« first day (3234 days earlier)      last day (1693 days later) » 

8:06 AM
@egreg I see lots of questions which remind me of Programming expl3: I do wonder if we should try to get some real stuff together
@DavidCarlisle Could contribute too :
 
@JosephWright perhaps, but first some emails...
 
9:02 AM
@JosephWright I've just read your blog and noticed that you never reenabled Google Analytics for your blog.
2
@JosephWright I appreciate that.
 
9:23 AM
Any Mac users around?
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[cmyk]{xcolor}
\usepackage{tcolorbox}
\begin{document}
\begin{tcolorbox}[colback=white]
  Hello, world.
\end{tcolorbox}
\end{document}
What colour is the background of the tcolorbox in Apple Preview? It looks off-white to me. Some function of CMYK.
 
9:44 AM
@JosephWright ooh
 
@DavidCarlisle well if fails simply because \ref is robust, so Frank will perhaps break it anyway. And if the kernel had sensible hooks hyperref would perhaps not have to redefine it. So we could blame Frank ;-)
 
@UlrikeFischer more consistent just to blame you.
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh lots of ducks
 
too big ;-(
 
10:53 AM
@DavidPurton Using the app Digital Colour Meter, which I think is an Apple provided app despite the “u” in the name, I find R=255, G=255 and B=254. So yes, it's off white. And if I remove [cmyk], it becomes all white.
 
@HaraldHanche-Olsen Odd. It's not a general problem, since \textcolor{white}{Some text} does not exhibit this.
 
@DavidPurton Conversion from cmyk to rgb is not very precise with xcolor. I get the same as @HaraldHanche-Olsen, but on my system the app is “Digital Color Meter”.
 
11:20 AM
@egreg The PDF is fine inside. And no problem with Adobe Reader. It's odd that Preview only has problems sometimes. I can reproduce it with just an empty white tikz node too. Perhaps it's just a Preview bug. But it's annoying, since it shows up when printing!
 
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[cmyk]{xcolor}
\begin{document}
\rule{20mm}{20mm}%
\textcolor{white}{\rule{20mm}{20mm}}%
\rule{20mm}{20mm}%
\end{document}
@DavidPurton You get the same result with the above code. And yes, the pdf looks fine inside. Note that the blacks aren't black either! (On the mac.)
 
@HaraldHanche-Olsen OK. It must be a general CMYK white issue then, I just didn't notice it with plain text. It's OK that the black isn't black. CMYK 100% K is not the darkest colour that can be printed, so when it gets transformed to RGB via colour profiles it is meant to come out a bit grey. But the whole point of CMYK white is that there is no ink, so you should get the same colour as the page, but this isn't happening.
 
⬥ mdls '/Applications/Utilities/Digital Color Meter.app'
_kMDItemDisplayNameWithExtensions  = "Digital Colour Meter.app"
kMDItemAlternateNames              = (
    "Digital Color Meter.app"
)
[… and so on …]
@egreg ↑↑↑ They cheated with the name
@DavidPurton It's just too bad we can't blame @UlrikeFischer for this one.
 
11:40 AM
Gosh, Preview is worse than useless. (My Linux system suffered catastrophic filesystem corruption, sadly, and I'm stuck with Mac OS until a rebuild things sob). Even though I have a PostScript Printer and PostScript driver installed, it's unable to even print the CMYK black as black! It comes out dark purple…
 
@DavidPurton What is Preview? Some OS X thing?
 
Actually, maybe I shouldn't be too critical. I think it's a CUPS problem. It uses a PDF workflow which transforms everything through RGB colour space :(. Linux does this too unless I use a PostScript workflow.
@FaheemMitha It's Mac OS's built in PDF viewer.
 
@DavidPurton I see. Can you use a different PDF viewer?
 
@FaheemMitha Yes, Adobe Reader outputs PostScript directly and bypasses the CUPS PDF workflow. I can also use pdf2ps and print the PostScript file directly.
 
@DavidPurton Ok.
What happened to your Linux machine? Filesystem corruption is (or should be) quite rare.
 
11:58 AM
@FaheemMitha It's the second time it's done it actually. I suspect it's due to poor support for Mac hardware. Things have been getting hard to make work with every Linux kernel upgrade and every Mac OS upgrade. It's old hardware now and if it runs out of memory and tends to die and I have to power it off. Sometimes it doesn't make it back...
The first time I lost my system partition, so not so bad. But this time, I lost my data partition. After a manual fsck and repair, I was left with 100000 files and directories in lost and found called #XXXXXXXX :(
And I didn't have a back up for a couple of months :(. Just spent two days trawling though and recovering things. But got just about everything back, which is a plus.
It corrupted so badly that it wouldn't even boot to Mac OS! I had to reinstall that too :(. Oh well. I just bought a new computer.
My MacBook Air is old and nearing the end of its useful life anyway
 
@DavidPurton Are you running linux in a VM inside macos?
 
@DavidPurton Oh, you're running Linux on an Apple machine? What distribution?
I personally don't think Apple machines make much sense. They're expensive, and they're basically locked, as I understand it. So you can't make changes as you want.
 
12:15 PM
@FaheemMitha I think it's more accurate to say that it's more closed, in the sense of closed source – which means it can be harder to figure out why things go wrong when they do. Yes, it is also more locked down, but you can disable most of the protections either temporarily or permanantly if you need to make changes the system normally won't allow. Expensive: Yes.
 
@HaraldHanche-Olsen, @FaheemMitha, no I run Debian dual boot. No VM. At the time I bought it more than five years ago it was the best value Ultrabook around. It's mostly worked well. But I admit that getting it to dual boot is a real pain.
I getting a ThinkPad this time round. I was tempted by the Dell XPS 13, but it's a fair bit more expensive than the ThinkPad X390 for similar specs. If not as pretty.
@HaraldHanche-Olsen It's a different case for the current Macs. It's currently much too hard to run Linux on them. Too much hardware isn't supported.
 
@DavidPurton The ThinkPads used to be really good. I don't know what they are like now.
Back when they were owned by IBM.
I suppose one could check reviews.
And I know people like laptops, but desktops/workstations are also an option.
@HaraldHanche-Olsen I meant you don't have a lot of choice about buying parts.
It's Apple's Way, basically.
 
@FaheemMitha I need a laptop. No office.
 
@DavidPurton Oh, that's too bad.
 
@FaheemMitha Not so bad :). My office is a cafe and they make good coffee. Or Adelaide University campus.
 
12:55 PM
@DavidPurton Doesn't sound particularly ergonomic. Or quiet. But preferences differ, of course.
 
1:27 PM
@FaheemMitha Oh. Yes, that is a problem. Upgrades are near impossible, which is why I tend to max out my macs when I buy them. Everything except the CPU. For me, it's not worth a small fortune to get a marginally faster CPU.
 
2:24 PM
@HaraldHanche-Olsen Personally, I don't think Apple's products make much sense, which is why I don't buy them. Well, except for a IPod in 2007, which died fairly quickly.
But there seems to be kind of a fetish surrounding them, for some reason.
They do look nice, no question about that.
 
@Skillmon Hi. The issue is legibility and also focus. I would like them to ignore all the other lines while we focus on one of them.
 
@CarLaTeX Nice race!
 
A different problem when trying to build a PC, which I'm facing now, is that there are so many choices they are bewildering. Plus, having to worry about Linux compatibility.
And it's often not clear what the good hardware is.
 
3:08 PM
@egreg Yes!!!!
 
3:19 PM
@UlrikeFischer Are you online?
 
@Dr.ManuelKuehner yes.
 
@FaheemMitha Well, over the years I have used MS-DOS, MacOS (before OS X), Domain/OS, FreeBSD, Linux (Ubuntu), and finally OS X / MacOS. I've had problems with every one of them. MacOS has given me loads of headaches too, but by and large, I find it sucks a bit less than the others. But of course, what makes sense to you depend on many things: Your computing needs, your economy, your time, and your competence in dealing with problems among thiem. …
… I find that the older I get, the more willing I am to spend money in order to waste less time. (But when I retire, I will have less money and more time, so this may change.)
 
Yes, It's a good day! I had a very odd error ('Command \sidewaysfigure already defined.') last week after updating all packages of my MacTex installation. If prevented me to use the [newfloat=true] option for minted package. Now, after updating all packages again, the error is gone.
 
4:05 PM
@HaraldHanche-Olsen I've used Debian for a long time, and I've found it trouble-free most of the time. Surprisingly so, in fact.
My experience with other operating systems is limited. I did used Sun machines once. And I've used Windows briefly.
 
5:05 PM
@HaraldHanche-Olsen Well said My view is the same
 
 
2 hours later…
7:00 PM
Hi, all, I thought I'd pop back in to say hello
3
 
@Brent.Longborough Hi. How are you?
 
7:15 PM
@FaheemMitha Hi, Faheem. Great, thanks. I haven't been here for ages.
 
@Brent.Longborough Hi Brent! You don't know me but I know you as co-author of arara, welcome back!
 
7:53 PM
@Brent.Longborough Yes, you're not here regularly.
 
8:26 PM
@ShreevatsaR have you seen this: saildart.org/PROFIL.WEB[WEB,DEK] ?
it's a WEB program that isn't listed anywhere
It purportedly pretty-prints TANGLEd output but it needs a "count file" that could be difficult to create
 
8:50 PM
@CarLaTeX Brent wrote the bits that work, @PauloCereda wrote the rest, I guess:-)
 
9:07 PM
@Brent.Longborough Hi, Brent!
 
@Brent.Longborough Frank was asking after you
 
9:57 PM
@DavidCarlisle oi
@JosephWright ooh
 

« first day (3234 days earlier)      last day (1693 days later) »