« first day (3004 days earlier)      last day (1927 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 23:00

Anonymous
6:01 PM
 
@Blue Oh Thanks. Threads are explained there.
 
@MartianCactus It seems interstellar travel may never happen, let alone in just 70-80 years
 
Anonymous
> PhD.History of relativity. Foundations of Einstein's theory
 
Anonymous
It's rare to find people working on the history of relativity. :)
 
6:17 PM
Hi @Blue, I forgot to return your greeting the other day!
@Slereah, are you here?
 
Maybe
 
Anonymous
@TerryBollinger Haha, no probs. There were too many simultaneous conversations going on. ;)
 
@SirCumference but that doesn't take into account either sending out drones to populate the galaxy or some sort of stasis allowing for much longer trips
 
or heavy shielding
 
6:19 PM
I looked up ADM and don't see how I can do anything but lead to singularities... Which I guess is part of the problem?
 
@enumaris Drones could be destroyed from this too :P
 
@SirCumference no I mean drones that live effectively forever so you could have them on v<0.5c spaceships
within a matter of a few tens of millions of years, we could populate the whole galaxy that way
 
@enumaris I think drones that live forever would have to be an even greater engineering miracle
 
ADM appears to rely on the first approximation set of assumptions on how to integrate space with momentum in a time frame work. I'm a bit astonished but that's the only way anyone has approached it, since the relationship inherently must be a bit more complex than that. But then I've only begun looking, so I may have misunderstood the intent.
 
@SirCumference well forever in the sense of a few hundred/thousand years
if they can self replicate or self repair then ez
 
6:22 PM
Well we could try, although I'm not sure the resources it'd entail. Perhaps I'm just being pessimistic about it tho
 
@Slereah no need to reply, but I was just fascinated to see that what I always assumed was a very deep set of relationships in quantum gravity was instead a fairly straightforward hamiltonian approximation
 
think long term :D
in as few as a 10-20 million years, we could have colonized the whole galaxy
 
@TerryBollinger I mean it's still fairly complicated
 
The quora post does mainly focus on sending humans, so I wouldn't know about drones
@enumaris yeah but by "colonize" do you just mean "sent drones everywhere", or "sent colonies of humans everywhere"?
 
drones
they can carry human DNA if spreading human DNA is what's more important
 
Anonymous
6:24 PM
@enumaris The AI takeover will probably happen way before that. ;P
 
Well in that case we don't need to worry about colonizing mars, already done :P
 
@Blue fo sho
 
@enumaris I think building a human from within a robot would be yet another feat
Eh who knows
 
@SirCumference probably not too bad, just do in-vitro fertilization to get fertile eggs...the only other piece is to create a machine-based incubator rather than using a surrogate
 
A bit more intensive algorithmic expiration likely is needed. but then I'm from a computer science background, so we tend to think in terms of the space algorithms possible. Our survival focused version of biological intelligence (AI is my real expertise) tends to make us assume too quickly what "obviously must" be right.
 
6:26 PM
breed some humans, have a nice orientation video for when they grow to about 5 or 6 and then let them loose
 
I'm no biologist, but wouldn't the dna suffer from similar biological damage as mentioned in the post?
 
you can shield it
if there's only a small compartment to shield, it'll be much easier than shielding the whole ship
but the post assumes v~c travel
you can just do v<<c travel
freeze the DNA
 
Heh! I'm doing nothing more than typing notes out loud, literally since I'm using my voice interface. This needs to go into a paper... @Slereah, thanks again for the simple pointer.Time for me to deep dig into the original papers...
 
Idk, i'm a bit skeptical. Seems like a massive time scale
 
10 million years is peanuts
barely the life-time of a supermassive star
 
6:30 PM
or we could just wait $10^{10^{50}}$ years for Boltzmann brains to form. Then boom, galaxies are colonized :P
 
that'
s way longer
10^100 years or so is heat death of the universe so
can't really wait $10^{48}$ orders of magnitude longer
uhhh...
 
@enumaris High estimate for heat death is $10^{10^{120}}$, so who knows lol
Shoot linked to the wrong part of the page
 
"$1.7×10^{106}$ Estimated time until a supermassive black hole with a mass of 20 trillion solar masses decays by the Hawking process.[114] This marks the end of the Black Hole Era. Beyond this time, if protons do decay, the Universe enters the Dark Era, in which all physical objects have decayed to subatomic particles, gradually winding down to their final energy state in the heat death of the universe.[3][4]"
"1 million Estimated shortest time by which humanity could colonize our Milky Way galaxy and become capable of harnessing all the energy of the galaxy, assuming a velocity of 10% the speed of light.[125]"
EZ
 
7:01 PM
All right, imma try to make an h bar ad. Any ideas?
 
recruit people to your initiative to colonize the galaxy
 
Ah, advertise a grander purpose
 
Sounds good to me
 
what's a good catch phrase for the room? or maybe a pic that symbolizes us?
 
Random Thoughts Part Deux
 
Anonymous
7:11 PM
@SirCumference Insert "asynchronous communication protocol" somewhere, maybe? ;)
 
@Blue I see
perhaps we need to rebrand ourselves as "exciting". ever see those movie posters where there are tons of explosions? those are attention grabbing
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference Also add few tiny symbols representing music, food, physics, math etc. ?
 
here's my idea
user image
3
perfect
 
Anonymous
Loool
 
ok i'm just bored rn lol
 
Anonymous
7:15 PM
Well, that wouldn't really be suitable for display on the main page. XD
 
Anonymous
That image is going down in history BTW. Downloaded and saved for future use. ;)
 
Anonymous
Gosh, the Hulk.
 
poor 0celo
 
hey...hey where's my icon
 
you don't have a pic :P
 
Anonymous
7:19 PM
Just put in a green dot somewhere. :P
 
Anonymous
@enumaris Oh, you're the Hulk's body.
 
@Blue y-yes, all part of my plan
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference Loong is the set of the building's windows?
 
why of course, glad someone noticed
 
XD
 
Anonymous
7:22 PM
Definitely. Genius level art.
 
!
 
Anonymous
@Loong Oops, I guess SirC didn't get time to paint the windows. ;P
 
not big enough budget for that
 
Hello brains with complicated neural connections forming the 'reality' and perceptions each of us has.
What the duck is this
where is my face ;(
It's weird how this is considered a community despite the fact that we haven't met each other in the 'real world'.
Of course the term real world has a quite complicated and abstract philosophical reasoning behind it so I'm not going to go into details...
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Your face is represented by the greyish clouds and clear sky bordered by those clouds. ;)
 
7:33 PM
@Blue <3
I think I'm finally grasping the concept of calculus but I don't know where to use it.
I'm currently exploring the realms of philosophy and non-mathematical areas.
My classical physics 'knowledge' is mediocre. Any chance I can apply my even more mediocre 'knowledge' of calculus there?
 
Anonymous
Why not learn calculus the proper way?
 
@Blue Proper way?
 
Anonymous
Pick up a high school calculus textbook and solve all the problems. That's the only way to gain real understanding.
 
Anonymous
You've been complaining about your difficulties in calculus for a long time now!
 
Anonymous
It's not a difficult subject. But you need to solve problems instead of just reading about it.
 
7:37 PM
Are there problems on the WWW?
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Yep! Paul's notes is one of the best resources you'll find on the WWW.
 
I don't want to just apply the 'Calculus Rules' and solve the 'problems'.
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany That's the only way to understand mathematics.
 
This is not 'understanding' mathematics. It's basically applying rules (something which I don't like) to the problems.
 
Anonymous
> Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
 
Anonymous
7:40 PM
Oh, the controversial quote. :P
 
I'm not intereted in solving calculus problems. I'm interested in applying calculus to physics.
 
Anonymous
It's like trying to read Shakespeare without learning A,B,C first.
 
Anonymous
Understanding comes later. First you pick up the rules and axioms (of course, not blindly!). You'll develop the understanding over time, when you start revisiting things.
 
@NovaliumCompany Almost all physics beyond high school level involves calculus in one way or the other, so don't worry - if you just continue learning physics you'll need calculus sooner or later :P
 
@NovaliumCompany our prototype ad lol
 
7:44 PM
mathsisfun.com/calculus/derivatives-rules.html So 'solving' calculus problems involves just applying those rules and getting an answer?
@SirCumference plz add my face, I wanna be famous
 
you don't have a face :P
besides i'm just memeing
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Yes. The rules of calculus are all very logical.
 
Anonymous
If you can't understand where a rule comes from, by all means ask for the proof!
 
The question is, do I need to understand where the rule comes from?
I just wanna make sense of calculus, not solve calculus.
 
Anonymous
That's a dangerous path to choose. You'll only develop a superficial understanding that way.
 
7:47 PM
@NovaliumCompany What you "need" to do always depends on what you're trying to achieve.
 
What's the problem to just look at the rules whenever I need to solve a calculus problem?
 
@NovaliumCompany Integration is intuitively like multiplication, except where one quantity changes as the other does. So as a random example, let's say I had a rope whose density changes with distance from the top, as a function $\lambda(r)$. Trying to get the entire mass via multiplication wouldn't be too accurate since I can only multiply a single point. Instead, I would integrate
Integration breaks the rope into tiny pieces, multiplies each density with $r$, and adds them up. So it's by definition a sum of multiplications, where each term differs slightly from the others
 
@SirCumference Why are you telling me this?
 
@NovaliumCompany You asked for an idea of when this stuff is useful :P
 
And what the "rules of calculus" are likewise depends on what you're doing. For many applications, you could get away with only knowing how to differentiate polynomials by role application of simple rules. For others, you'd need to know more. To "understand" the rules of calculus, you might learn proper analysis. But then you might think you don't "understand" these argument before you "understand" set theory...
 
7:50 PM
@ACuriousMind I'm glad you put "understand" in "".
$I = C\frac{dV}{dt}$ The complexity of the rules I'll have to use in order to solve a problem with this equation depends on the $V(t)$ function?
 
Like most knowledge and understanding, mathematical knowledge exists on a gradual scale from "I have no idea what this is" to "I could derive all of this from scratch from memory", and for most topics, your understanding will end up somewhere in the middle.
 
Anonymous
I guess by rules Novalium means things like $\frac{d}{dx} (x^n)=nx^{n-1}$. For these things proofs are easily accessible at a high school level.
 
@NovaliumCompany Yes. But I would suggest you're thinking the wrong way about approaching physical problems. Physicists don't learn some bit of math and go looking for physical problems to apply it to. They also don't dream up equations and then try to model as many problems as possible with it. Instead, they usually find a physical problem and then figure out the math required to deal with it.
 
@ACuriousMind I totally agree to this.
 
7:55 PM
@Blue Eh, it's all relative and depend on both your notion of "high school level" and "proof" :P I doubt many high schools do the things that are required for a proper definition of the real numbers and limits.
 
Sooo... why do apples fall. I can apply derivatives to this problem?
@SirCumference Delete your browser history.
 
Anonymous
Yes, of course. I'm not talking about the rigorous versions of the proofs. :)
 
@NovaliumCompany Uh what?
 
@SirCumference Just jokin'.
 
7:56 PM
@NovaliumCompany "Why" is a dangerously ill-defined question. If I answered "Because it is in their inherent nature", does that answer it?
Aristotle thought so.
 
@ACuriousMind lol
@ACuriousMind Then I'm smart as Aristotle.
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Uh, this is exactly what ACM is telling you to avoid. Don't imagine random problems to apply your newly-learnt math to. You're wasting a lot of time this way.
 
@NovaliumCompany Perhaps "because spacetime is curved" might serve as an answer. And too precisely understand that, you do in fact need calculus :P
 
Ok. I just learned a part of calculus. I feel unstatisfied with the fact that I'm not using it to do anything useful. I'm learning calculus to understand the world better. Solving calculus problems is not going to do it.
 
A more precise and most importantly quantitative question related to gravity you could ask yourself is: "How long does an object take to hit the surface of the Earth if it starts motionless at a distance $r_0$?"
 
7:59 PM
@NovaliumCompany I mean just pick up an undergrad classical mechanics book if you immediately want to start applying it
 
But answering this question would already involve having to solve an ordinary differential equation, after having derived said equation from Newton's laws and Newtonian gravity.
 
it'll expect you to be pretty comfortable with calculus tho
 
Finding problems for which one is not under- or over-equipped at random is basically not a successful strategy, which is why the best sources of suitable problems are textbooks that specifically choose their problems such that they can be solved by what they just taught you
 
Anonymous
The problem is: Novalium wants to jump to physics problems without getting acquainted with the formalism of calculus first. There's a sequential way to learn everything...just jumping around doesn't help!
 
Ahh... I wanna meet you guys in the real world and have a conversation there. I feel socially unsatisfied with this method of communication. It's like a deception. I'm still learning tho, which is the main reason I'm here.
 
8:02 PM
@NovaliumCompany If you want to apply calculus, then understand the theory well enough to realize when it's applicable. That's pretty much the deal with any type of higher level math.
 
I learned derivatives. I wanna apply them somewhere.
 
@NovaliumCompany Pretty sure very few people here have met :P But we still have a community over a chat
@NovaliumCompany Again, I'm sorry to say but you won't really have learned derivatives until you have an intuition for them. That's done in a math course. Simply knowing how to compute derivatives won't help you better understand the universe.
 
What do you mean by "intuition for them"?
 
Getting a feeling for what differentiation and integration are doing, and realizing why they would be applicable. A good site for this stuff is this
But in general, an idea of how to motivate differentiation/integration and why we'd want to define them the way we do.
When you know that, you quickly see when they're applicable
 
@SirCumference The website is quite interesting. Thanks.
 
8:09 PM
I found calculus to be the first transition from solely memorizing ideas in high school, to understanding why they should intuitively make sense in college
@NovaliumCompany No problem. Easily the best supplementary resource I used when learning calculus
For clarity, the calculus section is here from the bottom upwards
 
Alright then. I'll continue learning calculus, the rules, and digging deep into the small holes. Hopefully patterns will start to appear and I'll understand where in physics I can apply the knowledge. :P
 
Anonymous
If you want to "apply" derivatives it's best to start with kinematics first. For instance, Resnick Halliday covers calculus briefly in the first couple chapters and then proceeds with the physics i.e. kinematics. You'll find a lot of real life physics problems there (where you can apply calculus). The PDF is easily available online.
 
Okay. I'll go to bed, tommorow I'll continue my calculus learnings. Thanks everybody for your time.
 
Anonymous
Bbye!
 
8:30 PM
One last thing. I'm reading this article: real-world-physics-problems.com/curvilinear-motion.html and I was wondering why the magnitude of the velocity of particle P is given by summing the individual x, y, z squared, and then taking the square root of that?
 
Mo_
8:42 PM
@enumaris congrats! I got my first admission too
 
@Mo_ admission? Like to college or grad school?
 
9:04 PM
@enumaris PhD program iirc
 
nice nice
 
Anonymous
@Mo_ Congrats! Which place is it?
 
1
Q: I am having trouble improving how my questions are received

LunaIs there a way I can improve how my current questions are received because no matter what I do they get received worse? They don't even tell me what needs improvement.

 
9:20 PM
Good evening/night/morning/afternoon for everyone!

I would like to ask you something about the nature of computers.
Well, consider for instance the algebric structure called Magma as exposed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(algebra)
So, if you ask "what is the most fundamental algebric structure?" then probably your answer would be "magma".

Following this analogy, what is the fundamental notion of a computer? I mean, our PCs are just a physical implementation of physics and mathematics, that we can interact. To constrain in some sense my doubts, consider then Thermodynamics,Clas
 
@M.N.Raia 1. I would never call a "Magma" the most fundamental algebraic structure. 2. The standard abstract computer is a Turing machine.
 
@ACuriousMind Ok, why not? (about the 1) )
 
Because it's useless :P
I've never needed "magma theory" for anything. Group theory, on the other hand...
 
Yes, of course and a totally agree with you. But what generate the notion of a group? A magma with more structure.
@ACuriousMind
 
Most of mathematics is just "sets with structure".
 
9:27 PM
Indeed
 
9:42 PM
@ACuriousMind such set theory chauvinism
you can build mathematics from many things!
 
Just for the record: I know some of your from the time I spended here, since 2015 I guess. Like @ACuriousMind @Slereah @Qmechanic @JohnRennie
Well, I'm the Jack Clerk, I just changed my name.
 
Woo
 
some of you*
Just for the record: I know some of you from the time I spend here, since 2015 I guess. Like @ACuriousMind @Slereah @Qmechanic @JohnRennie
Well, I'm the Jack Clerk, I just changed my name. **
 
Anonymous
What's up with everyone changing their names these days... :P
 
That's my real name Mário Raia Neto and that's me,for real, in the photo.
Anyway, I don't know why I said that.
 
Anonymous
9:48 PM
Ah. Nevertheless, welcome back. ;)
 
I actually answered a question on Chinese SE
LOL my Chinese is so bad
 
Mo_
I don't know how to reply though (as I'm waiting for other applications)
 
Anonymous
@Mo_ Awesome!
 
Mo_
@AC still not interested in a PhD?
@Blue :)
finally switching to physics
 
10:03 PM
They generally give you a good amount of time to decide
 
Anonymous
Ha-ha, yesssh...finally! :D
 
unlike in the business world where they want you to accept/deny an offer within 24 hours or sometimes on the spot...
 
Anonymous
@Mo_ So when does the session start generally?
 
Anonymous
Around October?
 
Aug/Sep/Oct is generally when most colleges start
more Aug/Sep than Oct in my experience
 
Mo_
10:04 PM
Yeah should be in September
 
Anonymous
Oh, it's nearly same here.
 
Anonymous
> Welcome to CREOL, The College of Optics and Photonics, a world leader in education, research, and industrial partnership. Optics and photonics is the science and technology of light: lasers, LEDs, LCDs, optical fibers, and imaging systems for applications in industry and medicine. Learn more by exploring this website, and visit us to see our facilities and meet our faculty, staff, and students.
 
Anonymous
Still sounds a bit like engineering. ;)
 
@Blue Huh good point. Obe, skullpatrol, etc.
 
woah woah woah
 
Mo_
10:06 PM
 
why's Chinese Beta have questions 3 years old...
how long can you remain a beta site...
 
@Mo_ ?
 
Anonymous
@Mo_ ACM has already been fully corrupted by the software world; can't go back! ;P
 
Mo_
@enumaris as long as the stats show the website can graduate
 
He's saying if you go to that address, they will have a PhD waiting for you to claim.
 
Mo_
10:08 PM
@enumaris exactly (admission guaranteed :)
 
no no, not just admission guaranteed, but they have a physical PhD ready for him to claim
 
Mo_
6.5 years in beta
 
Anonymous
@enumaris The longest is ~8 years I think (till now).
 
@enumaris Indefinitely
 
That's a long beta
 
Anonymous
10:11 PM
They're changing things though. The graduation process is going to be revamped in the near future, from what I've heard.
 
Anonymous
There's also this "design-independent graduation" thing these days.
 
Anonymous
96
Q: Design-Independent Graduation is on for early September!

AnaThis is a follow-up to an earlier discussion Feedback Requested: Design-Independent Graduation. Like the title says, design-independent graduation will go into effect and become our new regular practice the second week of September! All sites which have been waiting in the backlog to graduate w...

 
Robert essentially said they're not really currently graduating anything and redesigning the process here two days ago.
 
Anonymous
Since beta sites are no longer closed except in the extreme cases (say when the site moderation is dysfunctional and flags are not being handled regularly), the difference between graduated sites and beta sites has become narrower. Now it's mostly just a issue of removing beta labels and setting up additional migration paths (apart from re-setting the reputation levels required for accessing site privileges).
 
Anonymous
> I am in the process of writing up a comprehensive site life cycle workflow which (among solving many other issues) would include breaking apart "graduation", and enabling each feature as soon as a community can reasonably support it. It's roughly based on the premise I outlined here — But what happened to Graduation?.
 
Anonymous
10:19 PM
That's good news!
 
SE weird
 
Anonymous
@enumaris They have been pretty inconsistent about this graduation thing, yes.
 
oh man, the VP that hired me won't even be in the office when I join lol, he'll be back in Germany until the grand opening in March...hmmm...
I guess I'll just have to see how things are managed when I get there
 
Mo_
@enumaris Is this (your) office in San Francisco?
 
The office is in the greater LA area
The current office is in Irvine, and the new one will be in Newport Beach
the new one won't be finished until March
 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 23:00

« first day (3004 days earlier)      last day (1927 days later) »