« first day (2848 days earlier)      last day (2082 days later) » 

12:02 AM
Which comment here has received the most stars?
$s^{t^{{a}^{{r}}}}$
Finally!
 
12:21 AM
@enumaris Another way to say it: it's fine to ask about something that you only thought about because of a homework problem, but don't ask for help on the homework problem itself.
One reason we make a big deal about showing your work is to get people who would otherwise ask for the answer to their homework problem to ask about something else.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:38 AM
😃😄😄👍👍😃😃
Eid Mubarak
 
 
2 hours later…
3:27 AM
can 0celo7 be unbanned already please
it's been 3 months give him a break sheesh
 
not gonna happen, pal :(
 
we need real mods on physics
all of them work 9-5 jobs and don't do physics anymore.
 
where are we gonna find these "real" mods?
 
Qmechanic is the only real and deserving mod
 
yeah, he's a good one :-)
very professional
whelp, there is no pay
 
3:37 AM
they just ruined the h bar for everybody, there's no point in coming here anymore, all the cool people left, 0celo7 was the only invariant member as others came and went but now he's booted too unfairly.
 
that's what they wanted
 
4:22 AM
I have to say I think the room works a lot better now than it used to. We get some awesome discussions about physics and there hasn't been a flag for weeks. That is pretty much all you could ask of a physics chat room.
 
again, that's what they wanted :-)
but, like mick jagger said "you can't always get what you want"
 
4:51 AM
hi :)
 
 
3 hours later…
7:48 AM
I just learnt octonian; I am still reading it on Wikipedia, which seems to say it's something like quaternion.
 
8:02 AM
In a non-associative sort of way :-)
 
@JohnRennie do you have another copy?
 
@Akash.B I don't have a spare copy I'm afraid.
There is an ebook version floating around the Internet but you really need a paper copy for a book like this.
 
@JohnRennie why is the dimension of octonion only 8, rather than $2^8$, the dimension of a Clifford algebra generated by a 8-dimnsional basis?
 
@CaptainBohemian no idea
 
8:19 AM
@JohnRennie mybe I find the reason--the multiplication rule of octonions is different from that of a Clifford algebra.
 
8:30 AM
A decision made billions of year ago...
It does seems we need to start thinking about not just noise, but adding unpredictability itself into a system and see what happens
 
The Test match is not looking good for England ...
 
Anonymous
Ah, England Vs. India.
 
9:02 AM
if i knew there was talk of a test in here, i would've studied :P
\o Blue
 
Anonymous
9:42 AM
@user1732 Morning
 
Anonymous
What's up?
 
hi
 
@Blue chillin' you?
 
Anonymous
@user1732 Doing homework :)
 
Anonymous
@user1732 Can't access without an account
 
:(
make one
 
Anonymous
@user1732 What's the summary though? I read on his blog that he needs some javascript help for his new logic game
 
> due to my inability to come up with a good general-purpose matching algorithm(or even specification of such an algorithm) for the the laws of first-order logic, many of the laws have to be hard-coded into the matching routine, so one cannot currently remove them from the text. It may well be that the best thing to do in fact is to rework the entire codebase from scratch using more professional software design methods.]
 
Anonymous
10:36 AM
@user1732 Ah. He could hire some CS students from his uni for the work
 
Anonymous
Or actually, he's Terence Tao. Many people would help him for free :P
 
make an account and follow his blog
 
Anonymous
Not feeling like doing so.
 
Anonymous
I read his blog occasionally though.
 
9
A: What programming language should a professional mathematician know?

Joel David HamkinsMy answer is: TikZ This is a programming language, often used in combination with LaTeX, for producing high-quality graphics. I view this language as important for mathematicians, not because mathematicians will use it to solve their mathematical problems, but rather, because mathematicians wil...

would a similar question for a professional physicist be off-topic?
or even chemist? @Loong
 
Anonymous
10:45 AM
@user1732 Does knowing TikZ even classify as knowing a "programming language"? I thought anyone who has to write math or physics papers has to learn it at some point of time. Pretty much impossible to draw good diagrams without it.
 
I guess there are still some "old timers" around :P
 
11:01 AM
@Blue I still have to learn it :P
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde It is actually easier than I thought. There are some nice tutorials out there. I'm using it to make some quantum circuits :)
 
Actually, I think we could have a a TikZ SE in conjunction with Latex SE.
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde TeX SE is a good place to ask TikZ questions too
 
@Blue I never really tried it. Yet. I know I will, soon.
@Blue I will be there :P
 
Anonymous
You have several of the core developers of TikZ on that site too
 
11:04 AM
Oh wow that's amazing. Then that's the perfect place to ask. Thanks for the info.
I could give them to do "my homework" :P
 
Anonymous
Haha, they do help you with "homework" as long as you can provide them a MWE :P
 
Anonymous
(minimal working example)
 
Sure, I'll copy and paste an example from their documentation.
 
Anonymous
Lol :P
 
I have to say that using TikZ for diagrams seems a bit like using assembler to write programs. Yes you can do it but wouldn't it be better to use a higher level tool?
 
Anonymous
11:10 AM
@JohnRennie There isn't a higher level tool for the type of diagrams I'm trying to draw afaik :/ Also, most image editors don't have LaTeX support (in case I want to write equations on my image). And if I try to use an image editor it compromises on the quality, often
 
In the good old days the equivalent would be Postscript. You can draw diagrams by hand coding Postscript (I have actually done this) but what you'd actually do is use Adobe Illustrator and have it export an EPS file.
 
Anonymous
11:22 AM
@JohnRennie That is an option, yes. But I think TikZ offers a lot more flexibility and precision. Also, once you set up a few manual libraries and customize them according to the type of diagrams you need to create on a daily basis, it gets a lot faster! We just got to import a couple of customized libraries, write 4-5 lines of code and end up with a well made circuit diagram like this:
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
I mean it is helpful if you got to create similar diagrams regularly, with not much significant variation
 
Anonymous
Now, I could just tweak the parameters a bit to create almost any quantum circuit in the Nielsen and Chuang textbook in like 10-20 minutes
 
12:25 PM
@Blue What are quantum circuits? That is something to do with quantum computation?
 
Is there a time dilation near black holes?
 
What do you mean?
 
can you elaborate?
 
Anonymous
So, I just discovered.. when you click on an image on the xkcd site, they have quirky image titles.
 
@Avantgarde what is the thing that you didn't understand?
 
12:35 PM
@Akash.B What do you mean by "time dilation near black holes"?
 
@Avantgarde time moves slower when we go near extreme gravitational field, right?
general theory of relativity
 
@Akash.B When compared to an observer who's in a weaker gravitational field, yes.
 
@Avantgarde what about the observer in extreme gravitational field ?
 
@Akash.B Then that's the proper time observed by him/her. In order to make the statement that "time has slowed down", you need another observer with which to compare to.
That's the whole idea of 'relativity'
Things slow down with respect to something.
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde Yep
 
Anonymous
12:42 PM
See the example image above
 
@Blue That's dope. So you're building a superquantumcomputer?
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde Lol, nope. I'm more of a quantum algorithm guy :P
 
Anonymous
Not an experimentalist
 
Hello everybuddy.
 
hi
 
12:44 PM
@Blue So what do you do? Devise new algorithms?
Hey Novalium
 
2 mins ago, by Avantgarde
Things slow down with respect to something.
something?
 
Well, I mean don't read too much into "something". I just meant that you need 2 things to compare.
 
what are those?
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde Sorta? :P I'm still in the learning stage. I find quantum information more fascinating tbh but I don't get much time for it :/ Till now I only corrected one algorithm which was published in 2013. Hoping to publish the correction sometime soon.
 
That depends on the question you wish to answer. Like time on earth, and time on a spaceship 2000 km away.
@Blue Oh nice, that seems pretty good.
 
Anonymous
12:48 PM
@Avantgarde Also you need someone to program the quantum computers to do useful stuff once they're created :P Quantum machine learning is a new and exciting field in that respect
 
Anonymous
So in some way the work I am doing is mostly imaginary XD
 
@Blue I see. I know nothing about Qcomputation.
or theoretical
So you're the string theorist of quantum computation.
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde Bad comparison, but okay :P I so wish I get even close to knowing all the pre-requisites for string theory (which seems to be a broad field in itself)
 
Anonymous
I haven't even come about learning GR completely :/
 
Quantum string circuits. Man, do it.
 
Anonymous
12:51 PM
Hopefully I can take up some grad classes in advanced physics/math. Difficult to make the transition as an engineering student though.
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde lol
 
@Blue Yes, that's true. But it can be done. Also a lot of studying yourself.
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde True, I am currently trying to pick up basic GR from Schuller's lectures online. Time is a major constraint. :( Too many lab reports, homeworks and assignment. I want my undergrad to get over as soon as possible so that I can learn whatever I want to learn (though that might always remain a dream...lol) :P Thanks for the encouragement though!
 
@Blue Oh I've seen some very few lectures by (Frederic?) Schuller. He's a good explainer.
well, do what you can with what you have. :)
 
Anonymous
Yep. And his German accent is cool too. I like his very mathematical appoach to GR instead of the common physicsy approach.
 
Anonymous
12:59 PM
@Avantgarde Hehe, I will :)
 
1:19 PM
Not the prettiest pictures of quantum flucturations out there, but it is a further step towards better understanding these transient processes
Quantum equivalence principle proposal: Mass and internal energy do not commute if this is true.
Moreover, states under freefall will exists in a superposition of masses and then became correlated or entangled
I am more interested when local lorentz invariance is violated though, because that will mean we may be able to meddle with time a lot more
 
 
2 hours later…
3:05 PM
Any chance you guys know what you'd call something like a time-dependent bar chart chose opacity is a time average?
Like an equalizer type thing where instead of just jumping back down, it fades out
 
3:22 PM
@Secret they're just handing the PRLs out to anyone these days, it seems
I really don't see how this significantly adds to what the previous experiment (i.e. using hundreds-of-years-old starlight) already brought to the table
 
3:35 PM
I am not sure either, in fact, I am not so up to date with this free choice loophole that I don't see how using ages ago starlight will rule out classical correlation since the photons that are actually entangled in the experiment are not from the starlight photons, and the starlight photons only controls the measurement process
 
4:54 PM
hmmm
 
 
1 hour later…
6:06 PM
Howdy
 
 
1 hour later…
7:34 PM
slow day in chat I see
 
Anonymous
@danielunderwood Morning
 
Ka-chow
!
 
afternoon!
 
Evening
Hmmm
 
Anonymous
I'm a bit concerned about my obsession with cracking my palm finger joints
 
7:41 PM
If I have a fan and I throw a ball at it
If I keep on increasing the speed of the fan
 
I got a bunch of mustard on my shirt -.-
now i gotta work the rest of the day with a stained shirt
booo
 
Anonymous
I just don't feel satisfied till I crack them every 30 mins :P
 
Anonymous
Might be a medical problem...lol
 
1. What happens to the probability of the ball getting sliced
2. Bouncing back
I say 1 increases while 2 remains the same
 
Sounds like an experiment to me
I need a $50K grant for balls please
 
7:42 PM
I have spent a week using my blank time
@danielunderwood ⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽
My brain hurts
 
Anonymous
@AvnishKabaj What are the balls made of?
 
Not sure about the bouncing thing
 
Anonymous
If it's made of steel, the fan will break instead.
 
@Blue it's not a trick question or anything
Sliceable material
 
You'll eventually get fast enough that it will blow the ball back
 
Anonymous
7:44 PM
Gelatin?
 
@danielunderwood vaccum
 
Anonymous
Nevermind, I'm in an anti serious mode now :P
 
It's a very serious question
Probability of slicing will increase am sure
But what about bouncing
Does it remain the same or not
G'night folks
Food for thought
 
Anonymous
@AvnishKabaj It might actually decrease since you're giving it less time to even reach a position where it can be sliced through. Pretty sure the graphical plot will increase and then decrease with fan's speed. At very high speeds, bounce backs are much more probable.
 
Depending on how you model this, there might be infinitessimal chance of "bounce" back
or maybe not lol
dunno XD
 
7:50 PM
Hmmm who would like to be a grad student in "periodic boundary collision theory"?
I wanted to come up with a good term for throwing balls at fans, but I don't seem to have it
 
Anonymous
"However, medical research has yet to conclusively demonstrate a connection between knuckle cracking and long-term joint problems."...hmmm, that gives some relief.
 
Anonymous
"Medical doctor Donald Unger cracked the knuckles of his left hand every day for more than sixty years, but did not crack the knuckles of his right hand. No arthritis or other ailments formed in either hand, earning him the 2009 Ig Nobel Prize in Medicine, a parody of the Nobel Prize."
 
Anonymous
Damn...lol
 
8:09 PM
That's some crazy commitment
Like what if he felt like he really needed to crack the knuckles in his right hand?
 
Anonymous
Must have been a superhuman to resist that urge :P . Seriously speaking, I think you gradually get used to not cracking your knuckles if you actively try, for around an year.
 
Anonymous
There was this other guy who didn't ever cut his nails for 60 years...and won a Guiness award
 
Anonymous
That's on another level
 
How can we be sure that the study was 100% honest?
 
I'll take a pass on that one. I can barely go past a week not cutting my nails
 
8:20 PM
There are so many studies these days.
Studies show that breathing can be good for your health.
 
Anonymous
"For 50 years, the author cracked the knuckles of his left
hand at least twice a day, leaving those on the right as a
control. Thus, the knuckles on the left were cracked at least
36,500 times, while those on the right cracked rarely and
spontaneously. At the end of the 50 years, the hands were
compared for the presence of arthritis.
There was no arthritis in either hand, and no apparent
differences between the two hands."
 
Anonymous
Cracked rarely...okay that's a bit more believable :P
 
Aha. Now define "rarely" :D
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde Well, the point of the experiment was to prove that cracking doesn't cause joint problems. So even if he cheated and cracked the other hand "not so rarely", the result still holds ;)
 
Anonymous
8:26 PM
Now there's a chance that the 36,500 figure is false, which is a more reasonable accusation
 
Anonymous
Btw 36500 seems a bit too less for me. I crack my knuckles at least 25 times a day
 
I crack mine so many times. Let's see what I get 30 years from today.
 
Sup guys, why total internal reflection occurs only in denser to less denser medium? Is it complicated and is worth for me to try to understand why?
 
Anonymous
We'll probably be able to buy cool robotic arms in the supermarkets in another 30-40 years. So I'm not that worried either XD
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Isn't it just Snell's law? Proof is given in Wikipedia I guess
 
8:32 PM
Oh cool, forgot to try that :D
 
@Blue I'm not too sure about that. When I was a kid, I read somewhere that robots would be ubiquitous in 2007. I'm still waiting.
But I don't know; a robotic engineer can give the most trustworthy testimonial on that.
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany CV Raman seems to have written a paper on that topic
 
@NovaliumCompany it's not that complicated, and it's worth it to try to understand it. :)
 
As Blue suggests, it is just a consequence of Snell's law.
 
Anonymous
8:36 PM
Btw total internal reflection is never "total". It's more like 99% of the light gets reflection
 
u coming at this from a different frequencies see different indices of refraction...or you coming at this from an engineering standpoint? Either way...*slaps Blue for bring up technicalities*
line breaks kill the italics
how fail
 
Anonymous
@Avantgarde That's true. But I meant basic models of robotic palms are already out, although I think they're very expensive and still in the nascent stage of R&D. For eg spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/medical-robots/…
 
Wait did you edit that?
I don't see a line break
But the italics are broken
 
on my screen the line is broken
and so the italics are broken
I did not edit
and typing it, I did not press enter
 
errr it's on the same line for me, but italics are still broken
 
8:47 PM
rekt
 
That makes zero sense unless the chat manually inserts line breaks at a certain number of characters and renders the markdown before sending to the server...which would be a bizarre way of doing things
hmmm certainly no manual line breaks
 
lol
take it up with the people who coded the chat
 
And it certainly sends the raw markdown to the server. No idea what's going on
 
lol
maybe if you read the source code
you could be more confused
 
It's the period before...exactly why that happens I'm not sure
in Sandbox, 49 secs ago, by danielunderwood
...*abc*
 
8:54 PM
lol
it actually tries to render italics
then gives up
 
On the bright side, the chat api looks pretty simple and I think I could throw my own page together that actually behaves when I want to have a half size page
 
famous last words
 
Yeah I saw it flash to italics at first then go back
who knows
 
lol
 
It's like it's seeing a period as an escape
I think I'm far too interested in this
I did look to see if chat was open source at one point because I was interested in contributing mathjax support if I could, but I never found anything
Oh man I had a notification for the new user questions queue on SO...it's something
>Comment: Voting to close for off-topic
>OP: Do you work for google?
 
9:10 PM
Is there a difference between electric flux density (D) and surface or vol density (p_s, p_v)? I mean, they seem to have the same units: coulombs/m^x (where x = area or volume in meters).
Additionally, why is ρ lowercase? Is it just to avoid confusion with other variables?
Could this be a real question?
 
How are you defining electric flux density?
 
Just the general usage of "D": strength/intensity of E-field by a fee electric charge.
D = εE
*free
 
9:31 PM
And how is that related to charge densities?
 
@Blue Yeah, I guess ... expensive.
 
I don't know. I'm studying for a Fields course I'm retaking, and so I made a list of all the vocabulary from each chapter, defined each, and now I'm making them all into flashcards...and I have "D = charge density" in there...so I don't know what to do.
Why is ρ lowercase (for charge density)?
 
Well they're related by a divergence, so the units are different. As for why it's lowercase, that's just convention. I can't really think of any uppercase Greek letters that are used other than $\Gamma$ as most are either confused with their lowercases ($\Theta$) or similar to Latin letters ($\Rho$)
 
10:26 PM
o.o
 
10:37 PM
0
Q: Why do tee leaves go to the center of the cup?

safesphereWhen I steer my tea with a spoon, I observe that the tee leaves all eventually concentrate in the center of the cup. Clearly they go against the centrifugal force. Why? Yet when I put the cup in the center of the rotating platter of my gramophone turntable, the tea leaves concentrate at the edge...

interesting question...
I feel like it has to do with mass segregation: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_segregation_(astronomy)
but I don't know enough to say for sure :P
but then again, tea is lighter than water
so hmmm
 
Anonymous
The parabolic surface of the spinning liquid and the surface tension probably has a major role.
 
probably
 
Anonymous
13
Q: Vortex in liquid collects particles in center

KricketAt xmas, I had a cup of tea with some debris at the bottom from the leaves. With less than an inch of tea left, I'd shake the cup to get a little vortex going, then stop shaking and watch it spin. At first, the particles were dispersed fairly evenly throughout the liquid, but as time went on (a...

 
Anonymous
The tea leaf paradox describes a phenomenon where tea leaves in a cup of tea migrate to the center and bottom of the cup after being stirred rather than being forced to the edges of the cup, as would be expected in a spiral centrifuge. The correct physical explanation of the paradox was for the first time given by James Thomson in 1857. He correctly connected the appearance of secondary flow (in both Earth atmosphere and tea cup) with ″friction on the bottom″ . The formation of secondary flows in an annular channel was theoretically treated by Boussinesq as early as in 1868. The migration of near...
 
lol
 
Anonymous
10:47 PM
I initially thought the question asks about a surface phenomenon. But this one is more interesting
 
Anonymous
Hard to confirm since I hardly have tea :P
 
Anonymous
41
A: What forces are at work causing sand to migrate to the centre of a spinning bucket of water?

John RennieThe problem was solved by a certain Albert Einstein, who is probably not unknown to users of this web site. Actually he also calculated the viscosity of particle dispersions (Einstein (1906). A. Ann. Phys. 19: 289 - not on the net!). Presumably he only did special relativity after getting bored w...

 
Anonymous
Goddamn, so many duplicates. There needs to a merging of all the good answers into a single thread
 
lol
Apparently Einstein solved everything
that smart ass
who does he think he is?
Einstein?
 
Anonymous
I'm not surprised since he was an expert in Brownian motion and in general fluid dynamics
 
Anonymous
10:57 PM
But yeah, I didn't know that this was explained by him
 
Anonymous
Interesting!
 
indeed
 
Dumb question, but consider nonequal numbers $a$, $b$. Does the sum of all the numbers in $(a,b)$ necessarily diverge?
 
there's no well defined notion of how to sum "all the numbers in (a,b)" as far as I'm aware
 
Anonymous
Sum of all numbers belonging to a continuous set?
 
Anonymous
11:02 PM
That's a good question
 
@enumaris The Riemann integral is the sum of all points in a continuous function, multiplied by a differential dx. I'm wondering if such a sum could ever converge when the dx is not present.
 
That's a very sloppy way to define a Riemann integral.
 
Well how do you define it?
 
the normal way...as a limit of Riemann sums
 
Yeah. Remove the infinitesimal $\Delta x$ term.
 
11:05 PM
and then integrate what, f(x)=1?
 
Can that limit converge?
 
so...can $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\Sigma_i^n 1$ converge? I don't believe so.
but I'm not sure that's what it means to "sum all the numbers between (a,b)"
 
Well no, I'm not asking if adding infinitely many 1s converges
 
since that has no (a,b) in it anymore lol
so what's the sum you want to do?
 
The question is, does there exist a continuous set $S$, such that the sum $\sum_{x \in S} x$ converges?
 
11:09 PM
how do you enumerate $x$ when $S$ is continuous?
 
Anonymous
81
Q: The sum of an uncountable number of positive numbers

BenjiClaim:If $(x_\alpha)_{\alpha\in A}$ is a collection of real numbers $x_\alpha\in [0,\infty]$ such that $\sum_{\alpha\in A}x_\alpha<\infty$, then $x_\alpha=0$ for all but at most countably many $\alpha\in A$ (A need not be countable). Proof: Let $\sum_{\alpha\in A}x_\alpha=M<\infty$. Consider $S_...

 
Anonymous
Goes down the aisle of measure theory apparently
 
@Blue Huh thanks, forgot to mention I meant positive numbers
 
well there you go :D
 
Anonymous
Too much math to learn :/
 
11:10 PM
Analysis sounds so cool tho
Infinity is a cool topic
 
one might ask
does the set of all numbers in (-1,1) sum to 0
 
@enumaris That's why I meant them to be positive
 
I don't think I'm famiiar enough with measure theory to understand how one would perform the sum
 
Anonymous
@enumaris Intuitively it should :P
 
since there's no 1-1 correspondence between a continuous set and the integers, one couldn't e.g. perform the sum sequentially
 
11:13 PM
@Blue Series have betrayed my intuition many times :P
E.g. Riemann series theorem
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference Yup, they're often unintuitive. BTW I don't like the example people normally tend to cite in these cases, like 1+2+3+... = -1/12. That's cringe XD
 
@Blue Yup
 
apparently there's some way to make the sum well defined
given that proof
 
Anonymous
The Shakarchi Stein analysis textbooks are still lying in my cupboard :( Never got time to read them
 
but I don't know how it's defined
I would guess the axiom of choice makes an appearance in the definition
 
Anonymous
11:17 PM
Stein was apparently Tao's advisor. Big on harmonic analysis
 
but the third answer down seems to say that the notion is not well defined
so who do we believe?
 
@Blue You know I kind of wish they mentioned "paradoxes" like that, or Zeno's paradox etc, in Calc 2 classes
Really would make it more interesting to the average person and clear up confusions
 
"clear up confusions"
highly doubt it
 
Anonymous
lol
 
Well maybe :P
 
Anonymous
11:20 PM
We don't have any math classes anymore
 
Anonymous
From this year
 
In your uni you mean?
 
I don't think a world exists where something like 1+2+3+...=-1/12 is presented in a calc 2 class where that would actually "clear up confusions" rather than just create more confusions.
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference Yeah. Engineering students only have math in their first year
 
Anonymous
Which sorta sucks
 
11:21 PM
In the "normal" definition of infinite series, 1+2+3+... diverges
 
Ah. Yeah my uni only requires Calc 3, Diff Eq and Lin Alg for physics majors
 
the result 1+2+3+...=-1/12 requires a specific redefinition of infinite series to make it work
 
But I'm probably going to take more
 
"As we don't have the notion of 'sum of uncountably many numbers', this question looks strange! But we can transform your question into the following, which makes sense."
 
Quora I'm going to lose my mind
They need to be clearer in their complaints
 
Anonymous
11:25 PM
@enumaris True. The cringiest thing for me was our communication systems professor (he's around 65-70) citing that as an example of useful formula in string theory and something that helps to determine than string theory has 8 dimensions. :P And I mean the excitement with which he was spreading misinformation, like: "You know 1+2+3+... is not infinity, it is actually -1/12. You'll learn it if you study string theory!" XD
3
 
Anonymous
He likes to comment on things which are far far away from his field of research :P
 
blame ACM
With regards to anything to do with string theory...blame @ACuriousMind
 
11:44 PM
Helloooo
 
hello there
 

« first day (2848 days earlier)      last day (2082 days later) »