« first day (2612 days earlier)      last day (2321 days later) » 

6:00 PM
@Slereah ok I need to write an abstract for the talk
 
@0celo7 To be fair to Apple they put in the throttling for a good reason.
 
capitalists
 
@JohnRennie my phone isn't slow, but the battery dies instantly now
 
Why do I feel the star on my vegan message is from @JohnRennie?
 
@JohnRennie My phone is slow and the battery dies instantly
 
6:00 PM
@0celo7 they've just reduced the price of replacement batteries to $29
 
android is for communist, apple is for capitalists dawgs
 
@ACuriousMind damn, rumbled! :-)
 
Purism is for communists
 
@JohnRennie I know
 
my s's are all messeds up
 
6:01 PM
I am no Apple fan boy but in this instance I think Apple haven't done anything wrong.
 
@BalarkaSen SF is so hypocritical
everyone is complete commie but a coffee costs $7
 
I see nothing hypo about it
we need $$$$$ to revolt
 
the coffee should be dirt cheap/free
 
@JohnRennie I don't disagree
I'm not angry about the battery stuff
 
@BalarkaSen I'm not threatening to hunt you down, but just know that I can
 
6:03 PM
I take it complete commie means a Democrat voter? :-)
 
@JohnRennie anyone who doesn't pray to Jesus that Trump succeeds, basically
so many republicans too
 
I am angry about:
1. How hard it is to replace the battery
2. My phone is garbage
 
there are actually groups of closet conservatives in this town
 
The people’s flag is palest pink,
It's not as red as most think.
We must not let the people know
What socialists thought long ago.
Don't let the scarlet banner float;
We want the middle classes' vote.
Let our old fashioned comrades sneer,
We'll stay in power for many a year
 
I registered for Ocean Kayaking next term
 
6:05 PM
That's my anthem
 
I will die
 
@BernardoMeurer to be fair, I have an ideologically sound OnePlus 3 but you'd still struggle to replace the battery without specialist kit.
 
@BalarkaSen Did you read the DRM essay?
 
I suspect that's true for most modern phones.
 
@Bernardo The one you put up on your blog?
 
6:05 PM
@JohnRennie Hmm
@BalarkaSen ye
 
Nope. I'll bookmark i
t
 
@JohnRennie I dunno, I can just take the battery out of my Samsung phone
 
ACM is a commie, I wouldn't listen to him
@BernardoMeurer M and I are getting google phones next
 
@0celo7 Pixel?
 
yes
 
6:06 PM
I can't believe M is leaving Apple
Or you
 
@ACuriousMind which model is that? I can't remember the last phone I had that had a removable battery.
A Samsung S3 I think ...
 
I think it might be an S3 mini, actually. Hm, that might not qualify as a "modern phone"...
 
Cancer causes iPhones. Remember that.
 
@ACuriousMind It doesn't
@BalarkaSen Weirdly true
 
But the one time I bought a state-of-the-art phone (the first OnePlus), I bricked it in less than a year, I'm not doing that again :D
 
6:09 PM
how did you manage to do that
 
I can't believe I managed to convert an EXT4 to a BTRF partition in-place with no data loss
@ACuriousMind How?
 
@BernardoMeurer Dropped it on a stone floor, broke the screen.
 
Damn, sad :/
 
is "idiot" an acceptable word here?
 
6:10 PM
Yeah, I really liked it
@0celo7 No, the appropriate word is "drunkard" :P
 
I'm swearing off alcohol
 
Pettibourgeoisie
 
it's the devil's juice
 
@ACuriousMind Lesson: If you really like your phone get an ugly cover for it and rejoice
 
@ACuriousMind there but for the grace of God go I :-)
 
6:12 PM
Although it is the only thing I ever broke being drunk, so I'd say it's an acceptable track record
 
@ACuriousMind Hearts? Morals? Tables? Chairs? Glasses?
Only thing?
 
@BernardoMeurer Hm, okay, add a few hearts and a snow shovel.
 
I need to ask you a moral question
 
Glasses I only break when sober :P
@BernardoMeurer Go ahead
 
6:14 PM
@ACuriousMind on one occasion I was so drunk I couldn't be bothered to lock my bicycle when I went into the takeaway to buy a kebab. When I came out, yes, the bicycle was gone. An expensive kebab really ...
 
@JohnRennie Ah, that's why I don't take the bike when I plan to drink ;)
 
Is it wrong to lure in $n>1$ women to a New Years party, but then actually take an entirely different one as my date?
 
what title should I give the talk
@BernardoMeurer M and I are both dying
our backs hurt from too much sugar
 
@0celo7 "On the transmutational characteristic of sexuality in n-dimensional complex fiber bundles"
 
@BernardoMeurer Uh. That depends on what you mean by "lure"
 
6:19 PM
@ACuriousMind Invite with an implicit implication of being together and possible intercourse
 
@BernardoMeurer If you're sure you're communicating that implication clearly, then yes, that's wrong
I'm not sure where the moral dilemma is supposed to be, seems rather clear cut to me :P
 
Well, I never explicitly said those things
So I don't see what's wrong
It's their own faults for allowing their minds to jump to conclusions
 
Also, regardless of morality, I'm not sure it would be a very enjoyable party when you have several women who expected to spend time with you finding out they're not the only ones!
 
@ACuriousMind This is where you misjudge my planning abilities
The party has a friends-only zone which I have access to, and none of they do!
And regardless I have no shame and the house is large
 
@BernardoMeurer Well, I rather had the possibility in mind it could be the other way around: You think they're jumping to that conclusion but they're not, in which case it would be perfectly fine (although questionable if you intended them to draw that conclusion).
 
6:23 PM
@ACuriousMind There we go, perfectly moral!
 
Mhhh
 
Let the record show it's okay to overpromise and underdeliver knowingly and willingly!
 
I will shed no tear for you if you end up with several drinks in your face and going home alone :P
2
 
@ACuriousMind Another mistake, I have no intention of coming back home until Tuesday :P
By which point I'd like to come back alone
Also, I've been forbidden to bring hookups to my mother's house anyway
for unknown reasons
 
Your life is a mystery to me
 
6:26 PM
How?
 
you somehow got multiple women to want to have sex with you in the future
how does that even happen?
 
I have no idea, I'm always drunk
 
again, a mystery
 
"I'm always drunk" - Hulk, 2017
 
@0celo7 It's all his talking about FREE SOFTWARE
Everyone digs that
 
6:28 PM
But mostly it's about being a good salesman
 
@ACuriousMind hmm
 
@ACuriousMind You know what, women on average do love that
 
what women are you talking to??
 
Iff you're able to sell it as you being an activist who sacrifices his comfort for what's right and tries to help others
which I do :P
 
@BernardoMeurer Sure. It's the passion you're showing, not the topic itself, that does most of the work of letting you seem attractive
 
6:32 PM
the waffles are a failure
 
@ACuriousMind Exactly, so Free Software gets you laid
@Slereah Pics
 
I'm passionate about inequalities but most women think I mean something completely different
7
 
Good waffles are hard to make
 
@0celo7 Lol
 
and then I go full trump when they think I mean social ones
 
6:32 PM
@0celo7 Beautiful
 
And as much as I'd love to discuss your soap opera of a life, I gotta go get drunk and play cards now
 
@ACuriousMind My life has way more drama than a soap opera
Play Go Fish in the name of me
 
@ACuriousMind please don't drink the devil's juice
I tried to explain my work to my sister's skin care person yesterday
I got nowhere
 
lol
You gotta improve that skill
I can explain what I want to work with to my grandma
 
computers are far more concrete than hypersurfaces in Lorentzian manifolds
 
6:34 PM
Who cares? Math sucks
I told you that
You work on trash bro
 
@BalarkaSen why don't you leave?
 
@0celo7 I guess, I just explain what Optimization problems are and how QC's can help
@BalarkaSen We upload trash
 
@0celo7 just tell them you're a rocker scientist
 
@heather When's your birthday?
 
@Bernardo november
why?
 
6:36 PM
@heather So you're like 13 now?
 
@Bernardo Face down, trash begets trash
 
Because I was talking to my cousin these days
 
@BernardoMeurer eh...bit older than that =P
 
and she's 14
so I wanted to remember how old you were
Ah, so you're in HS by now?
Right? Is that how it is in America?
 
yup
 
6:37 PM
Oooooh, yeah, I remember now
We talked about this before
me and Dan gave you HS tips
 
oh yeah
 
So, how do you hate it?
 
it's...not great.
 
Yeah, that's how it is
 
social studies is the worst.
engineering is the best.
 
6:39 PM
What even is that
 
social studies = history, this year it's french revolution/imperialism through modern day, i think
 
@BernardoMeurer it's Not Good/10
 
Ah, I used to love that
 
:explosion noises:
 
to give you an idea of how bad it is, one unit is literally called "asia".
 
6:39 PM
I always liked History
 
@heather not good
 
@heather Oh, I see
 
@BernardoMeurer i do too, i just don't like the class.
 
So this is how americans become "Americans"
 
People who dislike history generally turn out bad
 
6:40 PM
@0celo7 You hate history
 
I like history. Just not the way it's taught.
 
@0celo7 i dislike history class, which i think is significantly different.
don't worry, i won't be invading russia in the winter anytime soon.
 
CONFIRMED @heather HATES THE FRENCH
 
oh, actually, i've got a funny story
related to the french
i was reading a british newspaper, the telegraph i think
 
That's never good
 
6:42 PM
and it talked about a minor diplomatic scandal relating to the french and cheese
let me see if i can find it, it was hilarious
 
vzn
> those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it --santayana
 
@heather I refuse to give the Telegraph any traffic
 
why?
 
@BernardoMeurer how did you get that idea?
 
6:43 PM
@heather They are a shitty company :)
 
vzn
@bernardo enjoying the story of your new years eve sex life, maybe good blog fodder :P
 
@0celo7 You told me multiple times
 
@Bernardo (N+1)/N - 1 tends to 0 as N tends to infinity.
 
You’re full of crap
 
okay, whoever just flagged "I hate the French" needs to tone it down a notch.
 
6:44 PM
@vzn I am not posting about my sex life on my blog yet
I need to be at least 40 for that
 
vzn
uh oh random mod descends for flag o_O
 
@BernardoMeurer [citation needed]
 
Oh, what the hell
 
Thanks, whoever unbanned.
 
@dmckee @ACuriousMind @DavidZ @rob This is ridiculous
 
6:45 PM
who the heck confirmed that flag
@BernardoMeurer seconded, seriously.
 
@dmckee @ACuriousMind @DavidZ @rob This is no longer ridiculous
 
vzn
the tyranny of FLAGS aieee o_O
 
@vzn I flagged that, you offended the flags
 
vzn
@#%& FLAGS :(
 
@vzn Vexillologists everywhere are offended.
 
6:47 PM
It wasn't a hate speech, just to clarify (even though it's quite obvious). It was tangentially funny given the earlier comment, but I do dislike a lot of French art and French philosophy. Nothing to do with the generic French person :p
 
vzn
lol wow learn something new everyday
Vexillology is the scientific study of the history, symbolism and usage of flags or, by extension, any interest in flags in general. The word is a synthesis of the Latin word vexillum ("flag") and the Greek suffix -logia ("study"). The constitution of the International Federation of Vexillological Associations (known by its French acronym, FIAV) formally defines vexillology as "the creation and development of a body of knowledge about flags of all types, their forms and functions, and of scientific theories and principles based on that knowledge." A person who studies flags is a vexillologist,...
 
Though I should just put that out just in case.
 
@vzn I'm a vexillologist :)
(Not joking)
 
vzn
cites wikipedia to throw off censors mods :P
 
GOD BLESS ZSTD
 
6:51 PM
hey, the top physics.se question got mentioned in what if (by randall munroe, the book, not the online version)
(i got a copy for christmas)
 
That's what I call achievement.
In what context?
 
citing it as a source that's better than some scientific journals in one of his answers to a question @BalarkaSen
 
@heather Haha. Wonderful.
 
@BernardoMeurer lol did you really?
 
6:53 PM
@heather No, lol
 
you should
i'm sure it's a hoot
 
oh, just noticed this particular q&a is on the website here so you can read it @BalarkaSen
 
Ahhhh yes I have read this
I forgot about that
 
"The author obviously knows physics, but not how to teach it. Instead of enlightening the reader as repeatedly promised, he annoys the reader with too much adolescent humor, childish illustrations, unfinished thoughts, irrelevant distractions and in general too much nonsense."
I'm not sure I agree with "knows physics"
 
I’ve got a weird bump on my finger
 
6:58 PM
In two months, Duffield won't be banned anymore
Brace yourselves
 
@Slereah title “What is the mass of spacetime?”
Sound good?
 
It's catchy and simple enough
 
@Slereah hoo boy. that should be...interesting.
 
Is the volume of the spatial manifold or whatever well defined
 
Hopefully by then he'll be too old to come back
 
6:59 PM
I guess I don't know what volume means for Lorentzian objects
I was thinking in terms of Riemannian
 
not really
I mean you can integrate the volume form
But it's not really a volume
 
what does that mean
also do we know if the integral is finite or anything
 
Probably infinite
 
Well take Minkowski space
It's infinite
 
The entire volume of spacetime is rather uninteresting
 
7:02 PM
Is it interesting if you look at volume of a compact portion as time changes
so the metric changes too
 
Since it's just $\int d^4x$
The spacetime volume is the action of the cosmological term
 
Not really @BalarkaSen. There might be Cheeger-Gromov finiteness theorems for spacetimes, but I dunno.
 
I see
 
I'd suspect that if the spacetime isn't compact odds are low that the volume is finite
 
Thanks for bearing with nonsense questions from a mathematics person for a change :)
 
7:04 PM
Well
I guess you could have like
The spacetime of a ball
$\mathcal M = B^4$
 
@Slereah That's what I was thinking
I mean there are restrictions on the kind of metrics spacetime supports, right?
 
Hm
 
"What are the manifolds with "spacetime metrics" which have finite volume?"
 
If the spacetime is maximally extended and non-compact
 
Or something
 
7:05 PM
Can it have a finite volume
 
@Slereah yeah a ball
 
A ball isn't maximally extended
 
maximally extended as in, complete?
 
unless it has singularities all around
Well not necessarily complete
Maximally extended as in there's no spacetime where the original spacetime is a subset
 
7:07 PM
5 and a half hours later, still defragging
 
Schwarzschild is maximally extended but not complete
 
Maximally extended is a thing in Riemannian geometry too. Though I’m not sure why anyone cares
 
Isn't it equivalent to complete in the Riemannian case?
Hm, I guess not
 
Probably not
 
Like the revolution surface with $1/x^2$
Or...
No I don't think that's a good example
 
7:11 PM
Why is that maximally extended
Ok, it's not
 
It is maximally extended, but I thought it might be incomplete
But no I don't think so
 
tfw you change the question to make that answer right
@Slereah I don't get why it's maximally extended.
Take the revolution surface until $y = c$ for some large $c$
You know, I don't really get it. Any compact manifold is maximally extended, right? It can't be embedded as a proper subset of itself because of topology, not even geometry
Is $S^1 \times \Bbb R$ with the product metric maximally extended? Standard ways to embed it inside of itself topologically is to take $S^1 \times (a, b)$ inside it, which aren't complete, so these are not isometric to $S^1 \times \Bbb R$.
Just throwing easy examples to understand what the fuck is up.
 
$S^1 \times \mathbb R$ should be, yes
 
@BalarkaSen turning it into a finite cylinder fucks up tue metric
 
Since there's no regular boundary points
 
7:18 PM
@0celo7 That's the argument.
So what's an example of something NOT maximally extended?
 
You know what's weird though
There's compact manifolds with singularities
 
@BalarkaSen any open set of a Riemannian manifold yhats mot the whole thing
 
Which means that if you append the singular point to it, it is indeed a subset of a thing
I'm not sure what topology it has
 
@0celo7 But $S^1 \times (a - \epsilon, b - \epsilon)$ is isometric to $S^1 \times (a, b)$ isn't it?
 
The typical example of a non-maximally extended manifold is like
$\mathbb{R}_{>0}$
because you can embed it in $\mathbb R$
 
7:21 PM
@BalarkaSen homothetic, Not isometric
 
Ah, now you're talking.
 
Random autocorrect capitalization
 
Okkie-dokkie. I get it now
 
The maximally extended thing is basically to avoid garbage singularities where spacetime just stops because it feels like it
It's generally assumed that a real spacetime is maximally extended
 
But to get maximally extended Schwarzschild you have to glue a second copy
The penrose diagram gets mirrored
 
7:24 PM
Well you don't have to, but it's the most symmetric extension, yes
 
i should study geometry properly
it feels too dry
:(
 
Do you mean
 
the dilemma is stronk
 
EUCLIDIAN geometry?
The only proper geometry
 
Problem, Lobachevsky?
 
7:36 PM
How could geometry be dry
Differential equations are very juicy
 
they do have flows
 
I have to do chemistry now
help me
organic chemistry, no less
 
gross
I hope you like learning nomenclature
I remember organic chem being just learning the giant sheet of nomenclature
 
IUPAC makes me want to die
 
quantum chemistry is where it's at
Also there's RELATIVISTIC chemistry
But I'm not 100% sure if anyone has ever used it
I've got a book on it but how often do you really need relativistic corrections in chemistry
 
7:43 PM
0
Q: Why is it written on somebody's profile that it has been visited 0 times, while in fact, I visited the profile 4 times?

descheleschilderI took a look at somebody's profile 4 times. But why it is shown that 0 persons have visited his profile?

 
i should just TeX all these chemical equations up
whats the latex package i need for chemistry again
 
@BernardoMeurer BEHOLD THE UNIVERSE ON MY HEAD!
ugh, it doesn't show up well
I'm going back to my purple hat.
 
@DanielSank lol and lol
 
This question asks "Is the set of periodic functions from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}$ a subspace of $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}}?$ I get that it's probably going to be something to do with proving it is/isn't closed under addition, however short of checking a lot of functions $(f+g)(x)$ to see if they are periodic (and in turn hope that it isn't closed under addition) I'm stuck for ideas? Anyone help? =)
 
Your idea seems right to me. Why don't you try it?
Also is this simply the set of periodic functions, or the set of periodic functions with a fixed period?
 
7:55 PM
I'm not quite sure what kind to check? I started with trivial things such as cos(2x)+sin(x) but I think that was periodic
Fixed period I think
All functions f(x)=f(x+p) where p is a positive number
Doesn't state whether p is variable.
 
Indicator function of the rational is a periodic function of no period
or of all periods, more accurately
 
@CooperCape If it's fixed period that's simple enough to check.
You have f(x + p) = f(x) and g(x + p) = g(x). What is (f + g)(x + p)?
 
@Slereah Sorry what's an indicator function?
 

« first day (2612 days earlier)      last day (2321 days later) »