« first day (2962 days earlier)      last day (2002 days later) » 

Ben
2:04 AM
I visited my Grandpa lately, and I was greeted by a young guy in skinny jeans eating avocado toast. I asked my Grandpa who he was and he said "This is my hip replacement"
 
@Rubiksmoose D'you mod much? There are a couple pretty great ones out for settlements, depending on how much you also like survival.
 
Ben
@KorvinStarmast MUST CONSTRUCT ADDITIONAL PYLONS
 
2:34 AM
@Ben Ssspawn more Overlords
 
2:55 AM
Can someone sanity-check me on the just-closed grapple/shove/disarm question? I feel like it shouldn't be dupe-closed, because the disarm bit isn't addressed in the dupe-target.
But I'm hesitant to mod-reopen a question I'm 2/3 of the way through writing an answer for, because it feels like obvious COI.
Eh, I'm going to do it--I see someone else already had the same reaction.
%$&#(%)^$ reopening lost my draft =(
 
@nitsua60 sheesh
 
Eh, it's for the best. I was in the morally-dubious position of continuing to polish my draft, then cast a reopen vote, then immediately post an answer while Peter had no chance to get an answer in before me. This inadvertently leveled the field, which makes me feel better.
 
Lol
Abuse your power properly dangit
:P
 
3:13 AM
@trogdor yeah, what troggy said. Benign abuse of power can be beneficial ... said every monarch ever.
 
hey there @KorvinStarmast
 
@Shalvenay Hullo there amigo, how are things?
I just got off of Discord with my brother and his D&D campaign. We seem to have run off some kobold scouts, which suggests that something bigger is about to visit our caravan ... during next session.
 
heheheheh
 
Beyond that, work and life are the usual thing. And, I have to get to bed for an early work day tomorrow ... sheesh, they keep changing thing. :p
Nite all
 
Night
 
3:17 AM
@Miniman sanity check: Crawford's just blatantly wrong here, right?
 
3:31 AM
In 3.5 it was definitely your whole action
That being said I am biased about how similar 5 is to 3.5
 
4:11 AM
@nitsua60 I don't have the DMG in front of me, and my memory of that section is spotty at best, sorry.
Er, wait. That section is devoted to new action options, isn't it?
 
@Miniman Maybe--yeah. THere's a second-level header proclaiming it an "action option" that I missed.
 
@nitsua60 But, yanno. The main reason my memory is so spotty is because I read that section on my initial readthrough of the DMG and immediately dismissed it as poorly thought-out garbage.
Um, relative to 5e, I mean.
 
4:29 AM
Lol
I definitely hate some of the mechanics of 5e a little bit
Some of them literally because they seem out of place with everything else
Though to be fair considering how action economy works in 5e I expect disarm does cost your action
But I've gone into length about that stuff already
 
4:58 AM
Not to worry. Diablo Immortal PF 2e will fix everything and reunite the entire D&D fanbase.
 
5:15 AM
@Miniman "You guys all have phones math, right?"
 
@Miniman boy miniman, you sure do know a lot of uplifting stuff :P
 
5:34 AM
@trogdor I've been told in the past that I have the wrong level of cynicism. I'll leave it to you to judge whether it's too much or too little.
@MikeQ I saw an incredible reply to that line that I can't quote here.
 
@Miniman lol, that is rather vague
I don't think it's wrong to have a little more or less than most people though
It's just another thing that makes everyone a little different
 
 
3 hours later…
8:24 AM
@KorvinStarmast don't know. I never bought or played D3 after the "always online, real money auction house" info became public. I just followed a little of the post release dramma because fun.
I remember that among the various fights/flame wars the following arguments came out a lot:
a) Tyrael blackVSwhite supportes fights. Arguments were made that he was changed in between D2 and D3. Will have to check if the d2 ending really had him already shown with black hands
b) auction house just a scam to "steal" people money. Accusations of artificially controlled drops to push players to buy stuff. Also there were some rumors that some of the items on the auction house were put there by Blizzard itself to sell generated items while pretending that was just a player-to-player marketplace.
c) accusation of modifying the gameplay to make it even more item driven, again to push items sales
d) the online mode being very bugged at the start. While the rumors of a very easy man-in-the-middle attack that was used to steal accounts were never proved (or confirmed by Blizzard) some other very bad bugs were. For example, the timer on an auction was tied to the LOCAL time on the machine of the one browsing the auction... so it was possible to force a time-out and win an auction by tampering the LOCAL time on the client....
On top of that, the staff also made some epic PR handling failures.
In one emblematic case, one of the head members of the staff actually posted some very heavy insults at the community on the public forums for the game.
@KorvinStarmast ok, watched the ending again. While you might be right, to me the black color of the face / hands in that picture are only an effect of the over-saturated lighting on the armor (and to be fair, I also see some shades of green in there, I fear that picture should just be considered "El Shaddai" effect)
Anyway, as a final notice, that thing about the design of Tyrael never bothered me. If I had to find something I didn't like, I would have gone for the "bald" thing instead.
But mind you, if it was for me he probably would have been a lot shorter, red-bearded and axe wielding :P
 
 
2 hours later…
10:47 AM
Ducktales 2017 was nice
And turns out there's a second season. Woo-o!
 
11:13 AM
@kviiri you liked it? I saw the first 3-4 episodes but I wasn't very intrigued.
While I liked that Scrooge seemed to be far more like the original Carl Barks / Don Rosa depicted, to the point that the first episode could easily be placed just after the end of The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck
.. I didn't really like the way the nephews were handled.
Maybe it gets better?
 
11:36 AM
@kviiri Hooray! I'm gonna catch up on that one :D
 
11:51 AM
That's the one with Tennant as Scrooge McDuck right?
 
don't know what the original voice actors where, but that is the one with the "squared" art style if that helps you
 
@trogdor that's the one
 
Yeah I just looked it up and indeed it is
 
I saw the first... six-ish episodes? before I got distracted. Liked 'em well enough that I'd watch the rest.
But then, I'm not sure I ever saw a full episode of the original series so I'm more like their main target demographic in that regard.
 
@Derpy It got much better as the plotlines were developed. The early season was a bit of a disappointment because there wasn't enough of the classic "adventuring in interesting settings"
@Derpy You mean their more, err, rascally attitude or the fact they're more distinct personalities or?
(I am very much a fan of the latter)
 
12:04 PM
@kviiri oh, that sounds good
 
@kviiri I did like that.
And they had, like, more dimensional personalities than I expected.
 
one thing I disliked about the original,... they were just the same kid color coded different
 
Not much, but more than I expected.
 
@BESW And that's one of the things that they ramp up even further during Season 1
 
@kviiri no, not the rascally attitude. The "let's give them the "idiot ball" troope thing"
like when.. Huey? tries to cross the trapped bridge in the first or second episode.
 
12:08 PM
Oh, that was totally "I want a Fate point, please."
I'll forgive a lot of idiot ball when the idiot holding it is a young kid who's overexcited and acting in a way consistent with their established character notes.
 
I think they do that less overall as the season progresses
I mean, they still do a lot of dangerous stuff of course, but of the last few episodes that I remember vividly, not just for whimsy but they actually have a reason (good or bad one)
 
@BESW the fact is that coming from the "old age" it is more difficult for me to accept their total inexperience to adventure because back in those days the "Holy Junior Woodchucks Guidebook" was continuously invoked to turn them into MacGyver.
 
Ah, having a hard time remembering it's a reboot and not a continuation, got it.
 
Need to build a raft? Only have an apple, a battery and a bottle of water? No problem, the Guidebook has a note on it:P
 
@Derpy The auction house was for me a feature that never mattered, but yeah, it was a naked money grab. From the get go. As to all the rest, I chose not to be as "connected" to the community via the forums and such for my own reasons. Glad I avoided most of that.
 
12:17 PM
That said, even as a reboot I found it rather odd that they had to mention the same Guidebook (meaning they are in the Junior Woodchucks even in the reboot) soon after that bridge scene. But yep, that's just me.
 
@Derpy Well, it is the lost wisdom of the Library of Alexandria. I should hope so!
 
@Derpy It's now Dewey's schtick, and he actually makes pretty good use out of it. The other kids either aren't woodchucks or then they're less committed to that.
 
Last 12 hours to vote for RPGSE to place in the cheese contest! Vote here to enshrine RPGSE as the internet's finest cheese purveyor!
2
 
12:33 PM
No wait, not Dewey. Huey?
I think Louie is the green greedy one, and Dewey is the blue energetic and excitable one.
 
since we are already on topic, I suppose there is no hope that Flintheart will return to the original not-fat state, right ? :P
 
Nay, none
There's also no hope of him returning to being an Afrikaner instead of a Scot :P (although this is touched on)
 
12:52 PM
@kviiri ^ well, I suppose I just wanted s remake of this :P
Oh, and Goldie is a "dubious moral" explorer now?
 
1:25 PM
ugh. getting to old to be up late drinking, team
 
I have student org annual ball tomorrow. I already dread the depravities that await me
 
yea, but I'm 30
all of the memes about drinking in your early 20s vs late 20s are true
 
I'm late 20's too
Well, almost 27
That's a perfect cube
 
ah. I thought younger when you said student org
We have these store brand honey cheerios. They're not great...

But sprinkling a little instant coffee in them make them passable.
 
Yeah, I used to be in the board a couple of years ago, plus done a lot of odd jobs like tutoring and various other posts. The annual ball tends to gather former active members :)
And this being the 30 year celebration it's even more grandiose than usual
 
1:37 PM
yea. we have something similar at my alma matter (sp?). Birthday Ball.
 
I even went and leased a tailcoat
I have the honorary sash of our org (usually reserved for chairs and vice chairs of the board, but I've been an unusually active fellow otherwise) so I didn't want to spare any expense showing it off :)
 
"We've spared no expense"
 
2:05 PM
@nitsua60 Does the community get a time-share on the cheese board? What's the arrangement?
Or do we just leave the cheese board at the community's collective table?
(granted the cheese hall of fame is definitely largely your baby :P how do you keep all that cheese from melting in there?)
 
2:33 PM
@doppelgreener This is a logistical nightmare that I've just shied away from actually thinking about. I figure I'll privately contact the 12 top cheese-producers and ask if they'd like the thing for a month and send it myself.
@doppelgreener My heart is an unfeeling block of ice.
 
@nitsua60 Then, in a few decades, when this happens again, we can win another cheeseboard with the travel fotos of a cheeseboard…
 
@Anaphory Genius
Cheeses of the world, on the cheeseboard, for another cheeseboard
 
@NautArch somehow I missed that "roll-altering" bit in OP. I'll get there....
 
@nitsua60 Sounds like a grate idea.
 
@Anaphory BRILLIANT!!!
@Catija please note Anaphory's excellent idea for fall 2023 anniversary celebration. (About 5 messages back.)
 
2:44 PM
@Anaphory I refuse to include my Fluttershy plush with the cheeseboard.
 
2:56 PM
@Derpy Then how about some Applejack (this liquor works too ;) )? Apple wood smoked cheddar is yummy.
 
3:07 PM
@NautArch what do you think about the last paragraph now?
 
3:20 PM
@Rubiksmoose only have a Flutter and a Twily, sorry.
And them being the 4de ones... they were already pricey enough.
 
@nitsua60 Looks good to me. I actually started a new question just for that part.
Because I think it is interesting and I can't think of one that would. But someone might have a clever way.
 
I can't think of a single effect in the game that affects d% rolls.
 
Yeah I can't either.
 
3:36 PM
@Xirema Except it's not, RAW, a d% roll. It's just a 33% chance.
(I.e. the spell isn't worded "on a roll of 1-33 on d100 you can never cast again.")
 
@nitsua60 Same issue though: most effects that allow you to modify or reroll a die roll either affect d20's, or "damage roll"s, which a "33% chance" is neither.
 
@Xirema Oh, yeah. I'm with you. I'm just noticing that it's a strange little place where they've decided to give a percentage rather than the explicit roll.
I can't think of other places that happens other than WM surge results.
(Strike that: the WM surge table really is explicit rolls.)
 
@nitsua60 Yeah it is a strange departure.
It is the only place I can think of that does that.
Fwiw, I made the d%/d100 assumption explicit in my question.
 
@Rubiksmoose I also can't find when this entered wish's history. Wish doesn't exist 0e, and 1e/2e/3.5e don't have the "stress test."
4e... I just opened my 4e PHB for the first time and have no idea what I'm looking at. (cc:@trogdor)
Are there even spells!?
 
I like drawing pebbles from a urn as much as the next moose, but I would certainly settle this with a dice roll lol.
@nitsua60 iiiiiinteresting. I kind of assumed it was always a thing. But now that I think on it, I think in PF it wasn't there either.
 
3:44 PM
I kinda like it for its uniqueness (in game *and* at table) and portentiousness (at table).
"I *wish* to be past this damned puzzle!"
[GM rummages in bag, pulls out ceramic urn full of stones, leather straps holding it shut.]
"What's that!? I've never seen you pull that out!?"
"And you may never again, depending on which stone you draw...."
 
@nitsua60 [pauses] [googles urn prices]
 
"Okay, I guess- my grandfather's ashes! Why would you do this to me!?"
 
hahaha I love it.
 
Better, I guess, than the other use for an urn from dictionary.com: boiling water.
 
Now that's one I've never come across before lol
 
3:47 PM
I'm seeing some very nice-looking one on Amazon from $40. I may need to pick one up for my classroom.
Put in a lot of stones and a little chalk-dust, just to mess with the kids.
 
@nitsua60 hah!
 
(In my book: if you don't want to mess with teenagers, you've got no business teaching high school.)
 
I mean yeah, it is basically in the job description as far as I'm concerned.
 
As usual, Simulacrum cheese solves all your problems.
 
@Xirema I don't understand why you need the many simulacra. Why not just have the first simulacrum wish?
(Or are you just trying to ensure endless pain-free wishes?)
 
3:58 PM
@nitsua60 You need to make sure you have enough Ruby Dust to make the next one. Otherwise, you have to go on an adventure to get more.
So the first one makes a big-butt Ruby, and then you use that Ruby for the next 16-ish Simulacra, the last of which makes another Ruby, and the cycle goes on.
 
@Xirema Is that a ruby in the shape of a big butt?
 
*big butt-Ruby
 
@Xirema I'll pay extra for the non butt-Ruby if possible
 
@Xirema But why do you need the next one? Why doesn't the first one just wish?
 
@SirCinnamon Sorry, we only sell whole, organic butt rubies.
 
4:04 PM
@SirCinnamon XD
 
@Xirema This is the worst town...
 
@nitsua60 Because then you'd only get one Wish. Presumably, if you care about ensuring that you can ever use Wish more than once, you'd want to have a supply of Ruby Dust to keep casting Simulacrum whenever you need your Wish.
 
@Xirema Gotcha. So it's the endless source of wish you're going for.
 
@Xirema Are they free range? I don't want any factory farm rubies.
 
@Rubiksmoose Absolutely. We only sell ethically grown butt-rubies.
 
4:10 PM
@nitsua60 lookin' good!
 
The normal Simulacrum cheese involves the Simulacra casting Wish to make new Simulacra, using you, the original caster, as the target, right? Since that would preserve the ninth level spell slot (since you yourself haven't cast it yet), that might simplify the chain I've created...
Although that method still only gives you one or two uses of Wish per day. Since each Simulacrum is only using their Wish to make a new one.
It does give you a hundred-thousand-strong army of clones in only a day or two, though.
 
@Xirema hahahaa I was just thinking about that. ridiculous.
 
Each with unused 8th and lower spell slots
At that point, what do you even need Wish for?
 
Anyone else here have a d100 at their table?
 
@Xirema A challenge
 
4:14 PM
@Sdjz "I wish for a person with an equally strong clone army to challenge me to battle"
 
@NautArch d10 for tens digit, d10 for ones digit
 
@NautArch One of my DM's friends does. They used to bring it everywhere they went, even if they never used it.
 
@MikeQ One of our guy's found one in his old D&D stuff from when he was a kid and we love it.
 
@NautArch The things are so fun but they just never stop rolling lol
 
@Rubiksmoose really? I've had D20s that had more rolling issues (soft corners)
 
4:16 PM
Hmm. Can Twinned Spell be used when casting Wish to emulate Simulacrum?
 
@NautArch interesting. I only have known one so maybe it was just particularly roll-y
 
@Rubiksmoose and I've only known one so maybe it was particularly not roll-y. Hurray for small sample sizes!
 
@Xirema hmmmmm I would say no because wish itself can target more than one creature (via all of its effects), but it is a weird one and I don't know if there would be one conclusive interpretation of that.
 
@Xirema Wish's range is self.
 
@Yuuki oh yeah. good point.
 
4:21 PM
Crawford does say Wish is valid for Twinned Spell if you're duplicating a spell that is normally valid: sageadvice.eu/2016/04/04/…
So yeah. Sorcerer 17+, with at least one level of Wizard. Buy like 4-5 scrolls of Simulacrum (enough to successfully cast it twice, basically), create two Simulacra, then have one of them target you and the other Simulacra with Twinned Wish→Simulacrum to create two more Simulacra, have them do the same, then have those 4 do the same......
 
@Xirema oh interesting!
 
I knew I'd seen that cheese for 5e somewhere before, couldn't remember how it worked though.
 
@Xirema I'm Mr. Meseeks, look at me!
 
@Xirema Huh and you can use fewer Sorcery Points if the spell you're mimicking is a lower spell level?
 
@Yuuki Apparently!
It's worth noting though that with each generation of Simulacra, your control over them is more and more deferred.
i.e. You control your two immediate clones, but one of your clones controls the next two, and those two control the next four, and those four control the next eight, and those eight control the next sixteen...
 
4:28 PM
oh no.....
 
Any DM worth their salt recognizes how disastrously wrong that can go for the original caster.
 
it's like making a copy of a copy. if anyone saw multiplicity
 
@Xirema that might be worth pointing out in your answer btw
 
@Rubiksmoose That's not an issue in my answer. All your clones are directly controlled by you in that scenario.
(Also, in the answer I gave, you only ever have one clone at a time)
 
@Xirema all your clone are belong to us
 
4:32 PM
@Xirema oops yeah. Mixed up my terrifying clone army scenarios.
 
(You're not having your clones create their own clones)
 
@Xirema wait, what do you mean... what happens to the old clones?
 
@goodguy5 Normally, when you cast Simulacrum, if you make a second clone, the old one is instantly destroyed.
 
This town sells only two things: butt rubies and clone glue.
 
@Xirema oh, that's sad
 
4:33 PM
Twinning out Simulacrum should allow you to have two clones, bypassing that rule, but only just the one extra: if you tried to cast it again, the old one (or two) would be destroyed.
 
I thought of another potential way to do this without clones maybe?
 
@Rubiksmoose Just wish that you can withstand the stress of casting wish without losing it?
 
It is a bit tenuous and only works by shoving the risk onto other people, but you could use a 9th level spell gem (diamond), cast the spell into it and then hand it to some random person (perhaps dominated if not trustworthy) and have them cast your wish and roll the stress die.
 
13
Q: Can you use Wish to allow yourself to cast Wish without risks?

user3399In D&D, wish is an extremely powerfull spell, but it also comes with its risks: The stress of casting this spell to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell weakens you. After enduring that stress, each time you cast a spell until you finish a long rest, you take 1d10 necrotic ...

 
@goodguy5 possible! but I would sooo abuse that as a DM.
 
4:36 PM
@Sdjz yes. I've seen that.
 
@goodguy5 Oh? I thought this was what you were asking, apologies
 
@KorvinStarmast awesome job on that tarrasque question!~
 
@Sdjz Granted, you will no longer suffer psychological damage from encountering demonic clowns.
 
@NautArch agreed
 
@Rubiksmoose This is also something I would abuse hard as a DM. You can dominate a person all you want, but giving someone else a Wish to use, when they're being mind controlled by you? Something is going to go wrong, guaranteed.
 
4:39 PM
@Xirema Grant that unconscious wish to free yourself from domination!
 
Could you use a golem or something?
 
@Xirema Oh definitely. Though the unclear part for me is who gets to set the parameters of the wish. If the paramters are set by the caster: no issue. But spell gem does not say this. Also its not terribly great because you do have to find someone that can cast spells and has wish on their spell list. Nbd for an evil 9th level Wizard but perhaps a bit morally challenging for a good one.
 
oh, actually.
 
@goodguy5 With a spell gem you have to know the spell or have it be on your list.
 
Spell gem.
next day wish for a simalacrum
simalacrum wish
 
4:41 PM
@Rubiksmoose It's a great way to handle and I'm not sure I'd want to actually do it as a PC. The ROI seems awfully risky.
 
@NautArch Also agreed. And that was my first thought after reading it as well: I hope my DM never makes me go through all this just to have everything be really hard and not very worth it in the end. Either a quick rejection or a long process with at least a chance at awesomeness.
 
So you don't need to wish for rubies
 
@goodguy5 Hmmm I think I'm missing how the gem helps in this case?
@goodguy5 oh nvm I think I got it. So that you have a 9th level slot available.
 
Yea. Either way works.

You can either use the gem on yourself to cast wish for a simalacrum with a 9th level slot

Or you can use wish to create a simalacrum, then hand them the gem
 
And all it requires is a legendary item lol
 
4:57 PM
Can Spell Scrolls be affected by Metamagic? Our site's own post on the subject disagrees with what JC has actually said on the subject.
 
@Rubiksmoose This is definitely something you talk about out of game before you try to do it in-game.
 
(It appears there may have been some time between when the original answer was made, and the later tweets were made)
 
actually, what are the rules for making scrolls.....
 
@goodguy5 Magic Item Crafting Rules, see the Dungeon Master's Guide, or Xanathar's Guide to Everything, the latter of which making a rules a lot easier for players.
 
@Xirema would you mind linking to the original tweet? I can't access SA
 
5:02 PM
Jesus
 
My from the hip ruling without looking at either would be: "yes you can"
 
@Rubiksmoose here it is
 
@Sdjz thanks!
 
So, every year, with the low cost of 250,000 gp, you could have a scroll of wish
 
@goodguy5 bargain!
 
5:05 PM
have a simalacrum wish for a scroll of wish
then use that
 
I wonder what percentage of Faerun's GDP that is.
 
I'm going to assume a lot
 
Me too lol
I kind of hate how there's a complete lack of reference points for wealth though. At least that I've come across
 
like "how wealthy is an aristocrat", "how wealthy is a monarch", etc?
 
@doppelgreener Yeah exactly.
For example my group has lik 50k gp in my campaign. Are famous average sports person rich? Are we Bill Gates rich? Or are we even greater then that?
It is clear that I could take my 1/5 cut and be very happy and at least moderately comfortable for part of my life (if not all) but I kind of wish I had some gauge, you know?
(that is if I left now and the [spoilers] took over/destroyed the world I probably wouldn't be that happy, but lets just assume that wouldn't happen lol)
 
5:18 PM
Faerun establishes [somewhere, precisely where I don't recall] that 1gp is a common yearly income for a common peasant.
 
@Xirema Yeah that much I do know. So we could definitely live pauper-ish lifestyles for all eternity with our haul. And there are rules for expenses and such.
 
1
Q: How to handle questions where the most Upvoted/Accepted Answer has been falsified by newer information?

XiremaThe answer provided by this poster, dated from 2014 (and last edited in 2015) is based on evidence provided by citing Jeremy Crawford and Mike Mearls that was then interpreted to say that what the OP was trying to do was not possible. The issue is that in 2016, directly addressing exactly the su...

 
But what is the Faerun equivalent of a millionaire (eg)?
 
@Xirema i'm positive there's a meta on this already...searching
 
I've left some comments on the old post to notify the authors of the situation.
I may end up taking 7-sided's advice of just making a new post and marking the old one as a duplicate of the new one, depending on how that resolves.
 
5:34 PM
@Xirema I think we need a new answer on that question though. There is one answer that relies entirely on JC ruling which needs to be combined with rules logic to be a good answer (IMO).
 
@Rubiksmoose Yeah, it's maybe a good case study in why relying solely on Developer quotes to justify a ruling is.... bad.
 
@Xirema I think it is a fact that relying solely on developer quotes is bad, but I don't think malleability is what makes it so entirely.
After all the rules have the same issue: errata.
Not to mention new rules getting added with every new book.
 
@NautArch Heh, thanks for encouraging me. Probably still a bit too wordy ...
 
@KorvinStarmast it's a lot to consider. and in general on the stack moar words=moar votes
 
^
 
5:41 PM
@nitsua60 So roll a 1d6; result of a 1 or 2, and can't cast wish again. Simples.
 
@KorvinStarmast Yeah. I'm with you. Though I might go with 1-4 on a d12, just because I think they don't get enough love =)
 
@nitsua60 Actually, a Ring of Three wishes was in the original game. (Monsters and Treasures, page 33). Limited Wish, and Wish, were in Greyhawk, which is very much OD&D as it was played at a lot of tables ... so wish was in the original game.
 
i was about to make a very stupid math question about equivalence of 30% on different dice.
 
@Rubiksmoose Also, to be fair: the authors of that post interpreted "using a magic item is not the "Cast a Spell" action" as justification for why Metamagics/etc. would not work.
Which is.... I mean, I understand why you'd think that, but also those things don't quite follow.
@NautArch Programming Intensifies
 
@nitsua60 Oh heck yes, bring the d12 into play.
d12
 
5:44 PM
5
 
@Xirema Yeah I had the answer downvoted before I even knew of the JC tweet. I think it is straight up incorrect.
 
Yay, I can cast wish again!
 
@KorvinStarmast Ah, good call. I was thinking about the spell, but of course genies and rings and things always existed.
 
@Rubiksmoose the double edged sword of JC tweets
don't want 'em, kinda need 'em, don't like having to use 'em, but use 'em.
 
Even in Monsters and Treasures, EGG was encouraging DM's to be a bit sneaky about how to grant wishes ...
 
5:46 PM
@KorvinStarmast IT seems like one of those things where Be Nice should be come into play on both sides. EIther ask for something you know is dangerous and accept it, or ask for something reasonable and get it.
 
@NautArch to be clear I meant the answer is incorrect not the Tweet. And its incorrectness is supported by, but not based on, a JC tweet.
 
Heh, I just had an idea. Sorcerer Twins a Wish spell. Hillarity ensues ...
@NautArch For sure, I like your idea on that. I prefer a game where wish is incredibly rare. The original game seems to have, per some of Mike Mornard's posts on a grognard board, a bit more common due to rings of wishes popping up in random treasure rolls ... so DM's had to react to that, I guess.
The wish ring is a trope, I think, originally from the stories of Aladdin and the genies? It depends on the version of the Aladdin story you heard as a kid; there was more than one rendition of it.
 
@KorvinStarmast In the version of 1001 arabian nights I read recently, he had a ring AND a lamp with genies in them. He uses the ring to get the lamp back after it gets stolen
 
I remember one version of it where a ring was involved; @GreySage yeah, that sounds right.
 
Weirdly, the evil guy who sends him to get the lamp gives him the ring first. Like, you already have a genie containing thing, why are you trying to get the lamp?
 
5:52 PM
The wikipedia article has some interesting insights ...
@GreySage Greed, for starters, I guess.
 
@Xirema fwiw bringing up these cases on chat is another way to get eyes on the question.
 
@GreySage "When he rubs his hands in despair, he inadvertently rubs the ring and a jinnī (or "genie") appears who releases him from the cave so that he can return to his mother—still carrying the lamp. When his mother tries to clean the lamp, so they can sell it to buy food for their supper, a second far more powerful genie appears who is bound to do the bidding of the person holding the lamp."
TWO GENIES? can you imagine how poorly reviewed this would be as a movie? The same deus ex machina twice in the same story
 
@SirCinnamon Personally I was appalled by how Aladdin starts using the genie. His best idea is to wish for a fancy meal, and then he sells the fancy dinnerware. Is that REALLY the best you can come up with, Aladdin?
 
@SirCinnamon Plus think of all the rules exploits they could leverage.
 
@GreySage Education back then must have been pretty bad
or maybe aladdin is just... really dumb
Maybe its a comedy
 
6:07 PM
@Rubiksmoose Aladdin was not a munchkin; Aladdin was a simple, poor boy (perhaps not well educated) who encountered magical powers well beyond his ken. That's what makes the story work: the wonder of magic and the huge delta in his understanding of how the world is, and how the world is when powerful magic is involved.
So Aladdin wishing for something that, in his own context, would allow him to make a little coin on the side makes perfect sense.
 
@KorvinStarmast Indeed. the comment was very much tongue-in-cheek.
 
@Rubiksmoose Whoosh, I guess that one went over my head.
 
@KorvinStarmast No worries at all. I do agree with your assessment of the story.
The D&D munchkin-equivalent story would be: poor dnd-munchkin finds two genies. 26 hours later they have an army of clones and have taken over their continent. Not terribly compelling.
 
6:22 PM
 
@NautArch I'm reasonably sure that constitutes an attempt to evade the censors...
 
@Xirema flagged it
 
it's clearly an advertisment for urazzian kixx cereal
 
@goodguy5 kidd tested momm approved!
 
6:39 PM
I left my own answer on that meta: When rules change but votes don't, how to handle it?
@goodguy5 hahaha!
I of course welcome and critiques, suggestions, or feedback on it.
 
@Rubiksmoose you're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong...and i don't wanna talk about it :P
 
@NautArch I'll respect you wishes not to talk about it, but do you really disagree?
(not sure if you were joking or not)
 
@Rubiksmoose no, i'm on board. Good stuff. It's a sticky wicket.
 
"When you're wrong, you're wrong, and you, you're always wrong!"
(Spaceballs the misquote!)
 
6:55 PM
@NautArch ha, ok yeah just checking. I didn't think I had put anything that controversial in there.
I mean I certainly wish there were more options to help, but I think I covered all of the legally available routes.
 
@Rubiksmoose my only suggestion would be to order your list in how you think it should be addressed.
 
@NautArch hmmmm good point. But I think it is so variable that it would be hard. But I think I might be able to adopt a general flow.
 
@Rubiksmoose only because leading with downvotes rather than something more positive like commenting on the current top answer seems like something I woudn't suggest
 
@NautArch That's fair. I have reorganised.
Always nice to keep things on the more positive side I guess. My trigger for downvoting an incorrect answer is very low though. And the downvote also does help to notify the poster of an issue if they are paying attention.
 
@Rubiksmoose I find downvotes tend to be invisible. If you have any positive rep flow, they get silently subtracted from the total and don't show up in the recent rep changes dropdown
 
7:04 PM
@GreySage Yeah, you do really have to be paying attention.
So not the best option for that purpose.
 
@Rubiksmoose I hear you - but it's not a bad answer. It was a good answer until new information came out.
and i'm someone with a quick trigger finger for downvotes
 
The fastest downvoter in the west
 
@NautArch So? Voting is for sorting answer by what are the best. If an answer becomes invalid after the fact I don't see any reason to hesistate to downvote it.
Voting for me is in the moment. Right now, is this answer good or not?
 
@Rubiksmoose And that's your right :) I personally don't feel justified for it, but if I commented with the new info and it was ignored, I"d downvote. I'd also look at their history. If they haven't been active, I wouldn't hesitate to downvote and put up a new answer. If the are active, I'd prefer to give them a chance to update with the new info they had no reason to go find/know about.
But we all up/down vote to our own desires. That's what's great about this site.
 
Downvotes are reversible. If the answer improves, you can undownvote.
 
7:10 PM
@NautArch oh sure. I don't usually instatdownvote in cases like these. I have much the same if not exact process that you just described. And not every "old" answer deservs to be downvoted either.
@MikeQ Yup that is also an important thing to remember.
Nothing makes me happier than being able to change a downvote to an upvote.
 
Really? Nothing?
 
@MikeQ Don't tell his wife.
 
@MikeQ hahaha I wondered if someone was going to call out my hyperbole.
@NautArch XD
 
8:13 PM
@NautArch I find somewhat amusing that when one opens the profile, it says Apparently, this user prefers to keep an air of mystery about them ... but I say that with a username of that sort, the "low profile desire" is moot.
@Rubiksmoose Updoot tossed your way ...
 
@KorvinStarmast Thanks! Interesting comment as well. I'll have to think about the organization a bit more I think.
 
God, that arachnida question took a lot of head scratching
 
8:40 PM
noooooo

Valley is getting muh doots!!!!
T_T
 
9:20 PM
Obviously the answer is to double the cube's surface area
The new cube is 20* sqrt 2 ft per side, I think?
 
No, obviously the answer is to double the cube's perimeter
 
We could also increase the cube's surface area (and perimeter) by cutting holes in it
 
9:38 PM
@NautArch I'm with you on the odd ones, not so much with the even ones =)
(Sage Advice--as published--is more than enough for me.)
 
10:19 PM
Big thread on Improv for Gamers! New video, new workshops, and more! https://twitter.com/improvforgamers/status/1060656018852470784
 
My work just had a lunch and learn on the Dr Peters Centre. Apparently it provides the best care in the world to people who are HIV+.
Modern HIV medicine is so effective that most patients become 'undetectable', meaning common HIV tests don't detect the virus and they become incapable of passing it on, which is pretty awesome.
3
 

« first day (2962 days earlier)      last day (2002 days later) »