com/q/686423/407165

4: math.stackexchange.com/q/3453127/407165

5: math.stackexchange.com/q/221519/407165

6: math.stackexchange.com/q/1708900/407165

@YaniorWeg Could you please post links without hotboxing?

I am amused by this suggested edit. Unfortunately, I think that it kind of destroys the intention of the answer (for the record, I find the answer itself to be about 50% too snarky).

@TheSimpliFire Does editing a comment (as you have done) require more than room owner status? If not, how is it done?

Delete: DA, DB, DC, DD, DE, DF, DG, DH

Delete: DI, DJ, DK, DL, DM, DN, DO, DP

@XanderHenderson By colouring your username blue...

Oh! Right! You have a diamond now!

I'd forgotten about that lovely decoration. ;)

In that case, might you be willing to de-boxify the comments starting here, as well?

cv-pls calculus Duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/885056/… Show that xe^x=2 has a single positive root‭ - Omar Zaid‭ 2019-11-27 22:52:07Z

@XanderHenderson Admittedly, the new question is asking for slightly more (they want to show that there is only one root and find an interval of length 0.2 containing that root, however the new question is completely context-less, so I have no problem closing it for whatever reason, or closing it as a duplicate of a slightly more general question.